FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.5.51

తథేతి గురుపుత్రోక్తమనుజ్ఞాయేదమబ్రవీత్ । ధర్మో హ్యస్యోపదేష్టవ్యో రాజ్ఞాం యో గృహమేధినామ్ ॥ ౫౧ ॥
tatheti guru-putroktam
[tatheti guru-putroktam]
anujṣāyedam abravīt
[anujshaayedam abraveet]
dharmo hy asyopadeṣṭavyo
[dharmo hy asyopadeshtavyo]
rājṣāṁ yo gṛha-medhinām
[raajshaam yo griha-medhinaam]
tathā — in this way iti — thus guru-putra-uktam — advised by Ṣaṇḍa and Amarka, the sons of Śukrācārya anujṣāya — accepting idam — this abravīt — said dharmaḥ — the duty hi — indeed asya — unto Prahlāda upadeṣṭavyaḥ — to be instructed rājṣām — of the kings yaḥ — which gṛha-medhinām — who are interested in householder life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatheti guru-putroktam
tathā
in this way
anujṣāyedam abravīt
iti
thus
guru-putra-uktam
advised by Ṣaṇḍa and Amarka, the sons of Śukrācārya
anujṣāya
accepting
idam
this
abravīt
said
dharmo hy asyopadeṣṭavyo
dharmaḥ
the duty
rājṣāṁ yo gṛha-medhinām
hi
indeed
asya
unto Prahlāda
upadeṣṭavyaḥ
to be instructed
rājṣām
of the kings
yaḥ
which
gṛha-medhinām
who are interested in householder life.
After hearing these instructions of Ṣaṇḍa and Amarka, the sons of his spiritual master, Hiraṇyakaśipu agreed and requested them to instruct Prahlāda in that system of occupational duty which is followed by royal householder families.

Hiraṇyakaśipu wanted Prahlāda Mahārāja to be trained as a diplomatic king in ruling the kingdom, the country or the world, but not to be advised about renunciation or the renounced order of life. The word dharma here does not refer to some religious faith. As clearly stated, dharmo hy asyopadeṣṭavyo rājṣāṁ yo gṛha-medhinām. There are two kinds of royal families — one whose members are simply attached to household life and the other consisting of rājarṣis, kings who govern with ruling power but are as good as great saints. Prahlāda Mahārāja wanted to become a rājarṣi, whereas Hiraṇyakaśipu wanted him to become a king attached to sense enjoyment ( gṛha-medhinām ). Therefore in the Āryan system there is varṇāśrama-dharma, by which everyone should be educated according to his position in society’s division of varṇa ( brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya, vaiśya and śūdra ) and āśrama ( brahmacarya, gṛhastha, vānaprastha and sannyāsa ).

A devotee purified by devotional service is always in the transcendental position above the mundane qualities. Thus the difference between Prahlāda Mahārāja and Hiraṇyakaśipu was that Hiraṇyakaśipu wanted to keep Prahlāda in mundane attachment whereas Prahlāda was above the modes of material nature. As long as one is under the control of material nature, his occupational duty is different from that of a person not under such control. One’s real dharma, or occupational duty, is described in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ( dharmaṁ tu sākṣād bhagavat-praṇītam ). As described to his order carriers by Dharmarāja, or Yamarāja, a living being is a spiritual identity, and therefore his occupational duty is also spiritual. The real dharma is that which is advised in Bhagavad-gītā: sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja. One must give up one’s material occupational duties, just as one must give up his material body. Whatever one’s occupational duty, even according to the varṇāśrama system, one must give it up and engage in one’s spiritual function. One’s real dharma, or occupational duty, is explained by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu. Jīvera ‘svarūpa’ haya — kṛṣṇera ‘nitya-dāsa’: every living being is an eternal servant of Kṛṣṇa. That is one’s real occupational duty.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Accepting the instructions of Ṣaṇḍa and Amarka, Hiraṇyakaśipu said, “Instruct Prahlāda on the duties of householder kings.” Anjṣāya means “accepting.”
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 5