Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.3.21
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
rirakṣiṣuḥ
—
desiring to protect
Desiderative form of √rakṣ — 'desiring-to-protect'. The motive behind avatāra is named: not philosophical demonstration, not display, but rakṣaṇa of devotees and dharma. BG 4.8: paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁ — the same protective intent.
-
avatīrṇaḥ asi
—
You have descended
Past participle of ava-√tṛ ('to cross down') + asi. The verb avatīrṇa-bhū gives us 'avatāra'. Bhagavān has crossed down — He does not 'reincarnate' (a karma-bound process) but descends by His own will, retaining full transcendence.
-
akhila-īśvara
—
Lord of all without exception
Akhila (without remainder, complete) + īśvara (controller). The verse names what Kaṁsa fails to recognize — that the prisoner's newborn is the unconditional Lord of every being including Kaṁsa himself. Sambandha-jñāna's apex: there is no remainder of reality outside His īśvaratva.
-
rājanya-saṁjña-asura-koṭi-yūtha-paiḥ
—
by millions of demon-leaders called kings
An extended compound. Rājanya (royal, kṣatriya-class) + saṁjña (named, so-called) + asura (demon) + koṭi (ten million) + yūtha (host) + pa (leader). The saṁjña — 'named-as' — is the bite of the word: these are asuras NAMED kings. Gauḍīya social diagnosis: titles do not change tattva.
-
nihaniṣyase
—
You will kill
Future of ni-√han ('to slay'). Bhagavān's protection includes destruction of asuras — non-pacifist, non-sentimental. Real karuṇā for the saintly requires real daṇḍa for the demonic. Vaiṣṇava ethics does not flinch from this.
Kṛṣṇa appears in this world for two purposes, paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁ vināśāya ca duṣkṛtām: to protect the innocent, religious devotees of the Lord and to annihilate all the uneducated, uncultured asuras, who unnecessarily bark like dogs and fight among themselves for political power. It is said, kali-kāle nāma-rūpe kṛṣṇa avatāra. The Hare Kṛṣṇa movement is also an incarnation of Kṛṣṇa in the form of the holy name ( nāma-rūpe ). Every one of us who is actually afraid of the asuric rulers and politicians must welcome this incarnation of Kṛṣṇa: Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. Then we will surely be protected from the harassment of asuric rulers. At the present moment these rulers are so powerful that by hook or by crook they capture the highest posts in government and harass countless numbers of people on the plea of national security or some emergency. Then again, one asura defeats another asura, but the public continues to suffer. Therefore the entire world is in a precarious condition, and the only hope is this Hare Kṛṣṇa movement. Lord Nṛsiṁhadeva appeared when Prahlāda was excessively harassed by his asuric father. Because of such asuric fathers — that is, the ruling politicians — it is very difficult to press forward the Hare Kṛṣṇa movement, but because Kṛṣṇa has now appeared in His holy name through this movement, we can hope that these asuric fathers will be annihilated and the kingdom of God established all over the world. The entire world is now full of many asuras in the guise of politicians, gurus, sādhus, yogīs and incarnations, and they are misleading the general public away from Kṛṣṇa consciousness, which can offer true benefit to human society.
O father, in truth you know about me. But if you know, then say why I have appeared in your house? This verse answers. "Taking the name of a king you will kill all the troops directed by the asuras in order to protect the devotees and also the citizens in general."
Now I have attained you as a son though you come to protect the people. This is fortunate for the world and fortunate for me. You desire to protect all people submerged in an ocean of suffering, but especially your devotees, the Yādavas. Genitive case is used instead of accusative case in asya lokasya (you desire to protect the people). O powerful Lord! O Lord of all beings! It is impossible that you have appeared. But yet you have appeared, and in my house, with a relation to me, and even in a prison. Such great mercy! You will repeatedly (ni) kill all the armies moving about constantly (nir) and with purpose (vi), along with a host of demonic kings disguised as kṣatriyas. The word “with” is used to show that by destroying the armies, the kings will also be destroyed. Nirvyūhyamānāh can also mean nirvyūḍhamānāḥ meaning “constantly (ni) arranged in phalanxes.” This however is not accepted by Śrīdhara Svāmī.
- Govinda Pr SB 10-03-21 - 2007-08-14 ISKCON London
- Jitamitra Pr Hindi SB 10-03-21 - 2025-11-06 ISKCON Vrindavan
- Madhuresh Pr SB 10-03-21 Telugu - How to come out of consequences of Kaliyuga - ISKCON Porddatur
- BCS SB 10-03-21 - The Unparalled Potency of Holy Name - 2016-06-30 Los Angeles
- BCS SB 10-03-21 - The Birth of Lord Krishna - 2010-09-02 Ujjain
- BCS SB 10-03-21 - 2016-06-30 Los Angeles
- BCS SB 10-03-21 - The Birth of Lord Krishna - 2010-09-02 Ujjain
- BPSPSw SB 10-03-21 Hindi - 2013-06-19 ISKCON Mira Road
- BKG SB 10-03-21 - Krishna%27s Appearance - 2013-08-28 New Goloka
- PrahladAnS SB 10-03-21 - Advaita Acaryas Transcendental Pastimes - 1997-02-13 Radhadesh
- PrahladAnS SB 10-03-21 - Modern society means complicated - 2023-05-28 ISKCON Slovenia
- PrahladAnS SB 10-03-21 - Raganuga Hog Acharya - 2005-01-06 Melbourne
- PrahladAnS SB 10-03-21 Slovenian Translation - Moderna dru%C5%BEba pomeni komplikacije - 2023-05-28 ISKCON Slovenia
- Chant the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra audibly today as the very incarnation of Kṛṣṇa who protects you from asuric harassment.
- Refuse to place ultimate hope in any politician or worldly ruler — name one such attachment and consciously withdraw it, placing that trust in Kṛṣṇa instead.
- Notice when news or social media is breeding fear of asuric power, and immediately turn to nāma-saṅkīrtana as your concrete act of shelter.
- Where in my own life am I tolerating 'asuras dressed as kṣatriyas' — leaders, voices, or influences I follow because they wear the costume of authority, even though they are leading me away from Kṛṣṇa?
- Devakī recognizes Kṛṣṇa as akhileśvara appearing in her own house — what would change today if I treated my home, body, and daily situation as the very place He has descended to protect, rather than waiting for protection to arrive from elsewhere?
- Notice the 'asuras in costume' in your own feed today — influencers, politicians, even gurus packaged as wisdom — and unfollow one whose actual fruits are agitation, envy, or contempt for ordinary people.
- When a peer-pressure situation has you cornered (a group chat, a party, a campus stance you are being shamed into), chant sixteen names quietly before responding, and let Devakī's prayer — that Kṛṣṇa protects those who take shelter — be your actual backbone instead of social courage.
- Pick one 'kṣatriya-dressed' authority in your student life (a manipulative senior, a gaslighting coach, an exploitative internship) and stop pretending its costume is real; speak about it honestly to one trustworthy elder this week.
- In family financial decisions this month, refuse partnership with anyone whose money smells asuric — the contract that requires a small lie, the client who harasses staff, the scheme dressed as opportunity — even at real cost to income.
- Teach your children, by name, the difference between a leader and an asura-in-kṣatriya-clothing, using one concrete current example at the dinner table; do not raise them politically naive in the name of being spiritual.
- Establish a household kīrtana or japa time as your family's actual security policy — not as ornament — trusting Devakī's logic that the home where Kṛṣṇa is invited becomes the protected home.
- Use your remaining decades to mentor younger householders in distinguishing real protectors from asuras-in-costume; your pattern-recognition is the inheritance younger people most need and least have.
- Loosen your grip on the political outcomes you have agonized over for forty years — Devakī hands the army-killing to Kṛṣṇa, and so can you; redirect that energy into chanting the holy name as your final, most potent activism.
- Make your home, however small, a place where Kṛṣṇa is openly invited — pictures, prasāda, kīrtana — so that grandchildren and visitors experience what Devakī experienced: that the Lord's presence in a house is its real defense against the age.
- Reading the verse as a license for political activism or vigilante 'demon-slaying' — treating particular human rulers as the asuras to be killed, rather than recognizing that Kṛṣṇa Himself (and His holy name in this age) does the annihilating, while our work is sincere chanting and shelter.
- Spiritualizing the verse into a vague 'inner demons' metaphor and thereby losing its concrete claim that real, organized, asuric leadership exists in the world — and that the practical response is not introspection alone but taking shelter of nāma-rūpe Kṛṣṇa avatāra, the Hare Kṛṣṇa movement.
- Mistaking Devakī's mood for fearful flattery and trying to imitate it as performance, instead of cultivating her actual realization — that Kṛṣṇa is the proprietor of all creation (vibho, akhileśvara) — so one's prayers for protection become hollow petitions rather than confident surrender.
- Devakī calls these rulers 'asuras dressed as kṣatriyas.' Where in your own life do you encounter authority that wears a righteous costume but acts demonically — and where, honestly, do you yourself wear that costume?
- Prabhupāda says the Hare Kṛṣṇa movement itself is Kṛṣṇa's incarnation in this age, our protection from asuric rulers. Does that claim land for you as literal truth, as metaphor, or as something you resist? Be honest with each other about the resistance.
- Devakī asks Kṛṣṇa to *kill* the demon-armies — not reform them, not educate them. Where in our discourse have we softened this verse into something more palatable, and what is lost when we do?
Two students are siblings at the bedside of their elderly father, who has been a lifelong devotee. The father is afraid: a corrupt local official has been harassing the family business and a court date is coming. One sibling (Student A) wants to fight politically — hire lawyers, mobilize contacts, expose the official publicly. The other sibling (Student B) wants to lean entirely on chanting and Kṛṣṇa's protection through the holy name, citing this verse and Prabhupāda's purport. They have ten minutes to come to a shared decision before the father wakes up and asks what they will do. Play it out, then debrief: where did Devakī's prayer actually point — passive trust, active protection, or something both of you missed?
- This is just political grievance dressed up as scripture. Calling rulers you dislike 'demons' and asking God to kill them is exactly the kind of religious framing that fuels real-world violence and authoritarianism.
The verse is Devakī's prayer, not a license for us to identify and execute demons. The asura-quality Prabhupāda names is precise — rulers who capture power 'by hook or by crook' and harass innocents under invented emergencies. Our weapon, explicitly, is the holy name, not the sword. A Gauḍīya teacher takes this verse as a diagnosis of the age and a refuge in nāma, not as a permission slip. If anything, it disarms our own political rage by handing the killing to Kṛṣṇa and leaving us with the chanting. - Why do I need Kṛṣṇa personally to come and protect anyone? If there is a divine intelligence in the universe, surely it works through justice and karma without needing a blue cowherd boy born in a prison.
That is the impersonalist instinct, and the verse is its direct refutation. Devakī does not address an abstract justice; she addresses *akhileśvara*, the proprietor of all, who has just *appeared in her house*. The personalist line insists that protection is not a mechanism but a Person who responds, who descends, who takes birth where He is loved. Karma alone does not pull a child out of Kaṁsa's prison — Kṛṣṇa does. The blue cowherd boy is not embarrassing scripture we have to apologize for; He is the whole point.
A king disguises himself as a traveler to enter a region where bandits dressed as nobles oppress the people; the moment he sets foot, the entire militia he has secretly arranged begins to mobilize. Kṛṣṇa's birth in Kaṁsa's prison is the king setting foot; the asuras dressed as kṣatriyas are about to discover what kind of guest has arrived.
Bhagavān as Vāmana entered Bali's sacrificial arena as a small brāhmaṇa boy. Bali, an asura who happened to be virtuous, did not see the king-in-disguise immediately. The dwarf form was the entry; the cosmic step was the response to demonic over-reach.
The Bhāgavata's pattern: Bhagavān comes apparently small (a dwarf, an infant in a prison) precisely when the asuras have grown too large. The verse's 'rirakṣiṣuḥ' — 'desiring to protect' — is the recurring motive across every avatāra.
Daśaratha's son was apparently a prince of Ayodhyā. Rāvaṇa, in Laṅkā, was apparently a ten-headed king with infinite military strength. The Rāmāyaṇa reveals the actual proportions: a king-disguised-as-a-prince came down specifically to remove a demon-disguised-as-a-king.
This verse cites that same logic. The 'rājanya-saṁjña-asura' — those called kings but actually asuras — are the perennial target of Bhagavān's descents. Politics in any age is the asura-stage; the avatāra is the answer.
My note
Source: vedabase.io