FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.49.4

ఉవాస కతిచిన్మాసాన్ రాజ్ఞో వృత్తవివిత్సయా । దుష్ప్రజస్యాల్పసారస్య ఖలచ్ఛన్దానువర్తిన: ॥ ౪ ॥
uvāsa katicin māsān
[uvaasa katichin maasaan]
rājño vṛtta-vivitsayā
[raajno vritta-vivitsayaa]
duṣprajasyālpa-sārasya
[dushprajasyaalpa-saarasya]
khala-cchandānuvartinaḥ
[khala-chchandaanuvartinah]
uvāsa — resided katicit — some māsān — months rājñaḥ — of the King (Dhṛtarāṣṭra) vṛtta — the activity vivitsayā — with the desire of finding out duṣprajasya — whose sons were wicked alpa — weak sārasya — whose determination khala — of mischievous persons (like Karṇa) chanda — the desires anuvartinaḥ — who tended to follow .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uvāsa katicin māsān
uvāsa
resided
katicit
some
māsān
months
rājño vṛtta-vivitsayā
rājñaḥ
of the King (Dhṛtarāṣṭra)
vṛtta
the activity
vivitsayā
with the desire of finding out
duṣprajasyālpa-sārasya
duṣprajasya
whose sons were wicked
alpa
weak
sārasya
whose determination
khala-cchandānuvartinaḥ
khala
of mischievous persons (like Karṇa)
chanda
the desires
anuvartinaḥ
who tended to follow .
  • duṣprajasya — whose sons were wicked
    Compound: duḥ (bad) + prajā (offspring). Dhṛtarāṣṭra's defining flaw in the Bhāgavata's eye is not blindness of the eye but of judgment toward his sons.
  • alpa-sārasya — whose determination is weak
    Sāra is the inner pith; alpa-sāra is the man with no marrow of resolve. The Bhāgavatam diagnoses Dhṛtarāṣṭra here precisely as the political type Gītā 2.41 calls bahu-śākhā — split, branching, unable to hold one bhakti-anchored intention.
  • khala-chanda-anuvartinaḥ — following the desires of mischievous persons
    Khala (rogue, here meaning Karṇa, Śakuni) + chanda (whim) + anuvartin (follower). A devastating compound: the king of the Kurus is reduced to a follower of his own retinue's worst impulses.
  • vivitsayā — with the desire of finding out
    Desiderative of √vid (to know). Akrūra's months in Hastināpura are not idleness but jñāna-yajña on Kṛṣṇa's behalf — observing so that the Lord may act with full information.
He remained in Hastināpura for several months to scrutinize the conduct of the weak-willed King, who had bad sons and who was inclined to give in to the whims of mischievous advisers.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He remained in Hastināpura for several months to scrutinize the conduct of the weak-willed King, who had bad sons and who was inclined to give in to the whims of mischievous advisers.
Commentary

Akrura wanted to observe the behavior of the king, whose nature was to follow the will (cchanda) of mischievous men (khala) like Karna.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He had to stay many months to find out the crooked nature of the king. The cause was bad sons.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

This verse describes the unjust acts of the king. He stayed for several months since it took some time to learn the nature of the evil king. The sequence of adjectives in order of cause and effect. The conclusion was that he was evil.

Related values
Dana (Charity / Generosity)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Prema (Divine Love)Svadhyaya (Self-study & Scripture Study)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Udyama (Industriousness / Effort)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva

Akrūra stays on as a physician who lingers by the bedside not to chat but to read the pulse — the king's weakness, the sons' venom, the courtiers' whispers. Months pass; the diagnosis ripens into something Kṛṣṇa will need to hear plainly.

Vidura's own diagnosis

In the Mahābhārata's Udyoga-parva, Vidura repeatedly warns Dhṛtarāṣṭra in private — alpa-sāra, weak in essence, swayed by Duryodhana. Akrūra's months of observation in this verse arrive at the same verdict Vidura has already lived inside for years.

Gauḍīyas read this as the pattern of bhakta-sat-saṅga: two devotees of Kṛṣṇa, separately watching, converge on the same true sight.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 49