FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.2.8

ఏతేనైవ హ్యఘోనోఽస్య కృతం స్యాదఘనిష్కృతమ్ । యదా నారాయణాయేతి జగాద చతురక్షరమ్ ॥ ౮ ॥
etenaiva hy aghono ’sya
[etenaiva hy aghono ’sya]
kṛtaṁ syād agha-niṣkṛtam
[kritam syaad agha-nishkritam]
yadā nārāyaṇāyeti
[yadaa naaraayanaayeti]
jagāda catur-akṣaram
[jagaada chatur-aksharam]
etena — by this (chanting) eva — indeed hi — certainly aghonaḥ — who possesses sinful reactions asya — of this (Ajāmila) kṛtam — performed syāt — is agha — of sins niṣkṛtam — complete atonement yadā — when nārāyaṇa — O Nārāyaṇa (the name of his son) āya — please come iti — thus jagāda — he chanted catuḥ-akṣaram — the four syllables (nā-rā-ya-ṇa).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etenaiva hy aghono ’sya
etena
by this (chanting)
eva
indeed
hi
certainly
aghonaḥ
who possesses sinful reactions
asya
of this (Ajāmila)
kṛtaṁ syād agha-niṣkṛtam
kṛtam
performed
syāt
is
agha
of sins
niṣkṛtam
complete atonement
yadā nārāyaṇāyeti
yadā
when
nārāyaṇa
O Nārāyaṇa (the name of his son)
āya
please come
iti
thus
jagāda catur-akṣaram
jagāda
he chanted
catuḥ-akṣaram
the four syllables (nā-rā-ya-ṇa).
The Viṣṇudūtas continued: Even previously, while eating and at other times, this Ajāmila would call his son, saying, “My dear Nārāyaṇa, please come here.” Although calling the name of his son, he nevertheless uttered the four syllables nā-rā-ya-ṇa. Simply by chanting the name of Nārāyaṇa in this way, he sufficiently atoned for the sinful reactions of millions of lives.

Previously, when engaged in sinful activities to maintain his family, Ajāmila chanted the name of Nārāyaṇa without offenses. To chant the holy name of the Lord just to counteract one’s sinful activities, or to commit sinful activities on the strength of chanting the holy name, is offensive ( nāmno balād yasya hi pāpa-buddhiḥ ). But although Ajāmila engaged in sinful activities, he never chanted the holy name of Nārāyaṇa to counteract them; he simply chanted the name Nārāyaṇa to call his son. Therefore his chanting was effective. Because of chanting the holy name of Nārāyaṇa in this way, he had already vanquished the accumulated sinful reactions of many, many lives. In the beginning he was pure, but although he later committed many sinful acts, he was offenseless because he did not chant the holy name of Nārāyaṇa to counteract them. One who always chants the holy name of the Lord without offenses is always pure. As confirmed in this verse Ajāmila was already sinless, and because he chanted the name of Nārāyaṇa he remained sinless. It did not matter that he was calling his son; the name itself was effective.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When he chanted the four syllables “Nārāyaṇa,” atonement for the sins he committed has been accomplished. “But Ajāmila did not chant with awareness that this was atonement. He called out for his son because he was afraid of us.” You do not understand the truth. Being materialistic, you do not understand. Even by calling for his son while not seeking to make atonement, atonement of this sinner (aghonah) was accomplished. Aghavat is here conjugated like maghavan (maghonaḥ). Just chanting at this time for his son is the atonement for all his sins. However, previously he chanted in ungrammatical language, “O Nārāyaṇa, come here, from your mother’s lap to my lap.” The atonement took place then. Not only chanting four syllables, but chanting the Lord’s name in two syllables or one syllable also destroys all sins.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 2