FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.13.10

శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ ఏవం సఞ్చోదితో విప్రైర్మరుత్వానహనద్రిపుమ్ । బ్రహ్మహత్యా హతే తస్మిన్నాససాద వృషాకపిమ్ ॥ ౧౦ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
evaṁ saṣcodito viprair
[evam sashchodito viprair]
marutvān ahanad ripum
[marutvaan ahanad ripum]
brahma-hatyā hate tasminn
[brahma-hatyaa hate tasminn]
āsasāda vṛṣākapim
[aasasaada vrishaakapim]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said evam — thus saṣcoditaḥ — being encouraged vipraiḥ — by the brāhmaṇas marutvān — Indra ahanat — killed ripum — his enemy, Vṛtrāsura brahma-hatyā — the sinful reaction for killing a brāhmaṇa hate — was killed tasmin — when he (Vṛtrāsura) āsasāda — approached vṛṣākapim — Indra, who is also named Vṛṣākapi.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
evaṁ saṣcodito viprair
evam
thus
saṣcoditaḥ
being encouraged
vipraiḥ
by the brāhmaṇas
marutvān ahanad ripum
marutvān
Indra
ahanat
killed
ripum
his enemy, Vṛtrāsura
brahma-hatyā hate tasminn
brahma-hatyā
the sinful reaction for killing a brāhmaṇa
hate
was killed
tasmin
when he (Vṛtrāsura)
āsasāda vṛṣākapim
āsasāda
approached
vṛṣākapim
Indra, who is also named Vṛṣākapi.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Encouraged by the words of the sages, Indra killed Vṛtrāsura, and when he was killed the sinful reaction for killing a brāhmaṇa [brahma-hatyā] certainly took shelter of Indra.

After killing Vṛtrāsura, Indra could not surpass the brahma-hatyā, the sinful reactions for killing a brāhmaṇa. Formerly he had killed one brāhmaṇa, Viśvarūpa, out of circumstantial anger, but this time, following the advice of the sages, he killed another brāhmaṇa purposely. Therefore the sinful reaction was greater than before. Indra could not be relieved from the reaction simply by performing sacrifices for atonement. He had to undergo a severe series of sinful reactions, and when he was freed by such suffering, the brāhmaṇas allowed him to perform the horse sacrifice. The planned execution of sinful deeds on the strength of chanting the holy name of the Lord or undergoing prāyaścitta, atonement, cannot give relief to anyone, even to Indra or Nahuṣa. Nahuṣa was officiating for Indra while Indra, absent from heaven, was going here and there to gain release from his sinful reactions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Encouraged by the words of the sages, Indra killed Vṛtrāsura, and when he was killed, the sin of killing a brāhmaṇa took shelter of Indra. When Vṛtra was killed (tasmin hate) the sin fell upon Indra (vṛṣākapim). Because of committing sin on the strength of an atonement, the reaction was very strong. Without experiencing suffering, the atonement would not give relief by itself. Therefore they did not perform the horse sacrifice for Indra immediately. The sages, because of advising him to commit the sin on the strength of the atonement also suffered misfortune, the result of the offense, for a long time. This suffering came from Nahuṣa, who took over Indra’s post.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 13