• Begin the day by looking at Kṛṣṇa's deity or picture for one unhurried minute before reaching for the phone.
• Notice when your eyes feel restless and redirect them to a tulasī leaf, an image of Kṛṣṇa, or the words of a verse.
• Refuse the next piece of visual content that promises stimulation but leaves you emptier, and read one line of Bhāgavatam instead.

• Which forms am I currently feeding my eyes that leave me more agitated and less satisfied than before I looked?
• If the demigods themselves remained unsatiated gazing at Kṛṣṇa, what does my boredom in front of Him reveal about the condition of my heart?

• Treating darśana as a quick visual transaction rather than a slow, attentive drinking-in with the eyes.
• Imagining Kṛṣṇa's form as a symbol or mental abstraction rather than the actual personal Lord the demigods came to behold.
• Assuming that because we cannot yet feel the wonder the demigods felt, the wonder itself is not real or not for us.

• Share one kind of looking in your life that produces avitṛpta — unsatiated craving — and contrast it with the unsatiated gazing this verse describes.
• Do you think the demigods' inability to take their eyes off Kṛṣṇa is a weakness in them or the proper response to Him, and why does the difference matter for sādhana?
• What concretely changes in a household if its members spend even five minutes a day actually looking at Kṛṣṇa rather than only thinking about Him?

Two students sit together. One has just spent an hour scrolling videos and feels hollow; the other proposes they go before the deity and simply look, without prayer-performance or commentary, for five minutes. The first resists — it feels boring, useless, performative. Play out the conversation as the second student, drawing on this verse, invites the first into the demigods' kind of seeing.

• This sounds like idol worship — the demigods are staring at a form, and you are asking me to do the same. Surely the Absolute is beyond form.
  The verse is precise: the demigods, who are not naive, behold Kṛṣṇa with unsatiated eyes because His form is not a material idol but the supreme Person Himself. An impersonal absolute could never produce avitṛpta — only a real, personal beloved can hold the gaze forever. The personalist conclusion is the demigods' own.
• I have looked at the deity many times and felt nothing wonderful at all. The verse describes an experience I do not have, so it cannot really apply to me.
  The demigods see clearly because their eyes are purified by service and remembrance; our eyes are coated with rajas and tamas, so the wonder is veiled, not absent. Keep looking, keep hearing, keep chanting — the verse is a description of what these same eyes will eventually see, not a credential check at the door.