FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.25.24

కైవల్యం సాత్త్వికం జ్ఞానం రజో వైకల్పికం చ యత్ । ప్రాకృతం తామసం జ్ఞానం మన్నిష్ఠం నిర్గుణం స్మృతమ్ ॥ ౨౪ ॥
kaivalyaṁ sāttvikaṁ jṣānaṁ
[kaivalyam saattvikam jshaanam]
rajo vaikalpikaṁ ca yat
[rajo vaikalpikam cha yat]
prākṛtaṁ tāmasaṁ jṣānaṁ
[praakritam taamasam jshaanam]
man-niṣṭhaṁ nirguṇaṁ smṛtam
[man-nishtham nirgunam smritam]
kaivalyam — absolute sāttvikam — in the mode of goodness jṣānam — knowledge rajaḥ — in the mode of passion vaikalpikam — manifold ca — and yat — which prākṛtam — materialistic tāmasam — in the mode of ignorance jṣānam — knowledge mat-niṣṭham — concentrated upon Me nirguṇam — transcendental smṛtam — is considered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaivalyaṁ sāttvikaṁ jṣānaṁ
kaivalyam
absolute
sāttvikam
in the mode of goodness
jṣānam
knowledge
rajo vaikalpikaṁ ca yat
rajaḥ
in the mode of passion
vaikalpikam
manifold
ca
and
yat
which
prākṛtaṁ tāmasaṁ jṣānaṁ
prākṛtam
materialistic
tāmasam
in the mode of ignorance
jṣānam
knowledge
man-niṣṭhaṁ nirguṇaṁ smṛtam
mat-niṣṭham
concentrated upon Me
nirguṇam
transcendental
smṛtam
is considered.
Absolute knowledge is in the mode of goodness, knowledge based on duality is in the mode of passion, and foolish, materialistic knowledge is in the mode of ignorance. Knowledge based upon Me, however, is understood to be transcendental.

The Lord clearly explains here that spiritual knowledge of His supreme personality is transcendental to ordinary religious knowledge in the mode of goodness. In the mode of goodness one understands the existence of a higher spiritual nature within all things. In the mode of passion one acquires scientific knowledge of the material body. And in the mode of ignorance one fixes one’s mind on the sense objects without higher awareness, perceiving things as a small child or a retarded person does.

Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī elaborately explains in his commentary on this verse that the material mode of goodness does not award perfect knowledge of the Absolute Truth. He quotes from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (6.14.2) , proving that many great demigods in the mode of goodness could not understand the transcendental personality of Lord Kṛṣṇa. In the material mode of goodness, one becomes pious or religious, aware of a higher, spiritual nature. On the spiritual platform of purified goodness, however, one establishes a direct, loving relationship with the Absolute Truth, rendering service to the Lord rather than merely maintaining a connection to mundane piety. In the mode of passion the conditioned soul speculates about the reality of his own existence and of the world around him, and considers speculatively the existence of a kingdom of God. In the mode of ignorance one acquires knowledge for sense gratification, absorbing the mind in varieties of eating, sleeping, defending and sex, without any higher purpose. Thus, within the modes of nature the conditioned souls are trying to gratify their senses, or else they are trying to free themselves from sense gratification. But they cannot directly engage themselves in their constitutional, liberated activities until they come to the transcendental position of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, beyond the modes of nature.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Knowledge concerning the jīva apart from the body is in sattva. Knowledge with various options of doubt is in rajas. Knowledge of material life is in tamas. Knowledge concerning me, however, is understood to be beyond the guṇas. Now four types of knowledge and other items with guṇas and without guṇas are described in sequence. Knowledge concerning the jīva apart from the body is in sattva. Knowledge with doubt is in rajas. “This may be real or unreal. The jīva may be eternal or subject to birth.” Knowledge of material life such as eating or playing is in tamas. Knowledge concerning me is beyond the guṇas.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 25