Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.33.30
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
anīśvaraḥ
—
one who is not a controller
An (not) + īśvara. The technical opposite of v.29's īśvarāṇām. Gauḍīyas: this single antithesis is the chapter's pastoral pivot — by ontology not by moralism, you are anīśvara, so do not imitate.
-
mauḍhyāt
—
out of foolishness
Mauḍhya = bewilderment, stupidity. From √muh (to be deluded). The same root as moha. Gauḍīyas: imitation is not boldness but mauḍhya — confusion about one's own status. Bhakti begins with knowing one is not Bhagavān.
-
arudraḥ abdhijam viṣam
—
non-Rudra (drinking) the poison generated from the ocean
Sub-compound from contiguous synonyms. The Sāgara-manthana frame: only Śiva could drink the hālāhala. Gauḍīyas: the analogy is doctrinally precise — only īśvara handles what destroys anīśvara.
-
vinaśyati
—
he is destroyed
Vi + √naś (to perish). Total destruction. Gauḍīyas: Śuka does not soften — the consequence of imitation is vināśa, not mere reprimand. The strong verb is the chapter's safeguard against sahajiyā readings.
Lord Śiva, or Rudra, once drank an ocean of poison, and the result was that an attractive blue mark appeared on his neck. But if we were to drink even a drop of such poison, we would die immediately. Just as we should not imitate this pastime of Śiva’s, we should not imitate Lord Kṛṣṇa’s activities with the gopīs. We should clearly understand that while Lord Kṛṣṇa certainly descends to demonstrate religious principles, He also descends to demonstrate that He is God and we are not. That also must be demonstrated. The Lord enjoys with His internal potency and thus attracts us to the spiritual platform. We should not try to imitate Kṛṣṇa, for we will suffer severely.
The objection would be: "If the devatas commit adharma then others, following the principle of whatever great men do others will follow, will also commit acts of adharma." The answer is: "The lowly jiva, seeing the acts of the devas, should not even think of committing sinful acts. Doing so brings their destruction, just as any person other than Siva who attempts to drink halahala poison will immediately die. On the other hand, when Siva drinks the poison, he becomes more beautiful with a blue throat."
But this is not so for others. One should not at all perform acts that transgress dharma which these powerful beings perform. The prefix sam in samācaret indicates forbiddance. One should not do at all, at any time (jātu), not even in the mind (manasā), what to speak of using words or performing the act! This is certain (hi). One is destroyed completely (vi—naśyati), with suffering in this life and the next, if one acts in this because of not knowing that one is not qualified with the powers of the great īśvaras. An example is given concerning foolishness as a cause in eating. If one were not foolish, one would not try to consume the poisonous ocean. One will immediately die from the intense poison of the kālakuṭa. Śiva however does not die but rather attains glory by showing his special power. Thus Śiva is famous for his blue throat.
Lord Śiva drank an ocean of poison and got only a blue throat — beautiful. If you or I drink one drop, we die. The same act has opposite outcomes because the actors are ontologically different. Imitating Kṛṣṇa's līlā is drinking the ocean while being a mortal — fatal foolishness, not advanced devotion.
The sahajiyā schools attempt to enact rāsa-līlā among themselves — taking the gopīs as model for human sexual practice. Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura and Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī repeatedly warned: this is precisely the foolishness v.30 names. The result is not advanced bhakti but spiritual death.
Gauḍīyas treat this verse as the standing red line: rāsa is for hearing, never for imitating. Read it; do not perform it. The Lord shows that He is God and we are not — that too is part of the pastime's mercy.
My note
Source: vedabase.io