Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.14.9
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
anāryam
—
ignoble (behavior)
From a- + ārya. The same word Kṛṣṇa uses to Arjuna in BG 2.2 (anārya-juṣṭam). Brahmā now applies it to himself — the highest demigod confesses anārya-conduct. Bhakti's first sign is honest self-naming.
-
māyi-māyini
—
to the master of all magicians of illusion
Compound: māyin (illusionist) + māyin again — 'illusionist of illusionists'. Kṛṣṇa is the source of māyā and therefore not bewildered by it. The grammar itself is acintya-bhedābheda: same word doubled, two distinct referents.
-
para-ātmani
—
to the Supreme Soul
Compound: para (supreme) + ātman. Distinct from jīva-ātmā (Brahmā himself) and from brahman (the effulgence). The Gauḍīya threefold realization — Brahman, Paramātmā, Bhagavān — is contained in Brahmā's address.
-
arciḥ agnau
—
a spark in fire
Phrase: arcis (flame, spark) + agni (fire). The Upaniṣadic image (Muṇḍaka 2.1.1) of spark and fire — same essence, qualitative oneness, quantitative difference. Gauḍīyas read it as the standing illustration of bhedābheda.
-
ātma-vaibhavam
—
Your own power
Compound: ātman (Self) + vaibhava (opulence, glory). What Brahmā tried to test. The Bhāgavata's later catalogues of Kṛṣṇa's six vaibhavas (aiśvarya, vīrya, yaśas, śrī, jñāna, vairāgya) are anticipated here as the unsounded depths.
A great fire produces many sparks, which are insignificant in comparison to it. Indeed, if one of the small sparks were to try to burn the original fire, the attempt would be simply ludicrous. Similarly, even the creator of the entire universe, Lord Brahmā, is an insignificant spark of the potency of God, and therefore Brahmā’s attempt to bewilder the Supreme Lord was certainly ludicrous. Brahmā here addresses Lord Kṛṣṇa as īśa, which indicates that Kṛṣṇa is not only the supreme master of everyone but is also specifically the master of Brahmā, who creates the universe directly under the guidance of the Lord and who, indeed, is born directly from the Lord’s own body. Brahmā felt ashamed of his impudent attempt at deluding Lord Kṛṣṇa, and he was therefore perfectly willing to be punished or forgiven by the Lord, according to His decision. If Lord Kṛṣṇa does not mercifully punish His devotees when they act improperly, their foolishness will simply increase and gradually completely overwhelm their devotional sentiments. Therefore Lord Kṛṣṇa kindly disciplines His devotees and maintains them on the progressive path back home, back to Godhead.
Brahma speaks this verse to express his repentance, thinking that rather the perform devotional activities he has simply committed great offense to Krsna. The word arya means a worthy person or one with wisdom. "Oh lord, see my anaryam, my bad conduct and foolishness. You may give suitable punishment or forgiveness, otherwise persons like me will commit further impropriety. What was the bad conduct? You are the source of all (adya), you are my father, and I have committed offense against you, when you were enjoying lunch with your friends in the forest. What was the foolishness? You have immeasurable powers (ananta). You are the soul of all souls (paramatma). Having committed offense against you with such position, I have shown my foolishness. I have shown ultimate foolishness in attempting to fool the bewilderer of all those who bewilder. I desired to see your powers by invoking my powers of illusion. But beside you, I am insignificant, just like a spark which emanates from a huge flame and tries to burn the flame."
In this verse Brahmā asks forgiveness for his offense, making himself an example of the futility of trying to know the Lord. Āryam means “being well-bred.” That includes having wisdom. See my foul nature, foolishness (anāryam)! By this he reveals his nature. As a low-bred person I have committed a foolish act against you, my master (īśa), my father (ādye). As a fool I have committed an act against the soul of all including me (parātmani), against the person with unlimited powers (anante). Not knowing all of this, I spread my māyā over you, the master of māyā (māyi-māyini). This makes me the greatest fool. Why? I wanted to see your powers. Previously it was stated that he wanted to see some other sweet power of the Lord (SB 10.13.15). By spreading māyā to see your powers I am even more (kiyān) of a rascal. An example is given to show the extent of his low mentality. I am like a spark in a great fire. Or, out great wretchedness he says “I wanted see my own powers by spreading my māyā.”
Brahmā reveals his offensive actions. O lord (īśa)! You are my master. Furthermore you have unlimited glories (ananta). Furthermore you are my father (ādye). Furthermore you are the supreme guru (parātmani) since you reveal the Vedas in my heart. You are the master of māyā. You are Kṛṣṇa (tvayi). Calling him the distributor of māyā would be unsuitable. The order of terms is with increasing significance. By spreading my māyā I desired to see your greatness (ātma-vaibhavam). ambhojanma-janis tad-antara-gato māyārbhakasyeśitur draṣṭuṁ maṣju mahitvam anyad api tad-vatsān ito vatsapān nītvānyatra kurūdvahāntaradadhāt khe ’vasthito yaḥ purā dṛṣṭvāghāsura-mokṣaṇaṁ prabhavataḥ prāptaḥ paraṁ vismayam O Mahārāja Parīkṣit! Brahmā, who was born from Viṣṇu’s lotus navel, who resides in the sky, and who had become astonished on seeing Kṛṣṇa liberate Aghāsura, came to Vṛndāvana. Taking the boys and calves to another place in order to see some other power of the Lord, who was a boy with bewildering power, Brahmā then disappeared. SB 10.13.15 Hi indicates certainty or lamentation. Though this will not be an offense to you, I am such a low person (kiyān).
A spark leaps from the fire and dares to try to burn the fire that birthed it. Brahmā's confession is exactly this image: he, born of Kṛṣṇa's navel-lotus, tried to bewilder Kṛṣṇa with his māyā. The image he chooses — arciḥ agnau, a small flame in the great fire — is acintya-bhedābheda in one sentence: same substance, infinite difference.
Brahmā's own son-of-grace Hiraṇyakaśipu won a boon and immediately turned it against Viṣṇu, presuming his power could neutralize the Lord. Nṛsiṁha tore him open at the threshold (SB 7.8).
In this chapter Brahmā commits the same offense in a milder key — extending māyā to test the Lord — and is granted what Hiraṇyakaśipu was not: the chance to apologize. The difference is bhakti-bhāva: the spark recognizes the fire.
My note
Source: vedabase.io