Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.54.19-20
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
amarṣī
—
intolerant
From a- + √mṛṣ. The same family as 'amarṣa' (sañcāri-bhāva of impatience). In bhakti-rasa, intolerance can be holy (kṛṣṇa-aparādha-asahanam, v. 6 above); in asurika hands, it is poison.
-
pratijajñe
—
he swore
Perfect of prati-√jñā. A pratijñā binds even the gods; here Rukmī binds himself uselessly, since he cannot fulfill the impossible promise of killing the Unkillable.
-
mahā-bāhuḥ
—
mighty-armed
Mahā (great) + bāhu (arm). A standard epithet for warriors — but the Bhāgavatam reserves its strongest use for Kṛṣṇa Himself (cf. v. 33 below where Rukmiṇī addresses Him so). The repetition strips the title from Rukmī and re-grants it to the Lord.
-
kuṇḍinam
—
the city of Kuṇḍina
Capital of Vidarbha — Rukmiṇī and Rukmī's birthplace (cf. SB 10.52). Vyāsa names it deliberately; the vow about Kuṇḍina becomes the geography of Rukmī's defeat: he will build a new city (Bhojakaṭa, v. 51) to keep the letter of the vow while violating its spirit.
-
satyam
—
in truth
From √as ('to be'). The most loaded word in the Sanskrit lexicon. Rukmī swears 'in truth' to do what is metaphysically impossible — to fight the Person who IS satya. The Bhāgavatam's irony is theological, not just dramatic.
Rukmī spoke these angry words and then set off to pursue Lord Kṛṣṇa, as described in the following verses.
Rukmi, being intolerant and very angry, took up his bow. He said, "Without killing Krsna and bringing back Rukmini I will not enter Kundina." Another meaning is "Not having recognized Krsna and liberated Rukmini, I will not enter Kundina."
To show his great courage he made a fitting promise to all the kings who were listening while he raised his arms (mahā-bahūḥ). He already was wearing his armor. Without killing Kṛṣṇa in battle, without him playing some trick, and without bringing back Rukmiṇī, I will not enter Kuṇḍina. This was because he could not show his face to the citizens if he were defeated. This was like a prediction of the future.
Like a man who has bolted the door of his own house with a vow he cannot retract, Rukmī swears in front of the kings — and his oath becomes the cage that builds Bhojakaṭa. Pratijñā made in anger, not in dharma, is a self-imposed exile.
Bhīṣma's lifelong celibacy began as a son's gift to a father's desire — a vow undertaken in love. It cost him a kingdom, but it gave him Kṛṣṇa's personal attendance at his death-bed of arrows.
Rukmī's vow is the inversion: undertaken in pride, against Kṛṣṇa, to recover what was never his. Vows in the Bhāgavatam are weighed not by their severity but by their orientation. Bhīṣma's pratijñā bound him to Kṛṣṇa; Rukmī's pratijñā bound him away from Him.
My note
Source: vedabase.io