Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.8.23
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
tat - mātarau
—
Their mothers (Rohiṇī and Yaśodā)
Tat-mātṛ, dual. The verse holds both mothers together — Rohiṇī never absent from Yaśodā's house. Gauḍīya: both are nitya-siddha vātsalya-bhaktas, paired as the dual maternal śakti of Vraja.
-
snuvantyau
—
allowing (the babies) to drink the flowing milk
Present participle dual of √snu (to flow, to drip — used of breast milk). The verse uses the technical Vedic verb for nursing. Spontaneous lactation at the sight of one's child is the bodily signature of vātsalya in rasa-shastra (a sāttvika-bhāva called sneha).
-
paṅka - aṅga - rāga - rucirau
—
whose bodies were beautiful with smearing of mud
Paṅka (mud) + aṅga-rāga (body-smear, normally sandal paste) + rucira (beautiful), dual. The Vaiṣṇava reversal: ordinary cosmetic aṅga-rāga is sandal; for Kṛṣṇa the cosmetic is Vraja-mud. Mahā-prasāda aesthetic.
-
mugdha - smita - alpa - daśanam
—
(seeing) the charming smile with small teeth
Mugdha (charming) + smita (smile) + alpa (small) + daśana (tooth). The verse's slow zoom: from body to face to mouth to teeth. Rasa-shastra calls this an uddīpana-vibhāva — a detail that ignites the rasa. Gauḍīyas read this verse aloud for vātsalya-bhāvana.
-
pramodam
—
transcendental bliss
Pra (intense) + moda (joy). One of the rasa-shastra's joy-grades. Yaśodā's experience is not parental pleasure as ordinary mothers know it — it is transcendental ānanda mistakenly looking through a vātsalya-shaped window.
As the mothers cared for their respective babies, by the arrangement of Yoga-māyā the babies thought, “Here is My mother,” and the mothers thought, “Here is my son.” Because of affection, milk naturally flowed from the mothers’ breasts, and the babies drank it. When the mothers saw small teeth coming in, they would count them and be happy, and when the babies saw Their mothers allowing Them to drink their breast milk, the babies also felt transcendental pleasure. As this transcendental affection continued between Rohiṇī and Balarāma and Yaśodā and Kṛṣṇa, they all enjoyed transcendental bliss.
The two mothers would take the two children in their arms and experience bliss. The two mothers took both children as their own and the two children took both mothers as their own. Their breasts were flowing with milk (snuvantau) in motherly affection (ghrnaya). The dust on their bodies became beautiful like cosmetics and that dust increased their beauty, using the metaphor of sundare kim na sundaram (on someone who is beautiful an ornament looks more beautiful.) Mouth (mukhan ) is in the singular, as each mother concentrated on the mouth of one child. They derived pleasure from seeing one or two small teeth ( alpadasana mukham) in their innocent, smiling mouths (mugdha smita).
Their bodies shone with mud and cosmetics. It is said, “What is not beautiful in the Sundara-khaṇḍa of Rāmāyaṇa?” Similarly here it is said what was not beautiful in the infant boys? This follows the example “a lotus becomes more beautiful when covered by śaivala plants.” This was the particular beauty of their infant age from that time onward. Each regarded the other’s son as their own (nija-sutau), and sometimes out of affection gave the other child their breast to feed him. Out of great bliss they looked carefully in their children’s mouths and felt the greatest pleasure because of their bliss. nemaṁ viriṣco na bhavo na śrīr apy aṅga-saṁśrayā prasādaṁ lebhire gopī yat tat prāpa vimuktidāt Neither Lord Brahmā, nor Lord Śiva, nor even the goddess of fortune, who is always the better half of the Supreme Lord, can obtain from the Supreme Lord, the deliverer from this material world, such mercy as received by mother Yaśodā. SB 10.9.20 nāyaṁ sukhāpo bhagavān dehināṁ gopikā-sutaḥ jṣānināṁ cātma-bhūtānāṁ yathā bhaktimatām iha Kṛṣṇa, the son of mother Yaśodā, is accessible to devotees engaged in spontaneous loving service, but he is not as easily accessible to mental speculators, to those striving for self-realization by severe austerities and penances, or to those who consider the body the same as the self. SB 10.9.21 Sma expresses joy or wonder. Mukham is in the singular since each mother looked at the mouth of one child at a time with love. The soft or beautiful smile showed small teeth or few teeth.
Their sons were beautiful with the mud of Vraja, which was their cosmetics. Their actual cosmetics were covered by crawling in the mud. Nija-sutau indicates their great affection for the boys. Looking intensely (nirīkṣya) at their faces as they drank the milk eagerly (prapibatoḥ), they derived bliss (pramodam) greater than the bliss of brahman. Sma indicates joy. Mukham is in the singular though there were two faces, since a class is indicated. Other examples of use of the singular to represent the plural are found in SB 10.10.39, 10.29.34 and 10.31.5. They fed the boys with affection (ghṛṇayā). Their mouths had five or six (alpa) beautiful (mugdha) teeth seen when they smiled.
- Notice one ordinary act of caregiving today (feeding, holding, listening) and consciously offer it as service to Kṛṣṇa rather than mere bodily duty.
- When you feel surge of natural affection for a child, parent, or dependent, pause and recognize Yoga-māyā's hand arranging the bond — let it deepen your taste for the Lord's sweetness.
- Refuse the modern reduction of parenting and family love to biology or sentiment; treat each tender exchange as a small window into vātsalya-rasa pointing back to Kṛṣṇa.
A mother who finds her son returned home muddy and laughing — and presses him to her breast without first wiping the dust off. The mud is Vraja's, the breast is full of stored love, and the smile shows the new teeth — every detail is the substance of vātsalya-rasa, not its decoration.
My note
Source: vedabase.io