Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.46.24
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
kaṁsam
—
Kaṁsa
Accusative of Kaṁsa. The verse uses the personal name — without epithet, without title — because the demon has now been reduced to a corpse on the wrestling-arena floor. Gauḍīya tīkā: Kaṁsa's name without title is itself the announcement of his end.
-
nāga - ayuta - prāṇam
—
whose vital strength was that of ten thousand elephants
Compound: nāga (elephant) + ayuta (ten thousand) + prāṇa (vital force). The Bhāgavatam quantifies Kaṁsa's strength to make the killing's ease the more striking. Even ten-thousand-elephant strength is, before Kṛṣṇa, līlayā.
-
mallau
—
the two wrestlers (Cāṇūra and Muṣṭika)
Nominative dual of malla. Killed in SB 10.44. Verse cross-references the immediately preceding chapter — Nanda has clearly received reports.
-
gaja - patim
—
the king of the elephants (Kuvalayāpīḍa)
Compound: gaja (elephant) + pati (lord). Kuvalayāpīḍa, the elephant Kaṁsa stationed at the gate (SB 10.43). Gauḍīya tradition: the gaja-pati at Kṛṣṇa's gate is destroyed; the gaja-pati Gajendra at his own crisis is saved — the symmetry is part of the canto's theology.
-
līlayā
—
as a game
Instrumental of līlā. The signature term of Kṛṣṇa-theology. Whatever requires titanic effort from others, Kṛṣṇa does līlayā. The whole acintya-bhedābheda doctrine of effortless creation is condensed here.
-
mṛga - adhipaḥ
—
the lion, king of animals
Compound: mṛga (animal) + adhipa (lord). The Lord-of-beasts image — also the etymology behind Nṛsiṁha (man-lion). Gauḍīyas hear an echo: the Vraja-rakṣaka in His Mathurā register reveals the Nṛsiṁha-pulse always implicit in His protection.
Here Nanda means to say, “Not only did Garga Muni declare that these boys are divine, but just see what They have done! Everyone is talking about it.”
They killed (avadhiṣṭām) the wrestlers Cāṇūra and Muṣṭika and the elephant who were as strong as ten thousand elephants just as a lion kills other animals without effort.
The wrestlers and the elephant were as strong as ten thousand elephants. They were killed (avadhiṣṭām). This was done without effort (līlayā eva). This was suitable since he was like a lion in relation to other animals.
Nanda recounts the Mathurā exploits not as a wonder-tale but as testimony — Kaṁsa, the wrestlers, Kuvalayāpīḍa — and the analogy he reaches for is the natural one: 'a lion among small animals.' Vraja-vātsalya knows its son is a lion, even when it dares not call him Bhagavān.
My note
Source: vedabase.io