FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.6.8

విబుధ్య తాం బాలకమారికాగ్రహం చరాచరాత్మా స నిమీలితేక్షణ: । అనన్తమారోపయదఙ్కమన్తకం యథోరగం సుప్తమబుద్ధిరజ్జుధీ: ॥ ౮ ॥
vibudhya tāṁ bālaka-mārikā-grahaṁ
[vibudhya taam baalaka-maarikaa-graham]
carācarātmā sa nimīlitekṣaṇaḥ
[charaacharaatmaa sa nimeelitekshanah]
anantam āropayad aṅkam antakaṁ
[anantam aaropayad ankam antakam]
yathoragaṁ suptam abuddhi-rajju-dhīḥ
[yathoragam suptam abuddhi-rajju-dheeh]
vibudhya — understanding tām — her (Pūtanā) bālaka - mārikā - graham — a witch very expert in killing small babies cara - acara - ātmā — Kṛṣṇa, the all-pervading Supersoul saḥ — He nimīlita - īkṣaṇaḥ — closed His eyes anantam — the Unlimited āropayat — she placed aṅkam — on her lap antakam — for her own annihilation yathā — as uragam — a snake suptam — while sleeping abuddhi — a person who has no intelligence rajju - dhīḥ — one who thinks a snake to be a rope .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vibudhya tāṁ bālaka-mārikā-grahaṁ
vibudhya
understanding
tām
her (Pūtanā)
bālaka - mārikā - graham
a witch very expert in killing small babies
carācarātmā sa nimīlitekṣaṇaḥ
cara - acara - ātmā
Kṛṣṇa, the all-pervading Supersoul
saḥ
He
nimīlita - īkṣaṇaḥ
closed His eyes
anantam
the Unlimited
anantam āropayad aṅkam antakaṁ
āropayat
she placed
aṅkam
on her lap
antakam
for her own annihilation
yathoragaṁ suptam abuddhi-rajju-dhīḥ
yathā
as
uragam
a snake
suptam
while sleeping
abuddhi
a person who has no intelligence
rajju - dhīḥ
one who thinks a snake to be a rope .
  • anantam — the Unlimited
    Accusative of ananta — He who has no end. The verse pointedly uses this name as Pūtanā places Him on her lap: she thinks she is handling something small and finite; she is in fact handling the limitless. Acintya-bhedābheda corollary: the Unlimited can voluntarily appear as a finite infant without ceasing to be Unlimited.
  • antakam — for her own annihilation
    Accusative — 'the ender.' Sound-near to anantam by deliberate pairing in the verse: the Ananta is her antaka. The play of letters carries the doctrine.
  • rajju - dhīḥ — one who thinks (a snake to be) a rope
    Compound — rajju (rope) + dhī (intelligence). The classical Vedānta example of mis-cognition appears here inverted: the Advaitin example treats the rope as truth and the snake as illusion; here the snake is the truth and 'rope' is the deluded reading. Gauḍīya commentators love this inversion — it warns against any philosophy that calls the dangerous thing harmless because it has decided in advance that all is one.
  • cara - acara - ātmā — the Supersoul of all moving and non-moving beings
    Compound — cara (moving) + acara (non-moving) + ātmā (Self). Even as the apparent infant, Kṛṣṇa is the Paramātmā of every entity, including Pūtanā herself. The very life she will lose is His to take, because it was His to give.
  • nimīlita - īkṣaṇaḥ — with His eyes closed
    Compound — nimīlita (closed) + īkṣaṇa (eye). The līlā-touch: Kṛṣṇa pretends fear, closing His eyes, to let the demon think the plan is working. Vaiṣṇava ācāryas read this as ānanda-līlā — the Lord enacts a kind of stage-acting so that the destruction may unfold as pastime, not bare execution.
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the all-pervading Supersoul, lying on the bed, understood that Pūtanā, a witch who was expert in killing small children, had come to kill Him. Therefore, as if afraid of her, Kṛṣṇa closed His eyes. Thus Pūtanā took upon her lap Him who was to be her own annihilation, just as an unintelligent person places a sleeping snake on his lap, thinking the snake to be a rope.

In this verse there are two perplexities. When Kṛṣṇa saw that Pūtanā had come to kill Him, He thought that since this woman was present with motherly affection, although artificial, He had to offer her a benediction. Therefore He looked at her with a little perplexity and then closed His eyes again. Pūtanā Rākṣasī also was perplexed. She was not intelligent enough to understand that she was taking a sleeping snake on her lap; she thought the snake to be an ordinary rope. The two words antakam and anantam are contradictory. Because of not being intelligent, Pūtanā thought that she could kill her antakam, the source of her annihilation; but because He is ananta, unlimited, no one can kill Him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the all-pervading Supersoul, lying on the bed, understood that Pūtanā, a witch who was expert in killing small children, had come to kill Him. Therefore, as if afraid of her, Kṛṣṇa closed His eyes. Thus Pūtanā took upon her lap Him who was to be her own annihilation, just as an unintelligent person places a sleeping snake on his lap, thinking the snake to be a rope.
Commentary

Here is shown an opportunity for the Lord’s power of omniscience (sarvajnata sakti) to render service at the time of approaching evil. Though Krsna could understand Purana’s identity, he lay there with his eyes closed like a normal child. Why did he close his eyes? To show his fearfulness as a small child, to avoid seeing such an inauspicious person, to avoid making the violence become auspicious through the touch of his auspicious glance, to avoid shame of killing a woman acting as a mother, and to avoid seeing the inauspiciousness of Putana’s death. Then Putana placed him in her lap. He is called ananta, without end, and antakam, he who brings about the end. This was an opportunity for his destructive energy (samhara sakti) to operate. That person who is without limit in all space and time, Putana held on her lap. Antakam and ananta are also contradictory words to express this wonder, adbhuta rasa. As a foolish person holds a sleeping snake, thinking it is a rope, so Putana foolishly held Krsna, thinking him an ordinary, helpless child.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Understanding she was a killer of children, Paramātmā closed his lotus eyes since he displayed all actions suitable to a small child. He did this in order to show fear of her by acting as a small child, in order to avoid seeing such an evil person, in order to avoid overpowering her with his glance, in order to hide his embarrassment at on killing a woman even though she would be greatly benefited--since he was an ocean of good qualities-- and in order to avoid seeing the ghastliness of her death. She placed him on her lap, though he was Ananta, who could kill persons like her, like a person who thinks something is a rope but which is the opposite (abuddhi).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

She was a demon killer of children (bala-graham). The word bāla-grahaḥ is not in the feminine since it belongs to a class of words which retain their original gender when used as an adjective (even if the person is female.) He had his eyes closed because he was very small and afraid. Or she would not be able to see his eyes directly. Or since he was an ocean of good qualities he was ashamed of killing her, even though it was beneficial for her. Or he could bear to see her killed, since she was wearing clothing like Rohiṇī.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Atma Nigraha (Self-control)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)
Related verses
Concepts
Paramatma
Like Pūtanā mistaking a sleeping snake for a rope, we keep clasping what will undo us — only Kṛṣṇa, the ananta, is safe to embrace.
Practical Applications
  • Name one 'rope' you are presently nursing in your lap — a habit, ambition, or relationship — and ask honestly whether it is in fact antakam, a slow annihilation dressed as comfort.
  • Refuse the artificial affection that masks viṣaya: when someone or something offers sweetness with a hidden agenda, do not return the embrace, even politely.
  • Before sleep tonight, place on your 'lap' only Kṛṣṇa — chant His names with closed eyes, as the infant Kṛṣṇa Himself did, surrendering the day to the ananta who cannot be killed.

Pūtanā lifting baby Kṛṣṇa onto her lap is the fool who picks up a coiled cobra in the dark and lets it lie in his cloth, certain it is the rope he dropped. Every soul that hugs a worldly pleasure to its chest does the same — mistaking antakam, that which will end us, for a comfort.

Aghāsura swallowing the cowherd boys

Later in this same canto (SB 10.12), the python-demon Aghāsura opens his vast pink mouth and the cowherd boys, mistaking it for a beautiful mountain cave, walk in laughing. The 'cave' is in fact death.

Pūtanā in 10.6.8 makes the same kind of error in reverse: she thinks she has placed a target on her lap; she has actually placed her own antaka. Whoever does not see Kṛṣṇa for who He is — whether by demon-eyes or by attached eyes — will end up handling Him as though He were something else.

Hiraṇyakaśipu and the pillar

The asura-king, sure that no being could touch him, mocked Prahlāda's claim that Hari was everywhere — even in this pillar? (SB 7.8). He struck the pillar; out came Nṛsiṁha. He had been standing all along beside his antaka, calling it furniture.

Kṛṣṇa on Pūtanā's lap is the same secret in miniature: the demon clasps the destroyer and calls Him 'baby.'

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 6