FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.45.6

యస్తయోరాత్మజ: కల్ప ఆత్మనా చ ధనేన చ । వృత్తిం న దద్యాత్తం ప్రేత్య స్వమాంసం ఖాదయన్తి హి ॥ ౬ ॥
yas tayor ātmajaḥ kalpa
[yas tayor aatmajah kalpa]
ātmanā ca dhanena ca
[aatmanaa cha dhanena cha]
vṛttiṁ na dadyāt taṁ pretya
[vrittim na dadyaat tam pretya]
sva-māṁsaṁ khādayanti hi
[sva-maamsam khaadayanti hi]
yaḥ — who tayoḥ — of them ātma - jaḥ — a son kalpaḥ — capable ātmanā — with his physical resources ca — and dhanena — with his wealth ca — also vṛttim — a livelihood na dadyāt — does not give tam — him pretya — after passing away sva — his own māṁsam — flesh khādayanti — they make eat hi — indeed .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yas tayor ātmajaḥ kalpa
yaḥ
who
tayoḥ
of them
ātma - jaḥ
a son
kalpaḥ
capable
ātmanā ca dhanena ca
ātmanā
with his physical resources
ca
and
dhanena
with his wealth
ca
also
vṛttiṁ na dadyāt taṁ pretya
vṛttim
a livelihood
na dadyāt
does not give
tam
him
pretya
after passing away
sva-māṁsaṁ khādayanti hi
sva
his own
māṁsam
flesh
khādayanti
they make eat
hi
indeed .
  • ātma - jaḥ — a son
    Literally 'self-born' — the child is the parent's own ātman extended. The compound implies that refusing parents is a kind of self-refusal, which is why the karmic recoil is sva-māṁsa-khādana.
  • kalpaḥ — capable
    The condition matters: dharma applies to those with means. Kṛṣṇa is careful — He is not condemning the helpless poor but the able who choose otherwise.
  • vṛttim — a livelihood
    Vṛtti = sustenance, support. The minimum a capable child owes — not luxury, but the means of living. Gauḍīya gṛhasthas like Sanātana Gosvāmī before renunciation took this baseline obligation seriously even while preparing for tyāga.
  • pretya — after passing away
    After death — the karma matures post-mortem in pretaloka. Kṛṣṇa is using standard śāstric eschatology to land a domestic duty; bhakti does not abolish dharma's natural retribution.
  • sva - māṁsam — his own flesh
    The visceral image is intentional. Manu-smṛti uses similar formulae; Kṛṣṇa is quoting the tradition's own iron rhetoric to make the duty inescapable. Sva-māṁsa-khādana = the karmic boomerang of consuming one's source.
A son who, though able to do so, fails to provide for his parents with his physical resources and wealth is forced after his death to eat his own flesh.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A son who, though able to do so, fails to provide for his parents with his physical resources and wealth is forced after his death to eat his own flesh.
Commentary

"The son who, though able , does not support his parents according to the rules of the scriptures on the path of karma, has his flesh eaten by the servants of Yama after death and before getting a new body."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The servants of Yama make him eat his own flesh.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Physical resources and wealth should both be given (ca). He must eat his own (svasya) flesh. Hi means certainly. If one is ill, they rule does not apply.

Related values
Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Bhakti (Devotion)Vinaya (Humility / Modesty)Prema (Divine Love)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)
Related verses

A son with the means who refuses his aging parents is, in the śāstra's stark image, made to eat his own flesh hereafter — because he is already eating it now, only the chewing is invisible. Kṛṣṇa quotes the heavy verse so the dharma can land on every gṛhastha listening over the householders' shoulders.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 45