FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.22.5

నైతదేవం యథాత్థ త్వం యదహం వచ్మి తత్తథా । ఏవం వివదతాం హేతుం శక్తయో మే దురత్యయా: ॥ ౫ ॥
naitad evaṁ yathāttha tvaṁ
[naitad evam yathaattha tvam]
yad ahaṁ vacmi tat tathā
[yad aham vachmi tat tathaa]
evaṁ vivadatāṁ hetuṁ
[evam vivadataam hetum]
śaktayo me duratyayāḥ
[shaktayo me duratyayaah]
na — it is not etat — this evam — so yathā — as āttha — say tvam — you yat — which aham — I vacmi — am saying tat — that tathā — thus evam — in this way vivadatām — for those who argue hetum — over logical reasons śaktayaḥ — the energies (are impelling) me — My duratyayāḥ — unsurpassable.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
naitad evaṁ yathāttha tvaṁ
na
it is not
yad ahaṁ vacmi tat tathā
evaṁ vivadatāṁ hetuṁ
etat
this
evam
so
śaktayo me duratyayāḥ
yathā
as
āttha
say
tvam
you
yat
which
aham
I
vacmi
am saying
tat
that
tathā
thus
evam
in this way
vivadatām
for those who argue
hetum
over logical reasons
śaktayaḥ
the energies (are impelling)
me
My
duratyayāḥ
unsurpassable.
When philosophers argue, “I don’t choose to analyze this particular case in the same way that you have,” it is simply My own insurmountable energies that are motivating their analytic disagreements.

Because of the material potencies of the Supreme Lord, mundane philosophers are perpetually arguing about which came first, the chicken or the egg. By the influence of the modes of goodness, passion and ignorance, different philosophers are attracted to different views; and by the influence of the material atmosphere created by the Lord, these philosophers perpetually disagree with one another. The Supreme Lord Himself, however, has given the clear explanation. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (6.4.31) :

yac-chaktayo vadatāṁ vādināṁ vai vivāda-saṁvāda-bhuvo bhavanti kurvanti caiṣāṁ muhur ātma-mohaṁ tasmai namo ’nanta-guṇāya bhūmne

“Let me offer my respectful obeisances unto the all-pervading Supreme Personality of Godhead, who possesses unlimited transcendental qualities. Acting from within the cores of the hearts of all philosophers, who propagate various views, He caused them to forget their own souls while sometimes agreeing and sometimes disagreeing among themselves. Thus He creates within this material world a situation in which they are unable to come to a conclusion. I offer my respectful obeisances unto Him.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When philosophers argue, “I don’t choose to analyze this particular case in the same way that you have,” the cause of their arguments is my insurmountable śakti called avidyā. Dispute is graphically portrayed. In their disputes, the cause is the action of my energy. This means it is my śakti called avidyā, which takes the form of their various disputes. It is said in the Haṁsa-guhya prayers: yac-chaktayo vadatāṁ vādināṁ vai vivāda-saṁvāda-bhuvo bhavanti kurvanti caiṣāṁ muhur ātma-mohaṁ tasmai namo 'nanta-guṇāya bhūmne I offer respects to the great Lord of eternal qualities, whose material energy is the cause of agreement and disagreement among those who make philosophies and then argue with others, whose material energy continually bewilders them as to the real nature of ātmā. SB 6.4.31
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 22