Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.3.35
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
In the previous verse King Nimi inquired about various aspects of the Absolute Truth, namely Nārāyaṇa, Brahman and Paramātmā. Now the sage Śrī Pippalāyana explains these three features of the Absolute Truth in the same order in which the King mentioned them. Sthity-udbhava-pralaya-hetuḥ refers to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who expands Himself as the triple puruṣa incarnations — Mahā-Viṣṇu, Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu and Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu. As described in the Bhāgavatam (1.3.1) :
jagṛhe pauruṣaṁ rūpaṁ bhagavān mahad-ādibhiḥ sambhūtaṁ ṣoḍaśa-kalam ādau loka-sisṛkṣayā
“In the beginning of the creation, the Lord first expanded Himself in the universal form of the puruṣa incarnation and manifested all the ingredients for the material creation. And thus at first there was the creation of the sixteen principles of material action. This was for the purpose of creating the material universe.” Thus the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Nārāyaṇa, is mentioned here as hetuḥ, or the supreme cause of the creation, maintenance and annihilation of the cosmic situation. Still, there is no cause of the Lord Himself; He is ahetuḥ. As expressed in the Brahma-saṁhitā, anādir ādir govindaḥ sarva-kāraṇa-kāraṇam. The Supreme Lord is the cause of all causes, and being the eternal Absolute Truth, He has no cause of Himself. The word ahetuḥ has also been explained by Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī to indicate that the Supreme Lord has His original form as Kṛṣṇa in His own transcendental abode, called Kṛṣṇaloka. Since Kṛṣṇa is always engaged in His blissful pastimes in the company of His eternally liberated associates, He is aloof from the affairs of this world, which is created by His external potency, known as māyā. Therefore it is stated, jagṛhe pauruṣaṁ rūpam. The Lord expands Himself as Nārāyaṇa and Viṣṇu to facilitate the gross illusion and gradual rectification of the conditioned souls. The Lord’s aloofness from the material creation is also described in the Vedas: na tasya kāryaṁ karaṇaṁ ca vidyate. The Absolute Truth has nothing to do, since everything is done self-sufficiently by His multipotencies. Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura has pointed out that even though the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa is ahetuḥ, or causeless and aloof from the cause of material creation, the Lord is also described in this verse as hetuḥ, or the ultimate cause of the creation, maintenance and annihilation of the material manifestation, because He expands Himself as Paramātmā, or the Supersoul, who acts as the prime mover of the cosmic manifestation.
The word ahetuḥ may also be understood in another way. In Bhagavad-gītā (7.5) the Lord says:
apareyam itas tv anyāṁ prakṛtiṁ viddhi me parām jīva-bhūtāṁ mahā-bāho yayedaṁ dhāryate jagat
The conditioned living entities ( jīva-bhūta ) desire to engage in sense gratification with their material senses ( manaḥ-ṣaṣṭhānīndriyāṇi prakṛti-sthāni karṣati ). Thus the creation of the material world becomes necessary. In fact, the material cosmic manifestation continues to exist because of the desires of the conditioned souls to exploit it ( yayedaṁ dhāryate jagat ). The government must create a prison to accommodate those citizens who are inclined to criminal activity. There is no need for any citizen to live in the obnoxious conditions of the prison, but because a certain portion of the population is inclined toward antisocial behavior, the prison becomes necessary. In a higher sense, the prisoners themselves can be considered the hetuḥ, or the cause, for the construction of the prison. Similarly, the Supreme Personality of Godhead expands His internal potency according to His own desire to increase the ānanda, or transcendental bliss, of Himself and His pure devotees, but He manifests the material universe in response to the illicit desires of the conditioned souls to live a life of sense gratification in willful forgetfulness of Him. Therefore the conditioned living entities themselves can be considered the hetuḥ, or cause, of the material manifestation. The external potency of the Lord, māyā, who is charged with the duty of material manifestation, is called chāyā, or the shadow of the Lord’s internal potency. Sṛṣṭi-sthiti-pralaya-sādhana-śaktir ekā/ chāyeva yasya bhuvanāni bibharti durgā. The Lord does not personally desire to manifest the shadow potency, called Durgā or māyā. The blissful spiritual planets, eternally manifest, contain the best possible facilities for the living entities who are parts and parcels of the Lord. But the conditioned souls, rejecting the inconceivable, eternal living arrangements the Lord has kindly provided, prefer to seek their misfortune in the shadow kingdom called the material world. Thus, both Durgā and the conditioned living entities may be considered the hetuḥ, or cause, of the material manifestation. Since Lord Kṛṣṇa is ultimately sarva-kāraṇa-kāraṇam, the cause of all causes, He is to be known as the ultimate supreme cause. But how the Lord functions as the supreme cause of the material manifestation ( sthity-udbhava-pralaya-hetuḥ ) is described in the Thirteenth Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā. Upadraṣṭānumantā ca: the Lord acts as overseer and permitter. The actual desire of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is stated very clearly in Bhagavad-gītā: sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja. The Lord desires every living entity to give up the shadow potency māyā and return to the actual substance ( vāstavaṁ vastu ), which is the eternal kingdom of God.
Although various aspects of the Absolute Truth are being described, the Absolute Truth is ultimately one, as stated in this verse ( tad avehi paraṁ narendra ). King Nimi inquired about Brahman, and now this verse says, yat svapna-jāgara-suṣuptiṣu sad bahiś ca. The Lord’s all-pervading feature within wakefulness, dreaming and deep sleep, and His existence beyond these three mental states, are understood to be manifestations of Brahman, the spiritual potency of the Lord. Finally, the statement dehendriyāsu-hṛdayāṇi caranti yena saṣjīvitāni can be understood to refer to the Paramātmā feature of the Lord. When the Lord expands Himself as Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, the third of the three Viṣṇu features, and enters the heart of every living entity, the gross and subtle organs of the body become enlivened for continuing the chain of fruitive activity called karma.
According to Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura, the multifarious manifestations of the Supreme Personality of Godhead do not compromise His supremacy as one without a second. The Absolute Truth is paramavyoma-nātha, or the Lord of the spiritual sky, who appears as two-armed Śyāmasundara, as four-armed, as eight-armed or as having one thousand arms. In each aspect His body is eternal and full of bliss and knowledge ( sac-cid-ānanda-mūrti ). He appears on earth as Vāsudeva and within the Causal Ocean as Mahā-Viṣṇu. He lies on the Milk Ocean as Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu and rescues His helpless young devotee as Nṛsiṁhadeva. Appearing as Lord Rāmacandra, He acts as a perfect king. And appearing as Kṛṣṇa He steals the heart of everyone, and especially of young beautiful women. All these features of the Lord are indicated by the word Nārāyaṇa, or the Supreme Personality of Godhead, just as the word president indicates not only the official duties of the president but his personal family life and long intimate friendships as well. According to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam. When one transcends an official understanding of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and comes to the superior status of love of God, one can understand the Lord to be Kṛṣṇa, the cause of all causes. The innumerable Viṣṇu expansions of the Lord are also understood to be plenary portions of Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam. As the Lord Himself states in Bhagavad-gītā, ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ. These points have been explicitly clarified in the Tenth Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam as well as in the opening verse, oṁ namo bhagavate vāsudevāya, janmādy asya yato ’nvayād itarataś cārtheṣu.
- Pause before sleep tonight and acknowledge that the same Lord who enlivens your waking senses pervades your dreams and dreamless sleep.
- When you notice your body, senses, or mind acting, silently credit the Paramātmā within rather than claiming sole authorship.
- Refuse the impersonalist temptation to call the Supreme merely 'consciousness' — name Him as Kṛṣṇa, the cause of all causes.
- Where do I still treat my senses, life airs, and thinking as self-powered, ignoring the Paramātmā who enlivens them?
- If the same Lord is present in waking, dreaming, and deep sleep, which state of mine am I most pretending He cannot see?
- Before an exam or interview, quietly acknowledge that the alertness in your senses is Paramātmā's enlivening presence, not your private fuel.
- When friends talk about 'the universe' giving them signs, gently re-personalize it in your own mind — it is Kṛṣṇa, not an abstract field, who is present.
- Track your dream and sleep life for a week: notice that 'you' continue across waking, dreaming, and deep sleep, and let that continuity point you to the witnessing Paramātmā.
- When work, spouse, and children all seem to demand that you be the cause holding everything together, remember the actual sustainer is Kṛṣṇa as Paramātmā in each of their hearts.
- In family disagreements, pause and recognize that the same Lord enlivens the senses and mind of the person across from you — speak as if to Him within them.
- Before sleep, formally entrust the household — finances, children, unfinished tasks — to the Lord who is awake in waking, dreaming, and deep sleep alike.
- As bodily faculties weaken, meditate that the Paramātmā who once enlivened strong senses is the same Lord still present as those senses fade.
- When mentoring younger devotees, point them past 'inner wisdom' language to Kṛṣṇa Himself as the personal cause of all causes.
- Use the lengthening hours of rest and sleep to deepen the conviction that the Lord pervades even dreamless sleep, so death itself becomes a familiar passage rather than a stranger.
- Reducing Paramātmā to a vague 'inner light' or 'higher self' and quietly dropping the personal Kṛṣṇa from the picture.
- Treating Brahman, Paramātmā, and Bhagavān as competing truths to choose between, rather than three features of one Supreme.
- Hearing 'He is the cause of creation' and blaming Kṛṣṇa for one's suffering, forgetting that the conditioned soul's own desire is the proximate cause of bondage.
- If Kṛṣṇa is ahetuḥ — without cause — and also hetuḥ of creation, how do you reconcile this for someone who insists every effect must have a single cause?
- Pippalāyana says the Lord pervades deep sleep too. What practical difference does it make in your day to believe Paramātmā witnesses even your unconscious states?
- Share a moment when you slipped into impersonalist language about 'the universe' or 'consciousness' — what made the personal Kṛṣṇa harder to name there?
A classmate tells the student, 'I meditate on pure awareness — I don't need a personal God. Awareness itself is the source of everything.' Drawing on this verse, the student must respond: acknowledging the all-pervading feature (Brahman, Paramātmā) while clearly establishing Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality behind these features, without becoming combative.
- Modern cosmology already explains creation, maintenance, and dissolution through physical laws — why invoke a Personality of Godhead as cause?
Physical laws describe how matter behaves; they do not explain why there is matter at all, why it obeys law, or why conscious beings inhabit it. Pippalāyana points to the prior cause behind every secondary cause — anādir ādir govindaḥ, sarva-kāraṇa-kāraṇam — and notes the Lord Himself has no cause. Science maps the mechanism; this verse names the One whose presence enlivens even the scientist's own senses and intellect. - If the Supreme is equally present in waking, dreaming, and deep sleep, isn't He just an impersonal substrate — why insist on calling Him a 'Person'?
All-pervasiveness does not contradict personhood; it expresses His Paramātmā feature. The same Lord who pervades the three states has His original form as Kṛṣṇa in His own abode, engaged in eternal pastimes with His devotees. Brahman and Paramātmā are features of Bhagavān, not alternatives to Him. Calling Him merely a substrate is like calling a king only his shadow — true as far as it goes, but missing the person who casts it.
My note
Source: vedabase.io