Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.52.25
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
kṛṣṇa-dviṭ
—
hateful of Kṛṣṇa
Compound: kṛṣṇa + dviṣ (to hate). The technical Gauḍīya category for an opponent who is not merely unconcerned but actively antagonistic. Such hatred binds the asura even more tightly to Kṛṣṇa than ordinary indifference — by sustained meditation in hate, eventually rendered service in spite of itself.
-
bandhūnām-icchatām
—
even as the family members were desiring
Phrase. Genitive participle: the rest of Bhīṣmaka's family wants Rukmiṇī to marry Kṛṣṇa. Sūta is careful to show that the obstacle is not the dynastic consensus but one envious individual — this matters when justifying the Rākṣasa-style rescue.
-
caidyam-amanyata
—
decided upon Caidya (Śiśupāla)
Phrase. Caidya — son of Damaghoṣa, king of Cedi — is one of Kṛṣṇa's chronic adversaries (he will die at the Rājasūya in SB 10.74). His choice as bridegroom is the maximum possible misalignment Rukmī could engineer.
-
nivārya
—
preventing (them)
Absolutive of ni-√vṛ (to obstruct). The eldest brother actively prevents the family's natural wish — the verb pins the responsibility on him, exonerating Bhīṣmaka and the other brothers from the dharma-violation.
Rukmī abused his position as elder brother and acted with impure motives. He would only suffer for his decision.
Ignoring the relatives and elders like father who wanted to give Rukmini to Krsna in marriage, Rukmi on his own initiative prevented her from marrying Krsna and decided to giver her to Sisupala in marriage.
The reason for the quick marriage is given. Her parents wanted to give her to Kṛṣṇa. The possessive case is used (bandhūnām) to indicate that Rukmī did not show respect for their desires. Śukadeva also shows by this that Bhīṣmaka had proper qualities. Śrīdhara Svāmī also explains this in his commentaries on SB 10.53.7 and SB 10.53.35. Rukmī prevented them from doing this. Śukadeva calls out to Parīkṣit in astonishment, “O king!”
Rukmī blocks the marriage the way a single splinter jams a wheel — one hostile son holds up an entire family's desire. Kṛṣṇa-dviṭ is the technical category: the heart that hates Kṛṣṇa cannot bless what its kin wants to give. The household's natural inclination is right; only the eldest son's envy must be circumvented.
My note
Source: vedabase.io