FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.4.68

సాధవో హృదయం మహ్యం సాధూనాం హృదయం త్వహమ్ । మదన్యత్ తే న జానన్తి నాహం తేభ్యో మనాగపి ॥ ౬౮ ॥
sādhavo hṛdayaṁ mahyaṁ
[saadhavo hridayam mahyam]
sādhūnāṁ hṛdayaṁ tv aham
[saadhoonaam hridayam tv aham]
mad-anyat te na jānanti
[mad-anyat te na jaananti]
nāhaṁ tebhyo manāg api
[naaham tebhyo manaag api]
sādhavaḥ — the pure devotees hṛdayam — in the core of the heart mahyam — of Me sādhūnām — of the pure devotees also hṛdayam — in the core of the heart tu — indeed aham — I am mat-anyat — anything else but me te — they na — not jānanti — know na — not aham — I tebhyaḥ — than them manāk api — even by a little fraction.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sādhavo hṛdayaṁ mahyaṁ
sādhavaḥ
the pure devotees
hṛdayam
in the core of the heart
mahyam
of Me
sādhūnāṁ hṛdayaṁ tv aham
sādhūnām
of the pure devotees also
hṛdayam
in the core of the heart
tu
indeed
aham
I am
mad-anyat te na jānanti
mat-anyat
anything else but me
te
they
na
not
jānanti
know
nāhaṁ tebhyo manāg api
na
not
aham
I
tebhyaḥ
than them
manāk api
even by a little fraction.
The pure devotee is always within the core of My heart, and I am always in the heart of the pure devotee. My devotees do not know anything else but Me, and I do not know anyone else but them.

Since Durvāsā Muni wanted to chastise Mahārāja Ambarīṣa, it is to be understood that he wanted to give pain to the heart of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, for the Lord says, sādhavo hṛdayaṁ mahyam: “The pure devotee is always within the core of My heart.” The Lord’s feelings are like those of a father, who feels pain when his child is in pain. Therefore, offenses at the lotus feet of a devotee are serious. Caitanya Mahāprabhu has very strongly recommended that one not commit any offense at the lotus feet of a devotee. Such offenses are compared to a mad elephant because when a mad elephant enters a garden it causes devastation. Therefore one should be extremely careful not to commit offenses at the lotus feet of a pure devotee. Actually Mahārāja Ambarīṣa was not at all at fault; Durvāsā Muni unnecessarily wanted to chastise him on flimsy grounds. Mahārāja Ambarīṣa wanted to complete the Ekādaśī-pāraṇa as part of devotional service to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and therefore he drank a little water. But although Durvāsā Muni was a great mystic brāhmaṇa, he did not know what is what. That is the difference between a pure devotee and a so-called learned scholar of Vedic knowledge. The devotees, being always situated in the core of the Lord’s heart, surely get all instructions directly from the Lord, as confirmed by the Lord Himself in Bhagavad-gītā (10.11) :

teṣām evānukampārtham aham ajṣānajaṁ tamaḥ nāśayāmy ātma-bhāvastho jṣāna-dīpena bhāsvatā

“Out of compassion for them, I, dwelling in their hearts, destroy with the shining lamp of knowledge the darkness born of ignorance.” The devotee does not do anything not sanctioned by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As it is said, vaiṣṇavera kriyā mudrā vijṣeha nā bujhaya. Even the most learned or experienced person cannot understand the movements of a Vaiṣṇava, a pure devotee. No one, therefore, should criticize a pure Vaiṣṇava. A Vaiṣṇava knows his own business; whatever he does is precisely right because he is always guided by the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The pure devotee is my very heart: what pains him pains me. I am the heart of the pure devotee: what pleases him pleases me. My devotees do not know anything else but me, and I do not know more than they do. Though I want to give you the suitable result for causing pain to my devotee, I do not do so. Understand that this is because I am affectionate to brāhmaṇas. That is expressed in this verse. The devotees are my heart: you, who wanted to afflict my Ambarīṣa, have afflicted my heart. “If I have offended you then I fall at your feet for forgiveness.” I am the devotees’ heart: when the devotee’s heart is pleased, I am pleased. Go to Ambarīṣa and please him. “But he invited me and then did not feed me, and instead he ate. Do you not see his fault?” They do not know anything except me. Ambarīṣa does what I desire him to do. “Therefore I ask you. Please reply. Between a brāhmaṇa and a Dvādaśī, which is more respectable as dharma?” Please go. Ask Ambarīṣa. He will teach you, since you are so ignorant of the conclusions of the scriptures on dharma. Do not have any shame about this. I also have no knowledge. I do not know anything more than they do. Since the śruti says that drinking water is both eating and not eating, Ambarīṣa has equally respected the brāhmaṇa and the Dvādaśī. But you are ignorant. You do not know that. This is hinted. And Durvāsā had not asked Ambarīṣa about this, since he should be made to understand the superiority of the Dvādaśī over all dharma because of its bhakti by seeing result of his actions.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 4