FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.11.23

ఉత్థాతవ్యమితోఽస్మాభిర్గోకులస్య హితైషిభి: । ఆయాన్త్యత్ర మహోత్పాతా బాలానాం నాశహేతవ: ॥ ౨౩ ॥
utthātavyam ito ’smābhir
[utthaatavyam ito ’smaabhir]
gokulasya hitaiṣibhiḥ
[gokulasya hitaishibhih]
āyānty atra mahotpātā
[aayaanty atra mahotpaataa]
bālānāṁ nāśa-hetavaḥ
[baalaanaam naasha-hetavah]
utthātavyam — now this place should be left itaḥ — from here, from Gokula asmābhiḥ — by all of us gokulasya — of this place, Gokula hita - eṣibhiḥ — by persons who desire good for this place āyānti — are happening atra — here mahā - utpātāḥ — many great disturbances bālānām — for the boys like Rāma and Kṛṣṇa nāśa - hetavaḥ — having the definite purpose of killing Them .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
utthātavyam ito ’smābhir
utthātavyam
now this place should be left
itaḥ
from here, from Gokula
gokulasya hitaiṣibhiḥ
asmābhiḥ
by all of us
gokulasya
of this place, Gokula
hita - eṣibhiḥ
by persons who desire good for this place
āyānty atra mahotpātā
āyānti
are happening
atra
here
mahā - utpātāḥ
many great disturbances
bālānāṁ nāśa-hetavaḥ
bālānām
for the boys like Rāma and Kṛṣṇa
nāśa - hetavaḥ
having the definite purpose of killing Them .
  • utthātavyam — this place should be left
    Verbal adjective of ut-sthā (to rise up, depart) — 'is to be risen-from.' The word carries the connotation of leaving behind, not running from. Gauḍīya teaching: relocation for bhakti is an ut-sthāna (rising), not a palāyana (flight).
  • hita - eṣibhiḥ — by those who desire the good
    Hita-eṣin — seeker of welfare. The instrumental plural marks the agents: those who genuinely want Gokula's welfare are precisely the ones who must leave it. Gauḍīya paradox: real love for a place sometimes requires departing from it, when the place has become unsafe for what matters.
  • mahā - utpātāḥ — great disturbances
    The same word from verses 3 and 21. The repetition is structural: the utpātas the gopas first mistook for portents have, by the council's discernment, been re-read as deliberate assault. Gauḍīya teaching: the same external events reveal different meanings as one's discernment matures.
  • bālānām — for the boys
    Genitive plural — 'of the boys.' Specifically Rāma and Kṛṣṇa, the protected. Gauḍīya theology: even when Kṛṣṇa is svayaṁ-bhagavān, His Vraja-līlā permits Him to be 'protected' by His devotees. This is bhakta-vaśya's most touching aspect — He accepts being kept safe by those who love Him.
  • nāśa - hetavaḥ — having destruction as their cause
    Nāśa — destruction; hetu — cause, motive. The utpātas are not accidents; they have a hetu, an intentional source. Gauḍīya commentators: this is the bridge to Upananda's reasoning. Disturbances with intent require strategic response (relocation), not merely better defense in place.
He said: My dear friends the cowherd men, in order to do good to this place, Gokula, we should leave it, because so many disturbances are always occurring here, just for the purpose of killing Rāma and Kṛṣṇa.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He said: My dear friends the cowherd men, in order to do good to this place, Gokula, we should leave it, because so many disturbances are always occurring here, just for the purpose of killing Rāma and Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

"Thinking of the welfare of all the inhabitants of Vraja (gokulasya hitaisibhih), we should move."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

We should go elsewhere. Why? We think of the benefit of all the people of Gokula. Great disturbances which may cause the destruction of the young boys take place. He mentions boys in general rather than Kṛṣṇa so that Nanda would not feel Kṛṣṇa alone was the cause of moving. Another version has prajānām (all the people). Another version has vrajānām (people of Vraja). In reality by looking after the welfare of Kṛṣṇa all others’ welfare would prosper. While describing the pain of the disturbances to all the people, he showed affection for Kṛṣṇa, who had come there out of curiosity, by putting him on his lap, and spoke of the past incidents concerning Kṛṣṇa.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

We should go elsewhere. Why? We think of the benefit of all the people of Gokula. By giving benefit to Kṛṣṇa everyone benefited. Though the real goal was Kṛṣṇa, as explained later, Upananda mentioned danger to all the boys since they would go quickly if all the cowherds became frightened. Or if Kṛṣṇa was in danger, it followed that all the boys were in danger. Another version has prajānām instead of bālānām. The meaning is the same. Another version has vrajānām. If there was danger to Kṛṣṇa, the life of all beings in Vraja, everyone in Vraja would be destroyed.

Related values
Dana (Charity / Generosity)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Vinaya (Humility / Modesty)Satya (Truthfulness)Pratijna (Vow-keeping / Sacred Resolve)Adambhitva (Non-hypocrisy / Authenticity)Atma Nigraha (Self-control)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Bhakti (Devotion)
Related verses
When a place becomes hostile to Kṛṣṇa-conscious life, true daya for the community is to relocate — protect the shelter of the devotees, not the comfort of the spot.
Practical Applications
  • Notice one environment in your life that keeps producing disturbances to your sādhana, and decide today what concrete step Nanda-like resolve would take.
  • Speak to your family or close devotee circle about a 'Gokula-shift' you have been postponing — a move, a job change, a cut friendship — for the sake of Kṛṣṇa's shelter.
  • Refuse the sentimental attachment to a comfortable setting when it is quietly endangering the bhakti of those you are responsible for.

When termites enter the granary, the wise farmer does not negotiate with them — he moves the grain. Upananda counsels that Gokula be left because the place itself has become a stage for assassins of Rāma and Kṛṣṇa; protecting bhakti means relocating from the spot the asuras target, not arguing them out of it. Daya for the community is sometimes departure.

The Pāṇḍavas' wanderings

Through the Mahābhārata, Yudhiṣṭhira and his brothers repeatedly relocate when a place becomes hostile to their dharma — leaving Hastināpura for Vāraṇāvata, leaving Vāraṇāvata after the lac-house, leaving the forest for thirteen years, leaving even Virāṭa's court when their incognito ended. The pattern: protect the dharma-bearing souls; the place can be replaced.

In Gauḍīya tradition, the Six Gosvāmīs left Bengal and Orissa to settle in Vraja under Caitanya's instruction. Place-shift in service of bhakti is part of the sampradāya's DNA. Upananda's counsel in this verse is the first such relocation in Kṛṣṇa's own līlā — the seed of the principle.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 11