FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.7.39

నిమిత్తాని చ తస్యేహ ప్రోక్తాన్యనఘసూరిభి: । స్వతో జ్ఞానం కుత: పుంసాం భక్తిర్వైరాగ్యమేవ వా ॥ ౩౯ ॥
nimittāni ca tasyeha
[nimittaani cha tasyeha]
proktāny anagha-sūribhiḥ
[proktaany anagha-sooribhih]
svato jṣānaṁ kutaḥ puṁsāṁ
[svato jshaanam kutah pumsaam]
bhaktir vairāgyam eva vā
[bhaktir vairaagyam eva vaa]
nimittāni — the source of knowledge ca — also tasya — of such knowledge iha — in this world proktāni — mentioned anagha — spotless sūribhiḥ — by devotees svataḥ — self-sufficient jṣānam — knowledge kutaḥ — how puṁsām — of the living entity bhaktiḥ — devotional service vairāgyam — detachment eva — certainly vā — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nimittāni ca tasyeha
nimittāni
the source of knowledge
ca
also
tasya
of such knowledge
proktāny anagha-sūribhiḥ
iha
in this world
proktāni
mentioned
svato jṣānaṁ kutaḥ puṁsāṁ
anagha
spotless
sūribhiḥ
by devotees
svataḥ
self-sufficient
jṣānam
knowledge
kutaḥ
how
puṁsām
of the living entity
bhaktir vairāgyam eva vā
bhaktiḥ
devotional service
vairāgyam
detachment
eva
certainly
vā
also.
Spotless devotees of the Lord have mentioned the source of such knowledge. How could one have knowledge of devotional service and detachment without the help of such devotees?

There are many inexperienced persons who advocate self-realization without the help of a spiritual master. They decry the necessity of the spiritual master and try themselves to take his place by propagating the theory that a spiritual master is not necessary. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, however, does not approve this viewpoint. Even the great transcendental scholar Vyāsadeva had need of a spiritual master, and under the instruction of his spiritual master, Nārada, he prepared this sublime literature, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Even Lord Caitanya, although He is Kṛṣṇa Himself, accepted a spiritual master; even Lord Kṛṣṇa accepted a spiritual master, Sāndīpani Muni, in order to be enlightened; and all the ācāryas and saints of the world had spiritual masters. In Bhagavad-gītā Arjuna accepted Lord Kṛṣṇa as his spiritual master, although there was no necessity of such a formal declaration. So, in all cases, there is no question about the necessity of accepting a spiritual master. The only stipulation is that the spiritual master should be bona fide; i.e., the spiritual master must be in the proper chain of disciplic succession, called the paramparā system.

Sūris are great scholars, but they may not always be anagha, or spotless. The anagha-sūri is one who is a pure devotee of the Lord. Those who are not pure devotees of the Lord, or who want to be on an equal level with Him, are not anagha-sūri. Pure devotees have prepared many books of knowledge on the basis of authorized scriptures. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī and his assistants, under the instructions of Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, have all written various literatures for the guidance of prospective devotees, and anyone who is very serious about raising himself to the standard of a pure devotee of the Lord must take advantage of those literatures.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O sinless Maitreya! Tell me about the causes of this knowledge as described by the devotees. Can a person attain knowledge, bhakti or renunciation on his own? The cause for knowledge (nimittāni) is the association of the devotees. Describe this cause which is told by the offenseless, knowledgeable devotees (sūribhiḥ). This verse indicates that without guru, knowledge is impossible.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 7