Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.23.35
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
vidhṛtā-bhartrā
—
held back by force by her husband
Compound: vidhṛtā (held back) + bhartrā (by the husband, instrumental). The external bond can hold the body; the body's vāsanā then no longer matters. The Gauḍīya inference: the wife's success exposes the husband's failure.
-
yathā-śrutam
—
as she heard about Him from the others
Compound: yathā (as) + śrutam (heard). She received Him entirely through śravaṇa — never with her eyes. The verse is a proof-text for kṛṣṇa-kathā as the direct conveyor of Kṛṣṇa Himself.
-
hṛdā-upaguhya
—
embracing within her heart
Compound: hṛdā (with the heart, instrumental) + upaguhya (absolutive of upa + √guh, 'to embrace, conceal'). The heart-embrace — interior ālingana. Even physical restraint cannot interrupt it.
-
vijahau-deham
—
she gave up her material body
Compound: vijahau (gave up) + deham (body). The clean, undramatic exit of a bhakta — body abandoned at the moment of remembrance. Gauḍīya read: she attains Kṛṣṇa's eternal companionship without intermediate steps.
-
karma-anubandhanam
—
which is simply the basis of bondage to material activity
Compound: karma (action) + anubandhanam (binding). The body is named not by its biology but by its karmic function — the rope of saṁsāra. She drops the rope; karma cannot reattach.
The lady described here was especially devoted to Lord Kṛṣṇa. Upon giving up her material body, she immediately attained a spiritual body and left the sacrificial arena to join the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
As he is bhagavan, possessor of all powers, in front of him the brahmana woman gave up her material body. But as govinda, her senses (ga) attained him (vindati) for pleasure, unseen by others. That is the significance of the word "api" in this verse. With that food, which was actually insufficient to feed the great number of boys (tena eva annena), he (prabhu--most wealthy and merciful) satisfied them all. The ka in gopakan indicates his merciful attitude towards them. Though he had no desire to eat, he also ate to show mercy to the cowherd boys. That is the significance of svayam ca (he also). He had no desire to eat because he was feeling remorse at having made the brahmanas’ wives break their vows.
Kṛṣṇa did not promise that they would attain him soon just to pacify them. He did it as matter of his definite acceptance of them. An example is given. In the sacrificial arena, one of the wives among them was forcibly held back at the back. She embraced Kṛṣṇa, endowed with all qualities as she had heard from others, in her spiritual body made of prema, giving up all limitations such as fear and pain while thinking, “Protect me, as I have surrendered to you.” Her body attained that status following after the Lord’s body since it became related to him because of her prema for him. She gave up that body bound by karma. The prefix vi indicates that she gave up the material body but not the spiritual body attained by embracing the Lord in prema. The prefix vi also indicates that she did not again take a material body in this world. The body related to her husband was given to her husband and she attained the Lord in her body produced by prema. The Lord says, “Whatever you remember when you die you attain” and “Accordingly as you surrender to me I respond.” (BG 8.6 and 4.11) She attained him in Gokula within Goloka. This was explained in relation to Pūtanā’s liberation and will be described later as well.
Seeing the excellent devotion in those wives even before meeting Kṛṣṇa, the husbands developed respect for their wives. Now one among the wives (and there were more) is described as a typical example to show her excellent bhakti. Or considering the Lord’s statement that soon they would attain him, it should not be considered mere consolation. One of them immediately attained this result. At the place of sacrifice, or among the wives (tatra), one of them was restrained forcibly (vi—dhṛtā), by grabbing her hands and tying her feet. She gave up her body so that she had no more birth (vi—jahau). Why? That body was bound by karma. One cannot attain the Lord with a body dependent on karma. She attained a body of eternity, knowledge and bliss at that moment in Gokula. Srīdhara Svāmī comments that she gave up the body related to her husband and attained the Lord with a spiritual body. In this way the special bhakti of the wives is illustrated.
A bow drawn its whole length, held a year, finally released — the woman locked away by her husband releases the body itself, because the heart has already arrived where the body cannot follow. Bhakti can finish the journey without the vehicle.
Bharata Mahārāja, the great king after whom Bhārata-varṣa is named, gave up his body in the very moment of remembrance — though in his case attachment misdirected him to a deer-birth (SB 5.7-14).
The brāhmaṇa-wife of this verse performs the opposite version of the same operation: she gives up the body with remembrance of Kṛṣṇa alone, and Gauḍīyas read Bhāgavatam 8.5.48 (yat-smaraṇāt) over this verse — remembrance of Kṛṣṇa at the moment of leaving the body delivers her directly to Him.
My note
Source: vedabase.io