FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.17.10

ఇత్యతద్వీర్యవిదుషి బ్రువాణే బహ్వశోభనమ్ । రుషాహ దేవీ ధృష్టాయ నిర్జితాత్మాభిమానినే ॥ ౧౦ ॥
ity atad-vīrya-viduṣi
[ity atad-veerya-vidushi]
bruvāṇe bahv-aśobhanam
[bruvaane bahv-ashobhanam]
ruṣāha devī dhṛṣṭāya
[rushaaha devee dhrishtaaya]
nirjitātmābhimānine
[nirjitaatmaabhimaanine]
iti — thus a-tat-vīrya-viduṣi — when Citraketu, who did not know the prowess of Lord Śiva bruvāṇe — spoke bahu-aśobhanam — that which is not up to the standard of etiquette (the criticism of the exalted Lord Śiva) ruṣā — with anger āha — said devī — the goddess Pārvatī dhṛṣṭāya — unto Citraketu, who was quite shameless nirjita-ātma — as one who has controlled his senses abhimānine — thinking of himself.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ity atad-vīrya-viduṣi
iti
thus
a-tat-vīrya-viduṣi
when Citraketu, who did not know the prowess of Lord Śiva
bruvāṇe bahv-aśobhanam
bruvāṇe
spoke
bahu-aśobhanam
that which is not up to the standard of etiquette (the criticism of the exalted Lord Śiva)
ruṣāha devī dhṛṣṭāya
ruṣā
with anger
āha
said
devī
the goddess Pārvatī
dhṛṣṭāya
unto Citraketu, who was quite shameless
nirjitātmābhimānine
nirjita-ātma
as one who has controlled his senses
abhimānine
thinking of himself.
Not knowing the prowess of Lord Śiva and Pārvatī, Citraketu strongly criticized them. His statements were not at all pleasing, and therefore the goddess Pārvatī, being very angry, spoke as follows to Citraketu, who thought himself better than Lord Śiva in controlling the senses.

Although Citraketu never meant to insult Lord Śiva, he should not have criticized the lord, even though the lord was transgressing social customs. It is said, tejīyasāṁ na doṣāya: one who is very powerful should be understood to be faultless. For example, one should not find faults with the sun, although it evaporates urine from the street. The most powerful cannot be criticized by an ordinary man, or even by a great personality. Citraketu should have known that Lord Śiva, although sitting in that way, was not to be criticized. The difficulty was that Citraketu, having become a great devotee of Lord Viṣṇu, Saṅkarṣaṇa, was somewhat proud at having achieved Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa’s favor and therefore thought that he could now criticize anyone, even Lord Śiva. This kind of pride in a devotee is never tolerated. A Vaiṣṇava should always remain very humble and meek and offer respect to others.

tṛṇād api sunīcena taror api sahiṣṇunā amāninā mānadena kīrtanīyaḥ sadā hariḥ

“One should chant the holy name of the Lord in a humble state of mind, thinking oneself lower than the straw in the street; one should be more tolerant than a tree, devoid of all sense of false prestige and ready to offer all respect to others. In such a state of mind one can chant the holy name of the Lord constantly.” A Vaiṣṇava should not try to minimize anyone else’s position. It is better to remain humble and meek and chant the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra. The word nirjitātmābhimānine indicates that Citraketu thought himself a better controller of the senses than Lord Śiva, although actually he was not. Because of all these considerations, mother Pārvatī was somewhat angry at Citraketu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Citraketu, not knowing the prowess of Lord Śiva, spoke inauspicious words, Pārvatī, being angry, spoke to the proud Citraketu, who thought himself in control of his senses. Citraketu did not know Śiva’s powers. “The independent Lord will not be affected by anyone’s teachings.” The words were not auspicious because one should not give teachings to the Lord. He was considered proud because he spoke fearlessly. He had false identity, thinking “I have brought Paramātmā, Saṅkarṣaṇa, under control.” One should not think that Pārvatī became angry because she did not know the intentions of Śiva and the assembly. “I cannot accept these beneficial words because he does not criticize once, three or four times, but many times.” That is the reason for her anger.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 17