Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.81.33
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
nūnam bata
—
certainly indeed
Two emphatic particles paired. Sudāmā's inference is delivered with certainty — not hypothesis but logical conclusion. The grammar marks the verse as a formal deduction.
-
durbhagasya śaśvat daridrasya
—
of an unfortunate one, always poverty-stricken
durbhaga (unfortunate) + śaśvat (always) + daridra (poor). The bhakta names his prior condition with unflinching accuracy. Dainya intact even amidst the new wealth — Gauḍīya's most prized continuity.
-
samṛddhi-hetuḥ
—
the cause of (this) prosperity
Compound: samṛddhi (prosperity) + hetu (cause). The verse's logical pivot — the unique cause. Sudāmā is doing causal inference, in proper Sanskrit logical form.
-
mahā-vibhūteḥ avalokataḥ
—
from the glance of Him who possesses the greatest opulences
mahā (great) + vibhūti (opulence) + avalokana (glance). Bhagavān's avalokana — His glance — is the cause. Gauḍīya note: the kaṭākṣa, the sidelong glance of Kṛṣṇa, is the recognized doorway through which all His mercy enters.
-
yadu-uttamasya
—
of the best of the Yadus
Compound: yadu (Yadu dynasty) + uttama (best). Sudāmā names Kṛṣṇa formally by His dynastic title. The intimate friend of Sāndīpani's ashram is the most exalted of the Yadus — the bhakta holds both registers at once.
The great opulence of this house and myself can come from no other than seeing the Lord.
Nūnam expresses certainly and bata expresses joy. This has arisen because of the glance of Kṛṣṇa. Otherwise (anyat) there is no cause of my wealth, since I am unfortunate and always poor. Instead of anyat sometimes anyaḥ is seen. And Kṛṣṇa is always filled with complete śakti in the form of Lakṣmī (mahā-vibhūteḥ).
Nūnam expresses certainly or conjecture and bata expresses joy. His condition (etat) is described. I am unfortunate, without wealth etc. and always poor. The cause of prosperity is the glance of the Lord who is most excellent, appearing in the Yadu dynasty to manifest unlimited powers (yadūttamasya), and who has great wealth and power (mahā-vibhūteḥ). Or the cause of increase of great wealth (mahā-vibhūteḥ) is his glance. Without that glance, nothing occurs. I am devoid of good fortune without his glance, but suddenly it is possible by his glance.
A blind man whose sight returns reasons: there is no other source of light I have known but the sun; therefore the sun has risen on me. Sudāmā reasons: there is no source of wealth in my life-history but Kṛṣṇa's glance; therefore the glance has fallen on me. The bhakta's logic terminates in Bhagavān, not anywhere else.
In the Gauḍīya account of Bilvamaṅgala Ṭhākura (Līlā-śuka), having gouged out his own eyes to stop their wandering, he reasoned that whatever guidance reached him in the forest could only be Kṛṣṇa's. Sudāmā's logic here is identical: with all other causes ruled out, the only remaining cause of any good in a poor brāhmaṇa's life is Bhagavān's avalokana. Gauḍīyas treat this as the bhakta's standard inference.
My note
Source: vedabase.io