Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.80.6
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
sakhā
—
friend (named Sudāmā)
Sakhya — the third of the five rasas. Sudāmā's relationship with Kṛṣṇa is named here as friendship, not service — a higher, more equal mood. Gauḍīyas treat this verse as the formal opening of a sakhya-rasa episode in dvārakā-līlā.
-
brahma
—
in the Vedas
Locative use — brahma here means the Vedic scriptures (Veda-brahma), not impersonal Brahman. Sudāmā's learning is śāstric, not Advaitin. Gauḍīyas insist on this distinction to keep the verse from being Māyāvāda-aligned.
-
vit - tamaḥ
—
most learned
Compound: vit (knower) + tama (superlative). Sudāmā is the supreme knower of the Vedas — and yet Kṛṣṇa is what completes him. Knowledge without bhakti is incomplete; this verse is the demonstration.
-
viraktaḥ
—
detached
From vi-√raj. Vairāgya — not poverty-by-accident but freedom from sense-objects. Sudāmā's poverty is consonant with his vairāgya; Gauḍīyas note the Bhāgavata standard pairing of jñāna and vairāgya as bhakti's natural companions (SB 1.2.7).
-
praśānta
—
peaceful
Past participle of pra-√śam. Praśānta-ātmā — a mind at rest. The interior counterpart of jita-indriyaḥ — the senses subdued outside, the mind quiet inside. Both together describe the brāhmaṇa Kṛṣṇa chooses as friend.
-
jita
—
conquered
Past participle of √ji. The verse pairs viraktaḥ (detachment) with jita-indriyaḥ (sense-conquest) — vairāgya doubled outside-in. Gauḍīyas cite this pair as Sudāmā's qualification for sakhya.
There was a brāhmaṇa named Śrīdāmā, a friend of Kṛṣṇa who is an ocean of good qualities and mercy, attractive to all minds. Bṛhat-sahasra-nāma says śṛidāmaraṅka-bhaktārthaṁ bhūmyānītendra-vaibhavaḥ: Kṛṣṇa gave the wealth of Indra to earth for his starving devotee Śrīdāmā. He was not only a brāhmaṇa but the best knower of the meaning of the Vedas (vittamaḥ). Since he was fixed in bhakti to the Lord, he was detached from sense enjoyment. Why? He was most peaceful because his mind was devoid of lust and lamentation. Why? His senses were controlled.
A lamp can stand in a dark hut: Sudāmā is poor in the outer room but lit within. Kṛṣṇa's friendship has chosen the smallest, most untended cottage to keep its light — the Lord is no respecter of square footage.
Vidura, born of a maidservant and considered unfit for the Kuru throne, was nonetheless Kṛṣṇa's most cherished Mahābhārata friend — the Lord stayed at his hut, ate his banana peels in Duryodhana's place, and gave him the teachings of SB 3.
Like Sudāmā, Vidura unites brahma-vit-tama qualities with social and material poverty. Gauḍīyas pair them as twin proofs that Kṛṣṇa's sakhya selects on the basis of bhakti, not station.
When Sārvabhauma, the great Vedānta scholar, surrendered to Mahāprabhu, the Lord recognized in him a brahma-vit-tama who had previously lacked only the personalist key. Mahāprabhu's friendship with him was instant and total.
The parallel is exact: brahma-vit-tama plus subdued senses plus a heart open to the Person — Kṛṣṇa's sakhya finds such a one and does not let go.
My note
Source: vedabase.io