Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.11.14
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
ajohavīt
—
called repeatedly
An intensive (frequentative) verbal form of hū (to call) — 'kept calling, called over and over.' The grammatical doubling captures vātsalya's restless repetition. Gauḍīya commentators love this verb: prema does not call once and quit; it calls again and again, like the gopīs' kīrtana of Kṛṣṇa-nāma.
-
ati - velam
—
although it was too late
Ati-velā — past the proper hour. Time-pressure is the practical hinge: even Yaśodā's love operates inside dharma's clock (meals on time, baths before sunset). Bhakti does not abolish proper sequence; it enacts proper sequence with maximum tenderness.
-
saha - agrajam
—
with His elder brother
Agraja — first-born, elder. Balarāma is always agraja to Kṛṣṇa in Vraja-līlā. Gauḍīya theology: Balarāma is the original guru-tattva, the first expansion of Kṛṣṇa, and His elder-presence in every scene marks the principle that bhakti always travels with guru.
-
putra - sneha - snuta - stanī
—
milk flowing from her breast from love for her son
A compound that compresses three things into one image: putra (son), sneha (affection), snuta (flowing), stanī (with breast). Gauḍīya rasa-śāstra cites this exact phrase as evidence that vātsalya-rasa has its own sāttvika-bhāva — milk-flow — alongside the eight standard ones. The compound is a technical citation.
The word ajohavīt means “calling them again and again.” “Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma,” she called, “please come back. You are late for Your lunch. You have played sufficiently. Come back.”
She began to call repeatedly (ajohavit). She called from far off, because she feared that if she came close they would run away.
She called them repeatedly. She did not come close, fearing they would run away.
Her heart overcome with indescribable affection (sā), she called out many times (ativelam) to Kṛṣṇa who was playing with the boys (bālaiḥ saha). Or she called to Kṛṣṇa, her son and Balarāma, his elder brother, because it was getting late (ativelam). Or seeing him with Balarāma (sāgrajam), she called out.
- Nirantara Pr SB 10-11-14 - 2017-03-22 Los Angeles
- RCP SB 10-11-14 Telugu - 2009-11-21 ISKCON Tirupati
- Asita Krishna Sw SB 10-11-14 Hindi - Bhagavan ki Lilayein sadharan nahi hai - 2025-10-26
- Bhakti Prabhava Sw SB 10-11-14-17 - 2017-04-24 Bhaktivedanta Manor
- PrahladAnS SB 10-11-14-18 - Vedas contain standards of civilisation - 2023-12-30 ISKCON Slovenia
- PrahladAnS SB 10-11-14-18 Slovenian Translation - Vede vsebujejo standarde civilizacije - 2023-12-30 ISKCON Slovenia
- Romapada Sw SB 10-11-14-18 - Mother Yasodas affectionate call for Krishna and Balarama to come for lunch - 2020-06-17 Naperville
- Notice one relationship today where duty has gone cold, and re-enter it with the bodily warmth of vātsalya — call, feed, wait — instead of merely managing it.
- When you call someone back from their absorption (a child from play, a friend from distraction), do it ajohavīt — again and again, without irritation, as Yaśodā called Kṛṣṇa.
- Refuse the modern cult of detachment-as-coldness: today, let yourself be visibly moved — in prayer, in service, in love for Kṛṣṇa — without performing composure.
When a mother calls her child, her voice is not merely sound but body — milk lets down, hands open, breath catches. Yaśodā calls Kṛṣṇa and prema flows from her breasts visibly; love in Vraja is not concept but physiology, and Bhagavān answers what is offered with the body, not just the mind.
When Devahūti listened to her son Kapila expound sāṅkhya and bhakti (SB 3.25–33), her body too responded — tears flowing, voice catching, the same vātsalya-prema overflowing as physiology, not merely thought. The Bhāgavatam consistently treats bodily response as evidence of rasa's reality.
Gauḍīya tradition codifies this in the eight sāttvika-bhāvas (stambha, sveda, romāñca, svara-bheda, vepathu, vaivarṇya, aśru, pralaya). Yaśodā's flowing milk in this verse is read as the vātsalya-sister of those eight: prema made visible in the body. The 'modern cult of detachment-as-coldness' the personal-guidance file flags is exactly what Gauḍīya tradition opposes.
My note
Source: vedabase.io