FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.89.40

న ప్రద్యుమ్నో నానిరుద్ధో న రామో న చ కేశవ: । యస్య శేకు: పరిత్రాతుం కోఽన్యస్తదవితేశ్వర: ॥ ౪౦ ॥
na pradyumno nāniruddho
[na pradyumno naaniruddho]
na rāmo na ca keśavaḥ
[na raamo na cha keshavah]
yasya śekuḥ paritrātuṁ
[yasya shekuh paritraatum]
ko ’nyas tad-aviteśvaraḥ
[ko ’nyas tad-aviteshvarah]
na — not pradyumnaḥ — Pradyumna na — not aniruddhaḥ — Aniruddha na — not rāmaḥ — Balarāma na — not ca — also keśavaḥ — Kṛṣṇa yasya — whose (infants) śekuḥ — were able paritrātum — to save kaḥ — who anyaḥ — else tat — in this situation avitā — as a protector īśvaraḥ — capable .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na pradyumno nāniruddho
na
not
pradyumnaḥ
Pradyumna
na
not
aniruddhaḥ
Aniruddha
na rāmo na ca keśavaḥ
na
not
rāmaḥ
Balarāma
na
not
ca
also
keśavaḥ
Kṛṣṇa
yasya śekuḥ paritrātuṁ
yasya
whose (infants)
śekuḥ
were able
paritrātum
to save
kaḥ
who
anyaḥ
else
ko ’nyas tad-aviteśvaraḥ
tat
in this situation
avitā
as a protector
īśvaraḥ
capable .
  • keśavaḥ — Keśava (Kṛṣṇa)
    From keśa (hair) + va — slayer of Keśin, or 'long-haired one.' The brāhmaṇa names Kṛṣṇa among those who failed. Gauḍīyas read the verse as the rhetorical ceiling — beyond this no further insult is possible, and only revelation can answer.
  • paritrātum — to fully protect
    Infinitive of pari + √trai (to rescue). The strongest verb of rescue. The brāhmaṇa says: even Bhagavān could not paritrāṇa. The Bhāgavatam will show in verse 58 that Bhagavān withheld protection on purpose — for darśana.
  • anyaḥ — another
    Pronoun — 'who else?' The brāhmaṇa's rhetorical question. The Bhāgavatam answers: no other; only Bhagavān, on His own initiative, at His own time, for His own reason.
“When neither Pradyumna, Aniruddha, Rāma nor Keśava can save a person, who else can possibly protect him?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"When neither Pradyumna, Aniruddha, Rāma nor Keśava can save a person, who else can possibly protect him?
Commentary

"Who can protect he whom (yasya) Pradyumna, Aniruddha, Balarama or Krsna cannot protect?"

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

How can anyone else protect a person whom (yasya) Pradyumna and others cannot protect? Since the four are the Supreme Lord, and there is no other Supreme Lord, no one else can protect a person.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Balarāma is he who gives pleasure to the devotees by his prowess. Keśava is he who killed the great demon Keśī easily or is he who is directly the supreme Lord. The negative particle is repeated with each person to emphasize their inability to protect. Other than them, who is capable of protecting the child? He will be the protector here. Or what other protector of the child is there?

Concepts
Jiva

The brāhmaṇa's escalation: 'Not Pradyumna, not Aniruddha, not Rāma, not Keśava could save — who else can?' He names Keśava in the same breath, in Keśava's own city, with Keśava listening. The Bhāgavatam stages the maximum scandal so that the resolution can be maximally clear.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 89