Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.1.4
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
nivṛtta
—
released from
Past participle of ni-vṛt, 'to turn away.' Not 'repressed' or 'denied' — turned around, the gaze pointed elsewhere. Material thirst doesn't die by suppression; it goes nivṛtta when kṛṣṇa-kathā becomes the more attractive object.
-
tarṣaiḥ
—
lust, material activities, thirst
Instrumental plural of tarṣa, 'thirst.' Gauḍīya reading: not just sexual lust but the entire thirst-economy of the conditioned soul — for recognition, security, position. Nivṛtta-tarṣa names the qualified hearer; the rest of us hear while still being qualified, and the medicine works during the listening.
-
bhava-auṣadhāt
—
which is the right medicine for the material disease
Bhava = repeated material existence; auṣadha = medicine. Compound is ablative, 'from this medicine.' Kṛṣṇa-kathā is here named diagnostically: not entertainment, not literature, but a specific remedy for a specific disease — saṁsāra-roga.
-
uttamaśloka
—
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
Uttama (highest) + śloka (verse, fame). One whose fame is celebrated in the highest verses — a name reserved in the Bhāgavatam for Bhagavān as the subject of paramparā praise. Not 'a divine being' but the particular Person whom the śāstras have always spoken.
-
guṇa-anuvādāt
—
from describing such activities
Anuvāda = repeating after, recounting in the disciplic line. The medicine is potent precisely because it is anuvāda — relayed, not invented. The speaker repeats what was heard; that repetition is the channel.
-
paśu-ghnāt
—
either a butcher or one who is killing his own personal existence
Paśu (animal) + ghna (slayer). Prabhupāda glosses doubly: a literal butcher (with no interest in the soul) or a self-butcher (the human form was given for hearing Bhagavān; refusing it kills the purpose of the body). The word is mercy compressed into one syllable.
In India it is the practice among the general populace to hear about Kṛṣṇa, either from Bhagavad-gītā or from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, in order to gain relief from the disease of repeated birth and death. Although India is now fallen, when there is a message that someone will speak about Bhagavad-gītā or Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, thousands of people still gather to hear. This verse indicates, however, that such recitation of Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam must be done by persons completely freed from material desires ( nivṛtta-tarṣaiḥ ). Everyone within this material world, beginning from Brahmā down to the insignificant ant, is full of material desires for sense enjoyment, and everyone is busy in sense gratification, but when thus engaged one cannot fully understand the value of kṛṣṇa-kathā, either in the form of Bhagavad-gītā or in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. If we hear the glories of the Supreme Personality of Godhead from liberated persons, this hearing will certainly free us from the bondage of material activities, but hearing Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam spoken by a professional reciter cannot actually help us achieve liberation. Kṛṣṇa-kathā is very simple. In Bhagavad-gītā it is said that Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As He Himself explains, mattaḥ parataraṁ nānyat kiñcid asti dhanañjaya: “O Arjuna, there is no truth superior to Me.” ( Bg. 7.7 ) Simply by understanding this fact — that Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead — one can become a liberated person. But, especially in this age, because people are interested in hearing Bhagavad-gītā from unscrupulous persons who depart from the simple presentation of Bhagavad-gītā and distort it for their personal satisfaction, they fail to derive the real benefit. There are big scholars, politicians, philosophers and scientists who speak on Bhagavad-gītā in their own polluted way, and people in general hear from them, being uninterested in hearing the glories of the Supreme Personality of Godhead from a devotee. A devotee is one who has no other motive for reciting Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam than to serve the Lord. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu has therefore advised us to hear the glories of the Lord from a realized person ( bhāgavata paro diya bhāgavata sthane ). Unless one is personally a realized soul in the science of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, a neophyte should not approach him to hear about the Lord, for this is strictly forbidden by Śrīla Sanātana Gosvāmī, who quotes from the Padma Purāṇa: avaiṣṇava-mukhodgīrṇaṁ pūtaṁ hari-kathāmṛtam śravaṇaṁ naiva kartavyaṁ sarpocchiṣṭaṁ yathā payaḥ One should avoid hearing from a person not situated in Vaiṣṇava behavior. A Vaiṣṇava is nivṛtta-tṛṣṇa; that is, he has no material purpose, for his only purpose is to preach Kṛṣṇa consciousness. So-called scholars, philosophers and politicians exploit the importance of Bhagavad-gītā by distorting its meaning for their own purposes. Therefore this verse warns that kṛṣṇa-kathā should be recited by a person who is nivṛtta-tṛṣṇa. Śukadeva Gosvāmī epitomizes the proper reciter for Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, and Parīkṣit Mahārāja, who purposefully left his kingdom and family prior to meeting death, epitomizes the person fit to hear it. A qualified reciter of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam gives the right medicine ( bhavauṣadhi ) for the conditioned souls. The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is therefore trying to train qualified preachers to recite Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and Bhagavad-gītā throughout the entire world, so that people in general in all parts of the world may take advantage of this movement and thus be relieved of the threefold miseries of material existence. The instructions of Bhagavad-gītā and the descriptions of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam are so pleasing that almost anyone suffering from the threefold miseries of material existence will desire to hear the glories of the Lord from these books and thus benefit on the path of liberation. Two classes of men, however, will never be interested in hearing the message of Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam — those who are determined to commit suicide and those determined to kill cows and other animals for the satisfaction of their own tongues. Although such persons may make a show of hearing Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam at a Bhāgavata-saptāha, this is but another creation of the karmīs, who cannot derive any benefit from such a performance. The word paśu-ghnāt is important in this connection. Paśu-ghna means “butcher.” Persons fond of performing ritualistic ceremonies for elevation to the higher planetary systems must offer sacrifices ( yajñas ) by killing animals. Lord Buddhadeva therefore rejected the authority of the Vedas because his mission was to stop animal sacrifices, which are recommended in Vedic ritualistic ceremonies nindasi yajña-vidher ahaha śruti-jātaṁ sa-daya-hṛdaya darśita-paśu-ghātaṁ keśava dhṛta-buddha-śarīra jaya jagadīśa hare ( Gīta-govinda ) Even though animal sacrifices are sanctioned in Vedic ceremonies, men who kill animals for such ceremonies are considered butchers. Butchers cannot be interested in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, for they are already materially allured. Their only interest lies in developing comforts for the temporary body. bhogaiśvarya-prasaktānāṁ tayāpahṛta-cetasām vyavasāyātmikā buddhiḥ samādhau na vidhīyate “In the minds of those who are too attached to sense enjoyment and material opulence, and who are bewildered by such things, the resolute determination of devotional service to the Supreme Lord does not take place.” ( Bg. 2.44 ) Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura says: manuṣya-janama pāiyā, rādhā-kṛṣṇa nā bhajiyā, jāniyā śuniyā viṣa khāinu Anyone who is not Kṛṣṇa conscious and who therefore does not engage in the service of the Lord is also paśu-ghna, for he is willingly drinking poison. Such a person cannot be interested in kṛṣṇa-kathā because he still has a desire for material sense gratification; he is not nivṛtta-tṛṣṇa. As it is said, traivargikās te puruṣā vimukhā hari-medhasaḥ. Those interested in trivarga — that is, in dharma, artha and kāma — are religious for the sake of achieving a material position with which to gain better facilities for sense gratification. Such persons are killing themselves by willingly keeping themselves in the cycle of birth and death. They cannot be interested in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. For kṛṣṇa-kathā, topics about Kṛṣṇa consciousness, there must be a speaker and a hearer, both of whom can be interested in Kṛṣṇa consciousness if they are no longer interested in material topics. One can actually see how this attitude automatically develops in persons who are Kṛṣṇa conscious. Although the devotees of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement are quite young men, they no longer read materialistic newspapers, magazines and so on, for they are no longer interested in such topics ( nivṛtta-tarṣaiḥ ). They completely give up the bodily understanding of life. For topics concerning Uttamaśloka, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the spiritual master speaks, and the disciple hears with attention. Unless both of them are free from material desires, they cannot be interested in topics of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. The spiritual master and disciple do not need to understand anything more than Kṛṣṇa because simply by understanding Kṛṣṇa and talking about Kṛṣṇa, one becomes a perfectly learned person ( yasmin vijñāte sarvam evaṁ vijñātaṁ bhavati, Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad 1.3). The Lord sits within everyone’s heart, and by the grace of the Lord the devotee receives instructions directly from the Lord Himself, who says in Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) : sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyo vedānta-kṛd veda-vid eva cāham “I am seated in everyone’s heart, and from Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness. By all the Vedas, I am to be known; indeed, I am the compiler of Vedānta, and I am the knower of the Vedas. ” Kṛṣṇa consciousness is so exalted that one who is perfectly situated in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, under the direction of the spiritual master, is fully satisfied by reading kṛṣṇa-kathā as found in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Bhagavad-gītā and similar Vedic literatures. Since merely talking about Kṛṣṇa is so pleasing, we can simply imagine how pleasing it is to render service to Kṛṣṇa. When discourses on kṛṣṇa-kathā take place between a liberated spiritual master and his disciple, others also sometimes take advantage of hearing these topics and also benefit. These topics are the medicine to stop the repetition of birth and death. The cycle of repeated birth and death, by which one takes on different bodies again and again, is called bhava or bhava-roga. If anyone, willingly or unwillingly, hears kṛṣṇa-kathā, his bhava-roga, the disease of birth and death, will certainly stop. Therefore kṛṣṇa-kathā is called bhavauṣadha, the remedy to stop the repetition of birth and death. Karmīs, or persons attached to material sense enjoyment, generally cannot give up their material desires, but kṛṣṇa-kathā is such a potent medicine that if one is induced to hear kṛṣṇa-kīrtana, he will certainly be freed from this disease. A practical example is Dhruva Mahārāja, who at the end of his tapasya was fully satisfied. When the Lord wanted to give Dhruva a benediction, Dhruva refused it. Svāmin kṛtārtho ’smi varaṁ na yāce. “My dear Lord,” he said, “I am fully satisfied. I do not ask for any benediction for material sense gratification.” We actually see that even young boys and girls in the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement have given up their long practice of bad habits like illicit sex, meat-eating, intoxication and gambling. Because Kṛṣṇa consciousness is so potent that it gives them full satisfaction, they are no longer interested in material sense gratification.
I am taking the remnants of whatever Sridhara Swami and Sanatana Goswami have left. King Pariksit says to Sukadeva, "I am a jiva bound up by the disease of material life. How can I cease drinking the great medicine of the pastimes of Krsna recited by you, the greatest of doctors endowed with the greatest fortune?" With that intention he speaks this verse. Who could stop drinking the sweet topics of Krsna which are like a medicine to cure the disease of material existence (bhavausadhat)? Trsna refers to thirst or attachment to material enjoyment. Nivrtta tarsaih refers to those who, taking the medicine of Krsna’s pastimes, have extinguished the trsna or thirst for material life. Liberated from bondage of maya, they therefore glorify this process more than jnana and other processes. "We glorify loudly this medicine, as it has cured us of our disease." Unlike other medicines, this medicine does not have bitter taste. Therefore he says srotra manobhiramat: It gives pleasure to the ear and mind. Therefore drink it with both ear and mind. Who will avoid these topics except the persons involved in killing animals in sacrifice with a longing to attain svarga loka enjoyment (pasughnah). Only these people will not listen. In verse 3.3.18 it is stated: Those involved in seeking dharma, artha, and kama have no taste for the name, qualities and pastimes of Lord Madhusudana resplendent with attractive pastimes. Another meaning: Who would give up drinking the topics of Krsna which are recited by guru, and then glorifying, for even those who are liberated loudly glorify . Upa in upagiyamanat indicates intense or continuous glorification. What more can be said about tasting it? You are the taster. Nivritta tarsaih indicates pure devotees, not jnanis, because of the use of present tense and the prefix upa in upagiyamanat. The jnanis meditate, but they do not chant the Lord’s glories intensely. Those who have opportunity to hear the pastimes of the Lord do not stop listening because it cures them of the material condition (bhavausadhat). Neither the speaker nor the listener tires of hearing about the Lord, because it is enjoyable (srotra manobhiramat). Only those desiring wealth and material enjoyment would stop hearing. Thus he says that only a killer of animals would cease hearing about the Lord, and no one else.
One should not doubt my eagerness for such an elaborate description. That is expressed in this verse. Upagīyamānād: the Lord’s qualities are glorified by the liberated souls profusely or as the highest in nature (upa), for by constantly singing the Lord’s glories one attains the highest bliss as the supreme result. The liberated souls are both the jṣānīs and śuddha-bhaktas. They are the jīva-muktas living on earth and also person living in the spiritual realm with sālokya, sārṣṭi, sārūpya and sāmīpya. Bhavauṣadhāt: these talks are the medicine for the material world, destroying suffering for those desiring liberation. Śrotra-mano-’bhirāmāt: these talks give complete bliss to the ear by sound and to the mind by the meaning. However there is another type of person besides the desirer of liberation and material enjoyment: the person desiring bhakti. He is superior to the last two types mentioned. The first type, the liberated person, is naturally attracted and the fourth type of person, he who desires bhakti, is also qualified for hearing. Thus hearing the topics of the Lord is for the sādhakas and the siddhas. Who would not be satisfied with repeated topics of the famous (uttama-śloka) Lord’s qualities—such as his eternal and unlimited affection and generosity? The bliss of the Lord’s pastimes appearing in the minds of the first type, the liberated, with greater bliss than Brahman, out of intensity, transforms into song. This shows the predominance of singing the Lord’s glories in the perfected souls. These persons are pointed out first because of their perfected position. Those desiring liberation or material enjoyment are not considered perfected since the pastimes do not make their appearance spontaneously in their minds. They become absorbed in the pastimes because the topics give relief from misery (or give pleasure) through hearing. They have a predominance of hearing. These persons are less qualified than the first type. For those desiring liberation the topics appear in the mind as a sādhana for attaining their goal of liberation and give pleasure to the ear and mind because of the topics’ nature. But for those desiring material enjoyment the topics appear in the mind simply for pleasure of the ear and mind. The fourth type, those desiring bhakti, are inferior to the first type, but superior to the second and third type. There are three types of lists in the scriptures. In a list, the order may be from lesser to greater, greater to lesser, or randomly ordered. The first two types are employed to show the greatness or insignificance of an item compared to others. The random list is stated out of inattention or great prema. In the present verse the first three persons listed are in order of greater to lesser. The fourth type, the person desiring bhakti is randomly placed. Out of humility, such a devotee thinks that he is not detached in his attraction using his ear or mind, lacking liberation or desire for liberation. The word pumān (any man) is used in the verse. This means that others such as dependents, women, eunuchs or persons with disabilities would not be able to engage so freely in spiritual practice. Or men are mentioned because they predominant. Or pumān can refer to the jīva. Thus the topics of the Lord are for everyone. Vinā paśughnāt : only the animal killer is not attracted to the Lord’s topics, because of no interest in goals in this life or the next, since he is completely involved in giving suffering to others. It is said: rāja-putra ciraṁ jīva mā jīva muni putraka jīva vā mara vā sādho vyādha mā jivā mā mara The prince should live long. The son of the sage should not live. The devotee may live or not live. The hunter should not live nor die. The person who gives up the Lord’s topics is a hunter, throwing lances or punches at others, not caring that he ultimately gives himself suffering in this life and the next. This same topic is discussed in the glorification of topics of the Lord in the commentary named Bhagavad-bhakti-vilāsa. If topics about the Lord give such results, how much more will topics concerning Kṛṣṇa’s form and qualities will give results!
- NRM SB 10-01-04-35
- Gauranga Pr SB 10-01-04 - Sri Krishna Janmashtami - 2012-08-10 ISKCON Chowpatty
- Jitamitra Pr Hindi SB 10-01-04 - Part-01
- Jitamitra Pr Hindi SB 10-01-04 - Part-02
- Keshav Anand Pr SB 10-01-04 Hindi - Icchao ka Khel - 2016-02-11 Delhi
- Padaseva Pr SB 10-01-04 Oriya
- Radha Gopinath Pr SB 10-01-04 Hindi - 2010-08-22 ISKCON Kolhapur
- Sarvabhauma Pr Hindi SB 10-01-04 - 2014-12-25 Balaramdesh
- Sarvabhauma Pr SB 10-01-04-07 Russian Translation - 2017-08-12 Chita
- Sesa Pr SB 10-01-04 - 2011-07-04 ISKCON Alachua
- Vrajendra Nandan Pr SB 10-01-04 Hindi - 2019-01-08 Pr Punjabi Bagh
- Amal Bhakta Sw SB 10-01-04 - 2016-02-26 Los Angeles
- BAVS SB 10-01-04 - 2020-07-17 ISKCON Vrindavan
- BPremaSw SB 10-01-04 - 2018-09-15 ISKCON Ujjain
- BKG SB 10-01-04 - Janmashtami - 2020-08-11 New Goloka
- BKG SB 10-01-04 - Srimati Radharani - 2014-09-02 Lautoka
- BKG SB 10-01-04 - Hearing is Association - 2023-09-06 New Goloka
- BKG SB 10-01-04 - Are You A Killer If the Soul - 2013-08-26 New Goloka
- BKG SB 10-01-04 - Mundane piety is an anartha - 2018-08-24 New Goloka
- BKG SB 10-01-04 - Janmashtami Day - 2011-08-22 New Goloka
- DMS SB 10-01-04 - Convince Yourself About Krishna Consciousness Janmastami - 2002
- GKG SB 10-01-04 - 2010-08-16 Yaroslavl
- MNS SB 10-01-04 - Material Conception
- PrahladAnS SB 10-01-04-05 Slovenian Translation - Prava zavest oci%C5%A1cuje - 2023-11-29 ISKCON Slovenia
- 03 - RGS SB 10-01-04-07 Hindi - Krishna Janma Mahotsva-03 - 2017-08-12 Vrindavan
- ISKCON Kolhapur SB 10-01-04 Hindi - 2010-08-22 Radha Gopinath Prabhu
- Hear or read Bhāgavatam daily from Prabhupāda's books or recordings — go to the paramparā source, not speculation.
- When material desires for fame or pleasure arise, deliberately replace that hearing with one chapter of kṛṣṇa-kathā as medicine.
- Identify one source of 'glorification of the cosmic manifestation' (news, gossip, entertainment) and replace it this week with hearing about Kṛṣṇa.
- When kṛṣṇa-kathā is being spoken, where does my mind drift first — and what does that drift reveal about the 'temporary glorification' I am still relishing?
- Whose paramparā voice am I actually hearing Kṛṣṇa from daily, and where have I quietly substituted my own speculation or a non-paramparā source in its place?
- Notice what you currently thirst for — career validation, romantic attention, recognition online. The verse doesn't shame these; it observes that as long as the thirst is loud, kṛṣṇa-kathā will sound quiet. Begin by hearing anyway; the thirst loosens through hearing, not before it.
- You are not required to feel ecstasy in class to be 'doing it right.' The medicine works subcutaneously. Track instead whether over months your reactions to insult, failure, and desire are slowly changing — that is the bhavauṣadha acting.
- Choose carefully who you let speak Kṛṣṇa into your ears. Algorithms will feed you charismatic speakers; paramparā asks you to feed yourself from sober ones. Audit your listening monthly — what voices are actually shaping your understanding of Kṛṣṇa?
- Your household is a kṛṣṇa-kathā ecosystem whether you intend it or not. What gets glorified at your dinner table — promotions, property, neighbors' faults, or guṇānuvāda? The verse's medicine is administered in the daily speech of the home.
- Honor your varṇāśrama duties as the field where hearing is metabolized. A householder who hears Bhāgavatam and then deals honestly with employees, clients, and in-laws is taking the medicine. One who hears and then resents these duties has heard with the ear only.
- Protect a daily window — even fifteen minutes — of paramparā hearing that is not optimized for productivity, not multitasked. The verse calls this śrotra-mano-'bhirāmāt — pleasing to ear and mind. Give it conditions in which it can please you.
- At your stage, nivṛtta-tarṣa is no longer aspirational language — much of the material thirst has naturally receded with the body. This is the verse's promised window. The hearing you do now lands differently than it did at forty; do not waste this clarity on television or grievance.
- Consider becoming a transmitter, not only a receiver. Grandchildren, younger devotees, and seekers around you need someone who has heard Bhāgavatam for decades to relay it simply. You need not be a scholar — faithful relay is the paramparā's actual mechanism.
- Examine honestly what you are still glorifying. Many seniors substitute glorification of their own past — career, family achievements, the 'old days' — for guṇānuvāda. The verse asks for a quiet final pivot: let Kṛṣṇa's qualities, not your biography, be what your speech returns to.
- Hearing kṛṣṇa-kathā as literature or culture rather than as bhavauṣadhi, the actual medicine for repeated birth and death.
- Bypassing the paramparā channel — preferring stimulating speakers, algorithmic clips, or one's own readings over śravaṇam from realized Vaiṣṇavas.
- Mistaking emotional sentiment during hearing for genuine nivṛtta-tarṣa, while lusty desires remain unexamined and unsurrendered.
- Prabhupāda equates one who refuses to hear kṛṣṇa-kathā with a paśughna — a butcher killing his own self. Is this rhetorical intensity, or a literal spiritual diagnosis? If literal, what do we make of sincere people across traditions who never encounter Bhāgavatam yet live ethical, contemplative lives?
- The verse insists glorification must come through paramparā to be potent. But today many encounter Kṛṣṇa first through books, podcasts, or AI assistants — not a living guru. Does a verse heard outside an active disciplic relationship still carry bhavauṣadha potency?
- Nivṛtta-tarṣa (one freed from material thirst) is named as the qualified hearer. Yet most of us begin hearing while still saturated with material desires. Is there a contradiction here, or does the verse describe the singer rather than gate the hearer?
You are speaking with a 28-year-old software engineer in Bangalore who attends Bhāgavatam class weekly. He says: 'I love the philosophy and I chant 4 rounds, but honestly when I hear pastimes of Kṛṣṇa with the gopīs, my mind doesn't get medicine — it gets either bored or uncomfortable. The katha isn't working on me the way the verse promises. Am I the paśughna?' Respond as a personal guide — neither flattering nor crushing him. Address what nivṛtta-tarṣa actually requires, what hearing he should be doing at his stage, and whether his honesty is itself a qualification.
- This verse uses fear-language — calling non-hearers butchers and self-killers. Isn't that exactly the kind of religious coercion that has driven thoughtful people away from organized Vaiṣṇavism? A medicine shouldn't need to threaten the patient.
The śāstra is not threatening — it is diagnosing. Śukadeva is speaking to Parīkṣit who has seven days to live; there is no time for soft language. The 'butcher' image is not aimed at outsiders to frighten them in; it is aimed at those who have already heard and turned away, naming what such turning-away costs them. Compare a physician telling a cardiac patient 'if you keep eating this way you will kill yourself' — that is not coercion, it is precision. Read in context, paśughnāt is mercy compressed into one word. - If kṛṣṇa-kathā only works when sung by the liberated, then most kīrtana and class I attend — given by conditioned souls like myself — must be spiritually inert. So why bother?
The verse names the source of the current, not the only permitted conduit. When a conditioned speaker faithfully repeats what was heard from the paramparā — adding nothing, subtracting nothing, claiming nothing — the potency of the original liberated singer flows through. This is why Prabhupāda insisted on 'as it is.' The speaker is a pipe, not the well. Your local class is potent to the degree the speaker is transmitting rather than performing.
Kṛṣṇa-kathā is the medicine for the disease of repeated birth — but only when poured from the right bottle. The pharmacy label is paramparā: spiritual master to disciple, vessel to vessel. A glass of the same nectar drawn from one's own imagination, however lovely it tastes, is not bhavauṣadha. The refuser of even the labeled medicine is, the verse says, a paśughna — slaughtering the very self he was given a body to save.
King Khaṭvāṅga, after long service to the demigods, asked for one boon — to know how long he had left. He was told: a muhūrta, less than an hour.
He returned at once to Earth, withdrew from his kingdom, fixed his mind on Bhagavān, and attained perfection in that single muhūrta. Prabhupāda cites him often as proof that kṛṣṇa-kathā taken seriously even at the last moment is bhavauṣadha — strong enough to cross the soul over.
The verse calls the one who turns from such hearing paśughna; Khaṭvāṅga is the counter-image. Forty-eight minutes of attentive hearing did what eighty years of distraction could not.
Ajāmila, a fallen brāhmaṇa who had spent decades in degradation, in his last moments called out the name of his youngest son — Nārāyaṇa. The Viṣṇudūtas arrived and overruled the Yamadūtas who had come for him; the holy name, even uttered without conscious devotion, had administered the bhavauṣadha (SB 6.1–3).
The verse warns who would turn aside from such glorification. Ajāmila is its proof: even a half-attentive ear, brushed by paramparā-vibrated kṛṣṇa-kathā, is enough to override a lifetime of karma. The medicine is that potent — the only question is whether one keeps the lips closed.
My note
Source: vedabase.io