FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.4

యథా ధానాసు వై ధానా భవన్తి న భవన్తి చ । ఏవం భూతాని భూతేషు చోదితానీశమాయయా ॥ ౪ ॥
yathā dhānāsu vai dhānā
[yathaa dhaanaasu vai dhaanaa]
bhavanti na bhavanti ca
[bhavanti na bhavanti cha]
evaṁ bhūtāni bhūteṣu
[evam bhootaani bhooteshu]
coditānīśa-māyayā
[choditaaneesha-maayayaa]
yathā — just as dhānāsu — through seeds of paddy vai — indeed dhānāḥ — grains bhavanti — are generated na — not bhavanti — are generated ca — also evam — in this way bhūtāni — the living entities bhūteṣu — in other living entities coditāni — impelled īśa-māyayā — by the potency or power of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā dhānāsu vai dhānā
yathā
just as
dhānāsu
through seeds of paddy
vai
indeed
dhānāḥ
grains
bhavanti na bhavanti ca
bhavanti
are generated
na
not
bhavanti
are generated
ca
also
evaṁ bhūtāni bhūteṣu
evam
in this way
bhūtāni
the living entities
bhūteṣu
in other living entities
coditānīśa-māyayā
coditāni
impelled
īśa-māyayā
by the potency or power of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
When seeds are sown in the ground, they sometimes grow into plants and sometimes do not. Sometimes the ground is not fertile, and the sowing of seeds is unproductive. Similarly, sometimes a prospective father, being impelled by the potency of the Supreme Lord, can beget a child, but sometimes conception does not take place. Therefore one should not lament over the artificial relationship of parenthood, which is ultimately controlled by the Supreme Lord.

Mahārāja Citraketu was actually not destined to get a son. Therefore although he married hundreds and thousands of wives, all of them proved barren, and he could not beget even one child. When Aṅgirā Ṛṣi came to see the King, the King requested the great sage to enable him to have at least one son. Because of the blessing of Aṅgirā Ṛṣi, a child was sent by the grace of māyā, but the child was not to live for long. Therefore in the beginning Aṅgirā Ṛṣi told the King that he would beget a child who would cause jubilation and lamentation.

King Citraketu was not destined to get a child by providence, or the will of the Supreme. Just as sterile grain cannot produce more grain, a sterile person, by the will of the Supreme Lord, cannot beget a child. Sometimes a child is born even to an impotent father and sterile mother, and sometimes a potent father and fertile mother are childless. Indeed, sometimes a child is born despite contraceptive methods, and therefore the parents kill the child in the womb. In the present age, killing children in the womb has become a common practice. Why? When contraceptive methods are taken, why don’t they act? Why is a child sometimes produced so that the father and mother have to kill it in the womb? We must conclude that our arrangement of so-called scientific knowledge cannot determine what will take place; what is enacted actually depends on the supreme will. It is by the supreme will that we are situated in certain conditions in terms of family, community and personality. These are all arrangements of the Supreme Lord according to our desires under the spell of māyā, illusion. In devotional life, therefore, one should not desire anything, since everything depends on the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As stated in Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu (1.1.11):

anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jṣāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam ānukūlyena kṛṣṇānu- śīlanaṁ bhaktir uttamā

“One should render transcendental loving service to the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa favorably and without desire for material profit or gain through fruitive activities or philosophical speculation. That is called pure devotional service.” One should act only to develop Kṛṣṇa consciousness. For everything else, one should fully depend upon the Supreme Person. We should not create plans that will ultimately make us frustrated.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Just as grains appear or do not appear from seeds, children appear or do not appear from fathers, driven by māyā. “I may or may not be his father or his son in this birth or another birth. But enough with such questions for now! Please tell me for what fault do I experience suffering caused by separation from my object of affection?” It is not your offense. The cause is time alone. This is what they explain. “But for a long time I did not have a son. In my old age a son was born but died. This is great suffering.” Among the grain seeds some produce grains and some do not, but get destroyed. Among fathers some produce sons and some do not. Though some grains produce and others are produced, they have no relationship as father and son. Thus there is no lamentation. Dhānā means roasted grains and a woman. Thus there is another meaning. Just as grain does not arise from roasted grains, sons do not arise in persons like you without the karma for having sons. But O King (iśa)! Driven by māyā, the living entities have sons. To enlighten you, I, Aṅgirā, became your son through the influence of māyā.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 15