FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.2.36

కాయేన వాచా మనసేన్ద్రియైర్వా బుద్ధ్యాత్మనా వానుసృతస్వభావాత్ । కరోతి యద్ యత్ సకలం పరస్మై నారాయణాయేతి సమర్పయేత్తత్ ॥ ౩౬ ॥
kāyena vācā manasendriyair vā
[kaayena vaachaa manasendriyair vaa]
buddhyātmanā vānusṛta-svabhāvāt
[buddhyaatmanaa vaanusrita-svabhaavaat]
karoti yad yat sakalaṁ parasmai
[karoti yad yat sakalam parasmai]
nārāyaṇāyeti samarpayet tat
[naaraayanaayeti samarpayet tat]
kāyena — with the body vācā — speech manasā — mind indriyaiḥ — senses vā — or buddhyā — with the intelligence ātmanā — the purified consciousness vā — or anusṛta — followed svabhāvāt — according to one’s conditioned nature karoti — one does yat yat — whatever sakalam — all parasmai — to the Supreme nārāyaṇāya iti — thinking, “This is for Nārāyaṇa” samarpayet — he should offer tat — that.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāyena vācā manasendriyair vā
kāyena
with the body
vācā
speech
manasā
mind
indriyaiḥ
senses
vā
or
buddhyātmanā vānusṛta-svabhāvāt
buddhyā
with the intelligence
ātmanā
the purified consciousness
vā
or
anusṛta
followed
svabhāvāt
according to one’s conditioned nature
karoti yad yat sakalaṁ parasmai
karoti
one does
yat yat
whatever
sakalam
all
parasmai
to the Supreme
nārāyaṇāyeti samarpayet tat
nārāyaṇāya iti
thinking, “This is for Nārāyaṇa”
samarpayet
he should offer
tat
that.
In accordance with the particular nature one has acquired in conditioned life, whatever one does with body, words, mind, senses, intelligence or purified consciousness one should offer to the Supreme, thinking, “This is for the pleasure of Lord Nārāyaṇa.”

Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura has commented in this regard that a person who engages all the sensory activities of his body, mind, words, intelligence, ego and consciousness in the service of the Supreme Lord cannot be considered to be on the same level as a karmī working for his personal sense gratification. Although apparently still a conditioned soul, one who offers the fruits of all his activities to the Lord can no longer be touched by the countless miseries that arise from the reactions to materialistic activities.

Because of enmity against the Supreme Personality of Godhead and His omnipotent authority, the conditioned living entity performs activities against the order of the Lord. Yet self-realized souls continue to perform all types of work within this world to carry out the mission of the Supreme Lord. According to Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, those karmīs who are sufficiently pious follow the example of the self-realized souls by trying to offer the fruits of their own duties at the lotus feet of the Lord. Although this is counted as karma-miśrā bhakti, or devotional service mixed with the desire to execute fruitive activities, such mixed devotional service is gradually transformed into pure devotional service. As the pious fruitive workers disengage themselves, step by step, from the bogus philosophy of “enjoyment of one’s hard-earned rewards,” pure devotional service rewards them with complete good fortune.

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī has commented, ātmanā cittenāhaṅkāreṇa vā anusṛto yaḥ svabhāvas tasmāt: although one may still be in the bodily concept of life, he should offer the fruit of his work to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Those with a primitive, materialistic concept of the Supreme Lord consider the Lord present only in a temple or church. They make some offering to the Lord in the place of worship, but in their normal activities they claim proprietorship, not thinking that God is present everywhere and within everyone. We have practical experience of many so-called religious men who become very offended if their children try to become servants of the Supreme Lord. They feel, “God should be pleased with whatever humble offering I give Him, but my family and ordinary business affairs belong to me and are under my control.” The perception of anything as separate from the Supreme Personality of Godhead or His proprietorship is called māyā, or illusion. Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī has quoted, na kevalaṁ vidhitaḥ kṛtam eveti niyamaḥ; svabhāvānusāri laukikam api: “The regulation that one should serve the Supreme Lord does not refer only to prescribed religious paths, ceremonies and regulations; rather, all the activities one performs in this world according to one’s personal nature should be dedicated to the Supreme Personality of Godhead.”

The words karoti yad yat sakalaṁ parasmai nārāyaṇāyeti samarpayet tat in this verse are very significant. A similar verse is found in Bhagavad-gītā (9.27) :

yat karoṣi yad aśnāsi yaj juhoṣi dadāsi yat yat tapasyasi kaunteya tat kuruṣva mad-arpaṇam

“O son of Kuntī, all that you do, all that you eat, all that you offer and give away, and all the austerities that you perform should be done as an offering unto Me.” The objection may be raised, Since our ordinary activities are performed with a material body and material mind, not by the spirit soul, how can such activities be offered to the Supreme Lord, who is completely transcendental to the material world? How can such activities be considered spiritual? In answer to this it is stated in the Viṣṇu Purāṇa (3.8.8):

varṇāśramācāra-vatā puruṣeṇa paraḥ pumān viṣṇur ārādhyate panthā nānyat tat-toṣa-kāraṇam

One who wants to satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, must accept the system of varṇāśrama-dharma and worship the Lord through the execution of his prescribed duties. In Bhagavad-gītā (4.13) the Supreme Lord has personally taken credit for establishing the system of varṇāśrama-dharma: cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśaḥ. Therefore if one offers his work within the varṇāśrama-dharma system to the Supreme Lord, such work is counted as devotional service. According to one’s svabhāva, or nature, one may work as an intellectual or priest, as an administrator or military man, as an agriculturist or mercantile man, or as a laborer or craftsman. And while working, everyone should meditate on the Supreme Personality of Godhead, thinking, yat sakalaṁ parasmai nārāyaṇāya: “I am working for the Supreme Lord. Whatever result comes from my work, I shall accept the bare minimum for my personal maintenance, and the rest I shall offer for the glorification of Lord Nārāyaṇa.”

Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has pointed out, kāmināṁ tu sarvathaiva na duṣkarmārpaṇam: one cannot offer duṣkarma, or sinful, wicked activities, to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The four pillars of sinful life are illicit sex, meat-eating, gambling and intoxication. Such activities are never acceptable as offerings to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The example may be given that although in a free society each person is allowed to choose his own occupation, even a democratic government will not allow a citizen to choose the occupation of thief or murderer. In the same way, according to the laws of God one is invited to work according to his own nature in the varṇāśrama system, but one is forbidden to adopt a criminal life of sinful activities violating the laws of God.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura has given a nice description of how one should offer one’s ordinary activities to the Supreme Lord. He says that an ordinary sense gratifier begins his activities in the morning by passing stool and urine, cleaning his mouth, brushing his teeth, bathing, meeting his friends and family members and discussing with them the day’s business. In this way one has so many activities during the day, and a sense gratifier executes all these activities for his personal material enjoyment. A karmī, on the other hand, working under the jurisdiction of the karma-kāṇḍa section of the Vedas, will perform the same activities for the pleasure of the demigods and his forefathers. Thus, according to Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura, a devotee of the Supreme Lord, Nārāyaṇa, should similarly perform all of his daily activities for the pleasure of the Supreme Lord. In this way everything we do throughout the day will become bhakty-aṅga, or a supplementary aspect of our devotional service to Kṛṣṇa.

It should be understood that as long as one identifies oneself in terms of the varṇāśrama-dharma system rather than as part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa one is still on the platform of ahaṅkāra, or false ego, because the varṇāśrama system is designed according to the modes of nature acquired by the living entity through his material body. But the ācāryas have emphasized in their commentaries on this verse that such a false ego, by which one identifies oneself as a brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya, vaiśya, śūdra, sannyāsī, gṛhastha and so on, should also be offered to the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

According to Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī, when one becomes very much attracted to hearing and chanting about the Supreme Lord and not merely offering Him the fruits of one’s work, one has attained the stage called svarūpa-siddhā bhakti, or the stage in which actual devotion becomes visible. The example may be given that although any good citizen will pay his taxes to the government, he may not necessarily love the government or its leaders. Similarly a pious living entity can understand that he is working under the laws of God, and therefore in accordance with Vedic injunctions or the injunctions of other scriptures he offers a portion of his assets to the Supreme Lord in religious ceremonies. But when such a pious person actually becomes attached to chanting and hearing about the personal qualities of the Lord and when love thus becomes visible, he is considered to be reaching the mature stage of life. In this regard, Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has quoted several verses that very nicely show the development of love for Godhead. Anena durvāsanā-duḥkha-darśanena sa karuṇā-mayaḥ karuṇāṁ karotu: “May the merciful Lord show mercy on me by demonstrating the misery created by sinful desires.” Yā prītir avivekānāṁ visayeṣv anapāyinī/ tvām anusmarataḥ sā me hṛdayān nāpasarpatu: “Unintelligent persons have unflinching affection for the objects of sense gratification. Similarly, may I always remember You, so that that same attachment, applied to You, never leaves my heart.” ( Viṣṇu Purāṇa 1.20.19) Yuvatīnāṁ yathā yūni yūnāṁ ca yuvatau yathā/ mano ’bhiramate tadvan mano me ramatāṁ tvayi: “As the minds of young girls take pleasure in thinking of a young boy and those of young boys take pleasure in thinking of a young girl, may my mind take pleasure in You.” Mama sukarmaṇi duṣkarmaṇi ca yad rāga-sāmānyam, tad sarvato-bhāvena bhagavad-viṣayam eva bhavatu: “Whatever attraction I have for pious or sinful activities, let that attraction be wholeheartedly invested in You.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In accordance with one’s particular nature, whatever one does with body, words, mind, senses, intelligence or purified consciousness one should offer to the Lord, thinking, "This is for the pleasure of Nārāyaṇa." The intelligent person who begins the process described later in verse 39 should become absorbed in that process with all his functions such as speech. The meaning is this. Just as the material person, starting in the morning, performs actions such as urinating, stooling, washing his mouth, brushing his teeth, bathing, seeing, hearing and speaking for material happiness and performs rituals for worship of devatās and Pitṛs, so the devotee of the Lord will do all these activities as service to the Lord. These become aṅgas of bhakti. Whatever he performs according to his nature acquired by beginningless identification with body, using body, mind, words, senses, intelligence and citta, should be made to serve Nārāyaṇa. Dative case here has the sense of “for that purpose.”
Whatever you do with body, speech, mind, senses, intelligence or consciousness — according to your own nature — offer it to Nārāyaṇa as His pleasure.
Practical Applications
  • Before each task today — work, meals, conversations, even bathing — silently say, 'This is for the pleasure of Lord Nārāyaṇa,' and then do it.
  • Take the bare minimum from today's earnings or output for your maintenance and consciously earmark the rest for Kṛṣṇa's service.
  • Refuse to file any of the four duṣkarmas — illicit sex, meat-eating, gambling, intoxication — as 'offerings'; honestly drop them rather than dressing them up as bhakti.
Reflection Questions
  • Which corners of my day do I still treat as 'my private business,' off-limits to Nārāyaṇa's proprietorship?
  • Where am I offering only the temple-hour fruits while clinging to my work, family, and money as if they were mine to enjoy?
For Each Age Group
youth
  • Before opening a textbook or starting an exam, take three seconds to say internally, 'This study is for Nārāyaṇa's pleasure,' and then study with full attention.
  • Audit your phone for the day: which apps and feeds are duṣkarma dressed up as harmless scrolling, and quietly drop those rather than 'offering' them.
  • When peers pressure you toward illicit sex, intoxication, or gambling as part of 'fitting in,' refuse without lecturing — these are the four pillars the verse explicitly excludes from any offering.
householder
  • Sit with your spouse this week and decide together what is genuine household maintenance and what is surplus that can be earmarked for Kṛṣṇa's service.
  • Stop treating your children, career, and home as your private property; speak and decide about them as Nārāyaṇa's, beginning with one concrete decision this week.
  • Perform your prescribed work — at the office, with clients, at home — with full competence, and at day's end formally offer the results, not just the leftover puja flowers.
senior
  • Walk through your estate, possessions, and savings and explicitly re-title them in your own heart as Nārāyaṇa's, planning how the surplus beyond your maintenance will serve Him.
  • Mentor a younger family member or student in how to do ordinary work — earning, cooking, parenting — as offering, transmitting the verse by example rather than instruction.
  • Use the slowing of body and senses as a chance to graduate from karma-miśrā bhakti into hearing and chanting, so that what you offer ripens into svarūpa-siddhā bhakti before death.
Common Pitfalls
  • Reserving 'offering' for ritual moments and leaving ordinary work, eating, and speaking entirely on the platform of self-enjoyment.
  • Stretching samarpayet to cover duṣkarma — labeling illicit or sinful acts as 'service' because I mentally tagged Nārāyaṇa's name onto them.
  • Hardening into the ahaṅkāra of 'I am a brāhmaṇa / gṛhastha / sannyāsī doing my duty,' and forgetting that even that varṇāśrama identity is to be offered to Him.
Discussion Prompts
  • Share one routine activity — brushing teeth, commuting, paying bills — and discuss honestly whether it can be offered to Nārāyaṇa today, and what would have to change.
  • The verse says work should follow one's acquired svabhāva. Where do you and your partner disagree about whether someone should stay in their current varṇāśrama duty or change it in the name of bhakti?
  • Jīva Gosvāmī distinguishes offering fruits of work from svarūpa-siddhā bhakti where one is attached to hearing and chanting. Where do you locate yourself, and what would move you forward?
Role Play

Two students play a working gṛhastha and their visiting parent. The gṛhastha has just received a year-end bonus and announces they will keep only what is needed for the household's maintenance and offer the rest to Nārāyaṇa's service; the parent insists this is irresponsible toward the family. Each must argue from the verse's principle — kāyena vācā manasā... parasmai nārāyaṇāya — without slipping into either renunciation theatre or material proprietorship.

Objections & Responses
  • If I just relabel my ordinary job 'for Nārāyaṇa,' nothing actually changes — this is a psychological trick, not real spirituality.
    Prabhupāda anticipates this: the verse is not a mental relabel but a structural shift. You accept only the bare minimum for maintenance and offer the rest; you refuse duṣkarma even when convenient; and you gradually develop attraction to hearing and chanting. If those three shifts are absent, you are right — it is only a label. If they are present, karma-miśrā bhakti is genuinely transforming into pure bhakti.
  • Why must it be Nārāyaṇa specifically? Why not offer my work to 'the divine,' the universe, or my own higher Self?
    Because the verse names a person — nārāyaṇāya — and the whole tradition guards against the slide into impersonalism. An impersonal 'divine' has no will to please, no proprietorship over your work, and cannot receive an offering. Without a personal Supreme who owns everything and can be satisfied, samarpayet collapses into self-talk.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 2