athocyante trayas-triṁśad-bhāvā ye vyabhicāriṇaḥ |
[athochyante trayas-trimshad-bhaavaa ye vyabhichaarinah |]
viśeṣeṇābhimukhyena caranti sthāyinaṁ prati ||1||
[visheshenaabhimukhyena charanti sthaayinam prati ||1||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
athocyante trayas-triṁśad-bhāvā ye vyabhicāriṇaḥ |
viśeṣeṇābhimukhyena caranti sthāyinaṁ prati ||1||
Hereafter, the thirty-three vyabhicāri-bhāvas will be described. They are called vyabhicāri-bhāvas since they move (caranti) against the sthāyi-bhāva, while assisting it in a distinctive way (viśeṣena abhimukhyena)
Purport
NoD 29: Expressions of Love for Kṛṣṇa
There are some bodily symptoms which express overwhelming ecstatic love (vyabhicāri-bhāva). They are counted at thirty-three as follows: disappointment, lamentation, humility, guilt, fatigue, intoxication, pride, doubt, apprehension, intense emotion, madness, forgetfulness, disease, confusion, death, laziness, inertness, bashfulness, concealment, remembrance,k argumentativeness, anxiety, thoughtfulness, endurance, happiness, eagerness, violence, haughtiness, envy, impudence, dizziness, sleepiness and alertness.
The vyabhicāri-bhāvas reveal themselves by words, by eye brows and other bodily parts and by external actions (anubhāvas) which arise from overwhelming emotions (sattva). [Note: The section on sāttvika-bhāvas explained that sāttvika-bhāvas arise solely from deep emotions and anubhāvas arise from deep emotions with the addition of intellect as well. In the description of the various vyabhicāri-bhāvas, some of them are described as producing sāttvika-bhāvas such as tears or hairs standing on end, and some produce anubhāvas such as dancing. That would mean that a vyabhicāri-bhāva produces sattva (deep emotion) which then produces a sāttvika-bhāva. The external symptoms of sāttvika-bhāvas as sometimes called the anubhāva aspect of the sāttvika-bhāva.] Since they set in motion (sañcārayanti) the course of the sthāyi-bhāva, they are called sañcāri-bhāvas.
Purport
NoD 29: Expressions of Love for Kṛṣṇa
There are some bodily symptoms which express overwhelming ecstatic love (vyabhicāri-bhāva). They are counted at thirty-three as follows: disappointment, lamentation, humility, guilt, fatigue, intoxication, pride, doubt, apprehension, intense emotion, madness, forgetfulness, disease, confusion, death, laziness, inertness, bashfulness, concealment, remembrance,k argumentativeness, anxiety, thoughtfulness, endurance, happiness, eagerness, violence, haughtiness, envy, impudence, dizziness, sleepiness and alertness.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Commentary
The first verse explains the derivation of the word vyabhicāri-bhāva by analyzing the components of the word. Vi stands for viśeṣa, abhi stands for abhimukhya and cāra stands for caranti. Thus it means those bhāvas which move (caranti) against the sthāyi-bhāva while nourishing it in a special way (viśeṣena abhimukhyena), and are known by words, bodily movements and qualities of the mind (sattva). These bhāvas are also called sañcāri-bhāvas. This word is also given a meaning by analyzing its components.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Aṅga refers to the eyebrows and other body parts. Sattva refers to anubhāvas (external symptoms) which arise from sattvas (emotions which overwhelm the heart.)
ūrmivad vardhayanty enaṁ yānti tad-rūpatāṁ ca te ||3||
[oormivad vardhayanty enam yaanti tad-roopataam cha te ||3||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
unmajjanti nimajjanti sthāyiny amṛta-vāridhau |
ūrmivad vardhayanty enaṁ yānti tad-rūpatāṁ ca te ||3||
All the vyabhicāri-bhāvas, rising and falling like waves in the sweet ocean of the sthāyi-bhāva, increase the sthāyi-bhāva and then merge into the sthāyi-bhāva.
Purport
NoD 29: Expressions of Love for Kṛṣṇa
There are some bodily symptoms which express overwhelming ecstatic love (vyabhicāri-bhāva). They are counted at thirty-three as follows: disappointment, lamentation, humility, guilt, fatigue, intoxication, pride, doubt, apprehension, intense emotion, madness, forgetfulness, disease, confusion, death, laziness, inertness, bashfulness, concealment, remembrance,k argumentativeness, anxiety, thoughtfulness, endurance, happiness, eagerness, violence, haughtiness, envy, impudence, dizziness, sleepiness and alertness.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This verse describes where the vyabhicāri-bhāvas appear and compares them to a familiar object. The two parts of the sentence are joined together as one statement.
The vyabhicāri-bhāvas are as follows: self-disgust (nirveda), remorse (viṣāda), thinking oneself unqualified (dainyam or dīnatā), debility (glāni or mlāni), fatigue (śrama), rapture (mada), pride (garva), apprehension (śaṅkā), sudden fear (trāsa), confusion of the mind (āvega), insanity (unmāda), epilepsy (apasmṛti), sickness (vyādhi), loss of internal awareness (moha), death-like symptoms (mṛti), sloth (ālasyam), indecision (jāḍyam), shame (vrīḍā), concealment (avahitthā), remembrance (smṛti), conjecture (vitarka), pondering (cintā), finding meaning through scriptural reference (mati), steadiness (dhṛti), joy (harṣa), impatience (autsukyam), ferocity (augrya), indignation (amarṣa), fault-finding (asūyā), insolence (cāpalya), sleep (nidrā), dreaming (supti), and enlightenment (bodha).
Purport
NoD 29: Expressions of Love for Kṛṣṇa
There are some bodily symptoms which express overwhelming ecstatic love (vyabhicāri-bhāva). They are counted at thirty-three as follows: disappointment, lamentation, humility, guilt, fatigue, intoxication, pride, doubt, apprehension, intense emotion, madness, forgetfulness, disease, confusion, death, laziness, inertness, bashfulness, concealment, remembrance,k argumentativeness, anxiety, thoughtfulness, endurance, happiness, eagerness, violence, haughtiness, envy, impudence, dizziness, sleepiness and alertness.
The vyabhicāri-bhāvas are as follows: self-disgust (nirveda), remorse (viṣāda), thinking oneself unqualified (dainyam or dīnatā), debility (glāni or mlāni), fatigue (śrama), rapture (mada), pride (garva), apprehension (śaṅkā), sudden fear (trāsa), confusion of the mind (āvega), insanity (unmāda), epilepsy (apasmṛti), sickness (vyādhi), loss of internal awareness (moha), death-like symptoms (mṛti), sloth (ālasyam), indecision (jāḍyam), shame (vrīḍā), concealment (avahitthā), remembrance (smṛti), conjecture (vitarka), pondering (cintā), finding meaning through scriptural reference (mati), steadiness (dhṛti), joy (harṣa), impatience (autsukyam), ferocity (augrya), indignation (amarṣa), fault-finding (asūyā), insolence (cāpalya), sleep (nidrā), dreaming (supti), and enlightenment (bodha).
Purport
NoD 29: Expressions of Love for Kṛṣṇa
There are some bodily symptoms which express overwhelming ecstatic love (vyabhicāri-bhāva). They are counted at thirty-three as follows: disappointment, lamentation, humility, guilt, fatigue, intoxication, pride, doubt, apprehension, intense emotion, madness, forgetfulness, disease, confusion, death, laziness, inertness, bashfulness, concealment, remembrance,k argumentativeness, anxiety, thoughtfulness, endurance, happiness, eagerness, violence, haughtiness, envy, impudence, dizziness, sleepiness and alertness.
The vyabhicāri-bhāvas are as follows: self-disgust (nirveda), remorse (viṣāda), thinking oneself unqualified (dainyam or dīnatā), debility (glāni or mlāni), fatigue (śrama), rapture (mada), pride (garva), apprehension (śaṅkā), sudden fear (trāsa), confusion of the mind (āvega), insanity (unmāda), epilepsy (apasmṛti), sickness (vyādhi), loss of internal awareness (moha), death-like symptoms (mṛti), sloth (ālasyam), indecision (jāḍyam), shame (vrīḍā), concealment (avahitthā), remembrance (smṛti), conjecture (vitarka), pondering (cintā), finding meaning through scriptural reference (mati), steadiness (dhṛti), joy (harṣa), impatience (autsukyam), ferocity (augrya), indignation (amarṣa), fault-finding (asūyā), insolence (cāpalya), sleep (nidrā), dreaming (supti), and enlightenment (bodha).
Purport
NoD 29: Expressions of Love for Kṛṣṇa
There are some bodily symptoms which express overwhelming ecstatic love (vyabhicāri-bhāva). They are counted at thirty-three as follows: disappointment, lamentation, humility, guilt, fatigue, intoxication, pride, doubt, apprehension, intense emotion, madness, forgetfulness, disease, confusion, death, laziness, inertness, bashfulness, concealment, remembrance,k argumentativeness, anxiety, thoughtfulness, endurance, happiness, eagerness, violence, haughtiness, envy, impudence, dizziness, sleepiness and alertness.
Self-disgust arising from great sorrow, separation, hatred or worrying about doing what should not be done, or not doing what should be done, is called nirveda. In this state worry, tears, change of color, feeling of lack of qualities (dainyam) and sighing occur.
Purport
Disappointment
When one is forced to act in a way which is forbidden, or to refrain from acting in a way which is proper, he becomes regretful and thinks himself dishonored. At that time there is a sense of disappointment. In this kind of disappointment one becomes full of anxiety, sheds tears, changes bodily color, feels humility and breathes heavily.
From great sorrow: O Yaśodā! What is to be gained from continuing to maintain this sinful, unfortunate body? Come! We will immediately offer our bodies in the lake of Kāliya filled with the fire of poison.
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa, in punishing the Kāliya serpent, appeared to have drowned Himself in the poisonous water of the Yamunā, Nanda Mahārāja addressed Yaśodā-devī thus: “My dear wife, Kṛṣṇa has gone deep into the water, and so there is no longer any need to maintain our bodies, which are so full of sinful activities! Let us also enter into the poisonous water of the Yamunā and compensate for the sinful activities of our lives!” This is an instance of severe shock, wherein the devotee becomes greatly disappointed.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
In this verse the plural is used for the dual (Nanda is speaking to Yaśodā). This is according to the rule asmador dvayoś ca. (Pāṇini 1.2.59) Deha-hatakaiḥ is in the plural to indicate attaining many sinful bodies in past lives as well.
From separation: Without the presence of sweetness of Mādhava, Vṛndāvana became withered, without charm and devoid of flowers. How does this unfortunate, strong bee continue to live?
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa left Vṛndāvana, Subala, His intimate friend, decided to leave also. While leaving, Subala was contemplating that without Kṛṣṇa there was no longer any pleasure to be found in Vṛndāvana. The analogy is given that as the bees go away from a flower that has no honey, Subala left Vṛndāvana when he found that there was no longer any relishable transcendental pleasure there.
From Dāna-keli-kaumudī: O friend! Without hearing the words of Mādhava, my ears may as well become deaf. Without seeing the form of Mādhava, my eyes may as well become blind.
Purport
In Dāna-keli-kaumudī Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī addresses one of Her friends in this manner: “My dear friend, if I cannot hear of the glorious activities of Kṛṣṇa, it is better for Me to become deaf. And because I am now unable to see Him, it would be good for Me to be a blind woman.” This is another instance of disappointment due to separation from Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The form aśravaṇiḥ comes from the rule ākrośe naṣ yaniḥ. (Pāṇini 3.3.112) [Note: The affix ani can be added after a word when the syllable “a” precedes the word with meaning of negation. As well there should be a sense of cursing or misfortune expressed.]
durbhago ’yaṁ janas tatra kim artham anuśabditaḥ ||11||
From anger, in the words of Satyabhāmā, Hari-vaṁśa: O Kṛṣṇa! If Nārada is praising Rukmiṇī in front of You, he is calling upon her a misfortune similar to mine.
Purport
There is a statement in the Hari-vaṁśa wherein Satyabhāmā, one of the queens of Kṛṣṇa in Dvārakā, tells her husband, “My dear Kṛṣṇa, since I heard Nārada glorifying Rukmiṇī before You, I can understand that there is no need of any talking about myself!” This is an instance of disappointment caused by envy. Rukmiṇī and Satyabhāmā were co-wives, and because Kṛṣṇa was husband of both, there naturally was some feminine envy between them. So when Satyabhāmā heard the glories of Rukmiṇī, she was envious of her and thus became disappointed.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Sā refers to Rukmiṇī. Ayaṁ durbhagaḥ means “misfortune similar to mine.”
Through discrimination, from the Tenth Canto: I have wasted all this time, O unconquerable one, becoming more and more intoxicated by my domain and opulence as an earthly king. Misidentifying the mortal body as the self, becoming attached to children, wives, treasury and land, I suffered endless anxiety. SB 10.51.47
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Fifty-first Chapter, verse 47, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there is this statement: “My dear Kṛṣṇa, I cannot say that it is only other people who are implicated in material existence, because I too am much entangled with the bodily concept of life. I am always too anxious about my family, home, wife, wealth, land and kingdom. And because I have been so maddened by this material atmosphere, I am thinking now that my life has been simply spoiled.” This statement is an instance of disappointment caused by lamentation.
Though it is inauspicious, Bharata Muni has mentioned nirveda as the first vyabhicāri-bhāva, since it is the sthāyi-bhāva for śānta-rasa. This is the opinion of some persons. [Note: This is mentioned again in 3.1.50, in the discussion of śānta-rasa.]
Purport
According to Bharata Muni, this disappointment is inauspicious. But there are other learned scholars who have accepted such disappointment as being in the mood of neutrality and as being a preservative of ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Commentary
Since nirveda is an inauspicious emotion, why has it been considered first in the list? This verse answers. Bharata Muni has placed it first, considering it to be the sthāyi-bhāva of śānta-rasa. That is, though it appears inauspicious, it is suitable to be placed first because of its prominence as a sthāyi-bhāva as well. In this work it is placed simply to conform to Bharata Muni’s exposition of the subject.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The author (others) considers the sthāyi-bhāva of śānta-rasa to be śānta-rati. That nirveda is stated first here is merely conforming to Bharata Muni’s exposition of the subject.
[atropaaya-sahaayaanusandhish chintaa cha rodanam |]
vilāpa-śvāsa-vaivarṇya-mukha-śoṣādayo ’pi ca ||15||
[vilaapa-shvaasa-vaivarnya-mukha-shoshaadayo ’pi cha ||15||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha (2) viṣādaḥ –
iṣṭānavāpti-prārabdha-kāryāsiddhi-vipattitaḥ |
aparādhādito ’pi syād anutāpo viṣaṇṇatā ||14||
atropāya-sahāyānusandhiś cintā ca rodanam |
vilāpa-śvāsa-vaivarṇya-mukha-śoṣādayo ’pi ca ||15||
Remorse: Remorse or despair arising from failure to attain one’s desired object, from failure to accomplish a task, from occurrence of a disaster, or from committing an offense is called viṣāda. In this state, there is worry, search for a means of accomplishing, search for assistance, weeping, moaning, heavy breathing, change of color and drying of the mouth.
Purport
Lamentation
When one is unsuccessful in achieving his desired goal of life, when one finds no fulfillment in his present occupation, when one finds himself in reversed conditions and when one feels guilt—at such a time one is said to be in a state of lamentation.
In this condition of lamentation one becomes questioning, thoughtful, tearful, regretful and heavy-breathed. His bodily color changes, and his mouth becomes dry.
[atropaaya-sahaayaanusandhish chintaa cha rodanam |]
vilāpa-śvāsa-vaivarṇya-mukha-śoṣādayo ’pi ca ||15||
[vilaapa-shvaasa-vaivarnya-mukha-shoshaadayo ’pi cha ||15||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha (2) viṣādaḥ –
iṣṭānavāpti-prārabdha-kāryāsiddhi-vipattitaḥ |
aparādhādito ’pi syād anutāpo viṣaṇṇatā ||14||
atropāya-sahāyānusandhiś cintā ca rodanam |
vilāpa-śvāsa-vaivarṇya-mukha-śoṣādayo ’pi ca ||15||
Remorse: Remorse or despair arising from failure to attain one’s desired object, from failure to accomplish a task, from occurrence of a disaster, or from committing an offense is called viṣāda. In this state, there is worry, search for a means of accomplishing, search for assistance, weeping, moaning, heavy breathing, change of color and drying of the mouth.
Purport
Lamentation
When one is unsuccessful in achieving his desired goal of life, when one finds no fulfillment in his present occupation, when one finds himself in reversed conditions and when one feels guilt—at such a time one is said to be in a state of lamentation.
In this condition of lamentation one becomes questioning, thoughtful, tearful, regretful and heavy-breathed. His bodily color changes, and his mouth becomes dry.
mayā hanta prāpto na bhajana-rucer apy avasaraḥ ||16||
From not attaining one’s desired object: O Kṛṣṇa, killer of the Agha demon! My body is afflicted with age, my words are uncontrolled and my mind is without memory power. What to speak of attaining the moon of bliss on seeing You, I have not even attained the opportunity of desiring to worship You!
Purport
One aged devotee of Kṛṣṇa addressed Him in this way: “My dear Kṛṣṇa, O killer of the demon Agha, my body is now invalid due to old age. I cannot speak very fluently, my voice is faltering, my mind is not strong, and I am often attacked by forgetfulness. But, my dear Lord, You are just like the moonlight, and my only real regret is that for want of any taste for Your pleasant shining I did not advance myself in Kṛṣṇa consciousness.” This statement is an instance of lamentation due to one’s being unable to achieve his desired goal.
From failure to accomplish an action: Today in a dream I was picking flowers and very carefully made a garland out of them. But just when I thought of offering it to the heart of Mukunda, my sleep broke.
Purport
One devotee said, “This night I was dreaming of collecting various flowers from the garden, and I was thinking of making a garland to offer to Kṛṣṇa. But I am so unfortunate that all of a sudden my dream was over, and I could not achieve my desired goal!” This statement is an instance of lamentation resulting from nonfulfillment of one’s duties.
Remorse arising from impending disaster: I am so unfortunate! Why did I take my son to Mathurā? Why did I not forcibly keep Him in my house? In Mathurā the elephant desires to afflict my son just as Rāhu desires to afflict the moon.
Purport
When Nanda Mahārāja saw his foster son Kṛṣṇa embarrassed in the sacrificial arena of Kaṁsa, he said, “How unfortunate I am that I did not keep my son bolted within a room. Unfortunately, I have brought Him to Mathurā, and now I see that He’s embarrassed by this giant elephant named Kuvalaya. It is as though the moon of Kṛṣṇa were eclipsed by the shadow of the earth.” This is an instance of lamentation caused by reversed conditions.
Remorse arising from committing an offense, from the Tenth Canto: My Lord, just see my uncivilized impudence! To test Your power, I tried to extend my illusory potency to cover You, the unlimited and primeval Supersoul, who bewilder even the masters of illusion. What am I compared to You? I am just like a small spark in the presence of a great fire. SB 10.14.9
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Fourteenth Chapter, verse 9, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam there is a statement by Brahmā: “My dear Lord, just see my impudence! You are the unlimited, the original Personality of Godhead, the Supersoul—and You rule over the most perfect illusory energies! And just see my impudence! I wanted to supersede You by my own personal power, and I was very puffed up with this tiny power of mine. Just as a simple spark from a fire cannot do any harm to the fire, so my bewildering potency was completely unsuccessful in thwarting Your superior illusory power. Therefore I find myself to be most insignificant and think of myself as a most useless person.” This statement by Brahmā is an instance of lamentation caused by committing an offense.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Āryam means the condition of a well-bred person (aryaḥ). The opposite of that is condition of an uncultured person, anāryam. What was that? I desired (aiccham) to see (īkṣitum) Your (ātma) great power (vaibhavam). This was already mentioned in the previous chapter:
ambhojanma-janis tad-antara-gato māyārbhakasyeśitur
draṣṭuṁ mañju mahitvam anyad api tad-vatsān ito vatsapān
nītvānyatra kurūdvahāntaradadhāt khe ’vasthito yaḥ purā
dṛṣṭvāghāsura-mokṣaṇaṁ prabhavataḥ prāptaḥ paraṁ vismayam
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, Brahmā, who resides in the higher planetary system in the sky, had observed the activities of the most powerful Kṛṣṇa in killing and delivering Aghāsura, and he was astonished. Now that same Brahmā wanted to show some of his own power and see the power of Kṛṣṇa, who was engaged in His childhood pastimes, playing as if with ordinary cowherd boys. Therefore, in Kṛṣṇa’s absence, Brahmā took all the boys and calves to another place. Thus he became entangled, for in the very near future he would see how powerful Kṛṣṇa was. SB 10.13.15
If that is the case, what is the fault in doing so? Brahmā then explains. “To see Your powers, I tried to extend my powers beyond Yours. But how low I am (kiyāt)!” He gives an example of his lowness: “I am just like the spark of a fire.”
karavai taraṇīṁ kāṁ vā kṣipto vaitaraṇīyam anu ||20||
[karavai taraneem kaam vaa kshipto vaitaraneeyam anu ||20||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā vā –
syamantakam ahaṁ hṛtvā gato ghorāsyam antakam |
karavai taraṇīṁ kāṁ vā kṣipto vaitaraṇīyam anu ||20||
Another example or remorse arising from committing offense: Having stolen the Syamantaka jewel, I have fallen into the mouth of terrible hell. Having fallen in the Vaitaraṇī River, what boat should I use to cross over it?
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
These are thoughts of Akrura. Instead of kāṁ vā, kiṁ vā is also found. This is more refined speech. It would then mean “Will I be able to cross the Vaitaraṇī River?” [Note: There is a play on words with syamantakam and antakam, and taraṇīm and vaitaraṇiyam.]
Thinking oneself a low creature because of sorrow, fear or offense is called dainyam or dīnatā. In this state there are words of flattery, feebleness of the heart, impurity of the heart, thinking various thoughts, and immobility of the limbs.
Purport
Humility
A sense of weakness caused by distress, fear or offensiveness is called humility. In such a humble condition one becomes talkative, small in heart, dirty in mind, full of anxiety and inactive.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Anaurjityam means “thinking oneself extremely fallen and despicable.” Cāṭu means “making eloquent requests.” Māndyam refers to sickness of the heart. Mālinya means “impurity.” Cintā means “thinking various thoughts.”
Humility arising from sorrow, from the Tenth Canto: For so long I have been pained by troubles in this world and have been burning with lamentation. My six enemies are never satiated, and I can find no peace. Therefore, O giver of shelter, O Supreme Soul, please protect me! O Lord, in the midst of danger I have by good fortune approached Your lotus feet, which are the truth and which thus make one fearless and free of sorrow. SB 10.51.57
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Fifty-first Chapter, verse 57, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there is the following statement by King Mucukunda: “My dear Lord, because of my bad deeds in the past I am everlastingly aggrieved. I am always suffering from my desires, but still my senses are never satisfied with material enjoyments. Somehow or other, by Your grace, I am now in a peaceful condition because I have taken shelter of Your lotus feet, which are always free from all lamentation, fear and death. O supreme protector, O supreme soul! O supreme controller! Kindly give me Your protection. I am so much embarrassed.” This statement by Mucukunda is an instance of humility resulting from a severely miserable condition of material existence.
kāmaṁ dahatu māṁ nātha mā me garbho nipātyatām ||23||
[kaamam dahatu maam naatha maa me garbho nipaatyataam ||23||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
trāsena, yathā prathame –
abhidravati mām īśa śaras taptāyaso vibho |
kāmaṁ dahatu māṁ nātha mā me garbho nipātyatām ||23||
Lowness arising from fear, from the First Canto: O my Lord, You are all-powerful. A fiery iron arrow is coming towards me fast. My Lord, let it burn me personally, if You so desire, but please do not let it burn and abort my embryo. Please do me this favor, my Lord. SB 1.8.10
Purport
When Uttarā was attacked by the brahmāstra of Aśvatthāmā, she became afraid of losing her child, Mahārāja Parīkṣit, who was still within the womb. She immediately surrendered to Kṛṣṇa and said, “My dear Lord, kindly save my child! I do not mind if I myself must be killed by the brahmāstra of Aśvatthāmā.” This is an instance of humility caused by fear.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The mother of Parikṣit speaks, thinking that her son, still in the womb, would be worthy of serving the Lord, and thinking of herself as incapable of doing anything, prays to Kṛṣṇa. Taptāyaso śaras means “an arrow of iron emitting fire.”
Lowness arising from committing an offense, from the Tenth Canto: Therefore, O infallible Lord, kindly excuse my offenses. I have taken birth in the mode of passion and am therefore simply foolish, presuming myself a controller independent of Your Lordship. My eyes are blinded by the darkness of ignorance, which causes me to think of myself as the unborn creator of the universe. But please consider that I am Your servant and therefore worthy of Your compassion. SB 10.14.10
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Fourteenth Chapter, verse 10, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Lord Brahmā says, “O infallible one! I am born in the mode of passion, and therefore I have been falsely proud of being the creator of this material world. My false pride was just like dense darkness, and in this darkness I had become blind. In my blindness I was considering myself a competitor to You, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. But, my dear Lord, even though I am accepted as the creator of this universe, I am eternally Your servant. Therefore, kindly always be compassionate toward me and excuse me in that way.” This statement by Brahmā is another instance of humility resulting from committing an offense.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
I think of myself as the creator of the universe (aja). With eyes blinded by pride in the form of deep ignorance (andhatama), I think of myself as a Lord separate from You. Though still thinking myself as a controller even now, I (eṣaḥ) am the object of Your mercy (anukampyaḥ). How is that? I am your servant (nāthavān). ‘But Brahmā, what is the purpose of you being a servant?” You will think “I accept Brahmā as My servant in order that he can attain Me (mayi iti).”
The word adya in duḥkha-trāsāparādhādyair (verse 21) indicates that dainyam also arises from shame. This is illustrated in the Bhāgavatam: Dear Kṛṣṇa, don’t be unfair! We know that You are the respectable son of Nanda and that You are honored by everyone in Vraja. You are also very dear to us. Please give us back our clothes. We are shivering in the cold water. SB 10.22.14
Purport
Sometimes there is humility due to shyness. For example, when Kṛṣṇa stole all of the garments from the gopīs while they were bathing in the river, all of them begged Kṛṣṇa not to commit this injustice upon them. The gopīs addressed Him thus: “Dear Kṛṣṇa, we know that You are the son of Nanda Mahārāja and that You are the most beloved of all Vṛndāvana. And You are very much loved by us also! But why are You giving us this trouble? Kindly return our garments. Just see how we are trembling from the severe cold!” This humility was due to their shyness from being naked before Kṛṣṇa.
Ojas, whose ruling deity is the moon, produces strength and nourishment in the body. When it decreases by physical exertion, mental anxiety or the sexual act, the weakened state is called glāni or mlāni. In the state of glāni or languishing there is trembling, indecision, change of color, becoming thin and throwing glances here and there.
Purport
Guilt
When a person blames himself for committing an inappropriate action, his feeling is called guilt.
Glāni arising from physical exertion: One time Rādhā was churning yogurt for Kṛṣṇa. At that time here jewel studded bracelet on her hand began to shake. Her lips began to sing the glories of Kṛṣṇa, living in Vraja. In fear of her elders, her eyes began to move about. Churning the yoghurt in this way, she became extremely tired, and could not move her limbs.
Purport
One day Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī was churning yogurt for Kṛṣṇa. At that time the jeweled bangles on Her hands were circling around, and She was also chanting the holy name of Kṛṣṇa. All of a sudden She thought, “I am chanting the holy name of Kṛṣṇa, and My superiors—My mother-in-law and My sister-in-law—may hear Me!” By this thought Rādhārāṇī became overanxious. This is an instance of feeling guilty because of devotion to Kṛṣṇa.
Another example: In order to string an incomparable garland for Kṛṣṇa, doe-eyed Rādhā went into an inaccessible forest. While picking the beautiful flowers, she became very weak for a few moments, due to exhaustion.
Purport
One day the beautiful-eyed Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī entered into the forest to collect some flowers to prepare a garland for Kṛṣṇa. While collecting the flowers, She became afraid that someone might see Her, and She felt some fatigue and weakness. This is an instance of guilty feelings caused by labor for Kṛṣṇa.
Fatigue due to mental anxieties: Because of the summer heat, the lake’s water dries up and becomes devoid of lotuses and water birds. Mādhava! In a similar way, in separation, Your mother Yaśodā, devoid of happiness, has become weakened. Her soul has departed and her body is withering away.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Sā (she) refers to tava ambā (your mother). Sā vihinā rasa-vyatikareṇa means “Yaśodā is devoid of contact with happiness” in reference to Yaśodā. However, sārasa-vyatikareṇa vihīnā means “the lake is devoid of contact with the sārasa bird and the lotuses.” Śucinā means “with the coming of the summer month of Āṣāḍha.” That meaning is given in Amara-kośa.
Fatigue arising from amorous actions, from Rasa-sudhākara: At the conclusion of amorous activities, Kṛṣṇa raised Rādhā very carefully from the bed. Rādhā then held His hand and came to the veranda of the house shining with moonlight.
Purport
There is a statement in Rasa-sudhākara that after passing the night with Kṛṣṇa, Rādhārāṇī became so weak that She was unable to get up from bed. When Kṛṣṇa took Her hand to help Her, Rādhārāṇī felt guilty about having passed the night with Him.
Fatigue arising from losing the way, dancing or amorous activities is called śrama. In this state, sleep, perspiration, rubbing the body, yawning and heavy breathing appear.
Purport
Fatigue
One feels fatigue after walking a long distance, after dancing and after sexual activity. In this kind of fatigue there is dizziness, perspiration, inactivity of the limbs, yawning and very heavy breathing.
Fatigue from losing the way: When Kṛṣṇa offended his mother and fled away, she pursued her son in Vraja. Her hair become unbound and she began to perspire.
Purport
One day Yaśodā was chasing Kṛṣṇa in the yard after He had offended her. After a while, Yaśodā became very fatigued, and therefore she was perspiring, and her bunched hair became loosened. This is an instance of becoming fatigued because of working too much.
From dancing: At a festival performed for Kṛṣṇa, Baladeva, surrounded by his singing friends on the bank of the Yamunā River, began to dance, moving his body about while his pearl necklace shook. His body became covered in perspiration.
Purport
Sometimes all of the cowherd friends of Kṛṣṇa, along with Balarāma, danced together in some ceremony. At these times the garlands on their necks would move, and the boys would begin to perspire. Their whole bodies became wet from their ecstatic dancing. This is an instance of fatigue caused by dancing.
From amorous actions, from the Tenth Canto: Seeing that the gopīs were fatigued from conjugal enjoyment, my dear King, merciful Kṛṣṇa lovingly wiped their faces with His comforting hand. SB 10.33.20
Purport
In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Tenth Canto, Thirty-third Chapter, verse 20, it is said that after enjoying loving affairs with Kṛṣṇa by dancing, embracing and kissing, the gopīs would sometimes become very tired, and Kṛṣṇa, out of His causeless mercy and compassion, would smear their faces with His lotus hands. This is an example of fatigue caused by laboring in the rāsa dance.
Rapture which destroys all sense of discriminating power is called mada. There are two types: arising from intoxication and arising from extreme transformations due to love. In this state there is stumbling while walking, uncoordinated movement of the limbs, and uncoordinated speaking. The eyes roll, and the face becomes red.
Purport
Intoxication
When one becomes arrogant with false prestige due to drinking intoxicants or being too lustful, the voice becomes faulty, the eyes become swollen, and there are symptoms of redness on the body.
Rapture arising from intoxication, from Lalita-mādhava: Baladeva arrived with disheveled hair, fully intoxicated with liquor. He began to shout, “The ant-like kings, being defeated, are hiding in some hole. I will smash the whole universe. O Indra, plaything of Śacī! Why are you laughing?”
Purport
There is a statement in the Lalita-mādhava that Lord Baladeva, intoxicated from drinking excessive quantities of honey, once began to address the ants, “O you kings of the ants! Why are you hiding yourselves in these holes?” At the same time He also addressed the King of heaven, “O King Indra! You plaything of Śacī! Why are you laughing? I am now prepared to smash the whole universe, and I know that Kṛṣṇa will not be angry with Me.” [Note: Baladeva, or Balarāma, is the elder brother of Kṛṣṇa. He is an expansion of the Godhead Himself, and therefore to be considered and incarnation of God, as explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.]
Another example of intoxication from a traditional work: “O Kṛṣṇa! Tell me immediately! Is the earth swerving? Is the moon wobbling? O Yadus, why are you laughing? Give me some wine in a glass!” In this way sitting in his house, Balarāma stuttered while speaking. May that Balarāma give you blessings!
Purport
Then He addressed Kṛṣṇa, “My dear Kṛṣṇa, tell Me immediately why the whole world is trembling and why the moon has become elongated! And O you members of the Yadu dynasty, why are you laughing at Me? Please give Me back My liquors made of honey from the kadamba flower!” Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī prays that Lord Balarāma will be pleased with all of us while He is thus talking just like an intoxicated person.
When a person becomes intoxicated with liquor, the superior person falls asleep. The second best person laughs and sings. The lowest person shouts, uses rough words and weeps.
Purport
In this state of intoxication, Balarāma felt tired and lay down for rest. Generally, those who are exalted personalities lie down when they feel intoxicated, whereas those who are mediocre laugh and sing during intoxication, and those who are lowly use vulgar language and sometimes cry.
atra nātyupayogitvād vistārya na hi varṇitaḥ ||39||
There are three types of intoxication according to the stage of intoxication. However, in this work these will not be discussed as they are not very useful to the topic.
Purport
Such intoxication is manifested according to different ages and mentalities. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī does not describe further in this direction because there is no necessity for such a discussion.
Rapture arising from love: O Vṛndā! See this astonishing thing! Rādhā, in the rapture of new love, gazing at Kṛṣṇa in front of her, sometimes frowns, sometimes wanders about, sometimes laughs, sometimes weeps, sometimes covers her face, sometimes prattles and sometimes repeatedly offers respects to her friends.
Purport
There is another description of the symptoms of intoxication in the person of Śrī Rādhārāṇī after She saw Kṛṣṇa. Sometimes She was walking hither and thither, sometimes She was laughing, sometimes She was covering Her face, sometimes She was talking without any meaning, and sometimes She was praying to Her associate gopīs. Seeing these symptoms in Rādhārāṇī, the gopīs began to talk among themselves: “Just see how Rādhārāṇī has become intoxicated simply by seeing Kṛṣṇa before Her!” This is an instance of ecstatic love in intoxication.
Treating others with contempt due to one’s own good fortune, due to youthful beauty, due to one’s good qualities, due to taking shelter of the Lord, or due to attaining one’s object of love, is called garva or haughtiness.
Purport
Pride
Expressions of ecstatic love in pride may be the result of excessive wealth, exquisite beauty, a first-class residence or the attainment of one’s ideal goal. One is also considered proud when he does not care about the neglect of others.
In this state there are joking words, not giving answers by one’s own choice, showing off one’s body, concealing one’s intentions and not hearing others’ words.
Purport
Pride
Expressions of ecstatic love in pride may be the result of excessive wealth, exquisite beauty, a first-class residence or the attainment of one’s ideal goal. One is also considered proud when he does not care about the neglect of others.
hastam utkṣipya yāto ’si balāt kṛṣṇa kim adbhutam |
[hastam utkshipya yaato ’si balaat krishna kim adbhutam |]
hṛdayād yadi niryāsi pauruṣaṁ gaṇayāmi te ||43||
[hridayaad yadi niryaasi paurusham ganayaami te ||43||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra saubhāgyena, yathā śrī-kṛṣṇa-karṇāmṛte (3.93) –
hastam utkṣipya yāto ’si balāt kṛṣṇa kim adbhutam |
hṛdayād yadi niryāsi pauruṣaṁ gaṇayāmi te ||43||
Haughtiness arising from good fortune, from Kṛṣṇa-karṇāmṛta: O Kṛṣṇa! Is it really astonishing if You can give up holding my hand? I will consider You a real man if You can take Yourself from my heart.
Purport
Bilvamaṅgala Ṭhākura said, “My dear Kṛṣṇa, You are leaving me, forcibly getting out of my clutches. But I shall be impressed by Your strength only when You can go forcibly from the core of my heart.” This is an instance of feeling pride in ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Kṛṣṇa giving up her hand is not actually in her own interest. Such statements are made in love and sorrow.
[drik-paatam aacharatu krishna katham sakhee me ||44||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rūpa-tāruṇyena, yathā –
yasyāḥ svabhāva-madhurāṁ pariṣevya mūrtiṁ
dhanyā babhūva nitarām api yavana-śrīḥ |
seyaṁ tvayi vraja-vadhū-śata-bhukta-mukte
dṛk-pātam ācaratu kṛṣṇa kathaṁ sakhī me ||44||
Haughtiness arising from beauty: Endowed with the beauty of youth, my friend Rādhā is fortunate, having taken shelter of the form of natural sweetness. How can she glance at You, who have enjoyed hundreds upon hundreds of women of Vraja and then abandoned them?
Purport
Once during the rāsa dance, when Rādhārāṇī left the arena and Kṛṣṇa went to seek Her out, one of the dear friends of Rādhārāṇī addressed Kṛṣṇa thus: “My dear Kṛṣṇa, You have been very much obliging in serving the form of our Śrī Rādhārāṇī, and now You have left all the other gopīs to search for Her. Please allow me to inquire how You want Her to treat You.” This is an instance of feeling pride on account of exquisite beauty.
Haughtiness arising from good qualities: The cowherd boys can make unlimited garlands of the most beautiful, fragrant flowers. But Kṛṣṇa, showing great astonishment at the skill in its making, will eagerly hold over His heart my garland.
Purport
Sometimes Rādhārāṇī felt pride within Herself and said, “Although the cowherd boys prepare nice flower garlands for Kṛṣṇa, when I present My garland to Him, He becomes struck with wonder and immediately accepts it and puts it on His heart.”
From taking the shelter of the Lord, from the Tenth Canto: O Mādhava, Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord of the goddess of fortune, if devotees completely in love with You sometimes fall from the path of devotion, they do not fall like nondevotees, for You still protect them. Thus they fearlessly traverse the heads of their opponents and continue to progress in devotional service. SB 10.2.33
Purport
Similarly, in the Tenth Canto, Second Chapter, verse 33, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Lord Brahmā says, “My dear Madhusūdana, persons who are pure devotees of Your Lordship actually feel Your ecstatic friendship, and as such they are never vanquished by enemies. They know they are always protected by You, and so they can matter-of-factly pass over the heads of their enemies without any care.” In other words, one who has taken complete shelter under the lotus feet of the Lord is always proud of being able to conquer all enemies.
[vaikuntha-naatha-karunaam api naadya chetah ||47||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iṣṭa-lābhena, yathā –
vṛndāvanendra bhavataḥ paramaṁ prasādam
āsādya nandita-matir muhur uddhato ’smi |
āśaṁsate muni-manoratha-vṛtti-mṛgyāṁ
vaikuṇṭha-nātha-karuṇām api nādya cetaḥ ||47||
Haughtiness from attaining one’s desired object: O moon of Vṛndāvana! Receiving Your excellent mercy, in great bliss, I have become proud. Today my heart does not even desire the mercy of the Lord of Vaikuṇṭha which is sought by the minds of the sages.
Purport
One weaver at Mathurā addressed Kṛṣṇa in this way: “My dear King of Vṛndāvana, I have become so proud of Your causeless mercy upon me that I do not even count upon the mercy of the Lord of Vaikuṇṭha, which is sought after by many great sages in deep meditation.” In other words, although the yogīs and great sages sit in meditation upon Lord Viṣṇu, who is residing in Vaikuṇṭha, a devotee of Kṛṣṇa is so proud that he does not consider such meditation to be very valuable. This feeling of pride is due to one’s having achieved the highest goal of life—Kṛṣṇa.
Apprehension due to committing theft, offense, or others’ cruelty is called śaṅkā. In this state, there is drying of the mouth, change of complexion, glancing in all directions, and hiding oneself.
Apprehension from theft: After stealing the calves and cowherd boys out of pride, Brahmā, desiring to disappear from Kṛṣṇa’s presence, out of great apprehension glanced with his eight eyes in the eight directions.
Purport
After Lord Brahmā had stolen all of the calves, cows and cowherd boys from Kṛṣṇa, he was trying to go away. But all of a sudden he became doubtful about his stealing affairs and began to watch on all sides with his eight eyes. Lord Brahmā has four heads, and therefore he has eight eyes. This is an instance of ecstatic love in doubt, caused by stealing.
Another example: Akrura thought, “I have hidden the Syamantaka jewel which gives wealth, and fled away. In anxiety because of this despicable act, until today, happiness has disappeared from my heart.”
Purport
Similarly, just to please Kṛṣṇa, Akrūra stole the Syamantaka maṇi, a stone which can produce unlimited quantities of gold, but later on he repented his stealing. This is another instance of ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa in doubt caused by stealing.
Apprehension from offense: O Indra! As long as you pour rain upon Nanda’s fields, you will be despondent. Listen as I tell you something for your benefit. By surrendering completely to Kṛṣṇa’s lotus feet, you will enjoy full powers as Indra without apprehension in your heart.
Purport
When the King of heaven, Indra, was causing torrents of rain to fall on the land of Vraja, he was advised to surrender himself at the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa. At that time Indra’s face became very dark because of doubt.
Apprehension on seeing others’ cruelty, from Padyāvalī: O friend! Thinking of Kṛṣṇa living in Mathurā surrounded by the ferocious demons of Kaṁsa, I am deeply afflicted. In the same way I feel affliction in separation from Kṛṣṇa.
Purport
In the Padyāvalī there is the following statement: “My dear friend, Kṛṣṇa’s residence in the demoniac circle at Mathurā, under the supremacy of the king of demons, Kaṁsa, is causing me much worry.” This is one instance of apprehending some danger to Kṛṣṇa in ecstatic love for Him. [Note: This paragraph has been shifted from after verse 54.]
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Out of affection this person worries for what cannot actually happen to Kṛṣṇa. This is according to the rule anisṭā-śāṅkīni bandhu-hrḍayānī: the hearts of friends are filled with apprehension and unsteadiness concerning the welfare of their friends. (Abhijñāna-śakuntalā-nāṭaka)
The disturbance which arises in the heart from lightning, fearful creatures or a loud sound is called trāsa (terror). In this state a person grasps nearby objects for support. His hairs stand on end. He quivers, becomes paralyzed, and wanders about.
Purport
Apprehension
When a person becomes disturbed in his heart by seeing lightning in the sky, by seeing a ferocious animal or by hearing a tumultuous sound, his state of mind is called apprehensive. In such a state of apprehension, one tries to take shelter of something which provides safety. There may be standing of the hairs on the body, trembling of the body and sometimes the committing of mistakes. And sometimes the body may become stunned.
rakṣa kṛṣṇeti cukrośa ko ’pi gopī-stanandhayaḥ ||55||
[raksha krishneti chukrosha ko ’pi gopee-stanandhayah ||55||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra taḍitā, yathā –
bāḍhaṁ niviḍayā sadyas taḍitā tāḍitekṣaṇaḥ |
rakṣa kṛṣṇeti cukrośa ko ’pi gopī-stanandhayaḥ ||55||
Terror from lightning: When the eyes of the cowherd boys became pained by the flashing of lightning, they became to shout “O Kṛṣṇa, please protect us!”
Terror from ferocious beasts: When Vṛṣāsura, taking the form of a bull, approached, some of the gopīs began to tremble. Suddenly embracing a tamāla tree, mistaking it for Kṛṣṇa, they could not move.
Purport
When Vṛṣāsura appeared in Vṛndāvana as a bull, all of the gopīs became greatly affected with fear. Being perturbed in that way, they began to embrace the tamāla trees. This is an instance of fear caused by a ferocious animal and of the search for shelter while remembering Kṛṣṇa in ecstatic love.
Terror arising from frightening sounds: When the very wise Yaśodā heard the terrifying howling of wolves echoing in all directions, which gave pain to the ears, she kept Kṛṣṇa within her eyesight continually for some days.
Purport
Upon hearing the jackals crying in the forest of Vṛndāvana, Mother Yaśodā sometimes became very careful about keeping Kṛṣṇa under her vigilance, fearing that Kṛṣṇa might be attacked by them. This is an instance of ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa in fear caused by a tumultuous sound.
Disturbance of the heart which suddenly produces shaking of the limbs is called trāsa. This is different from fear. Fear arises after deliberating on previous and subsequent events.
Purport
This kind of fear is a little different from being actually afraid. When one is afraid of something, he can still think of past and future. But when there is this kind of ecstatic apprehension, there is no scope for such thinking.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This verse distinguishes trāsa from fear (bhaya). Manaḥ-kṣobha means the same as hṛt-kṣobha mentioned earlier in relation to trāsa. Trāsa occurs without any consideration of connections (sahasā). According to Amara-kośa, sahasā can mean “without consideration.” Therefore, if there is disturbance of the mind and shaking of the limbs without any consideration or thought, it is called trāsa. Fear or bhaya arises after consideration. Instead of vicārottham, vicārotthe is also seen in some texts. If there is disturbance of the mind after consideration, it is called fear. Therefore, it is different from trāsa.
cittasya sambhramo yaḥ syād āvego ’yaṁ sa cāṣṭadhā |
priyāpriyānala-marud-varṣotpāta-gajāritaḥ ||59||
Confusion of the mind is called āvega. It is of eight types, arising from dear things, detested objects, fire, wind, rain, calamity, elephants or enemies.
Purport
Intense Emotion
Emotion is caused by something very dear, by something very detestable, by fire, by strong wind, by strong rainfall, by some natural disturbance, by the sight of a big elephant or by the sight of an enemy.
apriyotthe tu bhū-pāta-vikrośa-bhramaṇādayaḥ ||60||
[apriyotthe tu bhoo-paata-vikrosha-bhramanaadayah ||60||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
priyotthe pulakaḥ sāntvaṁ cāpalyābhyudgamādayaḥ |
apriyotthe tu bhū-pāta-vikrośa-bhramaṇādayaḥ ||60||
In āvega arising from dear objects, standing of hair on end, words of affection, fickleness, and rising to one’s feet appear. In āvega arising from detested objects, falling on the ground, shouting and wandering about appear.
Purport
When there is emotion caused by seeing something very dear, one can speak very swiftly and use kind words. When there is emotion caused by seeing something detestable, one cries very loudly.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Sāntvam means “uttering affectionate words.” Abhyudgama means abhyutthana, rising up.
In āvega arising from fire, the actions are retreating, shaking of the body, closing the eyes, and tears. In āvega from wind, the actions are covering the body, walking swiftly, and rubbing the eyes.
Purport
When there is emotion caused by seeing fire, one tries to flee. There may also be trembling of the body, closing of the eyes and tears in the eyes. When one becomes emotional on account of a strong wind, one tries to run very swiftly and rubs his eyes.
In āvega arising from rain, the actions are running, holding an umbrella and crouching down. In āvega arising from calamity, the actions are discoloration of the face, astonishment and strong shaking of the body.
Purport
When one is emotional because of rainfall, one takes an umbrella, and there is tension in his body. When there is emotion due to a sudden disturbance, one’s face becomes discolored, one becomes struck with wonder, and there is trembling of the body.
In āvega from elephants, the actions are fleeing away, strong shaking, trāsa and looking behind. In āvega arising from enemies, the actions are taking up armor and weapons, abandoning one’s house and going elsewhere.
Purport
If there is emotion from seeing an elephant, one may jump and show various signs of fear, and sometimes one may keep looking behind him. When there is emotion due to the presence of an enemy, one looks for a fatal weapon and tries to escape.
Āvega arising from seeing one’s object of affection: When Yaśodā, the queen of Gokula, saw Kṛṣṇa returning from the forest of Vṛndāvana, her hair stood on end. She became perplexed and milk began to flow from her breast.
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa returned from the forest of Vṛndāvana, Mother Yaśodā was so emotional from seeing her son that milk began to flow from her breasts. This is an instance of emotion caused by seeing a dear object.
Āvega arising from hearing about one’s object of affection, from the Tenth Canto: The wives of the brāhmaṇas were always eager to see Kṛṣṇa, for their minds had been enchanted by descriptions of Him. Thus as soon as they heard that He had come, they became very excited. SB 10.23.18
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Twenty-third Chapter, verse 18, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Śukadeva Gosvāmī informs King Parīkṣit, “My dear King, the wives of the brāhmaṇas were usually very much attached to the glorification of Kṛṣṇa, and they were always anxious to get an opportunity to see Him. Because of this, when they heard that Kṛṣṇa was nearby, they became very anxious to see Him and immediately left their homes.” This is an instance of emotional activity caused by the presence of someone very dear.
From seeing something detestable: Hearing a terrifying sound and seeing Kṛṣṇa on the chest of Pūtanā during a dream at night, Yaśodā wailed in a loud voice, “What is this? What is this?” She began wandering about in confusion.
Purport
When Pūtanā, the demoniac witch, was struck down and killed by Kṛṣṇa, Mother Yaśodā was struck with wonder and began to cry emotionally, “Oh, what is this? What is this?” When she saw that her dear baby Kṛṣṇa was playing on the chest of the dead demoniac woman, Mother Yaśodā, at a loss what to do, began to walk this way and that. This is an instance of being emotional on account of seeing something ghastly.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Yaśodā wailed (lapantī) in a loud voice “What is this?”
Hearing something detestable: Hearing that Kṛṣṇa was situated between two Arjuna trees on the bank of the Yamunā, Yaśodā with eyes turned upwards, became struck with confusion, and could not decide what to do.
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa uprooted the two arjuna trees and Yaśodā heard the sound of the trees crashing down, she became overcome with emotion and simply stared upward, being too bewildered to know what else to do. This is an instance of being emotional from hearing a tumultuous sound.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This incident is also described in BRS 4.5.10, describing raudra-rasa.
Āvega arising from fire: O Kṛṣṇa with peacock feather! See the fire making a constantly ferocious sound. It is touching the Mandākinī River of Svarga with its long flames, as if sipping its waters. You are the jewel which protects the life of Your friends. Seeing You standing in the midst of the deep forest in order to protect the cows, our hearts have become bewildered.
Purport
When there was a forest fire in Vṛndāvana, all the cowherd men assembled together and desperately appealed to Kṛṣṇa for protection. This is an instance of emotion caused by fire.
Āvega arising from wind: When Tṛṇāvarta, making a terrifying sound, endowed with great strength to uproot large forest trees, spreading clouds of dust, carrying cow dung, dust, grass and stones, began to sway the branches of the Bhāṇḍira tree, Yaśodā, the wife of Nanda, not seeing her son Kṛṣṇa on the ground, became overcome with great confusion.
Purport
The whirlwind demon known as Tṛṇāvarta once carried Kṛṣṇa off from the ground and blew Him around, along with some very big trees. At that time, Mother Yaśodā could not see her son, and she was so disturbed that she began to walk this way and that. This is an instance of emotion caused by severe wind.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This is a description of the actions of rākṣasas. Śārkara means sand and stones together. It means “filled with gravel.” It is derived from śarkara. By lengthening the “a” it takes a possessive
meaning “filled with gravel.”
gopā gopyaś ca śītārtā govindaṁ śaraṇaṁ yayuḥ ||70||
[gopaa gopyash cha sheetaartaa govindam sharanam yayuh ||70||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
varṣajo, yathā śrī-daśame–
atyāsārātivātena paśavo jāta-vepanāḥ |
gopā gopyaś ca śītārtā govindaṁ śaraṇaṁ yayuḥ ||70||
Āvega arising from rain, from the Tenth Canto: The cows and other animals, shivering from the excessive rain and wind, and the cowherd men and ladies, pained by the cold, all approached Lord Govinda for shelter. SB 10.25.11
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Twenty-fifth Chapter, verse 11, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there is a description of Indra’s causing severe torrents of rain at Vṛndāvana. All the cows and cowherd boys became so afflicted by the wind and cold that they all gathered together to take shelter under the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa. This is an instance of emotion caused by severe rainfall.
sphuṭam asi tad-agārān mā sma bhūr niryiyāsuḥ ||71||
[sphutam asi tad-agaaraan maa sma bhoor niryiyaasuh ||71||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā vā –
samam uru-karakābhir danti-śuṇḍā-sapiṇḍāḥ
pratidiśam iha goṣṭhe vṛṣṭi-dhārāḥ patanti |
ajaniṣata yuvāno ’py ākulās tvaṁ tu bālaḥ
sphuṭam asi tad-agārān mā sma bhūr niryiyāsuḥ ||71||
Another example: Showers of rain along with hail are falling profusely like juice from the foreheads of elephants. The young men have become confused. You are just a boy. Therefore, do not try to go out of the house.
Purport
There were severe torrents of hail when Kṛṣṇa was staying in the forest of Vṛndāvana, and the elderly persons bade Him, “Kṛṣṇa, don’t You move now! Even persons who are stronger and older than You cannot move, and You are just a little boy. So please stay still!” This is an instance of emotion caused by heavy hailing.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
However, Kṛṣṇa could go to Govardhana in the rain without getting wet, just as He had transferred Himself and the cowherd boys from the forest fire to the Bhāṇḍira tree safely. (SB 10.19.13)
Āvega arising from calamity: Becoming perplexed, Yaśodā said, “The broad earth is suddenly shaking. In the sky meteors are making terrifying sounds. My young boy has just now gone to the bank of the Yamunā contaminated with the poison of Kāliya. What should I do?”
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa was chastising Kāliya in the poisonous water of the Yamunā, Mother Yaśodā began to speak emotionally: “Oh, see how the earth appears to be trembling! There appears to be an earth tremor, and in the sky meteors are flying here and there! My dear son has entered into the poisonous water of the Yamunā. What shall I do now?” This is an instance of emotion resulting from a natural disturbance.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Just at this time (adhunā) Kṛṣṇa has gone (aṭati). Talati or tvalati means it was disturbed or shaking. In an untimely manner, meteors were visible in the sky. This suggests an eclipse of the sun which made it dark enough to see the meteors. Ghuranti means that the meteors made a terrifying sound.
Āvega arising from elephants: O Śyāmasundara! Flee quickly! Flee quickly! There is terrifying elephant in front of You. Because of Your sweet glances, the fickle hearts of us Mathurā women have become completely disturbed.
Purport
In the arena of Kaṁsa, when Kṛṣṇa was attacked by big elephants, all of the ladies present began to address Him in this way: “My dear boy—please leave this place immediately! Please leave this place immediately! Don’t You see the big elephants coming to attack You? Your innocent gazing upon them is causing us too much perturbation!”
Another example: O mother! The horse demon Keśī blinds the heavenly damsels of Indra by raising the dust in the stables with his hooves. By shaking his mane, he whips the horses pulling the chariot of the sun and makes them flee away. But let that demon horse come towards Me! My long arm is ready for him! Why are you so disturbed?
Purport
Kṛṣṇa then told Mother Yaśodā, “My dear mother, don’t be perturbed by the appearance of the elephants and horses that are so forcibly coming and raising dust, causing blindness to these lotus-eyed women. Let even the Keśī demon come before Me; My arms will still be adequate for victory. So please don’t be perturbed.”
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
These are explanatory words of Kṛṣṇa to His mother. Though the phrase garvāndham (blind with pride) describes the horse demon, it modifies the verb prayāsīdatu (let him come foolishly towards Me.) It describes the demon’s foolishness in approaching the Lord out of pride. Since My very long arm (drāghiṣṭhe bhuje) is constantly alert for killing such demons (muhur jāgrati), do not be disturbed. Sarvāriṣṭa-hare ’tra (this arm which takes away all misfortune) is sometimes seen instead of drāghiṣṭhe muhur atra.
Disturbance arising from enemies, from Lalita-mādhava: Here is the lowest demon Śaṅkhacūḍa, sturdy in body, with arms long as tāla trees and chest broad as a mountain plateau. What a match for the beautiful child resembling Cupid, soft as the bud of new tamāla tree! Is there no skilful person here to help us? O queen of Vraja, I cannot understand where all the results of your austerities have gone today.
Purport
In the Lalita-mādhava, a friend tells Mother Yaśodā, “How wonderful it is that when the Śaṅkhacūḍa demon—as vast and strong as a great hill—attacked your Cupid-like beautiful son, there was no one present in Vṛndāvana to help. And yet the demon was killed by your little son. It appears to be due to the result of severe penances and austerities in your past lives that your son was saved in this way.”
rājñaḥ putrī bata hṛta-hṛtā kāminā vallavena ||77||
[raajnah putree bata hrita-hritaa kaaminaa vallavena ||77||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā vā tatraiva (5.30) –
saptiḥ saptī ratha iha rathaḥ kuñjaro me
tūṇas tūṇo dhanur uta dhanur bhoḥ kṛpāṇī kṛpāṇī |
kā bhīḥ kā bhīr ayam ayam ahaṁ hā tvaradhvaṁ tvaradhvaṁ
rājñaḥ putrī bata hṛta-hṛtā kāminā vallavena ||77||
Another example, also from Lalita-mādhava: When Kṛṣṇa stole Rukmiṇī at the svayaṁvara, the kings spoke to their servants. “My horse, chariot, elephant, bow quiver, and sword are here. What fear do I have? You should be quick! The lusty cowherd has stolen the daughter of a king!”
Purport
In the same Lalita-mādhava there is an account of Kṛṣṇa’s kidnapping Rukmiṇī at her royal marriage ceremony. At that time all of the princes present began to converse among themselves, saying, “We have our elephants, horses, chariots, bows, arrows and swords, so why should we be afraid of Kṛṣṇa? Let us attack Him! He is nothing but a lusty cowherd boy! He cannot take away the princess in this way! Let us all attack Him!” This is an instance of emotion caused by the presence of enemies.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
In repeating the words such as ratha iha ratha etc. there is no redundancy. The words are repeated in order to convey the words of many kings.
Though the above example is actually only an ābhāsa of āvega, being the sentiment of āvega in non-devotees, taking Kṛṣṇa as the enemy, because it reveals the superior nature of Kṛṣṇa, it is given as an example.
Purport
Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī is trying to prove by the above examples that in relationship with Kṛṣṇa there is no question of impersonalism. All personal activities are there in relationship with Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Here it is understood that by hearing about demons being defeated by Kṛṣṇa’s party, the devotees become joyful, and their rati increases. For this purpose, such examples are given.
Confused understanding caused by extreme bliss, calamity or separation is called unmāda (insanity). [Note: Unmāḍa is defined as hṛd-bhrama.This is similar to āvega, which was defined as cittasya bhrama, confused mind. The difference is that unmāda arises from extreme states, and produces more extreme actions.] In this state the actions are loud laughing, dancing, singing, useless actions, prattling, running, shouting and performing activities opposite of what are normally performed.
Confused understanding caused by extreme bliss, calamity or separation is called unmāda (insanity). [Note: Unmāḍa is defined as hṛd-bhrama.This is similar to āvega, which was defined as cittasya bhrama, confused mind. The difference is that unmāda arises from extreme states, and produces more extreme actions.] In this state the actions are loud laughing, dancing, singing, useless actions, prattling, running, shouting and performing activities opposite of what are normally performed.
Insanity arising from intense bliss, from Kṛṣṇa-karṇāmṛta: May Rādhā who, having surrendering her heart to Kṛṣṇa, churned an empty yogurt pot, purify the world. And may Kṛṣṇa, whose eyes like bees hovered upon Rādhā’s breasts which were like flower clusters, with mind absorbed in Rādhā, and who began milking a bull, purify the world.
Purport
Śrīla Bilvamaṅgala Ṭhākura prays in his book as follows: “Let Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī purify the whole world, because She has surrendered Herself completely unto Kṛṣṇa. Out of Her ecstatic love for Him, She sometimes acted just like an addled person and attempted to churn yogurt, although there was no yogurt in the pot. And seeing this, Kṛṣṇa became so enchanted by Rādhārāṇī that He began to milk a bull instead of a cow.” These are some of the instances of insanity or madness in connection with the loving affairs of Rādhā and Kṛṣṇa.
Insanity arising from calamity: What a calamity! When Kṛṣṇa entered the lake of Kāliya, Yaśodā became insane, and thinking the animals were knowers of mantras, folded her hands and began offering them respects. Thinking the trees were doctors, she asked them for medicine to counteract the poison.
Purport
In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam it is said that when Kṛṣṇa entered the poisonous waters of the Yamunā, Śrīmatī Yaśodā-devī went insane. Instead of searching for curative herbs, she began to speak to the trees as if they were snake chanters. With folded hands she began to bow down to the trees, asking them, “What is the medicinal herb which can check Kṛṣṇa’s dying from this poisonous water?” This is an instance of insanity caused by some great danger.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
From the animals Yaśodā asked with folded hands about the destruction of the snake’s strength. From the trees she asked about medicine for destroying the snake’s poison.
Insanity arising from separation, from the Tenth Canto: The gopīs began to sing in a loud voice together and began to search for Kṛṣṇa in the various forests like insane persons. They began to inquire from the trees about that person who is inside and outside of all living beings like ether. SB 10.30.4
Purport
How a devotee can be in a state of insanity because of ecstatic love is described in the Tenth Canto, Thirtieth Chapter, verse 4, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, wherein the gopīs were searching for Kṛṣṇa in the forests of Vṛndāvana. The gopīs were loudly singing the glories of Kṛṣṇa and wandering from one forest to another in search of Him. They knew that Kṛṣṇa is not localized, but all-pervading. He is in the sky, He is in the water, He is in the air, and He is the Supersoul in everyone’s heart. Thus the gopīs began to inquire from all kinds of trees and plants about the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This is an instance of ecstatic madness on the part of devotees.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This is a suitable example of insanity. They inquired from the trees about their lover, Kṛṣṇa (puruṣam). They asked the trees about Kṛṣṇa appearing directly as the Lord who resides inside and outside of all moving and non-moving living entities like ether. Such displays arise because of special actions of the gopīs’ prema. Trees manifest Viṣṇu within in the following way:
vana-latās tarava ātmani viṣṇuṁ
vyañjayantya iva puṣpa-phalāḍhyāḥ
The trees and creepers in the forest respond by becoming so luxuriant with fruits and flowers that they seem to be manifesting Lord Viṣṇu within their hearts. SB 10.35.9
Since the manifestation of the Lord as being outside everything is far away from the senses to perceive, and since the manifestation of the Lord within is too close for the senses to perceive, in the state of madness it seems sensible to ask questions to those who have no senses at all such as the trees.
unmādaḥ pṛthag utko ’yaṁ vyādhiṣv antarbhavann api |
[unmaadah prithag utko ’yam vyaadhishv antarbhavann api |]
yat tatra vipralambhādau vaicitrīṁ kurute parām ||84||
[yat tatra vipralambhaadau vaichitreem kurute paraam ||84||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
unmādaḥ pṛthag utko ’yaṁ vyādhiṣv antarbhavann api |
yat tatra vipralambhādau vaicitrīṁ kurute parām ||84||
Insanity could be included within sickness (vyādhiṣu). However, it is described separately because in states such as separation, it induces a unique variety of actions. Vyādhiṣu means “among different types of sickness.”
Purport
Similarly, there are symptoms of diseases caused by ecstatic love.
When a person attains the stage of bewilderment in the adhirūḍha stage of mahā-bhāva, unmāda takes on another form called divyonmāda.
Purport
This condition is credited by learned scholars as being mahābhāva. This highly elevated condition is also called divyonmāda, or transcendental madness.
A condition of almost total lack of consciousness arising from disturbance of the dhātus due to grief is called apasmāra (epilepsy). In that state there is falling on the ground, running about, pain in the limbs, confusion, shaking of the body, foaming at the mouth, flailing the arms and shouting.
Purport
Forgetfulness
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Āsphoṭanam means “pain or agitation in the limbs.”
An example: O best of the Yadus! Now, our mother Yaśodā, because of pain due to separation from You for a long time is foaming at the mouth like the shore of the ocean. Her arms are moving about like waves in the ocean. She sometimes whirls about, sometimes rolls on the ground, makes sounds and sometimes remains motionless.
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa was absent from Vṛndāvana and was staying in Mathurā, Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī sent news to Him that His mother, the Queen of Vraja, was feeling such separation from Him that there was foam coming from her mouth, like the foam on the shore of the ocean. And sometimes she was raising her arms like the waves of the ocean, and because of her intense feelings of separation, she was rolling on the ground and creating a tumultuous roaring sound. And sometimes she was remaining completely silent, like a calm sea. These symptoms of separation from Kṛṣṇa are called apasmāra, or forgetfulness. One completely forgets his position when he manifests these symptoms in ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This is message sent by Rādhā to Kṛṣṇa. Velā means “shore or water” according to the Amara-kośa. The phrase vraja-rāja-rājñī means “the queen who reigns (rāja) over Vraja, Yaśodā.”
ghūrṇann arṇava-sīmni maṇḍalatayā bhrāmyan na viśrāmyati ||88||
Another example: Crown jewel of the Yadus! Hearing that You killed Kaṁsa, Kaṁsa’s close friends underwent unspeakable, terrible transformations. They wander on the beach whirling about like wheels and cannot stop. From their mouths, foam flows in great quantities and their arms flail about. [Note: This is also a case of ābhāsa, since it takes place in the enemies of Kṛṣṇa.]
Purport
Another message was once sent to Kṛṣṇa informing Him that after He had killed Kaṁsa, one of Kaṁsa’s demon friends had gone insane. This demon was foaming at the mouth, waving his arms and rolling on the ground.
This sickness called apasmāra has been described separately from sickness, as in the case of unmāda, since it produces an extremely astonishing state with a hint of bhayānaka-rasa (fear).
Purport
This demoniac demonstration is in relationship with Kṛṣṇa in a ghastly humor. This mellow or flavor is one of the indirect relationships with Kṛṣṇa. The first five kinds of relationships are called direct, and the other seven are called indirect. Some way or other, the demon must have had some relationship with Kṛṣṇa, because these symptoms developed when he heard that Kṛṣṇa had already killed Kaṁsa. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī remarks that there is also transcendental excellence in this kind of symptom.
Sickness such as fever generated from extreme sorrow at hearing of contempt for Kṛṣṇa by the demons or from separation or other events is called vyādhi or disease, but in this book vyādhi refers to symptoms caused by an emotional state (rather than from disturbance of the dhātus) arising from that separation. In this state, paralysis, slackness of the limbs, heavy breathing, anxiety and fatigue occur.
O Kṛṣṇa! Separated from You for a long time, Your associates in Vraja are afflicted. Their bodies are burning and remain motionless. Their nostrils quiver because of heavy breathing, and they roll on the ground.
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa was absent from Vṛndāvana and was staying at Mathurā, some of His friends informed Him, “Dear Kṛṣṇa, because of their separation from You, the inhabitants of Vraja are so afflicted that they appear to be diseased. Their bodies are feverish, and they cannot move properly. They are simply lying down on the ground and breathing heavily.”
A complete lack of awareness (internal inaction) arising from joy, separation, fear or lamentation is called moha. In this state there is falling on the ground, absence of sense perceptions, wandering around and inactivity.
Moha arising from joy, from the Tenth Canto: O Śaunaka, greatest of saints and devotees, when Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired from Śukadeva Gosvāmī in this way, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, immediately remembering subject matters about Kṛṣṇa within the core of his heart, externally lost contact with the actions of his senses. Thereafter, with great difficulty, he revived his external sensory perception and began to speak to Mahārāja Parīkṣit about kṛṣṇa-kathā. SB 10.12.44
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Twelfth Chapter, verse 44, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Mahārāja Parīkṣit asked about Lord Ananta, and upon hearing this question, Śukadeva Gosvāmī began to show symptoms of collapsing. Yet he checked himself and answered King Parīkṣit’s question in a mild voice. This collapsing condition is described as a feverish state resulting from ecstatic pleasure.
Another example of moha arising from joy: Seeing Kṛṣṇa alone in Kurukṣetra, the women of Vraja stopped breathing, stopped blinking their eyes, stopped all actions and became devoid of consciousness. They remained standing there like golden statues.
Purport
There is another statement in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam telling of the damsels of Vraja meeting Kṛṣṇa at the sacred place of Kurukṣetra, many years after their childhood pastimes. When they met in that sacred place, all the gopīs became stunned by the occurrence of a solar eclipse. Their breathing, blinking of the eyes and all similar activities stopped, and they stood before Kṛṣṇa just like statues. This is another instance of a diseased condition resulting from exuberant transcendental pleasure.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Nirucchsvasita-rītayaḥ means “the gopīs from whom there were manifestations (rītayaḥ) of heavy breathing.” Śālabhañjī means a statue.
Moha arising from separation, from Haṁsadūta: Once, Rādhā, in order to assuage the fire of separation in her heart, went to the bank of the Yamunā with her friends, but seeing there the familiar bower of creepers, her heart became covered with a blank state of mind--which was her dear friend, like deep sleep.
Purport
NoD 30: Further Features of Ecstatic Love for Kṛṣṇa
Confusion
There is the following statement in the Haṁsadūta: “One day when Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī was feeling much affliction because of Her separation from Kṛṣṇa, She went to the bank of the Yamunā with some of Her friends. There Rādhārāṇī saw a cottage wherein She and Kṛṣṇa had experienced many loving pleasures, and by remembering those incidents She immediately became overcome with dizziness. This dizziness was very prominently visible.” This is an instance of confusion caused by separation.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Kuṭīra means a bower made of creepers. From seeing the bower, a state of moha covered her mind. It is described as a dear friend, since the moha was similar to deep sleep (which everyone welcomes every night).
Moha arising from fear: When Kṛṣṇa showed His universal form, Arjuna, who had the insignia of Hanumān on his flag, seeing that form, dropped his Gāṇḍiva bow. However, being in a state of moha, he was not aware of this.
Purport
Similarly, there is a statement describing confusion caused by fearfulness. These symptoms were exhibited by Arjuna when he saw Kṛṣṇa’s universal form on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra. His confusion was so strong that his bow and arrows fell from his hand and he could not perceive anything clearly.
Moha arising from despair, from the Tenth Canto: When Balarāma and the other boys saw that Kṛṣṇa had been devoured by the gigantic duck, they became unconscious, like senses without life. SB 10.11.49
Purport
Death
Once the Bakāsura demon assumed the shape of a very big heron and opened his mouth in order to swallow Kṛṣṇa and all the cowherd boys. When Kṛṣṇa was entering into the demon’s mouth, Balarāma and the other cowherd boys almost fainted and appeared as though they had no life.
kṛṣṇa-sphūrti-viśeṣas tu na kadāpy atra līyate ||98||
[krishna-sphoorti-visheshas tu na kadaapy atra leeyate ||98||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
asyānyatrātma-paryante syāt sarvatraiva mūḍhatā |
kṛṣṇa-sphūrti-viśeṣas tu na kadāpy atra līyate ||98||
When the devotees develop moha, they lose awareness of objects including their own bodies, but awareness of Kṛṣṇa never disappears.
Purport
Even if devotees are illusioned by some ghastly scene or by any accidental occurrence, they never forget Kṛṣṇa. Even in the greatest danger they can remember Kṛṣṇa. This is the benefit of Kṛṣṇa consciousness: even at the time of death, when all the functions of the body become dislocated, the devotee can remember Kṛṣṇa in his innermost consciousness, and this saves him from falling down into material existence. In this way Kṛṣṇa consciousness immediately takes one from the material platform to the spiritual world.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
When the devotees of the Lord develop moha they are still conscious of Kṛṣṇa, because without Him as their shelter, their various emotional states cannot exist. Thus it is said:
itthaṁ sma pṛṣṭaḥ sa tu bādarāyaṇis
tat-smāritānanta-hṛtākhilendriyaḥ
O Śaunaka, greatest of saints and devotees, when Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired from Śukadeva Gosvāmī in this way, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, immediately remembering subject matters about Kṛṣṇa within the core of his heart, externally lost contact with the actions of his senses. SB 10.12.44
When the lack of external awareness becomes most prominent the state is called pralaya (sāttvika-bhāva). When the lack of internal functions becomes prominent it is called moha. Thus in the definition of moha it was said hṛn-mūḍhatā, lack of awareness internally. Mūḍha means a swoon, or lack of consciousness. Hrṭ means internal. The meaning of the state of moha can be derived from the meaning of the roots.
Giving up life because of grief, sickness, fear, beating or exhaustion is called mṛti (death). In this state, unclear speaking, change of bodily color, feeble breathing and hiccups occur.
The pious persons of Mathurā, with weak breathing, eyes glancing sideways and upwards, taking on a unique complexion in their bodies and hiccupping loudly, gave up their lives while uttering Kṛṣṇa’s name unclearly.
Purport
In this connection there is a statement about persons who died at Mathurā: “These persons had a slight breathing exhilaration, their eyes were wide open, the colors of their bodies were changed, and they began to utter the holy name of Kṛṣṇa. In this condition they gave up their material bodies.” These symptoms are prior manifestations of death.
Another example: The sun in the form of Kṛṣṇa drank up the deep darkness of life of the midnight in the form of Pūtanā. Her eyes lit up for a moment beyond her control and then died out, like the glowing of fireflies in the night. That midnight suddenly disappeared with the loud hooting of owls in the form of her death groans.
The state of consciousness just prior to death is generally called mṛti. However, some say that mṛti should be considered only an external similarity to death (anubhāva). It has been described in the enemies of Kṛṣṇa (though it is not the vyabhicāri-bhāva called mṛti) just in order to show His power.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Three statements are made concerning mṛti. The author is not satisfied with the first conclusion, since there is lack of bhāva at the stage of giving up life. The second statement means that giving up life (mṛtiḥ) should only be an external appearance of death-like symptoms (anubhāvaḥ). This is stated by some--meaning the author. Not satisfied with the description of mṛti given in describing Pūtanā in verse 101, he explains that this is not the same as the mṛti-vyabhicāri-bhāva which appears in devotees.
Lack of enthusiasm to do activities because of satiation or fatigue, even though one has the ability to do them is called ālasya.
Purport
Laziness
When, because of self-satisfaction or dislike of excessive labor, a person does not perform his duty in spite of having the energy, he is called lazy. This laziness also is manifested in ecstatic love of Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Sad-bhāve means having the ability to do if one had the enthusiasm.
ālasya arising from satiation: O king of the cowherds! At the festival of Govardhana we have become so satisfied that we cannot even give blessings.
Purport
For example, when some brāhmaṇas were requested by Nanda Mahārāja to circumambulate Govardhana Hill, they told him that they were more interested in offering benedictions than in circumambulating Govardhana Hill. This is an instance of laziness caused by self-satisfaction.
ālasya arising from fatigue: After arm wrestling with me to please me, he cannot do any activity now and he is stretching his limbs. You should not call him to fight immediately.
Purport
Once when Kṛṣṇa, along with His cowherd boyfriends, was having a mock battle, Subala showed the symptoms of fatigue. Kṛṣṇa immediately told His other friends, “Subala is feeling too fatigued from mock-fighting with Me. So please do not disturb him any more by inviting him to fight.” This is an instance of laziness caused by dislike of excessive labor.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Niḥsaha tanuḥ means “his body cannot at all tolerate.” Sahasāhūyatām is an alternative to sahasāhvayatām. Niyuddham means “arm wrestling.”
Absence of the ability to decide anything, which arises from hearing or seeing desirable or undesirable things or which arises from separation, is called jāḍyam. This occurs previous to and following moha (inoperative mind). In this state, blinking of the eyes, silence and forgetfulness occur.
Purport
Inertness
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Apratipattiḥ means “not having the ability to decide.” It is said to be similar to moha since it is the state preceding and following moha, but it is separate from moha.
From hearing what is desirable, from the Tenth Canto: Using their upraised ears as vessels, the cows are drinking the nectar of the flute-song flowing out of Kṛṣṇa’s mouth. The calves, their mouths full of milk from their mothers’ moist nipples, stand still as they take Govinda within themselves through their tear-filled eyes and embrace Him within their hearts. SB 10.21.14
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Twenty-first Chapter, verse 13, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there is an appreciation by the gopīs of the inertia of the cows in Vṛndāvana. The gopīs saw that the cows were hearing the sweet songs vibrated by Kṛṣṇa’s flute and were appearing to be drinking the nectar of these transcendental sounds. The calves were stunned, and they forgot to drink the milk from the milk bags. Their eyes seemed to be embracing Kṛṣṇa, and there were tears in their eyes. This is an instance of inertia resulting from hearing the transcendental vibrations of Kṛṣṇa’s flute.
From hearing what is undesirable: Hearing Keśava call out someone else’s name, the heart of Lakṣmaṇā, one of the leaders of the gopīs, was pained. Her eyes stopped blinking and she did not utter a word.
Purport
When Lakṣmaṇā became disturbed upon hearing words against Kṛṣṇa, she remained inert and did not move her eyelids. This is another example of inertia caused by hearing.
From seeing the object of desire, from the Tenth Canto: King Yudhiṣṭhira respectfully brought Lord Govinda, the Supreme God of gods, to his personal quarters. The King was so overcome with joy that he could not remember all the rituals of worship. SB 10.71.40
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Seventy-first Chapter, verse 39, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there is an account of King Yudhiṣṭhira’s bewilderment after his bringing Kṛṣṇa into his home with the greatest respect. King Yudhiṣṭhira was very much bewildered because of his transcendental pleasure at having Kṛṣṇa present in his house. In fact, while receiving Kṛṣṇa, King Yudhiṣṭhira forgot himself. This is an instance of inertia resulting from the ecstasy of seeing Kṛṣṇa.
From seeing the undesirable, from the Tenth Canto: Sending their minds after Kṛṣṇa, the gopīs stood as motionless as figures in a painting. They remained there as long as the flag atop the chariot was visible, and even until they could no longer see the dust raised by the chariot wheels. SB 10.39.37
Purport
There is another instance in the Tenth Canto, Thirty-ninth Chapter, verse 36, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. When Kṛṣṇa was going to Mathurā, all of the gopīs were standing behind Kṛṣṇa, and upon seeing the chariot leaving, they stood there stunned and did not move. They remained like that until the flag of the chariot and the dust thrown up by its wheels became invisible.
From separation: Your friends, pained by long separation from You, remain on this earth like the deities of neglectful brāhmaṇas which are without ornaments, wearing soiled cloth which is falling off, with limbs dirty and thin.
Purport
Kṛṣṇa was once addressed by His friend thus: “My dear Mukunda [Kṛṣṇa], due to their being separated from You, the cowherd boys are standing just like neglected Deities in the house of a professional brāhmaṇa.” There is a class of professional brāhmaṇas who take to Deity worship as a means of earning their livelihood. Brāhmaṇas in this class are not very interested in the Deity; they are interested mainly in the money they can earn as holy men. So the Deities worshiped by such professional brāhmaṇas are not properly decorated, Their dress is not changed, and Their bodies are not cleaned. They look dirty and are not very attractive. Actually, Deity worship should be done very carefully: the dress should be changed daily, and as far as possible there should be ornaments. Everything should be so clean that the Deity is attractive to all visitors. Here the example is given of the Deities in the house of a professional brāhmaṇa because such Deities are not at all attractive. The friends of Kṛṣṇa, in the absence of Kṛṣṇa, were appearing like such neglected Deities.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Śavala means “soiled with dirt.” Devala is a brāhmaṇa who makes a profession from doing deity worship.
The state of bashfulness, the opposite of audacity, arising from just meeting one’s lover, from performing forbidden actions, from praise or neglect is called vrīḍā (shyness). In this state there is silence, anxiety, covering the head, writing on the ground, and hanging the head.
From meeting the Lord for the first time, from Padyāvalī: O lotus-eyed friend! Blinded with love, you have offered your beautiful body to Govinda. O friend! Do not be miserly by showing yourself to Him only a little. The purchased elephant does not quarrel with the goad.
Purport
When Rādhārāṇī was first introduced to Kṛṣṇa, She felt very bashful. One of Her friends addressed Her in this way: “My dear friend, You have already sold Yourself and all Your beauty to Govinda. Now You should not be bashful. Please look upon Him cheerfully. One who has sold an elephant to another person should not make a miserly quarrel about selling the trident which controls the elephant.” This kind of bashfulness is due to a new introduction in ecstatic love with Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Just as the purchased elephant does not object to the goad and cooperates with its new owner, you should also cooperate with Govinda.
Shame arising from doing forbidden actions: O Indra! You should not hang down your head in shame and remain silent. Take the parijāta tree and go. Otherwise how can you show your face to your wife?
Purport
The heavenly King, Indra, upon being defeated in his fight with Kṛṣṇa for possession of the pārijāta flower, became very bashful because of his defeat. He was standing before Kṛṣṇa, bowing down his head, when Kṛṣṇa said, “All right, Indra, you can take this pārijāta flower. Otherwise, you will not be able to show your face before your wife, Śacīdevī.” Indra’s bashfulness was due to defeat.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
These are the words of Kṛṣṇa. Śiraḥ avāk means “hanging the head.” Vadanam avāk means “being silent.”
Shame from being praised: When Kṛṣṇa praised Uddhava, listing all of his good qualities, Uddhava lowered his head and took on a unique attractiveness.
Purport
In another instance, Kṛṣṇa began to praise Uddhava for his various high qualifications. Upon being praised by Kṛṣṇa, Uddhava also bowed down his head bashfully.
Shame arising from neglect, from Hari-vaṁśa, in a statement by Satyā: Raivataka Mountain is always glorious with spring flowers. How can I look upon that mountain when I have lost the affection of Kṛṣṇa, though once I most dear to Him?
Purport
In the Hari-vaṁśa, Satyabhāmā, feeling slighted by Rukmiṇī’s high position, said, “My dear Kṛṣṇa, the Raivataka Mountain is always full of spring flowers, but when I have become persona non grata to You, what is the use of my observing them?” This is an instance of bashfulness resulting from being defeated.
The external action of wanting to hide one’s external symptoms because of thinking oneself low is called avahitthā.
Purport
Concealment
There is a symptom of ecstatic love known as concealment, or trying to hide one’s real mental condition by externally showing another attitude.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Kenacit bhavena means “under the control of that bhāva.” Ākāra-guptiḥ means concealing ones anubhāvas (external symptoms). Thus, desiring to conceal one’s anubhāvas because of internal feelings of lowness is called avahitthā.
In this state, hiding one’s limbs so others will think one is something else, glancing elsewhere, useless actions, and clever use of words occur.
Purport
In this state of mind one tries to hide his mind by looking away in different directions, by unnecessarily trying for something which is impossible, or by using words which cover one’s real thoughts.
The ancient authorities say that the bhāva which conceals ones anubhāvas (external symptoms) is called the avahitthā-vyabhicāri bhāva.
Purport
According to ācāryas expert in the study of psychological activities, these attempts at hiding one’s real affections are another part of ecstatic feeling for Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The order of the words is anubhāva-pidhānārto bhāvaḥ avahittham ucyate.
Out of deceit: Śrī Kṛṣṇa had awakened romantic desires within the gopīs, and they honored Him by glancing at Him with playful smiles, gesturing amorously with their eyebrows, and massaging His hands and feet as they held them in their laps. Even while worshiping Him, however, they felt somewhat angry (which they concealed), and thus they spoke to Him. SB 10.32.16
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Thirty-second Chapter, verse 15, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Śukadeva Gosvāmī states, “My dear King, the gopīs were always beautiful and decorated with confidential smiles and alluring garments. In their movements, intended to give impetus to lusty feelings, they would sometimes press Kṛṣṇa’s hand on their laps, and sometimes they would keep His lotus feet on their breasts. After doing this, they would talk with Kṛṣṇa as if they were very angry with Him.”
[sausheelyatah kila na ko ’pi vidaam babhoova ||122||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dākṣiṇyena, yathā –
sātrājitī-sadana-sīmani pārijāte
nīte praṇīta-mahasā madhusūdanena |
drāghīya-sīmani vidarbha-bhuvas taderṣyāṁ
sauśīlyataḥ kila na ko ’pi vidām babhūva ||122||
Out of mild nature: When Madhusūdana brought the parijāta tree to the house of Satyabhāmā, though Rukmiṇī was filled with anger, no one could detect that deception because of her mildness.
Purport
There is another instance of this concealment in ecstatic love. When Kṛṣṇa, the supreme joker, planted the pārijāta tree in the courtyard of Satyabhāmā, Rukmiṇī, the daughter of King Vidarbha, became very angry, but due to her natural gentle behavior, she did not express anything. No one could understand Rukmiṇī’s real mental condition. This is an instance of competitive concealment.
Concealment out of bashfulness, from the First Canto: The insuperable ecstasy was so strong that the queens, who were shy, first embraced the Lord in the innermost recesses of their hearts. Then they embraced Him visually, and then they sent their sons to embrace Him [which is equal to personal embracing]. But, O chief amongst the Bhṛgus, though they tried to restrain their feelings, they inadvertently shed tears. SB 1.11.32
Purport
There is another instance in the First Canto, Eleventh Chapter, verse 32, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. After entering Dvārakā, Kṛṣṇa was received in different ways by different members of His family. Upon seeing their husband from a distance, the queens of Dvārakā immediately embraced Him within their minds and slowly glanced over Him. As Kṛṣṇa came nearer, they pushed their sons forward to embrace Him. Others were trying, out of shyness, not to shed tears, but they still could not keep the tears from gliding down. This is an instance of concealment caused by shyness.
[kaa vrishasyati tam goshtha-bhujangam kula-paalikaa |]
dūti yatra smṛte mūrtir bhītyā romāñcitā mama ||124||
[dooti yatra smrite moortir bheetyaa romaanchitaa mama ||124||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jaihmya-hrībhyāṁ, yathā –
kā vṛṣasyati taṁ goṣṭha-bhujaṅgaṁ kula-pālikā |
dūti yatra smṛte mūrtir bhītyā romāñcitā mama ||124||
From deceit and bashfulness: O messenger! Will a respectable women desire such a snake among cowherds? Remembering Him, the hairs of my body are standing on end out of fear.
Purport
On another occasion, when Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī thought that Kṛṣṇa was involved with another woman, She addressed Her friend in this manner: “My dear friend, as soon as I think of Kṛṣṇa the cowherd boy attached to some other woman, I become stricken with fear, and the hairs on My body stand up. I must be very careful that Kṛṣṇa not see Me at such times.” This is an instance of concealment caused by shyness and diplomatic behavior.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Vṛṣyasyati means “desire a male companion.” An example is lakṣmaṇam sā vṛṣasyantī: she desires Lakṣmaṇa. Kula-pālikā means a respectable woman.
Concealment by good qualities: Though Rādhā’s attachment to Kṛṣṇa increased to the extreme, by the wealth of her self-control, she concealed it so that no one could doubt her.
Purport
It has been stated, “Although Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī developed a deep loving affection for Kṛṣṇa, She hid Her attitude in the core of Her heart so that others could not detect Her actual condition.” This is an instance of concealment caused by gentleness.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Dakṣiṇyam means softness in the mind. This causes the concealment of anger. Saujanya however means that there is bashfulness and self-control which cause concealment. That is the difference. Her attraction was hidden (mano-gahvara-garbhagā). Though it increased (prauḍhāpi), it remained hidden (durvitarkā) because of her strong self-control.
Concealment out of respect: When Kṛṣṇa began to joke among His laughing cowherd friends, His servant Patrī became jubilant. Out of respect, he hung his head and with great difficulty covered his laughing.
Purport
Once when Kṛṣṇa and His cowherd friends were enjoying friendly conversation, Kṛṣṇa began to address His associates in casual language. At that time Kṛṣṇa’s servant Patrī was also enjoying the conversation. But then, remembering his position of servitude, Patrī bowed down before his master, and with great respect and control, he stifled his smiling. This subdued smiling is an instance of concealment caused by a respectful attitude.
hetutvaṁ gopanatvaṁ ca gopyatvaṁ cātra sambhavet |
prāyeṇa sarva-bhāvānām ekaśo ’nekaśo’pi ca ||128||
Three bhāvas will be seen operating in this situation: one as a cause, one which is concealed and one bhāva which conceals the other. Individually or in a group, the bhāvas may act as a cause, being concealed or concealing.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
In verse 121 the cause is deceit filled with envy (jaihmya). It is a crookedness of mind which will later be revealed by their words. It is understood as well by the movements of their brows. What is concealed (gopya) is the anger stemming from envy. This is understood from the words iṣat kupitā (they were slightly angry). Gopanaḥ means that by which they conceal something--in this case the anger. In the case of the gopīs the concealing element (gopana) is a show of joy made convincing by words of praise and touching His body. Though their laughing glances make the deceit convincing, those glances are part of the strategy of concealment and are false. The gopana elements are an appearance only. Though the acts which produce concealment are only an appearance they are also an anubhāva in themselves.
In verse 122, the cause is the submissive attitude. That is well known in Rukmiṇī and therefore has not been mentioned. What is hidden (gopya) is her anger. That is mentioned in the verse. Sauśilya means a false gentle behavior. She appeared joyful because of that behavior, which was the concealing element (gopana).
In verse 123, the cause of concealment is bashfulness. What is concealed (gopya) is the durantabhāva, their inner intention to enjoy the Lord. The concealing element (gopana) is their slight control, manifested by an attempt to hold back their tears. And to hide the flow of tears, the queens sent their sons to embrace their Lord. This is also a concealing element (gopana), indicating mere friendliness which is obligatory towards a husband. This conceals their desire to enjoy with the Lord. Rearranging the sentence, the actual order is as follows: first by glancing, then by intelligence and then by sending their sons to embrace the Lord.
In verse 124 the cause is a natural deceitful nature. What is concealed (gopya) is her joy. The concealing element (gopana) is fear and speaking. In verse 125, the cause is saujanya or good character. In verse 126 the cause is respect. The concealing element (gopana) is self-control or the attempt to do so. What is hidden (gopya) is his unsteadiness.
hetutvaṁ gopanatvaṁ ca gopyatvaṁ cātra sambhavet |
prāyeṇa sarva-bhāvānām ekaśo ’nekaśo’pi ca ||128||
Three bhāvas will be seen operating in this situation: one as a cause, one which is concealed and one bhāva which conceals the other. Individually or in a group, the bhāvas may act as a cause, being concealed or concealing.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
In verse 121 the cause is deceit filled with envy (jaihmya). It is a crookedness of mind which will later be revealed by their words. It is understood as well by the movements of their brows. What is concealed (gopya) is the anger stemming from envy. This is understood from the words iṣat kupitā (they were slightly angry). Gopanaḥ means that by which they conceal something--in this case the anger. In the case of the gopīs the concealing element (gopana) is a show of joy made convincing by words of praise and touching His body. Though their laughing glances make the deceit convincing, those glances are part of the strategy of concealment and are false. The gopana elements are an appearance only. Though the acts which produce concealment are only an appearance they are also an anubhāva in themselves.
In verse 122, the cause is the submissive attitude. That is well known in Rukmiṇī and therefore has not been mentioned. What is hidden (gopya) is her anger. That is mentioned in the verse. Sauśilya means a false gentle behavior. She appeared joyful because of that behavior, which was the concealing element (gopana).
In verse 123, the cause of concealment is bashfulness. What is concealed (gopya) is the durantabhāva, their inner intention to enjoy the Lord. The concealing element (gopana) is their slight control, manifested by an attempt to hold back their tears. And to hide the flow of tears, the queens sent their sons to embrace their Lord. This is also a concealing element (gopana), indicating mere friendliness which is obligatory towards a husband. This conceals their desire to enjoy with the Lord. Rearranging the sentence, the actual order is as follows: first by glancing, then by intelligence and then by sending their sons to embrace the Lord.
In verse 124 the cause is a natural deceitful nature. What is concealed (gopya) is her joy. The concealing element (gopana) is fear and speaking. In verse 125, the cause is saujanya or good character. In verse 126 the cause is respect. The concealing element (gopana) is self-control or the attempt to do so. What is hidden (gopya) is his unsteadiness.
[dridhyaabhyaasaadinaa vaapi saa smritih parikeertitaa |]
bhaved atra śiraḥ-kampo bhrū-vikṣepādayo ’pi ca ||129||
[bhaved atra shirah-kampo bhroo-vikshepaadayo ’pi cha ||129||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha (20) smṛtiḥ –
yā syāt pūrvānubhūtārtha-pratītiḥ sadṛśekṣayā |
dṛḍhyābhyāsādinā vāpi sā smṛtiḥ parikīrtitā |
bhaved atra śiraḥ-kampo bhrū-vikṣepādayo ’pi ca ||129||
Scrutiny of previous experience, which arises from strict practice or from seeing similar objects, is called smṛti (remembrance). In this state shaking the head and moving the brows occur.
Purport
Remembrance
There are many symptoms of ecstatic love caused by remembering Kṛṣṇa.
Smṛti arising from seeing a similar object: O Mukunda! When lotus-eyed Rādhā saw a dark cloud she remembered You and experienced the force of love.
Purport
For example, one friend of Kṛṣṇa informed Him, “My dear Mukunda, just after observing a bluish cloud in the sky, the lotus-eyed Rādhārāṇī immediately began to remember You. And simply by observing this cloud She became lusty for Your association.” This is an instance of remembering Kṛṣṇa in ecstatic love because of seeing something resembling Him. Kṛṣṇa’s bodily complexion is very similar to the bluish hue of a cloud, so simply by observing a bluish cloud, Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī remembered Him.
Smṛti arising from determined practice: Without concentrating, spontaneously, the lotus feet of the Lord now appear in my heart at any time and at any place.
Purport
One devotee said that even when he was not very attentive he would sometimes, seemingly out of madness, remember the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa within his heart. This is an instance of remembrance resulting from constant practice. In other words, devotees who are constantly thinking of the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa, even if they are momentarily inattentive, will see the figure of Lord Kṛṣṇa appearing within their hearts.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Pramādataḥ means “without intending, a sudden occurrence.” Sometimes instead of pramādataḥ the word upadravataḥ (suddenly) is found.
Arriving at a conclusion based on error, doubt or inference is called vitarka (conjecture). In this state, moving the brows and moving the head and fingers occur.
Purport
Argumentativeness
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Vimarṣa means to infer a cause. Thus “There is fire on the mountain because I see smoke.” Saṁśaya or doubt means inability to come to a conclusion because of seeing contrary views. An example is “Is that a man or a pillar?” Ādi indicates a mistake. An example is thinking that a sea shell is a piece of silver. The judgment for concluding the truth of the matter (ūha) by these methods is called vitarka. Reaching a conclusion from vimarṣa or logical analysis depends upon the validity of the logical proposition. After seeing smoke, one must use the proposition “where there is smoke there is fire, as in the kitchen.” Thus one concludes that there must be fire. The conclusion after doubt can only be made by reasoning as well. After making a wrong conclusion, correct reasoning also is sometimes seen.
Vitarka arising from inference, from Vidagdha-mādhava: O elephant who sports in the houses of Vṛndāvana! The peacock feather has fallen from Your head on the ground, but You are unaware of that. There is a prepared garland lying in front of You, but You do not put it on. From that I can infer that the power of the bees, in the form of Rādhā’s eyes, has agitated You.
Purport
Madhumaṅgala was an intimate friend of Kṛṣṇa coming from the brāhmaṇa community. Kṛṣṇa’s friends were mostly cowherd boys belonging to the vaiśya community, but there were others who belonged to the brāhmaṇa community. Actually, in Vṛndāvana the vaiśya community and the brāhmaṇa community are considered prominent. This Madhumaṅgala one day addressed Kṛṣṇa in this fashion: “My dear friend, I can see that You are not aware of the peacock feathers that are falling on the ground, and at the same time You are unmindful of the flower garlands which are offered to You. I think I can guess the reason for Your absentmindedness when I see Your two eyes flying over to the eyes of Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī, just like black drones flying to lotus flowers.” This is an instance of an argumentative suggestion in ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
In this verse the logical law is understood from previous experiences. The statement is made in order to break down Kṛṣṇa’s mood of concealment (avahitthā) and is not a true conclusion. However, it is classed as vitarka because a conclusion is drawn from inferences. The last line of the next verse also is similar. The conclusion that Rādhā is the cause is drawn from the strength of the symptoms under discussion.
Vitarka arising from doubt: Is that a tamāla tree? It cannot be, for why would it endowed with such pure, clear movements? Is it a cloud? No, it cannot be, for a spotless moon is residing there. O moonfaced one! It seems that Mukunda, who can enchant the universe with the sound of His flute, is certainly wandering on the top of Govardhana Mountain.
Purport
Once while Kṛṣṇa was out walking, one of the associates of Rādhārāṇī told Her, “My dear friend, do You think that this walking personality is a tamāla tree? [Note: The tamāla tree is always described as being the same color as Kṛṣṇa.] If He is a tamāla tree, then how is it possible for Him to walk and be so beautiful? Then, this personality might be a cloud. But if He’s a cloud, then where is the beautiful moon within? Under the circumstances, I think it may be granted that this person is the same enchanting Personality of Godhead by whose flute vibration the three worlds are captivated. He must be the same Mukunda who is standing before Govardhana Hill.” This is another instance of an argumentative presentation of ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
First there is doubt. Is it a tamāla tree, a cloud or Mukunda? There appears to be a swaying movement, like a tree. However, with the mention of the pure, definite movement (amala-śrī), the conclusion is clear. It cannot be a tree. Next a cloud is proposed, but that is eclipsed by a moon. So maybe it is spotted moon? But it is neither a cloud nor the moon, because this form has no spots.
vilāpottāpa-kṛśatā-bāṣpa-dainyādayo ’pi ca ||136||
Pondering, arising from not attaining a desired object or from attaining an undesirable object, is called cintā. In this state, heavy breathing, hanging the head, writing on the ground, change of color, sleeplessness, prattle, and fever occur.
Purport
Anxiety
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Dhyānam here means pondering. When pondering arises from not attaining a desired object or attaining an undesired object it is called cintā.
tasthur mṛjantya uruduḥkha-bharāḥ sma tūṣṇīm ||137||
[tasthur mrijantya uruduhkha-bharaah sma tooshneem ||137||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra iṣṭānāptyā, yathā śrī-daśame
kṛtvā mukhāny avaśucaḥ śvasanena śuṣyad
bimbādharāṇi caraṇena likhantyaḥ |
asrer upāttamasibhiḥ kucakuṅkumāni
tasthur mṛjantya uruduḥkha-bharāḥ sma tūṣṇīm ||137||
Pondering arising from not attaining the desired object of love, from the Tenth Canto: Their heads hanging down and their heavy, sorrowful breathing drying up their reddened lips, the gopīs scratched the ground with their toes. Tears flowed from their eyes, carrying their kajjala and washing away the vermilion smeared on their breasts. Thus they stood, silently bearing the burden of their unhappiness. SB 10.29.29
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Twenty-ninth Chapter, verse 29, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, when Kṛṣṇa asked all the gopīs to go back to their homes, they did not like it. Because of their grief at this, they were sighing heavily, and their beautiful faces appeared to be drying up. In this condition they remained, without making a sound. They began to draw lines on the ground with their toes, and with their tears they washed the black ointment from their eyes onto their breasts, which were covered with red kuṅkuma powder. This is an instance of anxiety in ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Commentary
This verse shows the anubhāvas resulting from cintā. Lajjā is also implied. “By this invitation to love we gave up our natural shyness and now shyness has returned. Being well-bred young women we have heaps of shyness, but because of that love we have given up shyness. That type of love is praiseworthy in the opinion of those knowledgeable of rasa, and is never criticized. The characteristic of this love is that it brings the Supreme Lord under control. If the object of our love, Kṛṣṇa has not come under control, it must be that we do not really have love for Him. What was the use of our giving up our shyness? Such thoughts show remorse, shyness and cintā, pondering.”
Their faces show that remorse. Out of lamentation their lips, red like bimba fruits, became dried up by hot breathing. When the heat of the sun dries up ripe bimba fruits, they lose their fullness and become full of blemishes. The shyness and pondering are next described. They wrote on the earth with the big toes of their left feet. By this they indicated that they desired to enter the earth as it parted. Lamentation and pain are described next. The tears mixed with kajjala smeared the kuṁkuma on their breasts. It appeared that the black line created was dividing them in half with the saw of great remorse due to the increased period of separation. Tears in the plural indicate that great volumes of tears flowed. By not mentioning that the tears dampened their clothing, it is suggested that the two Yamunā rivers flowing from their eyes and the fire of pain arising in their hearts began a conflict, one desiring to moisten everything and one desiring to dry everything up, one being victorious and one being defeated. With the weight of extreme sorrow, they stood silently. Not tolerating the burden, they lost consciousness. Thus they simply stood there. They stood straight up, like statues without consciousness.
kim ahaha gṛhaṁ krīḍā-lubdha tvayādya visasmare ||138||
Another example: O killer of Agha! Your affectionate mother, depressed and thin from thinking of You, remained sitting on the veranda from a long time, and having waited till evening, she now wanders about within the house. How astonishing it is! Though You experienced such fun there, You have completely forgotten about Your house.
Purport
One of the friends of Kṛṣṇa once informed Him, “My dear killer of the demon Mura, Your kind and gentle mother is very anxious because You have not returned home, and with great difficulty she has passed the evening constantly sitting on the balcony of Your home. It is certainly astonishing how You could forget Your mother while You are off somewhere engaged in Your playful activities!” This is another instance of deep anxiety in ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Adoṣa-dhīḥ means pure minded. Because she is pure minded, Yaśodā has natural affection for Kṛṣṇa. Praghāṇam means a veranda. It is spelled either praghāṇam or praghānam.
[tava sutam aham eva draak paraavartayaami ||139||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aniṣṭāptyā, yathā –
gṛhiṇi gahanayāntaścintayonnidra-netrā
glapaya na mukha-padmaṁ tapta-bāṣpa-plavena |
nṛpa-puram anuvindan gāndineyena sārdhaṁ
tava sutam aham eva drāk parāvartayāmi ||139||
Cintā arising from attaining something undesirable: Do not remain sleepless, absorbed in intense deliberation, with hot tears withering your lotus face. I will go to Mathurā with Akrura and bring back your son very soon.
Purport
When Mother Yaśodā was very anxiously waiting for Kṛṣṇa to return from Mathurā, Mahārāja Nanda gave her this solace: “My dear Yaśodā, please don’t be worried. Please dry your beautiful lotuslike face. There is no need for you to breathe so hotly. I will go immediately with Akrūra to the palace of Kaṁsa and get your son back for you.” Here is an instance of anxiety in ecstatic love caused by Kṛṣṇa’s awkward position.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Snapaya na mukha padma tapta bāśpa plavena is an alternative reading of the second line. Stating “I will soon bring him back,” the speaker (Garga) is saying that Yaśodā should no longer worry about undesirable things. The undesirable thing is that Kṛṣṇa was staying in Mathurā after killing Kaṁsa.
Ascertaining a meaning after consulting scripture is called mati. [Note: Conclusions are drawn in vitarka as well, but not through reference to scripture.]
[upadeshash cha shishyaanaam oohaapohaadayo ’pi cha ||141||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atra kartavya-karaṇaṁ saṁśaya-bhramayoś chidā |
upadeśaś ca śiṣyāṇām ūhāpohādayo ’pi ca ||141||
In this state performing necessary actions after cutting doubts and illusions, giving instructions to students, and defeating other’s arguments and opposite conclusions occur.
From the Padma Purāṇa, Vaiśākha-maḥātmya: Let the purāṇas and other scriptures glorify here and there for a kalpa the greatness of their respective devatās in order to produce illusion in the people of this world. But after taking account of all varieties of interpretation, their conclusion is that Viṣṇu alone is the Supreme Lord.
Purport
In the Vaiśākha-māhātmya section of the Padma Purāṇa a devotee states that though in some of the eighteen Purāṇas the process of glorifying Lord Viṣṇu is not mentioned and the glorifying of some demigod is offered, such glorification must be continued for millions of years. For when one studies the Purāṇas very scrutinizingly, he can see that ultimately Lord Viṣṇu is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This is an instance of ecstatic love developed out of thoughtfulness.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Let the purāṇas and āgamas speak here and there to persons incapable of concluding the essence of all the purāṇas and āgamas, and let them glorify the devatās as the best for a kalpa. However, their conclusion is actually otherwise. When the meanings of the various statements (vyāpāreṣu), which may be conventional or literal, are brought together for judging as a whole (vivecana-vyatikaram), the conclusion is that Viṣṇu alone is Bhagavān. Carācaraysa (of moving entities) refers to humans in this context, because they are qualified for understanding the scriptures.
From the Tenth Canto: Knowing that great sages who have renounced all attachments proclaim Your glories, that You are the Supreme Soul of all the worlds, and that You are so gracious that You give away even Your own self, I chose You as my husband, rejecting Lord Brahmā, Lord Śiva and the rulers of heaven, whose aspirations are all frustrated by the force of time, which is born from Your eyebrows. What interest, then, could I have in any other suitors? SB 10.60.39
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Sixtieth Chapter, verse 39, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there is an account of Rukmiṇīdevī’s writing a letter to Kṛṣṇa requesting Him to kidnap her before her marriage to another person. At that time the specific attachment of Rukmiṇī for Kṛṣṇa was expressed by Rukmiṇī as follows: “My dear Lord Kṛṣṇa, Your transcendental glories are chanted by great sages who are free from material contamination, and in exchange for such glorification You are so kind that You freely distribute Yourself to such devotees. As one can elevate oneself simply by Your grace, so also by Your direction alone one may be lost to all benedictions, under the influence of eternal time. Therefore I have selected Your Lordship as my husband, brushing aside personalities like Brahmā and Indra—not to mention others.” Rukmiṇī enhanced her love for Kṛṣṇa simply by thinking of Him. This is an instance of thoughtfulness in ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Commentary
This is a response of Rukmiṇī to Kṛṣṇa’s statement in SB 10.60.16. You have said that you are praised only by beggars. But being praised by the beggar renunciates is most praiseworthy. That is explained in this verse by Rukmiṇī. Those who have become meek, renouncing the rod, are called bhikṣu. Your powers are praised by the bhikṣus. You are the soul of all beings, the most dear to all beings. Thus glorifying You is not useless. If you say that glorifying you is useless, that statement alone is useless. You give yourself (ātmada) to those in the universe who worship You. Knowing this, I have accepted You as my husband. You have said that I chose You out of ignorance. However, that statement shows that you do not know my knowledge. I have accepted you, rejecting Brahmā and others whose benedictions are destroyed by the force of time, which emanates from Your eyebrow—what to speak of rejecting the most inferior kings. You have said I am short-sighted. But you have said this, not knowing my foresight.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Rukmiṇī speaks this verse, exploring her own nature of “churning of the milk ocean to produce nectar.” Nyasta-daṇḍa (renouncing the staff) means “devoid of all material possessions and desires.” Rukmiṇī raises this example of detached sages in order to show that what she has concluded has also been concluded by great authorities previously. The dangers of association and desire are illustrated in verses such as saṅgāt saṁjāyate kāmaḥ kāmāt krodho ’bhijāyate. (BG 2.62)
The steadiness of heart arising from attaining realization of the Lord, from absence of suffering in attaining realization of the Lord, and from realizing prema with the Lord is called dhṛti. In this state there is no lamentation for things not attained or for things which have disappeared.
Purport
Endurance
When a person is fully satisfied due to attaining knowledge, transcending all distress or achieving his desired goal of life in transcendental devotional service to God, his state of endurance or steady-mindedness is called dhṛti. At this stage one is not perturbed by any amount of loss, nor does anything appear to be unachieved by him.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Jñāna means realization of the Lord. Duḥkhābhava means absence of suffering from realizing a relationship with the Lord. Uttamāpti is attaining prema in relation to the Lord. The fullness due to this or the absence of fickleness in the mind is called dhṛti.
śayīmahi mahī-pṛṣṭhe kurvīmahi kim īśvaraiḥ ||145||
[shayeemahi mahee-prishthe kurveemahi kim eeshvaraih ||145||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra jñānena, yathā vairāgya-śatake (55) bhartṛhariḥ –
aśnīmahi vayaṁ bhikṣām āśāvāso vasīmahi |
śayīmahi mahī-pṛṣṭhe kurvīmahi kim īśvaraiḥ ||145||
From attaining realization of the Lord, from Bhartṛhari’s Vairāgya-śataka: When I attain knowledge related to the Lord, I will eat only begged food and live without clothing. I will sleep on the ground. What is the necessity of serving the king or other authorities?
Purport
According to the opinion of Bhartṛhari, a learned scholar, when a person is elevated to this state of endurance, he thinks as follows: “I do not wish to be a highly posted government servant. I shall prefer to remain naked, without proper garments. I shall prefer to lie down on the ground without any mattress. And despite all these disadvantages, I shall refuse to serve anyone, even the government.” In other words, when one is in ecstatic love with the Personality of Godhead, he can endure any kind of disadvantages calculated under the material concept of life.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This is a glorification of knowledge related to the Lord. Īśvaraiḥ means “by kings and others.”
From lack of suffering: Our cow sheds have become the playground of Lakṣmī and more than a 100,000 billion cows are running around. A divine child is playing in the house. I am fully satisfied with the happiness of family life.
Purport
Nanda Mahārāja, the father of Kṛṣṇa, used to think, “In my pasturing ground the goddess of fortune is personally present, and I possess more than ten hundred thousand cows, which loiter here and there. And above all, I have a son like Kṛṣṇa, who is such a powerful, wonderful worker. Therefore, even though I am a householder, I am feeling so satisfied!” This is an instance of mental endurance resulting from the absence of all distress.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This is a statement by the king of the cowherd men, Nanda. Paraḥ parārdhāh means more than 100,000 billion, or countless cows. How has this happiness been ascertained? The divine child is playing happily in my house. “I am satisfied” means that complete destruction of sorrow which would cause dissatisfaction.
[mano mama chaturvargam trinaayaapi na manyate ||147||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uttamāptyā, yathā –
harilīlā-sudhā-sindhos taṭam apy adhitiṣṭhataḥ |
mano mama caturvargaṁ tṛṇāyāpi na manyate ||147||
From attaining prema: I am situated on the bank of the ocean of nectar consisting of the Lord’s pastimes. Thus my mind is not aware of artha, dharma, kāma and mokṣa, which are now worthless like grass.
Purport
In another instance a devotee says, “I am always swimming in the nectarean ocean of the pastimes of the Personality of Godhead, and as such I have no more attraction for religious rituals, economic development, sense gratification or even the ultimate salvation of merging into the existence of Brahman.” This is an instance of the mind’s endurance due to achieving the best thing in the world. The best thing in the world is absorption in Kṛṣṇa consciousness.
Happiness of the heart arising from seeing or attaining one’s desired object is called harṣa. In this state standing of hair on end, perspiration, tears, glowing face, confusion (āvega), insanity (unmāda), indecision jaḍatā) and fainting (moha) occur.
Purport
Happiness
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The appearance of happiness means to be pleased or cheerful.
Joy on seeing one’s desired object, from Viṣṇu Purāṇa: O sage! When Akrura saw Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma, his lotus-faced blossomed with joy and all his hairs stood on end.
Purport
It is described in the Viṣṇu Purāṇa that when Akrūra came to take Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma to Mathurā, just by seeing Their faces he became so cheerful that all over his body there were symptoms of ecstatic love. This state is called happiness.
candanāliptam āghrāya hṛṣṭaromā cucumba ha ||150||
[chandanaaliptam aaghraaya hrishtaromaa chuchumba ha ||150||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
abhīṣṭa-lābhena, yathā śrī-daśame
tatraikāṁsagataṁ bāhuṁ kṛṣṇasyotpalasaurabham |
candanāliptam āghrāya hṛṣṭaromā cucumba ha ||150||
From attaining one’s desired object, from the Tenth Canto: Upon the shoulder of one gopī Kṛṣṇa placed His arm, whose natural blue-lotus fragrance was mixed with that of the sandalwood pulp anointing it. As the gopī relished that fragrance, her bodily hair stood on end in jubilation, and she kissed His arm. SB 10.33.11
Purport
It is stated in the Tenth Canto, Thirty-third Chapter, verse 11, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, “Upon seeing that Kṛṣṇa’s arm was placed on her shoulder, one of the gopīs engaged in the rāsa dance became so ecstatically happy that she kissed Kṛṣṇa on His cheek.” This is an instance of feeling happiness because of achieving a desired goal.
Inability to tolerate the passing of time, arising from desire to see or attain a desired object is called autsukyam (impatience). In this state there is drying of the mouth, haste, pondering and prominence of breathing.
Purport
Eagerness
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Kālākṣamatvam means non-toleration of the passing of time.
draṣṭuṁ yayur yuvatayaḥ sma narendra-mārge ||152||
[drashtum yayur yuvatayah sma narendra-maarge ||152||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra iṣṭekṣā-spṛhayā, yathā śrī-daśame –
prāptaṁ niśamya nara-locana-pāna-pātram
autsukya-viślathita-keśa-dukūla-baddhāḥ |
sadyo visṛjya gṛha-karma patīṁś ca talpe
draṣṭuṁ yayur yuvatayaḥ sma narendra-mārge ||152||
Impatience arising from a desire to see one’s cherished object, from the Tenth Canto: When the young women of the city heard that Lord Kṛṣṇa, the reservoir of pleasure for human eyes, had arrived, they hurriedly went onto the royal road to see Him. They abandoned their household duties and even left their husbands in bed, and in their eagerness the knots of their hair and garments came loose. SB 10.71.34
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Seventy-first Chapter, verse 33, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, it is said, “When Kṛṣṇa first came from His kingdom, Dvārakā, to Indraprastha, [Note: Indraprastha is the present-day Delhi.] the young females of the city became so eager to see Him that even at night, when they were lying down with their husbands, they could not restrain their eagerness. Even though they were not properly dressed and although their hair was loose and there were many household duties to perform, they still gave up everything and immediately went into the street to see Kṛṣṇa.” This is an instance of eagerness in ecstatic love.
[snapayati nija-daasye raadhikaa maam kadaa nu ||153||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā vā, stavāvalyāṁ śrī-rādhikāṣṭake (14.7) –
prakaṭita-nija-vāsaṁ snigdha-veṇu-praṇādair
druta-gati harim ārāt prāpya kuñje smitākṣī |
śravaṇa-kuhara-kaṇḍuṁ tanvatī namra-vaktrā
snapayati nija-dāsye rādhikā māṁ kadā nu ||153||
From Stavāvalī, Śrī-rādhikāṣṭaka: When Kṛṣṇa revealed his whereabouts in the grove by the sound of His flute, Rādhā, coming quickly to the grove with smiling face, remained waiting with head hung down, eager to hear Kṛṣṇa’s words. When will that Rādhā engage me in her service?
Purport
In his book Stavāvalī, Śrī Raghunātha dāsa Gosvāmī has prayed for the mercy of Rādhārāṇī, who was so captivated by the flute vibrations of Kṛṣṇa that She immediately asked information of His whereabouts from residents in the Vṛndāvana forest. Upon first seeing Kṛṣṇa, She was filled with such ecstatic love and pleasure that She began to scratch Her ears.
Impatience arising from a desire to attain one’s desired object: When the gopīs tried to prolong the conversation with Kṛṣṇa by expert joking, and thus delay Him, Rādhā came to the grove quickly, on the pretext of accepting a bunch of flowers.
Purport
The damsels of Vraja and Rādhārāṇī were very expert in talking cunningly, so as soon as they saw Kṛṣṇa they began their talkings; and Kṛṣṇa, pretending to go for some flowers for them, immediately left that place and entered into a mountain cave. This is another instance of eager loving exchanges on the parts of both the gopīs and Kṛṣṇa.
Augrya arising from offense (to Kṛṣṇa): Garuḍa speaks: By my power the snakes have abortions. But in my presence, Kāliya is offending my master. I want to offer him to the fire in my stomach, but I am afraid of Kṛṣṇa’s anger.
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa was fighting with the Kāliya snake by dancing on his heads, Kāliya bit Kṛṣṇa on the leg. At that time Garuḍa became infuriated and began to murmur, “Kṛṣṇa is so powerful that simply by His thundering voice the wives of Kāliya have had miscarriages. Because my Lord has been insulted by this snake, I wish to devour him immediately, but I cannot do so in the presence of my Lord, because He may become angry with me.” This is an instance of eagerness to act in ecstatic love as a result of dishonor to Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The order of the words is huta-bhujy vauśaṭ kuryāṁ means “offer to the fire.”
Augrya arising from harsh words (against Kṛṣṇa), in a statement by Sahadeva: Sahadeva speaks: I will place with more force than the punishment of Yama my left foot on the head of that person who cannot tolerate the first worship of Kṛṣṇa--who is full of all glories and worth of worship by all devatās.
Purport
When Śiśupāla objected to the worship of Kṛṣṇa in the Rājasūya arena at a sacrifice organized by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, Sahadeva, the younger brother of Arjuna, said, “A person who cannot tolerate the worship of Kṛṣṇa is my enemy and is possessed of a demoniac nature. Therefore I wish to strike my left foot upon his broad head, just to punish him more strongly than the wand of Yamarāja!”
Baladeva speaks: O Lord! These evil men, lowest members of Kuru dynasty, having attained and given up the qualities of kings, are attached to sitting on the king’s throne. How painful it is to have to hear them today in the assembly boldly insulting Acyuta, worthy of praise by the whole universe.
Purport
Then Baladeva began to lament like this: “Oh, all auspiciousness to Lord Kṛṣṇa! I am so surprised to see that the condemned descendants of the Kuru dynasty, who so unlawfully occupied the throne of the Kuru kingdom, are criticizing Kṛṣṇa with diplomatic devices. Oh, this is intolerable!” This is another instance of eagerness caused by dishonor to Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Kaṭākṣayanti means they insult Kṛṣṇa, making Him the object of fraudulent perceptions.
Intolerance arising from contempt or insult or other causes is called amarṣa (indignation). In this state perspiration, shaking the head, change of color, pondering, looking for methods, shouting, turning away and beating occur.
Intolerance arising from contempt or insult or other causes is called amarṣa (indignation). In this state perspiration, shaking the head, change of color, pondering, looking for methods, shouting, turning away and beating occur.
niḥśaṅkas tvaṁ bhramasi bhavitā nākulatvaṁ kuto me ||161||
[nihshankas tvam bhramasi bhavitaa naakulatvam kuto me ||161||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra adhikṣepād, yathā vidagdha-mādhave (2.53) –
nirdhautānām akhila-dharaṇī-mādhurīṇām dhūrīnām
kalyāṇī me nivasati vadhūḥ paśya pārśve navoḍhā |
antargoṣṭhe caṭula naṭayann atra netra-tribhāgaṁ
niḥśaṅkas tvaṁ bhramasi bhavitā nākulatvaṁ kuto me ||161||
Indignation arising from contempt, from Vidagdha-mādhava: Jaṭilā said to Kṛṣṇa: See! My son’s new, auspicious bride, endowed with all the sweetness of the earth, is sitting by my side. O unsteady boy! You cannot disturb me, though You wander fearlessly through Vraja moving Your eyebrows!
Purport
In the Vidagdha-mādhava, Jaṭilā, the mother-in-law of Rādhārāṇī, began to criticize Kṛṣṇa in this way: “Kṛṣṇa, You are standing here, and Rādhārāṇī, who has just been married to my son, is also standing here. Now I know both of You very well, so why should I not be very anxious to protect my daughter-in-law from Your dancing eyes?” This is an instance of dishonorable words used to indirectly criticize Kṛṣṇa.
varāpi yad ayogyayā sphuṭam adūṣi tārākhyayā ||162||
[varaapi yad ayogyayaa sphutam adooshi taaraakhyayaa ||162||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
apamānād, yathā padmoktiḥ –
kadamba-vana-taskara drutam apehi kiṁ cāṭubhir
jane bhavati mad-vidhe paribhavo hi nātaḥ paraḥ |
tvayā vraja-mṛgī-dṛśāṁ sadasi hanta candrāvalī
varāpi yad ayogyayā sphuṭam adūṣi tārākhyayā ||162||
Indignation arising from disrespect, in the words of Padmā: O thief in the kadamba forest! Quickly come here and do not use clever words. There is no greater disrespect for a person like me than directly to spoil excellent Candrāvalī in the assembly of gopīs by uttering the unsuitable name of Rādhā.
Purport
Similarly, some of the gopīs once began to address Kṛṣṇa with these dishonorable words: “My dear Kṛṣṇa, You are a first-class thief. So please leave this place immediately. We know You love Candrāvalī more than us, but there is no use in praising her in our presence! Kindly do not contaminate the name of Rādhārāṇī in this place!” This is another instance of dishonorable words cast upon Kṛṣṇa in ecstatic love.
Indignation arising from being cheated, indicated by the word ādi: Dear Acyuta, You know very well why we have come here. Who but a cheater like You would abandon young women who come to see Him in the middle of the night, enchanted by the loud song of His flute? Just to see You, we have completely rejected our husbands, children, ancestors, brothers and other relatives. SB 10.31.17
Purport
There is another statement in the Tenth Canto, Thirty-first Chapter, verse 16, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. When all the gopīs came out of their homes to meet Kṛṣṇa in the Vṛndāvana forest, Kṛṣṇa refused to accept them and asked them to go home, giving them some moral instruction. At that time the gopīs spoke as follows: “Dear Kṛṣṇa, there is extreme distress in being out of Your presence, and there is extreme happiness simply in seeing You. Therefore we have all left our husbands, relatives, brothers and friends and have simply come to You, being captivated by the sound of Your transcendental flute. O infallible one, You had better know the reason for our coming here. In plain words, we are here simply because we have been captivated by the sweet sound of Your flute. We are all beautiful girls, and You are so foolish that You are rejecting our association. We do not know anyone, other than Yourself, who would miss this opportunity to associate with young girls in the dead of night!” This is another instance of indirect insults used against Kṛṣṇa in ecstatic love.
Hatred arising from the others’ increase of good fortune or qualities is called asūyā (envy or fault-finding). In this state, malice, disrespect, insult, fault finding, speaking ill of others, casting evil glances and moving the eyebrows occur.
[vairee na ched bhavati vepathur antaraayah ||165||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra anya-saubhāgyena, yathā padyāvalyām (302)–
mā garvam udvaha kapola-tale cakāsti
kṛṣṇa-svahasta-likhitā nava-mañjarīti |
anyāpi kiṁ na sakhi bhājanam īdṛśīnāṁ
vairī na ced bhavati vepathur antarāyaḥ ||165||
Envy arising from others’ increase of good fortune, from Padyāvalī: Do not be proud, now that you attain the glory of a new mañjarī marked with the hand of Kṛṣṇa on your forehead. Can no one else be the recipient of that mark? Others would also have this good fortune if our enemy’s hand did not shake.
Purport
In the Padyāvalī, one of the friends of Rādhārāṇī once addressed Her thus: “My dear friend, please do not be too puffed up because Kṛṣṇa has decorated Your forehead with His own hand. It may be that Kṛṣṇa is yet attracted by some other beautiful girl. I see that the decoration on Your forehead is very nicely made, and so it appears that Kṛṣṇa was not too disturbed in painting it. Otherwise, He could not have painted such exact lines!” This is an instance of envy caused by Rādhā’s good fortune.
From the Tenth Canto: These footprints of that special gopī greatly disturb us. Of all the gopīs, she alone was taken away to a secluded place, where she is enjoying the lips of Kṛṣṇa. SB 10.30.31
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Thirtieth Chapter, verse 30, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there is the following statement: “When the gopīs were searching for Kṛṣṇa and Rādhā before the rāsa dance, they thus began to speak among themselves: ‘We have seen the footprints of Kṛṣṇa and Rādhā on the ground of Vṛndāvana, and they are giving us great pain, because although Kṛṣṇa is everything to us, that girl is so cunning that She has taken Him away alone and is enjoying His kissing without sharing Him with us!’ ” This is another instance of envy of the good fortune of Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī.
baliṣṭhā bala-pakṣāś ced durbalāḥ ke tataḥ kṣitau ||167||
Envy arising from increase of good qualities: Balarāma’s team thinks itself strong and able to defeat our team with Kṛṣṇa on our side, but is there anyone weaker than Balarāma’s team in this world?
Purport
Sometimes when the cowherd boys used to play in the forests of Vṛndāvana, Kṛṣṇa would play on one side, and Balarāma would play on another. There would be competition and mock fighting between the two parties, and when Kṛṣṇa’s party was defeated by Balarāma, the boys would say, “If Balarāma’s party remains victorious, then who in the world can be weaker than ourselves?” This is another instance of envy in ecstatic love.
Cāpalam (insolence) means inconsiderateness of the heart arising from attraction or repulsion. In this state, lack of judgment, rough words and careless actions occur.
Cāpalya arising from attachment: O unconquerable one, tomorrow when my marriage ceremony is about to begin, You should arrive unseen in Vidarbha and surround Yourself with the leaders of Your army. Then crush the forces of Caidya and Magadhendra and marry me in the Rākṣasa style, winning me with Your valor. SB 10.52.41
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Fifty-second Chapter, verse 41, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Rukmiṇī addresses Kṛṣṇa in a letter as follows: “My dear unconquerable Kṛṣṇa, my marriage day is fixed for tomorrow. I request that You come to the city of Vidarbha without advertising Yourself. Then have Your soldiers and commanders suddenly surround and defeat all the strength of the King of Magadha, and by thus adopting the methods of the demons, please kidnap and marry me.”
According to the Vedic system there are eight kinds of marriages, one of which is called rākṣasa-vivāha. Rākṣasa-vivāha refers to kidnapping a girl and marrying her by force. This is considered to be a demoniac method. When Rukmiṇī was going to be married to Śiśupāla by the choice of her elder brother, she wrote the above letter to Kṛṣṇa requesting Him to kidnap her. This is an instance of impudence in ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa.
guror api puro nīvīṁ yā bhraṁśayati subhruvām ||170||
[guror api puro neeveem yaa bhramshayati subhruvaam ||170||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dveṣeṇa, yathā –
vaṁśī pūreṇa kālindyāḥ sindhuṁ vindatu vāhitā |
guror api puro nīvīṁ yā bhraṁśayati subhruvām ||170||
Cāpalya arising from hatred: May the flute, which loosens the cords tying the clothing of the beautiful women, enter the ocean on the waves of the Yamunā!
Purport
One of the gopīs said, “May Kṛṣṇa’s sweet flute be washed away by the waves of the Yamunā, and let it fall into the ocean! The sweet sound of that flute is so impudent that it makes us lose all composure before our superiors.”
Suspension of external awareness arising from pondering, lack of energy, natural tendency, and fatigue is called nidrā or sleep. In this state, rubbing the limbs, yawning, inaction, heavy breathing, and closing the eyes occur.
Nidrā arising from worry: When the sun turned red at sunset and she did not hear the sound of the flute, Yaśodā entered a state of nidrā, being afflicted by excessive pondering the situation.
Purport
Every evening at sunset Kṛṣṇa used to return from the pasturing ground where He herded cows. Sometimes when Mother Yaśodā could not hear the sweet vibration of His flute she would become very anxious, and because of this she would feel dizzy. Thus, dizziness caused by anxiety in ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa is also possible.
Nidrā arising from lack of energy: When Yaśodā tied up Kṛṣṇa, she was unable to move her body. She became dizzy. Rubbing her limbs, she entered a state of nidrā.
Purport
When Yaśodā had tied Kṛṣṇa up one time, she began to think, “Kṛṣṇa’s body is so soft and delicate. How could I have tied Him with rope?” Thinking this, her brain became puzzled, and she felt dizziness.
Nidrā arising from natural urge: O killer of Agha! Look! Having extinguished all fears by thinking of Your exploits, the cowherd men have given up locking their doors and sleep at night in the yards of their houses without moving their limbs.
Purport
The gopīs were advised by their superiors to bolt the doors at night, but they were so carefree that they did not carry out this order very rigidly. Sometimes, by thinking of Kṛṣṇa, they became so confident of being out of all danger that they would lie down at night in the courtyards of their houses. This is an instance of dizziness in ecstatic love due to natural affection for Kṛṣṇa.
The state just previous to extinguishing of consciousness, in which there is the appearance of Kṛṣṇa without particular pastimes, is called nidrā for the devotees.
Purport
It may be questioned why devotees of Kṛṣṇa should be attacked by dizziness, which is usually considered a sign of the mode of ignorance. To answer this question, Śrī Jīva Gosvāmī has said that the devotees of Lord Kṛṣṇa are always transcendental to all the modes of material nature; when they feel dizziness or go to sleep, they are not considered to be sleeping under the modes of nature, but are accepted as being in a trance of devotional service. There is an authoritative statement in the Garuḍa Purāṇa about mystic yogīs who are under the direct shelter of the Supreme Personality of Godhead: “In all three stages of their consciousness—namely wakefulness, dreaming and deep sleep—the devotees are absorbed in thought of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore, in their complete absorption in thought of Kṛṣṇa, they do not sleep.”
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Nidrā has been described as absence of external consciousness. This is normally the state of consciousness under the influence of the mode of ignorance, which is not possible for the highest devotees, since their consciousness is beyond the modes of nature. Why then do they have this state of nidrā? This verse answers. This state of nidrā is a state of concentration on the Lord found in the highest devotees of Kṛṣṇa. It is not a material state of sleep. This is a state beyond the modes. The Garuḍa Purāṇa says:
jāgrat svapna suṣupteṣu yoga sthasya ca yoginaḥ
yā kācin manaso vṛttiḥ sā bhaved acyutāśrayā
All the states of mind—waking, sleeping and dreaming— of the practicing yogī take shelter of Acyuta.
Thus the state previous to extinguishing external consciousness in which there is a vision of Kṛṣṇa is called nidrā, not simply extinguishing consciousness. Though it was previously stated that nidrā was citta-mīlanam or extinguishing consciousness, that statement should be modified in light of the present verse.
Sleep in which there are various thoughts and an experience of objects is called supti or dreaming. In this state there is absence of the functioning of the external senses, heavy breathing and closing the eyes.
An example: Baladeva astonished the assembly of Yadus and made them laugh, when he went to sleep. While breathing heavily and heaving his belly, he exclaimed in a dream state, “O lotus-eyed Kṛṣṇa! You have magnificently manifested your wealth of childhood pastimes, by powerfully crushing the intolerable pride of Kāliya, king of the snakes.”
Purport
Once Lord Baladeva began to talk in His sleep as follows: “O lotus-eyed Kṛṣṇa, Your childhood adventures are manifest simply according to Your own will. Therefore, please immediately dispose of the stubborn pride of this Kāliya serpent.” By saying this, Lord Baladeva astonished the assembly of the Yadus and made them laugh for some time. Then, yawning so hard as to make ripples on His abdomen, Lord Baladeva, the bearer of the plow, returned to His deep sleep. This is an instance of sleepiness in ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Keli-vitatiḥ means “extent of pastimes.” Another suitable alternate version is kelir abhitaḥ (pastimes which are everywhere). Keli is sometimes seen in the feminine form, as in Umāpatidhara’s poem quoted in Padyāvalī (371):
ratna-cchāyā-cchurita-jaladhau mandire dvārakāyā
rukmiṇyāpi prabala-pulakodbhedam āliṅgitasya
viśvaṁ pāyān masṛṇa-yamunā-tīra-vānīra-kuñje
rādhā-kelī-parimala-bhara-dhyāna-mūrcchā murāreḥ
He astonished those Yadu members who had entered the inner chamber of the assembly hall (yadu-sabhām), and made them laugh.
Bodha arising from destruction of ignorance: Enlightenment occurs after the appearance of knowledge which occurs after removal of ignorance. This enlightenment consists of realization one’s identity with brahman, which destroys unlimited suffering.
Purport
A devotee once stated, “I have already conquered the mode of ignorance, …
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
n this verse, bodha means knowledge of self and the Supreme Lord and knowledge of the non-difference of the two which is called vidyā. The sādhana for realization of these three items consists of nididhyāsana or contemplation. After contemplation, there is destruction of avidyā, and then knowledge of the two. Finally, there is knowledge of the non-difference of the two. The bodha which arises from destruction of ignorance (avidyā-dvaṁsataḥ) comes after (puraḥsaraḥ) the appearance of knowledge (vidyodaya). In this bodha, there is destruction of unlimited kleśas and realization of non-difference (svarūpāvagama). The word ādi indicates that there is realization of bhakti as well in the state of bodha. This type of bodha is an assistant to bhakti for some persons, and therefore is considered a vyabhicāri-bhāva. This is the meaning of the verse brahma-bhūtaḥ prasannātmā in the Gītā (18.54).
Another example: Realizing my svarūpa of eternity and knowledge after attaining the lamp of knowledge, without obstacle, I will now search for the supreme brahman personified, composed of concentrated bliss.
Purport
“… and I am now on the platform of transcendental knowledge. Therefore I shall be engaged only in searching after the Supreme Personality of Godhead.” This is an instance of alertness in ecstatic love.
Bodha arising from destruction of moha: When moha is destroyed by the sound, fragrance, touch and taste of the Lord, there is bodha. In this state the eyes are open, hairs stand on end, and there is rising from the ground.
Purport
Transcendental alertness is possible when the illusory condition is completely overcome. At that stage, when in contact with any reaction of material elements, such as sound, smell, touch or taste, the devotee realizes the transcendental presence of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In this condition the ecstatic symptoms (e.g., standing of the hair on the body, rolling of the eyeballs and getting up from sleep) are persistently visible.
Bodha from destruction of moha, arising from sound of the Lord: All of Rādhā’s sense stopped functioning (moha) due to the bliss generated from first seeing Kṛṣṇa. Then when Lalitā uttered the names of Kṛṣṇa in her ear, she opened her eyes.
Purport
When Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī first saw Kṛṣṇa, She suddenly became conscious of all transcendental happiness, and the functions of Her different limbs were stunned. When Lalitā, Her constant companion, whispered into Her ear the holy name of Kṛṣṇa, Rādhārāṇī immediately opened Her eyes wide. This is an instance of alertness caused by hearing the sound of Kṛṣṇa’s name.
Arising from smell: When Kṛṣṇa once disappeared from the presence of Rādhā, she lost control of her limbs, lost her color, and lost her breath. She fell on the forest earth. When the fragrance of Kṛṣṇa’s forest garland spread in all directions, Rādhā’s hairs stood on end by smelling the fragrance, and look--she rose from the earth.
Purport
One day, in a joking mood, Kṛṣṇa informed Rādhārāṇī, “My dear Rādhārāṇī, I am going to give up Your company.” Upon saying this, He immediately disappeared, and because of this Rādhārāṇī became so afflicted that the hue of Her body changed, and She immediately fell down upon the ground of Vṛndāvana. She had practically stopped breathing, but when She smelled the fragrance of the flowers on the ground, She awoke in ecstasy and got up. This is an instance of transcendental alertness caused by smelling.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This is an incident when Kṛṣṇa disappeared as a joke.
Breaking moha by touch: O friend! Whose touch is this, which is soft, blissful and all-conquering? Seeing the bank of the Yamunā I had fainted. The touch of that hand completely removed with force my fainting condition which gave me so much suffering, and produced in me a fainting condition of happiness.
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa was touching the body of one gopī, the gopī addressed her companion thus: “My dear friend, whose hand is this touching my body? I had become very afraid after seeing the dark forest on the bank of the Yamunā, but suddenly the touch of this hand has saved me from hysterical fits.” This is an instance of alertness caused by touching.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Madhura means “giving bliss by its very nature.” Masṛṇah means softness of the skin. Pallavayati is in the present tense because the production of happiness occurred almost in the present.
Destruction of moha caused by taste: Younger brother of Balarāma! When You disappeared during the rāsa dance, my friend Rādhā lost control of her body and became unconscious. But when lotus-eyed Rādhā tasted Your chewed tāmbūla which I placed in her mouth, her hairs stood on end.
Purport
One of the gopīs informed Kṛṣṇa, “My dear Kṛṣṇa, when You disappeared from the arena of the rāsa dance, our most dear friend, Rādhārāṇī, immediately fell on the ground and lost consciousness. But after this, when I offered Her some of Your chewed betel nut remnants, She immediately returned to consciousness with jubilant symptoms in Her body.” This is an instance of alertness caused by tasting.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Tava tāmbūla-carvitam means “your chewed betel.” The genitive case of tava here has a possessive meaning. Another version is tvac carvitaṁ mukham anupratipadya gaurī tāmbūlam arpitam udsratayā ciceta: Having been offered your chewed tāmbūla, Rādhā woke up with tears in her eyes.
Bodha arising from breaking sleep: There is bodha when sleep is broken by a dream, by sufficient sleep and by noise. In this state rubbing the eyes, rising from bed and rubbing the limbs occurs.
Bodha arising from breaking sleep through a dream: “O Kṛṣṇa! Do not laugh. Stop pulling the edge of my cloth, otherwise I will tell Jaṭilā about Your fickle behavior.” Saying this in a dream, Rādhā suddenly woke up. Seeing the elders in front of her, she became very bashful and hung her head.
Purport
One night Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī was talking in a dream. “My dear Kṛṣṇa,” She said, “please do not play any more jokes on Me! Please stop! And please don’t touch My garments either. Otherwise I shall inform the elderly persons, and I shall disclose all of Your naughty behavior.” While She was talking like this in a dream, She suddenly awoke and saw some of Her superiors standing before Her. Thus Rādhārāṇī became ashamed and bowed Her head. This is an instance of alertness after awakening from sleep.
[dootee chaagaat tad-aagaaram jajaagaara cha raadhikaa |]
tūrṇaṁ puṇyavatīnāṁ hi tanoti phalam udyamaḥ ||189||
[toornam punyavateenaam hi tanoti phalam udyamah ||189||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nidrā-pūrtyā, yathā –
dūtī cāgāt tad-āgāraṁ jajāgāra ca rādhikā |
tūrṇaṁ puṇyavatīnāṁ hi tanoti phalam udyamaḥ ||189||
Bodha arising from breaking sleep due to sufficient sleep: Just when the messenger arrived at her house, Rādhā woke up. It is seen that the attempts of those with pious credits quickly bear fruit.
Purport
There is another instance of this. A messenger from Kṛṣṇa came to Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī while She was sleeping, and Rādhārāṇī immediately awakened. Similarly, when Kṛṣṇa began to blow on His flute in the night, all of the gopīs, the beautiful daughters of the cowherd men, immediately got up from their sleep.
By sound: Just as the rumbling of the clouds which gives joy to the peacocks causes the swans to fly away, so the sound of the flute broke the sleep of the gopīs.
Purport
There is a very beautiful comparison made in this connection: “The lotus flower is sometimes surrounded by white swans, and sometimes it is surrounded by black wasps who are collecting its honey. When there is a thundering in the sky, the swans go away, but the black wasps stay to enjoy the lotus flowers.” The gopīs’ sleeping condition is compared to the white swans, and the sound of Kṛṣṇa’s flute is compared to a black wasp. When Kṛṣṇa’s flute sounded, the white swans, which represent the sleeping condition of the gopīs, were immediately vanquished, and the black wasp sound of the flute began to enjoy the lotus flower of the gopīs’ beauty.
Thus the thirty-three vyabhicāri-bhāvas have been described. They should be described as superior, moderate and inferior according to their condition.
Purport
NoD 31: Additional Symptoms
All the previously mentioned thirty-three symptoms of ecstatic love are called vyabhicārī, or disturbing. All these symptoms refer to apparently disturbed conditions, but even in such disturbed conditions there is acute ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa. These symptoms, however, can be divided into three groups: first class, second class and third class.
klaibyaṁ kṣamā ca kutukam utkaṇṭhā vinayo ’pi ca ||192||
[klaibyam kshamaa cha kutukam utkanthaa vinayo ’pi cha ||192||]
saṁśayo dhārṣṭyam ity ādyā bhāvā ye syuḥ pare ’pi ca |
[samshayo dhaarshtyam ity aadyaa bhaavaa ye syuh pare ’pi cha |]
ukteṣv antarbhavantīti na pṛthaktvena darśitāḥ ||193||
[ukteshv antarbhavanteeti na prithaktvena darshitaah ||193||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mātsaryodvega-dambherṣyā viveko nirṇayas tathā |
klaibyaṁ kṣamā ca kutukam utkaṇṭhā vinayo ’pi ca ||192||
saṁśayo dhārṣṭyam ity ādyā bhāvā ye syuḥ pare ’pi ca |
ukteṣv antarbhavantīti na pṛthaktvena darśitāḥ ||193||
All other conditions such as envy, agitation, deceit, spite, discrimination, coming to conclusion, impotence, toleration, curiosity, longing, modesty, doubt, and audacity can be included in the thirty-three and are thus not described separately
Purport
There are many disturbing symptoms in ecstatic love, such as envy, anxiety, pride, jealousy, coming to a conclusion, cowardliness, forgiveness, impatience, hankering, regret, doubtfulness and impudence. These are included in the thirty-three conditions of ecstatic love.
klaibyaṁ kṣamā ca kutukam utkaṇṭhā vinayo ’pi ca ||192||
[klaibyam kshamaa cha kutukam utkanthaa vinayo ’pi cha ||192||]
saṁśayo dhārṣṭyam ity ādyā bhāvā ye syuḥ pare ’pi ca |
[samshayo dhaarshtyam ity aadyaa bhaavaa ye syuh pare ’pi cha |]
ukteṣv antarbhavantīti na pṛthaktvena darśitāḥ ||193||
[ukteshv antarbhavanteeti na prithaktvena darshitaah ||193||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mātsaryodvega-dambherṣyā viveko nirṇayas tathā |
klaibyaṁ kṣamā ca kutukam utkaṇṭhā vinayo ’pi ca ||192||
saṁśayo dhārṣṭyam ity ādyā bhāvā ye syuḥ pare ’pi ca |
ukteṣv antarbhavantīti na pṛthaktvena darśitāḥ ||193||
All other conditions such as envy, agitation, deceit, spite, discrimination, coming to conclusion, impotence, toleration, curiosity, longing, modesty, doubt, and audacity can be included in the thirty-three and are thus not described separately
Purport
There are many disturbing symptoms in ecstatic love, such as envy, anxiety, pride, jealousy, coming to a conclusion, cowardliness, forgiveness, impatience, hankering, regret, doubtfulness and impudence. These are included in the thirty-three conditions of ecstatic love.
saṁśayo’ntarbhavet tarke tathā dhārṣṭyaṁ ca cāpale ||195||
Thus mātsarya (envy) is included in asūyā. Udvega (agitation) is included in trāsa. Dambha (deceit) is included in avahitthā. Īrṣyā (spite) is included in amarṣa. Viveka (discrimination) and nirṇaya (concluding) are included in mati. Klaibyam (impotence) is included in dainyam. Kṣamā (toleration) is included in dhṛti. Kutuka (curiosity) and utkaṇṭha (longing) are included in autsukya. Vinaya (modesty) is included in lajjā. Saṁśaya (doubt) is included in vitarka. Dhārṣṭya (audacity) is included in cāpala.
Purport
Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī has very nicely analyzed the different kinds of disturbing symptoms, and although it is very difficult to find the exact English equivalents for many Sanskrit words used here, his analysis will now be presented.
When one becomes malicious upon seeing another’s advancement of life, his state of mind is generally called envy. When one becomes frightened at seeing a lightning bolt in the sky, that fearfulness brings on anxiety. Therefore, fearfulness and anxiety may be taken as one. One’s desire to hide his real mentality is called avahitthā, or concealment, and a desire to exhibit superiority is called pride. Both of these may be classified under pretension. In a pretentious attitude both avahitthā and pride are to be found. One’s inability to tolerate an offense committed by another is called amarṣa, and one’s inability to tolerate the opulence of another is called jealousy. Jealousy and amarṣa are both caused by intolerance. One’s ability to establish the correct import of a word may be called conclusiveness. And before such a conclusive determination of import, there must be thoughtful consideration. Therefore, the act of consideration is present during the establishment of a conclusion. When one presents himself as ignorant, his attitude is called humility, and when there is absence of enthusiasm it is called cowardice. Therefore, in humility, there is sometimes cowardice also. When the mind is steadfast it is called enduring, and one’s ability to tolerate others’ offenses is also called endurance. Therefore, forgiveness and endurance can be synonymous. Anxiousness for time to pass is called impatience, and when one sees something wonderful one is said to be struck with wonder. Impatience may be caused by being struck with wonder, and so impatience and being struck with wonder can be synonymous. When anxiety is in its dormant stage it is called hankering. Therefore, anxiety and hankering can also be synonymous. When one becomes regretful for some offense, his feeling is called bashfulness. In this way, bashfulness and regret can be synonymous. Doubtfulness is one of the aspects of argument. After exhibiting impudence one becomes restless. Therefore restlessness and impudence can be synonymous.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Mātsarya is hatred at seeing the good fortune of others. That hatred is also in asūyā, attributing fault to good qualities of others. Thus mātsarya is included in asūyā. Sudden fear from thunder etc. is called trāsa. Inability to tolerate thunder etc. is called udvega. Thus it is included in trāsa. Hiding one’s true form is called avahitthā. Dambha is showing oneself as superior when actually one is not. Both have false pretension. Thus dambha is included in avahitthā. Intolerance of others’ offenses is called amarṣa. Īrṣyā is intolerance of others’ superiority. Both have the element of intolerance as a main element and are thus practically the same. To find the meaning of something is mati. That is the same as nirṇaya. Its cause is vicāra or viveka, using discrimination. Because it is the cause of mati, viveka is included in mati. Thinking oneself most fallen is called dainyam. Lack of vigor is called klaibyam (impotence). Thus klaibyam is an aspect of dainyam. Steadiness of mind is called dhṛti. Kṣamā is toleration. Thus it is included in dhṛti. Autsukam is the inability to tolerate the passing of time. Desire to see something astonishing is kutuka. Since kutuka is a cause of autsukya it is included in it. Utkanthā is a subtle aspect of autsukyam. In lajjā, vinaya (modesty) is a necessary element and thus included in it. Vitarka means conjecture. Saṁśaya (doubt) is included in it since after saṁsāya comes vitarka. Dhārṣṭyam (audacity) is included within cāpalam since after dhārṣṭyam comes cāpalam (insolence).
saṁśayo’ntarbhavet tarke tathā dhārṣṭyaṁ ca cāpale ||195||
Thus mātsarya (envy) is included in asūyā. Udvega (agitation) is included in trāsa. Dambha (deceit) is included in avahitthā. Īrṣyā (spite) is included in amarṣa. Viveka (discrimination) and nirṇaya (concluding) are included in mati. Klaibyam (impotence) is included in dainyam. Kṣamā (toleration) is included in dhṛti. Kutuka (curiosity) and utkaṇṭha (longing) are included in autsukya. Vinaya (modesty) is included in lajjā. Saṁśaya (doubt) is included in vitarka. Dhārṣṭya (audacity) is included in cāpala.
Purport
Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī has very nicely analyzed the different kinds of disturbing symptoms, and although it is very difficult to find the exact English equivalents for many Sanskrit words used here, his analysis will now be presented.
When one becomes malicious upon seeing another’s advancement of life, his state of mind is generally called envy. When one becomes frightened at seeing a lightning bolt in the sky, that fearfulness brings on anxiety. Therefore, fearfulness and anxiety may be taken as one. One’s desire to hide his real mentality is called avahitthā, or concealment, and a desire to exhibit superiority is called pride. Both of these may be classified under pretension. In a pretentious attitude both avahitthā and pride are to be found. One’s inability to tolerate an offense committed by another is called amarṣa, and one’s inability to tolerate the opulence of another is called jealousy. Jealousy and amarṣa are both caused by intolerance. One’s ability to establish the correct import of a word may be called conclusiveness. And before such a conclusive determination of import, there must be thoughtful consideration. Therefore, the act of consideration is present during the establishment of a conclusion. When one presents himself as ignorant, his attitude is called humility, and when there is absence of enthusiasm it is called cowardice. Therefore, in humility, there is sometimes cowardice also. When the mind is steadfast it is called enduring, and one’s ability to tolerate others’ offenses is also called endurance. Therefore, forgiveness and endurance can be synonymous. Anxiousness for time to pass is called impatience, and when one sees something wonderful one is said to be struck with wonder. Impatience may be caused by being struck with wonder, and so impatience and being struck with wonder can be synonymous. When anxiety is in its dormant stage it is called hankering. Therefore, anxiety and hankering can also be synonymous. When one becomes regretful for some offense, his feeling is called bashfulness. In this way, bashfulness and regret can be synonymous. Doubtfulness is one of the aspects of argument. After exhibiting impudence one becomes restless. Therefore restlessness and impudence can be synonymous.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Mātsarya is hatred at seeing the good fortune of others. That hatred is also in asūyā, attributing fault to good qualities of others. Thus mātsarya is included in asūyā. Sudden fear from thunder etc. is called trāsa. Inability to tolerate thunder etc. is called udvega. Thus it is included in trāsa. Hiding one’s true form is called avahitthā. Dambha is showing oneself as superior when actually one is not. Both have false pretension. Thus dambha is included in avahitthā. Intolerance of others’ offenses is called amarṣa. Īrṣyā is intolerance of others’ superiority. Both have the element of intolerance as a main element and are thus practically the same. To find the meaning of something is mati. That is the same as nirṇaya. Its cause is vicāra or viveka, using discrimination. Because it is the cause of mati, viveka is included in mati. Thinking oneself most fallen is called dainyam. Lack of vigor is called klaibyam (impotence). Thus klaibyam is an aspect of dainyam. Steadiness of mind is called dhṛti. Kṣamā is toleration. Thus it is included in dhṛti. Autsukam is the inability to tolerate the passing of time. Desire to see something astonishing is kutuka. Since kutuka is a cause of autsukya it is included in it. Utkanthā is a subtle aspect of autsukyam. In lajjā, vinaya (modesty) is a necessary element and thus included in it. Vitarka means conjecture. Saṁśaya (doubt) is included in it since after saṁsāya comes vitarka. Dhārṣṭyam (audacity) is included within cāpalam since after dhārṣṭyam comes cāpalam (insolence).
[autsukyam prati chintaayaah kathitaatraanubhaavataa |]
nidrāṁ prati vibhāvatvam evaṁ jñeyaḥ pare ’py amī ||198||
[nidraam prati vibhaavatvam evam jneyah pare ’py amee ||198||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
autsukyaṁ prati cintāyāḥ kathitātrānubhāvatā |
nidrāṁ prati vibhāvatvam evaṁ jñeyaḥ pare ’py amī ||198||
Cintā (pondering) is the effect of autsukya (impatience) and the cause of nidrā (sleep). In this way one should understand how the vyabhicāri-bhāvas act mutually as anubhāva (actions as effect) and vibhāva (actions as cause). [Note: Most of the vyabhicāri-bhāvas are defined with mention of cause and effect. Circumstances, actions (anubhāvas) or vyabhicāri-bhāvas will act as a cause, and other actions (anubhāvas), vyabhicāri-bhāvas or sāttvika-bhāvas will appear as effects. For instance, “Happiness of the heart arising from seeing or attaining one’s desired object is called harṣa. In this state standing of hair on end, perspiration, tears (all sāttvika-bhāvas), glowing face, confusion (āvega), insanity (unmāda), indecision (jaḍatā) and fainting (moha) occur.]
[eshaam cha saattvikaanaam cha tathaa naanaa-kriyaa-tateh |]
kārya-kāraṇa-bhāvas tu jñeyaḥ prāyeṇa lokataḥ ||199||
[kaarya-kaarana-bhaavas tu jneyah praayena lokatah ||199||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
eṣāṁ ca sāttvikānāṁ ca tathā nānā-kriyā-tateḥ |
kārya-kāraṇa-bhāvas tu jñeyaḥ prāyeṇa lokataḥ ||199||
The causes and effects of vyabhicāri-bhāvas, sāttvika-bhāvas and various other actions should be understood to be similar to situations in the material world.
Purport
All of these symptoms are transcendental, and they are exhibited in different ways, acting and interacting under different conditions. They are like the reciprocation of love between the lover and beloved.
Criticism or other actions are considered the cause of change of color (sāttvika-bhāva) and amarṣa (indignation, vyabhicāri-bhāva), and the effect of asūyā (envy, vyabhicāri-bhāva).
Purport
When a person is envious or defamed, there may be a change in the color of the body. This may be classified as vibhāva, or subecstasy. Sometimes illusion, collapse and strong anxiety are also considered to be vibhāva. When there are many such symptoms, they can simply be grouped together under ecstatic love.
Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī says that fright, sleep, fatigue, laziness and the madness of intoxication are sometimes grouped under continuous symptoms of ecstatic love, and they are due to a strong attraction.
False argument, determination, steadiness, remembrance, joyfulness, ignorance, humility and unconsciousness are also different symptoms of ecstatic love. Dependence is also grouped under ecstatic love, and this can be divided into superior dependence and inferior dependence. The direct differentiations between superior and inferior dependence are ascertained by Rūpa Gosvāmī and will be presented in due course.
[prahaarasya vibhaavatvam sammoha-pralayau prati |]
augryaṁ pratyanubhāvatvam evaṁ jñeyāḥ pare ’pi ca ||201||
[augryam pratyanubhaavatvam evam jneyaah pare ’pi cha ||201||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prahārasya vibhāvatvaṁ saṁmoha-pralayau prati |
augryaṁ pratyanubhāvatvam evaṁ jñeyāḥ pare ’pi ca ||201||
Beating is the cause of moha (vyabhicāri-bhāva) and pralaya (sāttvika-bhāva). It is also the effect of augrya (ferocity, vyabhicāri-bhāva). Other states should be understood similarly.
sākṣād-rater na sambandhaḥ ṣaḍbhis trāsādibhiḥ saha |
syāt parasparayā kintu līlānuguṇatākṛte ||203||
Rati has no direct relationship with the six vyabhicāri-bhāvas just mentioned. Rati has a relationship with them only because they support rati for encouraging pastimes.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The six bhāvas just mentioned never arise in relationship to Kṛṣṇa in those possessing rati, since He is experienced only through the pleasant nature in the rati. They arise through obstacles to their rati, being experienced by the devotees in those conditions alone. Harṣa and other positive emotions arise with Kṛṣṇa as the direct cause (vibhāva). Trāsa etc. do not arise in this way. Thus the verse states that there is no relationship with rati directly in the manifestation of these six vyabhicāri bhāvas, since they arise only when there are obstacles to rati. But they will have a relationship with rati, in the sense that they mix together with rati (parasparayā), since these bhāvas arise when there are obstacles to the rati. Mention of six vyabhicāri-bhāvas should also include other vyabhicāri-bhāvas such as fear. These occur only when there are acts such as offense against the Lord.
Vitarka, mati, nirveda, dhṛti, smṛti, harṣa, and the type of bodha arising from destruction of ignorance become “somewhat” the cause of rati.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Bodha-bhit means the particular bodha arising from destruction of ignorance. These are said to be causes of rati (rati-vibhāvatā) “somewhat.” It should be understood from this that rati and these vyabhicāri-bhāvas mutually act upon each other. They are said to be a cause of rati because they cause further appreciation of Kṛṣṇa (they stimulate rati, but rati is permanent and not caused).
The vyabhicāri-bhāvas may be either dependent or independent.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The dependent vyabhicāri-bhāvas are under the control of the mukhya and gauṇa-ratis. [Note: However the inferior dependent vyabhicāri-bhāva arises from a rati which is neither primary or secondary.] The independent ones are not under the direct control of rati.
mukhyām eva ratiṁ puṣṇan sākṣād ity abhidhīyate ||208||
[mukhyaam eva ratim pushnan saakshaad ity abhidheeyate ||208||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra sākṣāt –
mukhyām eva ratiṁ puṣṇan sākṣād ity abhidhīyate ||208||
That superior vyabhicāri-bhāva which nourishes a primary rati is called a direct, superior dependent vyabhicāri-bhāva.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
It should be understood that if the vyabhicāri-bhāva becomes a component of the primary or secondary rasas (nourishes the rasa) it is called superior (vara), dependent vyabhicāri-bhāva. Verse 213 describes the inferior (avara), dependent vyabhicāri-bhāva in the opposite way.
An example: What is the use of eyes which do not see Mathurā, hearing whose name my hairs stand on end?
Purport
One devotee exclaimed, “Oh, I cannot see the district of Mathurā! Even though by simply hearing the name of Mathurā the hairs of my body are standing up, I cannot see the place. So of what use are my eyes?” This statement reveals a strong anxiety to see the district of Mathurā resulting from a strong attachment to Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The desire to see Mathurā is an expression of a genuine principal rati for the Lord. The vyabhicāri-bhāva of nirveda (self-deprecation) nourishes the rati directly.
dhig astu me bhuja-dvandvaṁ bhīmasya parighopamam |
[dhig astu me bhuja-dvandvam bheemasya parighopamam |]
mādhavākṣepiṇaṁ duṣṭaṁ yat pinaṣṭi na cedipam ||211||
[maadhavaakshepinam dushtam yat pinashti na chedipam ||211||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā –
dhig astu me bhuja-dvandvaṁ bhīmasya parighopamam |
mādhavākṣepiṇaṁ duṣṭaṁ yat pinaṣṭi na cedipam ||211||
I am Bhīma. How unfortunate are my two arms, strong as iron beams, if they cannot crush the evil Śiṣupāla, the enemy of Kṛṣṇa?
Purport
There is another instance of this strong attachment for Kṛṣṇa expressed by Bhīma when he began to murmur, “My arms are just like thunderbolts, but despite these arms I could not smash Śiśupāla while he was blaspheming Kṛṣṇa. Therefore, of what use are these strong arms?” In this instance Bhīma became angry, and being influenced by such anger, his hopelessness became a cause for strong attachment to Kṛṣṇa. This instance can be described as strong attachment for Kṛṣṇa in anger.
When the vyabhicāri-bhāva is not a component of either a primary or secondary rasa (does not nourish the rasa), it is called an inferior, dependent vyabhicāri-bhāva. [Note: Both superior and inferior dependent vyabhicāri-bhāvas are however directly caused by a rati of some sort. The superior type arise directly from primary or secondary ratis and the inferior type arises from a rati neither primary or secondary.]
When Arjuna saw the universal form of Kṛṣṇa which was crushing the heads of the living entities in the universe with its teeth situated in its shining mouths, his mouth became dry and he forgot himself.
Purport
When Arjuna witnessed the universal form of Kṛṣṇa, whose dazzling teeth were practically devouring the very existence of the universe, Arjuna’s mouth became dried up. At that time Arjuna forgot himself and could not understand that he was Arjuna, Kṛṣṇa’s friend, although he was always dependent upon Kṛṣṇa’s mercy. This incident is an example of inferior dependence.
Uncontrollable fear appeared from Arjuna experiencing the frightful actions of the universal form. This covers the rati of Arjuna. The vyabhicāri-bhāva of moha is under the control of a fear which is not a secondary rati.
Purport
Sometimes ghastly activities also support strong ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa. This state of mind is called ecstatic fearfulness under illusion.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
From seeing terrifying form of the Lord with which he was unfamiliar, Arjuna simply had fear that the universal form would devour the whole world. This is not bhaya-rati. [Note: The fear is not related to the Lord, whereas when the cowherd men fear that Kṛṣṇa may be harmed by the forest fire that fear is considered genuine bhaya-rati. Similarly the anger of Bhīma in verse 211 is considered genuine krodha-rati, since the anger is related to insults made to Kṛṣṇa.]
O mighty-armed one, seeing this great form with many mouths and eyes, many arms, thighs and feet, many stomachs, fearful with many teeth, the world is filled with terror. BG 11.23
From this statement it is understood that it is not rati. However, the following description is different:
O controller of the senses! Rightly, the world rejoices and becomes attracted to You by this celebrated form. BG 11.36
Thus Arjuna’s resulting moha is not part of a secondary rati. Therefore, it is considered avara or inferior.
Svatantra (independent) vyabhicāri-bhāvas: Though all the vyabhicāri-bhāvas are dependent to some degree, they manifest some independence. Though the employees of the king are dependent on the king, at the time of collecting the king’s taxes or during marriages, they show independence from the king.
bhāvajñai rati-śūnyaś ca raty-anusparśanas tathā |
[bhaavajnai rati-shoonyash cha raty-anusparshanas tathaa |]
rati-gandhiś ca te tredhā svatantrāḥ parikīrtitāḥ ||217||
[rati-gandhish cha te tredhaa svatantraah parikeertitaah ||217||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhāvajñai rati-śūnyaś ca raty-anusparśanas tathā |
rati-gandhiś ca te tredhā svatantrāḥ parikīrtitāḥ ||217||
Those knowledgeable of rati divide the independent vyabhicāri-bhāvas into three types: devoid of genuine rati, influenced by genuine rati and having a trace of rati.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Among the independent vyabhicāri-bhāvas, independence is manifested clearly in the first type (being devoid of rati). [Note: Rati-śūnya-vyabhicāri-bhāva is the most independent. It is equivalent to raty-ābhāsa-bhava-sāttvika-bhāva. Raty-anusparśana-vyabhicāri-bhāva is equivalent to digdha-sāttvika-bhāva.] In the other two types of independent vyabhicāri-bhāvas (a touch of rati or contact with rati), the same term “independence” is applied. However, they are somewhat dependent and this is expressed by the word kvacid “somewhat” in verse 216. Kara-graha means marriage or receiving taxes. There will more involvement with the son-in-law than the king at the time of marriage because he has to take care of the needs of the son-in-law.
Devoid of genuine rati: When vyabhicāri-bhāvas are displayed in a person devoid of genuine rati, but not inimical to Kṛṣṇa, it is called a rati-śūnya-svatantra-vyabhicāri-bhāva.
dhig janma nas trivṛd-vidyāṁ dhig vrataṁ dhig bahujñatām |
[dhig janma nas trivrid-vidyaam dhig vratam dhig bahujnataam |]
dhik kulaṁ dhik kriyā-dīkṣāṁ vimukhā ye tv adhokṣaje || atra svatantro nirvedaḥ | ||219||
[dhik kulam dhik kriyaa-deekshaam vimukhaa ye tv adhokshaje || atra svatantro nirvedah | ||219||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā śrī-daśame–
dhig janma nas trivṛd-vidyāṁ dhig vrataṁ dhig bahujñatām |
dhik kulaṁ dhik kriyā-dīkṣāṁ vimukhā ye tv adhokṣaje || atra svatantro nirvedaḥ | ||219||
Independent self-deprecation, from the Tenth Canto: To hell with our threefold birth, our vow of celibacy and our extensive learning! To hell with our aristocratic background and our expertise in the rituals of sacrifice! These are all condemned because we were inimical to the transcendental Personality of Godhead. [Note: The vyabhicāri-bhāva of nirveda (self-deprecation) is called independent because it is devoid of real rati for Kṛṣṇa. The brāhmaṇas did not have rati for Kṛṣṇa, but rati-chāyā. Just as raty-ābhāsa gives rise to apparent sāttvika-bhāvas, it gives rise to apparent vyabhicāri-bhāvas.] SB 10.23.40
Purport
In the Tenth Canto, Twenty-third Chapter, verse 40, of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there is the following statement by the brāhmaṇas who were performing sacrifices: “We have all been born into three advantageous conditions: we are in high brāhmaṇa families, we have ceremoniously received the sacred thread, and we are also properly initiated by a spiritual master. But, alas, in spite of all these advantages, we are condemned. Even our observance of brahmacarya is condemned.” The brāhmaṇas thus began to condemn their own activities. They realized that in spite of being so elevated by birth, education and culture, they still were under the spell of the illusory energy. They also admitted that even great yogīs who are not devotees of the Lord are covered by the influence of material energy.
Influenced by genuine rati: When a vyabhicāri-bhāva appears spontaneously but devoid of even rati-gandha (the third type of independent vyabhicāri-bhāva, having genuine rati as the indirect cause), but is related to genuine rati because the experiencer has permanent genuine rati, it is called raty-anusparśana-svatantra-vyabhicāri-bhāva.
Purport
This kind of hopelessness felt by the brāhmaṇas who were performing ritualistic ceremonies shows practically no attachment for Kṛṣṇa.
hā kṛṣṇa pāhi pāhīti cukrośābhīra-bālikā || ra trāsaḥ | ||221||
[haa krishna paahi paaheeti chukroshaabheera-baalikaa || ra traasah | ||221||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā –
gariṣṭhāriṣṭa-ṭaṅkārair vidhurā vadhirāyitā |
hā kṛṣṇa pāhi pāhīti cukrośābhīra-bālikā || ra trāsaḥ | ||221||
Terror: Hearing the roaring of the terrifying bull demon, the cowherd boys became fearful and almost deaf because of the loud sound. They began to shout, ’’Kṛṣṇa! Please save us!”
Purport
There is another hopelessness, however, which shows attachment for Kṛṣṇa. When the bull demon attacked the damsels of Vraja, they began to cry out, “Dear Kṛṣṇa—please save us! We are now gone!” This is hopelessness with attachment for Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
It has previously been said (216) that even the independent vyabhicāri-bhāvas are always dependent to some degree on rati. But in verse 220, raty-anusparśana was described as being devoid of even rati-gandha (and of course rati-śūnya in verse 218 was described as being completely devoid of rati). In order to remove the contradiction, an example is given in this verse. Because they were cowherd boys of Vraja, they had genuine rati at all times. All of their vyabhicāri-bhāvas were dependent upon their rati for Kṛṣṇa. However, by the terrifying sight of the bull demon, the vyabhicāri-bhāva of trāsa (in relation to the demon, not in relation to fear for Kṛṣṇaṣ safety from the bull) arose on its own spontaneously. [Note: In the case of the inferior, dependent vyabhicāri-bhāva, a rati which is neither primary or secondary is the direct cause of a vyabhicāri-bhāva in a devotee with permanent rati. Arjuna’s fear of the universal form’s destructive powers directly gave rise to moha. In the case of independent rati-anuśparśana-vyabhicāri-bhāvas, a vyabhicāri-bhāva not related to Kṛṣṇa arises on its own due to certain circumstances, not directly through any rati, in a devotee with permanent rati.] In the case of the brāhmaṇas performing sacrifice, they had at least a semblance of rati (rati-chāyā), though not pure rati for Kṛṣṇa. Thus the example of vyabhicāri-bhāva of nirveda in verse 219 is classed as rati-śūnya (devoid of pure rati, but not absolutely devoid of rati).
When a vyabhicāri-bhāva shows a touch of rati even though it remains independent, it is called rati-gandhi-svatantra-vyabhicāri-bhāva.
Purport
There is another hopelessness, however, which shows attachment for Kṛṣṇa. When the bull demon attacked the damsels of Vraja, they began to cry out, “Dear Kṛṣṇa—please save us! We are now gone!” This is hopelessness with attachment for Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
That vyabhicāri-bhāva (yaḥ) which shows a trace of rati (rati-gandhām) though it remains independent is called rati-gandhi.
Bashfulness: “O my daughter! I know why you are wearing that yellow cloth on your body. Do not try to hide from me (your attraction for Kṛṣṇa).” When Mukharā told this to Rādhā, Rādhā quickly hung her head and covered her face with the edge of her cloth to hide her shame.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Mukharā’s inferred Rādhā’s longing for Kṛṣṇa by her display of great passion. Since her secret had been revealed, Rādhā tried to conceal her shame (vyabhicāri-bhāva). A trace of rati can be detected in Rādhā’s action. Rādhā’s great attraction for Kṛṣṇa causes her transgressing the rules of dharma, which caused Mukharā to make her statement, which caused Rādhā’s shame. (Thus Rādhā’s shame directed towards Mukharā is caused by her rati for Kṛṣṇa. The shame is independent, being directly caused by Mukharā’s accusations, but showing a trace of rati, since madhura-rati is the indirect cause of the incident.) [Note: In the case of raty-anusparśana, rati as a cause is more indirect, being a general cause because the devotee always has rati for Kṛṣṇa.]
When these vyabhicāri-bhāvas manifest inappropriately in unqualified persons, they are actually semblances or ābhāsas of vyabhicāri-bhāvas. There are two types of inappropriateness: appearing in persons hostile to Kṛṣṇa and being improperly credited.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
In order to show two types of ābhāsa of the vyabhicāri bhāvas, two types of inappropriateness are shown in the second half of the verse.
Unfavorable vyabhicāri-bhāvābhāsa: When the bhāvas are present in those hostile to Kṛṣṇa they are called prātikūlya (unfavorable). [Note: This is similar to the sāttvika-bhāvas appearing in the enemies of Kṛṣṇa, which was called pratīpa.]
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The two types of improper manifestation of vyabhicāri-bhāvas are now shown. First the prātikūyam variety is shown.
An example of hostile manifestation of self-deprecation: When the cowherd boy without training killed the horse demon who was my very life and soul, what is the need for me, the unfortunate king Kaṁsa, who defeated Indra as play, to maintain my life?
Purport
When the Keśī demon was assassinated by Kṛṣṇa, Kaṁsa became hopeless. He said, “Keśī-daitya was as dear to me as my own life, but he has been killed by some cowherd boy who is crude, uneducated and ignorant in fighting. Even though I have defeated the King of heaven without difficulty, still I do not know the value of life.” Because this hopelessness has a slight touch of attraction for Kṛṣṇa, it is considered to be a reflection of ecstatic love in hopelessness.
atrāsūyāyāḥ |Translation: Another example of hostile manifestation, concerning envy:
[atraasooyaayaah |translation: another example of hostile manifestation, choncherning envy:]
O foolish Akrura! This Kāliya is only a harmless water snake. Govardhana Mountain is only a lump of earth. You are attributing the title of controller of the universe to a person who has just controlled a harmless snake and lifted a pile of earth!
[o foolish akrura! this kaaliya is only a harmless water snake. govardhana mountain is only a lump of earth. you are attributing the title of chontroller of the universe to a person who has just chontrolled a harmless snake and lifted a pile of earth!]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā vā –
ḍuṇḍabho jalacaraḥ sa kāliyo
goṣṭha-bhūbhṛd api loṣṭra-sodaraḥ |
tatra karma kim ivādbhutaṁ jane
yena mūrkha jagadīśateryate ||227||
atrāsūyāyāḥ |Translation: Another example of hostile manifestation, concerning envy:
O foolish Akrura! This Kāliya is only a harmless water snake. Govardhana Mountain is only a lump of earth. You are attributing the title of controller of the universe to a person who has just controlled a harmless snake and lifted a pile of earth!
ḍuṇḍabho jalacaraḥ sa kāliyo goṣṭha-bhūbhṛd api loṣṭra-sodaraḥ | tatra karma kim ivādbhutaṁ jane yena mūrkha jagadīśateryate ||227|| atrāsūyāyāḥ |Translation: Another example of hostile manifestation, concerning envy: O foolish Akrura! This Kāliya is only a harmless water snake. Govardhana Mountain is only a lump of earth. You are attributing the title of controller of the universe to a person who has just controlled a harmless snake and lifted a pile of earth!
Purport
Kaṁsa once rebuked Akrūra by saying, “You are such a fool that you are accepting a cowherd boy to be the Supreme Personality of Godhead simply because He has defeated some harmless water snake! The boy may have lifted one pebble called Govardhana Hill, but what is more surprising than that is your statement that this boy is the Personality of Godhead!” This is an instance of a maliciously opposing element, caused by hopelessness in ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa.
There are two types of inappropriateness: non-existent (asatya) and unqualified (ayogya). “Non-existent” means attributing vyabhicāri-bhāvas to inanimate objects (which cannot have emotions). “Unqualified” means attributing the bhāvas to animals (who are unqualified for higher emotions).
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Anaucityam means “unsuitability.” In this description of unsuitability, the bhāvas do not really exist, and thus all are really asatya, non-existent. However, the two types are distinguished in order to analyze unsuitability in detail. There is no existence of pride or other vyabhicāri-bhāvas in animals or inanimate objects. However, because the animals have life, among the animals, some may have the possibility of the bhāvas. Thus they are distinguished as superior to the non-moving objects like trees.
[mridnan karishyati harish charitaarthataam te ||]
atra nirvedasya | ||229||
[atra nirvedasya | ||229||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra aprāṇini, yathā –
chāyā na yasya sakṛd apy upasevitābhūt
kṛṣṇena hanta mama tasya dhig astu janma |
mā tvaṁ kadamba vidhuro bhava kāliyāhiṁ
mṛdnan kariṣyati hariś caritārthatāṁ te ||
atra nirvedasya | ||229||
Self-deprecation in trees: “My life is useless since Kṛṣṇa has not enjoyed the shade of my branches even once.” “O kadamba tree! Do not lament! You will attain success in life when Kṛṣṇa jumps from your branches to punish Kāliya.”
Purport
One devotee tried to console a kadamba tree when the tree was lamenting because Kṛṣṇa had not touched even its shadow. The devotee said, “My dear kadamba tree, do not be worried. Just after defeating the Kāliya snake in the Yamunā River, Kṛṣṇa will come and satisfy your desire.” This is an instance of inappropriate hopelessness in ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa.
Pride in animals: A peacock speaks: I am very pure. What bird is there to compare with me? Giving up Garudā, the Lord enjoys my feather on His head.
Purport
Garuḍa the eagle, the carrier of Viṣṇu, once said, “Who can be more pure than I? Where is there a second bird like me, so able and competent? Kṛṣṇa may not like me, He may not wish to join my party, but still He has to take advantage of my wings!” This is an instance of hopelessness in the neutral mood of ecstatic love.
Consciousness, discrimination, and the experience of sweetness described in the kadamba tree and other objects should be understood to be only a semblance to those items because they have only consciousness without discriminating powers.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Consciousness (jñānam) is certainly present in trees and other objects, and even a little higher understanding (vijñānam). Though they have awareness as if they were humans, that will disappear in them in order to conceal from them the confidential pastimes. In some places they are described as having emotions, but this should be taken as only a general form, not with discriminating powers:
kevalena hi bhāvena gopyo gāvo nagā mṛgāḥ
ye ’nye mūḍha-dhiyo nāgāḥ siddhā mām īyur añjasā
The inhabitants of Vṛndāvana, including the gopīs, cows, unmoving creatures such as the twin arjuna trees, animals, living entities with stunted consciousness such as bushes and thickets, and snakes such as Kāliya, all achieved the perfection of life by unalloyed love for Me and thus very easily achieved Me. SB 11.12.8
Thus it sāmānya-dṛṣṭyā means that they have consciousness without discriminating powers.
daśāś catasra etāsām utpattis tv iha sambhavaḥ ||232||
[dashaash chatasra etaasaam utpattis tv iha sambhavah ||232||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhāvānāṁ kvacid utpatti-sandhi-śābalya-śāntayaḥ |
daśāś catasra etāsām utpattis tv iha sambhavaḥ ||232||
Sometimes four stages are seen in the manifestation of vyabhicāri-bhāvas: appearance, conjunction, conflict and disappearance. Appearance (utpatti) means the initial manifestation of the vyabhicāri-bhāva.
Purport
The symptoms of ecstatic love are sometimes grouped under four headings—namely generation, conjunction, aggregation and satisfaction.
Appearance of harṣa: When the sun turned red, and Yaśodā heard the sound of the flute close by, her bodice became damp with the flow of milk from her breasts.
Appearance of asūyā: O Viśakhā! When you came in the morning to the bower, your friend Rādhā appeared splendid, even though her belt was crooked from her haste in tying it around her waist. When Kṛṣṇa revealed that confidential matter, Rādhā sent a crooked glance at Him with a frown on her brow. May that Rādhā purify you!
Purport
Kṛṣṇa once told Rādhārāṇī, “My dear friend, when You tried to meet Me alone in the morning, Your friend Mekhalā remained hungry with envy. Just look at her!” When Kṛṣṇa was joking with Rādhārāṇī in this way, Rādhārāṇī moved Her beautiful eyebrows crossly. Rūpa Gosvāmī prays that everyone may become blessed by this movement of Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī’s eyebrows. This is an instance of the generation of malice in ecstatic love of Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This is an example of utpatti of envy (asūyā). By joking in this manner with Rādhā’s associates, this gopī is hinting at her own superior position, arising from a relationship of love-hate with Kṛṣṇa.
Jaḍya caused by favorable and unfavorable circumstances: In the evening, the dead demoness lay on the earth and your son was sitting on her breast laughing. When Yaśodā heard this, for some time she remained motionless.
Purport
One night, after the Pūtanā demon had been killed, baby Kṛṣṇa could be seen playing upon her breast. Upon seeing this, Yaśodā became stunned for some time. This is an example of a conjunction of various symptoms of ecstatic love. The conjunction can be auspicious or inauspicious. That the Pūtanā demon had been killed was auspicious, but that Kṛṣṇa was playing on her breast in the dead of night, with no one to help Him in case of trouble, was inauspicious. Yaśodā was caught between auspiciousness and inauspiciousness.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
She remained motionless because of the sight of the demoness and because of affection for Kṛṣṇa. This is an event from a dream as previously described (2.3.10), or a story related in Harivaṁśa.
durvāracāpalo ’yaṁ dhāvann antar bahiś ca goṣṭhasya |
[durvaarachaapalo ’yam dhaavann antar bahish cha goshthasya |]
śiśur akutaścid bhītir dhinoti hṛdayaṁ dunoti ca me || tatra harṣa-śaṅkayoḥ | ||239||
[shishur akutashchid bheetir dhinoti hridayam dunoti cha me || tatra harsha-shankayoh | ||239||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha eka-hetu-jayoḥ, yathā –
durvāracāpalo ’yaṁ dhāvann antar bahiś ca goṣṭhasya |
śiśur akutaścid bhītir dhinoti hṛdayaṁ dunoti ca me || tatra harṣa-śaṅkayoḥ | ||239||
Two differing bhāvas arising from one source: This child is very fickle. He constantly runs inside and outside of Gokula. His fearlessness causes me both joy (harṣa) and apprehension (śaṅkā).
Purport
After Kṛṣṇa had just learned to walk, He was going in and out of the house very frequently. Yaśodā became surprised and said, “This child is too restless and cannot be controlled! He is incessantly going about the neighborhood of Gokula [Vṛndāvana], and then He is coming back inside the house. I see that the child is very fearless, but in spite of His fearlessness, I am becoming more and more afraid of His falling into some danger.” This again is an instance of the conjunction of two opposing elements: the child was very fearless, but at the same time Yaśodā was becoming fearful of some danger. Here danger is the cause, and Yaśodā’s feelings are in a conjunction of two opposing symptoms. In other words, Yaśodā was feeling both happiness and doubt, or growing fear.
Two bhāvas of harṣa and viṣāda from differing sources joining together: Seeing her son with joyful eyes in front of her, and seeing the strong wrestlers as well, Devakī began to shed both cool and hot tears.
Purport
When Devakī, the mother of Kṛṣṇa, saw her son very jubilant in the presence of the wrestlers in Kaṁsa’s arena, two kinds of tears were simultaneously gliding down her cheeks: sometimes her tears were warm, and sometimes they were cold. This is an instance of a conjunction of jubilation and lamentation due to different causes of ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Gaja-danta-sphurad-aṁsam aṅgajam (seeing her son carrying the booty of an elephant tusk) is sometimes found instead of sutam utphulla-vilocanam purah (seeing her son with joyful eyes in front of her). Seeing her son victorious, her joy became prominent. In the case of the first version, for Devakī, who recognized her son as the Lord, seeing his joyful eyes acted as a stimulant and produced happiness. Thus both versions have a reasonable explanation.
Here there is a combination of harṣa (joy), autsukya (impatience), garva (pride), amarṣa (indignation) and asūyā (displeasure) arising from one cause: Rādhā, being stopped forcibly by strong Kṛṣṇa in the forest on the bank of the Yamunā, internally smiled at Him. She gracefully glanced at Him with red eyes and furrowed brows. Her eyes lit up with flickering pupils, but she showed contempt for him. May Rādhā remain glorious!
Purport
Once when Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī was standing on the bank of the Yamunā River in the forest of Vṛndāvana, She was attacked by Kṛṣṇa, who was stronger than She. Although She externally expressed a disturbed mood from this incident, within Herself She was smiling and feeling great satisfaction. Externally She moved Her eyebrows and made a show of rejecting Kṛṣṇa. In this mood Rādhārāṇī looked very beautiful, and Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī glorifies Her beauty. This is an instance of exhibiting varying feelings in ecstatic love, although the cause is one only—Kṛṣṇa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Her bright pupils indicate autsukya. Her reddened glances with knit eyebrows indicate her displeasure (asūyā). (Her internal smile indicates her harṣa. Garva are indicated by her contempt and amarṣa is indicated by her furrowed brows.)
Many bhāvas arising from many causes: In this example there is lajjā (shame), amarṣa (envy), harṣa (joy) and viṣāda (despair). On the occasion of a festival, Rādhā, wearing a necklace given by Kṛṣṇa, saw nearby her mother, and in front of her, smiling Padmā. At a distance, she saw Kṛṣṇa and her husband Abhimanyu. She hung her head in shame on seeing her mother, threw crooked glances at Padmā in hatred. Her face blossomed with joy on seeing Kṛṣṇa and became withered on seeing her husband.
Purport
Sometimes there were great festivals in the house of Nanda Mahārāja, and all of the inhabitants of Vṛndāvana would assemble for these festivals. During one such festival, Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī was seen wearing a golden necklace given Her by Kṛṣṇa. This was immediately detected by Mother Yaśodā as well as by Rādhārāṇī’s mother, because the necklace was too long for Rādhārāṇī’s neck. At the same time Rādhārāṇī could see Kṛṣṇa nearby, as well as Her own husband, Abhimanyu. So all of these things combined to make Rādhārāṇī feel very much ashamed, and with Her face shriveled She began to look very beautiful. In this case there was a combination of bashfulness, anger, jubilation and lamentation. This is an instance of an aggregate of symptoms of ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
One time, being welcomed on the occasion of a festival at the house of Yaśodā, Rādhā wore a necklace given by Kṛṣṇa. Though it was covered by her clothing, when she bent down, it became visible. Parihita-hari-hārā means “Rādhā, wearing a necklace given by Kṛṣṇa.” A version with this phrase in the accusative case is rejected. Another version with hṛdi-dhṛta instead of parihita is also rejected. Here amarṣa means asūyā (envy or hatred). [Note: Padma is a gopī in Candrāvalī’s party. She thus smiled when Rādhā was in trouble. Rādhā therefore showed hostility to her.]
In this example there is a combination of garva (pride), viṣāda (despair), dainyam (feeling feeble), mati (consideration), smṛti (remembrance), śaṅkā (apprehension), amarṣa (indignation) and trāsa (terror). What can that child do? Yet he has killed all of my friends! Should I then surrender to Him? A warrior can never do that. I am preparing huge wrestlers to fight Him. But He has lifted Govardhana with His hand. I should go today to Vraja and attack Him, but my heart is shaking because of Him.
Purport
Kaṁsa once said, “What harm can this boy do to me? He has no power.” The next moment Kaṁsa was informed that all of his friends had been killed by the boy. Then Kaṁsa began to think in perplexity, “Shall I go immediately and surrender unto Him? But how can a great warrior do this?” The next moment he thought, “Why should I be afraid of Him? There are still so many wrestlers standing to support me.” But the next moment he began to consider, “The boy is certainly not common, because He has lifted Govardhana Hill with His left hand. So what can I do in this connection? Let me go to Vṛndāvana and inflict pains on all the residents there. But still I cannot even go out, because my heart is trembling from fear of this boy!” This condition of Kaṁsa’s mind reveals an instance of pride, lamentation, humility, determination, remembrance, doubtfulness, anger and fear. Actually eight different symptoms comprised the mental condition of Kaṁsa. This is another instance of an aggregate of symptoms in hopeless ecstatic love.
Here there is a combination of nirveda (self-contempt), garva (pride), śaṅkā (apprehension), dhṛti (steadiness), viṣāda (despair), mati (contemplation) and autsukya (impatience). My long eyes are unfortunate since they do not see Mathurā. My learning has made kings into servants. Time devours everything, but my house is the playground of Lakṣmī. Yet how unfortunate I am! My body grows thinner day by day. Therefore, I should sit in my house and worship the Lord but my heart is attracted to Vṛndāvana.
Purport
One householder devotee once said, “My Lord, I am so wretched that these two eyes are never desiring to see the glorious city of Mathurā. Therefore, my eyes are actually condemned. I am nicely educated, but my education has simply been used in government service. I have not considered formidable time, stronger than anything else, which creates and annihilates everything. To whom shall I leave all of my wealth and fortune? I am becoming older and older. What shall I do? Shall I execute devotional service from here at home? This I cannot do, because my mind is being attracted by the transcendental land of Vṛndāvana.”
This is an instance of hopelessness, pride, doubt, patience, lamentation, determination and eagerness—an aggregation of seven different symptoms in ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa.
There is a proverb in Sanskrit which says, “Disappointment gives rise to the greatest satisfaction.” In other words, when one’s sentiment or ambition becomes too great and is not fulfilled until after seemingly hopeless tribulation, that is taken as the greatest satisfaction.
This is an example of disappearance of viṣāda (despair): When the children of Vraja could not see Kṛṣṇa, their faces withered and became pale. They began searching for Kṛṣṇa in the forest. At that time, hearing the soft sound of His flute on a mountain top, they became filled with joy with hairs standing on end.
Purport
Once the cowherd boys in Vṛndāvana were vainly searching after Kṛṣṇa for a long time, and for that reason their faces became blackened, and their complexions appeared faded. Just then they could hear on the hill a faint vibration from Kṛṣṇa’s flute. Immediately all of them became very much gladdened. This is an instance of satisfaction in the midst of disappointment.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Gaveṣayantaḥ means “they searched.” Though there are other versions mṛdu-kala-muralīṁ niśamya (hearing the soft sound of the flute) is the preferred version.
Though my words do not have variety in meaning or flavor, examples of the vyabhicāri-bhāvas have been presented to indicate their essential nature as much as possible.
Purport
Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī says that although he has no expert knowledge about the sounds and meanings and mellows of the symptoms of ecstatic love, he has tried to give some examples of different varieties of love of Kṛṣṇa.
trayastriṁśad ime ’ṣṭau ca vakṣyante sthāyinaś ca ye |
[trayastrimshad ime ’shtau cha vakshyante sthaayinash cha ye |]
mukhya-bhāvābhidhās tv eka-catvāriṁśad amī smṛtāḥ ||250||
[mukhya-bhaavaabhidhaas tv eka-chatvaarimshad amee smritaah ||250||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
trayastriṁśad ime ’ṣṭau ca vakṣyante sthāyinaś ca ye |
mukhya-bhāvābhidhās tv eka-catvāriṁśad amī smṛtāḥ ||250||
The forty-one chief bhāvas or emotions are these thirty-three vyabhicāri-bhāvas, the seven secondary sthāyi-bhāvas, [Note: Later Rūpa Gosvāmī explains that the seven secondary ratis are actually vyabhicāri-bhāvas. He classes them as ratis only out of deference to Bharata Muni and others.] and the one mukhya-sthāyi-bhāva of the devotee. [Note: Though a devotee may have a mixture of primary ratis in his relationship with Kṛṣṇa, one of those is dominant as the sthāyi-bhāva, and others appear only at certain times, not at the same time, as vyabhicāri-bhāvas, or secondary ratis.]
Purport
He further states that the thirty-three disturbing symptoms of ecstatic love, plus eight other symptoms, all taken together equal forty-one primary symptoms of ecstatic love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Commentary
The eight chief bhāvas besides the thirty-three vyabhicāri-bhāvas (making a total of forty–one bhāvas) are the seven secondary ratis starting with hāsya and one of the five principle ratis starting with śānta-rati. By the word mukhya in the phrase mukhya-bhāvābhidhāḥ, the sāttvika-bhāvas are excluded.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Aṣṭau (eight) refers to the seven secondary sthāyi-bhāvas such as hāsya and the one normal state of bhakti of the particular devotee. The word mukhya here excludes the sāttvika-bhāvas. [Note: The sāttvika-bhāvas and anubhāvas are not classed as bhāva-rūpa-bhakti, but ceṣṭā-rūpa-bhakti.]
The transformations of mind created by the appearance of these forty-one bhāvas are said to create transformations in the body and all of the senses. [Note: These become the cause of sāttvika-bhavas and anubhāvas.]
Purport
These symptoms create transformations of bodily activities as well as movements of the senses.
One bhāva is natural to the person, and other bhāvas are incidental. The natural bhāva spreads internally and externally just as red color is completely identical with naturally red substances. Thus, the natural bhāva becomes very apparent just by a slight contact with the cause (Kṛṣṇa).
Purport
All of them can be accepted as different feelings of the heart. Sometimes some of the feelings are quite natural. Sometimes some of the feelings are just temporary appearances. Those symptoms which are very natural always remain, both within and without the devotee.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Commentary
Among all the forty-one bhāvas such as augrya, cāpalya, dhairya or lajjā, one is natural. That bhāva permeates the devotee internally and externally. It is similar to red color in a naturally red object such as red dye (mañjiṣṭha), which, spreading internally and externally within the object, appears to be one with that substance completely.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Tan-maya means “having as its component.” Nāma-mātrena means “just by a slight contact.”
One bhāva is natural to the person, and other bhāvas are incidental. The natural bhāva spreads internally and externally just as red color is completely identical with naturally red substances. Thus, the natural bhāva becomes very apparent just by a slight contact with the cause (Kṛṣṇa).
Purport
All of them can be accepted as different feelings of the heart. Sometimes some of the feelings are quite natural. Sometimes some of the feelings are just temporary appearances. Those symptoms which are very natural always remain, both within and without the devotee.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Tan-maya means “having as its component.” Nāma-mātrena means “just by a slight contact.”
By this natural bhāva, rati (attraction or love) is appears. Though rati is one in speaking about it generally, it appears in various forms when wishing to describe its various qualities.
Purport
All of them can be accepted as different feelings of the heart. Sometimes some of the feelings are quite natural. Sometimes some of the feelings are just temporary appearances. Those symptoms which are very natural always remain, both within and without the devotee.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Commentary
That rati which is acquired by that natural bhāva, though only one when speaking of it generally, takes many forms such as śānta and dāsya, when speaking of the different qualities such as śānta in the various types of devotees.
[aagantukas tu yo bhaavah pataadau raktimeva sah |]
tais tair vibhāvair evāyaṁ dhīyate dīpyate ’pi ca ||255||
[tais tair vibhaavair evaayam dheeyate deepyate ’pi cha ||255||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āgantukas tu yo bhāvaḥ paṭādau raktimeva saḥ |
tais tair vibhāvair evāyaṁ dhīyate dīpyate ’pi ca ||255||
Just as white cloth appears red when red dye is applied to a cloth, the incidental bhāvas become situated in the devotees by various causes and then become visible.
Purport
As one can detect the color of dye a cloth was soaked in by looking at the cloth, so, simply by understanding the different signs of these symptomatic features, one can understand the actual position. In other words, attachment for Kṛṣṇa is one, but because there exist different kinds of devotees, such attachment is manifested in many varieties. As clothing tinged red appears red, so the temporary appearance of a certain type of feeling can be detected or observed by the specific ecstatic symptom.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Commentary
Besides the natural bhāva, there are incidental bhāvas. The natural or intrinsic bhāva is compared to a white cloth and the incidental bhāvas are compared to dye. Just as red dye colors a white cloth red, the incidental bhāvas become situated in the devotees and become visible in them by intrinsic causes. It has already been said: among the vyabhicāri-bhāvas some act as cause (vibhāva) and others act as effect (anubhāva). (BRS 2.4.196)
vividhānāṁ tu bhaktānāṁ vaiśiṣṭyād vividhaṁ manaḥ |
mano ’nusārād bhāvānāṁ tāratamyaṁ kilodaye ||257||
There is a variety of minds of the various types of devotees (devotees in śānta, dāsya etc.). In accordance with the variety of minds, there are also various gradations of the appearance of the bhāvas because of various natures such as gariṣṭha.
Purport
… produce various specific feelings within the mind. And according to these differences, the symptoms of ecstatic love appear in different forms and degrees.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
There are various minds of the devotees who have variety of moods as śānta, dāsya etc. The causes of gradation of bhāvas (even in persons possessing one rati such as dāsya) are the particular qualities of the individual mind such as gariṣṭha, which are described in the following verses.
samyag-unmīlitāś cāmī na lakṣyante sphuṭaṁ janaiḥ ||258||
[samyag-unmeelitaash chaamee na lakshyante sphutam janaih ||258||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
citte gariṣṭhe gambhīre mahiṣṭhe karkaśādike |
samyag-unmīlitāś cāmī na lakṣyante sphuṭaṁ janaiḥ ||258||
Even if these bhāvas were to appear strongly in hearts which are gariṣṭha (heavy), gambhīra (deep), mahiṣṭha (expansive) or karkaśa (hard) in nature, ordinary people could not perceive the bhāvas clearly because there would be no external transformations of body or senses.
Purport
If one’s heart is highly elevated, grave and magnanimous, or if one’s heart is rough and crude, different symptoms of ecstatic love will appear, influenced by the condition of the heart. Actually, people cannot generally understand such different qualities of mentality, …
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This verse begins the description of the degrees of manifestation of the bhavas.
The word amī refers to the bhāvas.
When these bhāvas arise even slightly in hearts which are laghiṣṭha (light), uttāna (spread on the surface), kṣodiṣṭha (small) and komala (soft), they can be recognized externally because of extreme transformations of the body and senses.
Purport
… but when one’s heart is very soft or gentle, these symptoms become very easily visible, and one can understand them very clearly.
The heavy heart is like a pile of gold. The light heart is like a pile of cotton wool. The bhāvas act like wind in relation to these two types of hearts.
Purport
The heart of one who is highly elevated and grave is compared to gold. If one’s heart is very soft and gentle, his heart is compared to a cotton swab. When there is an ecstatic sensation within the mind, the golden heart or grave heart is not agitated, but the soft heart immediately becomes agitated.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Bhāvasya pavanopamā would normally mean that the bhāva is compared to the wind. Pavana in the compound word would be resolved into the locative: pavane upamā, meaning “bhāva is similar to the wind.” However, in verse 262 there is the phrase bhāvasya dīpenebhena vopamā. Here the words dīpena and ibhena are in the instrumental case rather than the locative case. Thus to keep uniformity, it should be understood that pavana in the compound pavanopamā should similarly be taken in the instrumental case. This is the intention of the author. By the context, the instrumental in the compound however cannot be considered to mean “with” as in “he went with his son.” However, use of instrumental with upamā is forbidden by Pāniṇi. Tulyārthair atulopamābhyāṁ tṛtīyā ’nyatarasyām: the instrumental case or genitive case is used with words meaning “like” or resembling” but not with the words upamā or tulya (equal or same); the genitive case only is used with them. (Pāṇini 2.3.71). But then again in the commentary on the sūtras, counter examples of these two words when they mean “similar” are given. Examples of the use of these words (genitive case) are as follows: upamā strī-mukhasyenduḥ (a comparison of the moon with the face of a woman) and candrasya strī-mukham tula (the woman’s face is like the moon). Thus, according to Pāniṇi’s rule, the instrumental case is not supposed to be used with either tula or upamā when they mean “similar.” However, the instrumental case can indicate the locative case, as in the phrase kāṁsya pātryā bhuṅkte: he eats with a bell-metal plate (pātryā is in the instrumental case), though the meaning is the same as “he eats on a bell-metal plate (locative case).” This then is the meaning of the phrase bhāvasya dīpenebhena vopamā in the instrumental. By the rule kartṛ-karaṇe ca krṭā bahulam (Pāṇini 2.1.32) the instrumental case then forms a compound. The same usage should be understood in the following verses.
The expansive heart is like a city and the small heart is like a hut. Bhāva is like a lamp or an elephant for these two types of hearts.
Purport
To offer another example, a grave, magnanimous heart is compared to a great city, and a soft heart to an insignificant cottage. There may be many lights, or even great elephants in the big city, but no one will take particular notice of them. But when such lights or elephants are seen near a small cottage, everyone can distinctly point them out.
The thunderbolt is extremely hard and never becomes soft. This hardness is seen in the hearts of those who perform severe austerities.
Purport
The lightning bolt is very strong and never becomes soft. Similarly, the hearts of those who are engaged in severe austerities and penances do not become very easily softened.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Tāpasādīnām refers to immature devotees in śānta mood.
Gold becomes liquid from intense heating. By the very strong heat of bhāva, this heart becomes soft. Lac becomes soft with very little heat. With a little bhāva, this heart becomes soft.
Purport
The golden heart becomes melted at high temperature, as in ecstatic love. And the lac heart is very easily melted in slight temperature.
Softness is of three degrees: like bee’s wax, butter and nectar. In relation to these, bhāva is like the heat of the sun.
Purport
A soft heart is compared to honey, to butter and to nectar. And the condition of the mind is compared to sunshine.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Madana means bee’s wax. The list of words starting with laghu (light, followed by uttāna, and kṣodiṣṭha) is considered in relation to the words starting with gariṣṭha (heavy, followed by gambhīra and mahiṣṭha) in order to explain the cause of being externally undisturbed or disturbed by vyabhicāri-bhāvas. However, the use of the words karkaśa (hard) and komala (soft) are used in order to explain the cause of solid or liquid nature (or degree of receptivity) of the heart in relation to the chief sthāyi-bhāva in a person.
The word gariṣṭha indicates being unmoved by any object, because of having a dense nature (thick-skinned individual), which allows little contact with objects. The word laghiṣṭha indicates being moved by any object, because of lack of a dense nature, which allows quite a lot of contact with various stimuli. Samyag unmīlanam (“strongly appearing” in verse 258) means there is possibility that the bhāvas can appear strongly in gariṣṭha or karkaśa hearts, but these are prevented from manifesting externally because of the gariṣṭha or karkaśa hearts. Therefore, it will be explained in verse 269 that when the sthāyi-bhāva becomes extremely prominent, then even the gariṣṭha heart becomes very agitated (and the transformations become externally visible.)
Being deep (gambhīra) means that there is no visible disturbance even by extensive contacts with objects, even with an object of powerful stimuli because contact is not thorough (cannot penetrate the depth). Being spread on the surface (uttāna) is the opposite: there is visible disturbance, by less extensive contacts, with a less a powerful object, because of thorough contact.
Expansive (mahiṣṭha) means that though a person has extensive contact with the objects, and thorough contact with the object, with a somewhat suitable object, there is only a localized manifestation of disturbance. That means only one or two senses are affected. Kṣodiṣṭha (small) means that, just by a slight contact with the object, there is complete manifestation of bhāvas spontaneously.
In explaining the nature of uttāna (shallow) the analogy of the pond indicates that the emotions are at some depth, or still somewhat hidden, whereas in explaining the nature of kṣodiṣṭha (small), the analogy of the hut indicates that there is nothing hidden at all.
Thunderbolt, gold and lac are used to explain the phenomenon of becoming liquid (receptive) to various degrees. The person hard like a thunderbolt is completely hostile to Kṛṣṇa. The person who is hard like gold has equal amounts of hostility and affection for the Lord. The person who is hard like lac is affectionate with a slight tinge of hostility. On the other hand, bee’s wax, butter and nectar indicate three degrees of softness in affectionate devotees, who are respectively immature, moderate or advanced in their devotion. The meaning here is that these degrees of hardness or softness will produce even more differences in the pairs of three: gariṣṭha, gambhīra, mahiṣṭha and laghiṣṭha, uttāna and kṣodiṣṭha.
govinda-preṣṭha-varyāṇāṁ cittaṁ syād amṛtaṁ kila ||267||
[govinda-preshtha-varyaanaam chittam syaad amritam kila ||267||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
draved atrādya-yugalam ātapena yathāyatham |
dravībhūtaṁ svabhāvena sarvadaivāmṛtaṁ bhavet |
govinda-preṣṭha-varyāṇāṁ cittaṁ syād amṛtaṁ kila ||267||
Bee’s wax and butter become liquid from different degrees of heat from the sun. Nectar is naturally liquid. The hearts of the dearest devotees of Govinda are naturally soft like nectar.
Purport
As honey and butter become melted even in slight sunshine, softhearted persons become easily melted. Nectar, however, is by its nature always liquid. And the hearts of those who are in pure ecstatic love with Kṛṣṇa are by nature always liquified, just like nectar.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The hearts of the dearest devotees are naturally soft (dravībhūtam), and thus produce a great variety in vyabhicāri-bhāvas.
samavetaṁ sadāmībhir dvitrair api mano bhavet ||268||
[samavetam sadaameebhir dvitrair api mano bhavet ||268||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛṣṇa-bhakti-viśeṣasya gariṣṭhatvādibhir guṇaiḥ |
samavetaṁ sadāmībhir dvitrair api mano bhavet ||268||
The mind of some devotee may be constantly influenced by a mixture of two or three of the above conditions such as gariṣṭha.
Purport
A pure devotee of Kṛṣṇa is always specifically qualified with nectarean qualifications and sometimes with the qualifications of butter and honey.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Gariṣṭha, gambhīra and mahiṣṭha are caused by having mixed motives in a relationship with Kṛṣṇa. Laghiṣṭha, uttāna and kṣodiṣṭha manifest by having with no personal motives. Awareness of the greatness of Brahman produces hardness in the heart (karkaśa). Awareness of sweetness of Kṛṣṇa produces softness in the heart. The appreciation of Kṛṣṇa’s sweetness and the soft heart produced in His devotees are causes of astonishing effects. This is explained in the commentary on the Tenth Canto of the following verse.
itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā
dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena
māyāśritānāṁ nara-dārakeṇa
sākaṁ vijahruḥ kṛta-puṇya-puñjāḥ
Here is the Supreme Person, who is considered the impersonal Brahman by great sages, a most worshipable form by the dāsya-bhaktas, and the son of a human being by ordinary men. Now these boys, who have performed many, many pleasing activities in their past lives, are playing with that Supreme Personality of Godhead in the form of a cowherd boy. SB 10.12.11
In the verse at hand, the minds of these devotees do not show variety caused by material guṇas such as sattva-guṇa, but rather by various bhāvas (guṇaiḥ). These bhāvas are of two types: prākṛta (inferior) and bhāgavata (exalted). The kaniṣṭha devotees possess prākṛta-bhāvas and these become causes of gariṣṭha, gambhīra and mahiṣṭha. The devotees of highest quality show bhāgavata-bhāvas. Because of possessing bhāvas caused by having hearts as soft as nectar, those devotees are completely devoid of low qualities such as gariṣṭha.
In all cases, the amount of softness or melting of the heart depends on the strength of the sthāyi-bhāva. In the list of thunderbolt, gold and lac mentioned in verse 263, lac is softest, gold is less soft, and the thunderbolt is least soft. (Thus the amount of sthāyi-bhāva will be least with the thunderbolt heart.) And thus disturbance or lack of disturbance from the vyabhicāri-bhāvas also depends on the strength of the sthāyi-bhāva. But in all these cases the cause of being gariṣṭha, gambhīra and mahiṣṭha, laghiṣṭha, uttāna or kṣodiṣṭha is the one natural bhāva (strong or weak) and the causes of disturbance are various incidental bhāvas. [Note: This is restatement of verses 254-255.]
sarva-prakāram evedaṁ cittaṁ vikṣobhayaty alam ||269||
[sarva-prakaaram evedam chittam vikshobhayaty alam ||269||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kintu suṣṭhu mahiṣṭhatvaṁ bhāvo bāḍham upāgataḥ |
sarva-prakāram evedaṁ cittaṁ vikṣobhayaty alam ||269||
But when the principal sthāyi-bhāva becomes very prominent, all types of hearts become completely disturbed by the vyabhicāri-bhāvas.
Purport
On the whole, the heart in any of the different conditions mentioned above can be melted under certain circumstances, just as a hard diamond is sometimes melted by a combination of certain chemicals.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
“There may not be disturbance of the heart from vyabhicāri-bhāvas in persons who are gariṣṭha, and in the thunderbolt heart there is no softness at all. It has also been said that melting of the heart is created by the sthāyi-bhāva alone. How then can such a heart be considered a devotee heart at all?” This verse answers the question. Bhāva here indicates a sthāyi-bhāva which has become the principal sthāyi-bhāva of an individual, while the others become incidental. Just as by application of special chemicals diamonds become soft, so all types of hearts also become soft by a very prominent sthāyi-bhāva.
vikāraṁ na sphāraṁ jala-nidhir ivendau prabhavati ||270||
[vikaaram na sphaaram jala-nidhir ivendau prabhavati ||270||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā dāna-keli-kaumudyām (4) –
gabhīro ’py aśrāntaṁ duradhigama-pāro ’pi nitarām
ahāryāṁ maryādāṁ dadhad api harer āspadam api |
satāṁ stomaḥ premaṇy udayati samagre sthagayituṁ
vikāraṁ na sphāraṁ jala-nidhir ivendau prabhavati ||270||
The devotee is like the ocean. As Viṣṇu resides in the milk ocean, so the Lord resides in the heart of the devotee. As the ocean is deep or unfathomable, the heart of the devotee is inscrutable, not revealing its qualities. As the ocean is unwearied, so the devotee is continuous in his service. As the ocean is difficult to cross, but has a permanent shore, so the devotee’s qualities are difficult to enumerate, but he appears to limit those qualities. But when the devotee develops full prema he cannot prevent the transformations arising from that prema, just as, the ocean cannot prevent the rising of the tide when the moon rises from the ocean
Purport
In the Dāna-keli-kaumudī it is stated, “When love develops in the heart of a devotee, he cannot check the transformation of his sentiments. His heart is just like the ocean at the rising of the moon, when the ebb tide cannot be checked: immediately there must be movement of high waves.” Although in its natural state the ocean is always grave and unfathomable, when the moon rises, nothing can check the ocean’s agitation. Similarly, those who are pure devotees cannot on any account check the movement of their feelings within.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This verse is a summary. The multitudes of devotees (satāṁ stomam) have natural gabhīratva or inscrutability, which becomes the cause of hiding their prema. “Having limits” (maryādām) means that the devotees show a limit to their good qualities, in order to avoid arrogance. “Being hard to understand completely” (duradhigama-pāraḥ) means that the devotees actually possess unlimited good qualities. That becomes the cause of appearing to have limits. Whenever someone sees a good quality in the devotee, the devotee takes that as a rare occurrence (not his nature) because he wants to hide from public awareness. Though the devotees are the abode of the Lord, the devotees make efforts to hide that fact. The devotee does not indulge in showing external symptoms from having attained his nature and from seeing the Lord directly.
In relation to the ocean, though it is always the residence of the Lord, it undergoes transformations (tides) on seeing the moon, because the ocean becomes spread with the rays of the moon, its offspring, which makes it suitable for the Lord’s pastimes of sleeping there.
Thus ends the fourth wave explaining vyabhicāri-bhāvas in the southern section of the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu.
2.5 The Fifth Wave
Concerning Sthāyi-bhāva
In the Southern Section of the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu
Outline of Sthāyi-bhāva
I. Definition of Sthāyi-bhāva
II. Mukhya-rati (Primary sthāyi-bhāva):
A. Roles:
1. Svārtha: nourishes itself
2. Parārtha: allows secondary rati to become predominant
B. Types:
1. Śuddha-rati
a) Sāmānya-rati
b) Svaccha-rati
c) Śānta-rati
2. Kevala (pure) and Saṅkula (mixture of primary ratis)
a) Prīti-rati (Dāsya)
b) Sakhya-rati
c) Vatsala-rati
3. Priyatā-rati (Madhura-rati)
III. Gauṇa-rati (Secondary Sthāyi-bhāva)
A. Types
1. Hāsa
2. Adbhuta
3. Utsāha
4. Śoka
5. Krodha
6. Bhaya
7. Jugupsā
IV. Power of Rati
A. Rati as the Principal Cause of Vibhāva, Anubhāva and other Elements
B. Other Elements increase Rati
C. Hearing about previous devotees invokes Rati
D. The combination produces complete satisfaction in the devotee
E. Suffering caused by śoka-rati is only apparent
V. Production of Rasa from Rati
A. Primary Rasa
1. Śānta-rasa, Prīti-rasa, Preyo-rasa, Vatsala-rasa, Madhura-rasa
B. Secondary Rasa
1. Hāsya-rasa, Adbhuta-rasa, Vīra-rasa, Karuṇa rasa, Raudra-rasa, Bhayānaka-rasa, Bībhatsa-rasa
VI. Colors and Deities of the Rasas
VII. Taste in the Rasas:
A. Pūrti (Śānta-rasa), Vikāśa (all rasas from Prīti to Hāsya), Vistāra (Adbhuta and Vīra), Vikṣepa (Karuṇa and Raudra), Kṣobha (Bhayānaka and Bībhatsa)
VIII. Blissful Nature of Rasa
IX. Disqualification for Rasa
X. Difference between Rasa and Bhāva