Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.45.6
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
ātma - jaḥ
—
a son
Literally 'self-born' — the child is the parent's own ātman extended. The compound implies that refusing parents is a kind of self-refusal, which is why the karmic recoil is sva-māṁsa-khādana.
-
kalpaḥ
—
capable
The condition matters: dharma applies to those with means. Kṛṣṇa is careful — He is not condemning the helpless poor but the able who choose otherwise.
-
vṛttim
—
a livelihood
Vṛtti = sustenance, support. The minimum a capable child owes — not luxury, but the means of living. Gauḍīya gṛhasthas like Sanātana Gosvāmī before renunciation took this baseline obligation seriously even while preparing for tyāga.
-
pretya
—
after passing away
After death — the karma matures post-mortem in pretaloka. Kṛṣṇa is using standard śāstric eschatology to land a domestic duty; bhakti does not abolish dharma's natural retribution.
-
sva - māṁsam
—
his own flesh
The visceral image is intentional. Manu-smṛti uses similar formulae; Kṛṣṇa is quoting the tradition's own iron rhetoric to make the duty inescapable. Sva-māṁsa-khādana = the karmic boomerang of consuming one's source.
"The son who, though able , does not support his parents according to the rules of the scriptures on the path of karma, has his flesh eaten by the servants of Yama after death and before getting a new body."
The servants of Yama make him eat his own flesh.
Physical resources and wealth should both be given (ca). He must eat his own (svasya) flesh. Hi means certainly. If one is ill, they rule does not apply.
A son with the means who refuses his aging parents is, in the śāstra's stark image, made to eat his own flesh hereafter — because he is already eating it now, only the chewing is invisible. Kṛṣṇa quotes the heavy verse so the dharma can land on every gṛhastha listening over the householders' shoulders.
My note
Source: vedabase.io