Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.60.19
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
ānitā asi
—
you were taken in marriage
Past passive of ā + √nī (to bring, lead). The Lord makes Rukmiṇī's marriage sound like a strategic abduction. The grammar is passive — she is the object of a political act. The pralambha sharpens here.
-
smaya-nuttaye
—
to dispel the arrogance
Compound: smaya (pride) + nutti (driving away). He reduces His own act to a foreign-policy operation — pride-suppression — disowning the conjugal motive. The surface insult is total; the deep affection is unspoken.
-
asatām
—
of the wicked
Genitive plural of asat — the unreal, the wicked. He frames the rival kings as asat. The bhakti-frame, where He removes asat to make room for sat-saṅga, is just below the surface — but Rukmiṇī, alarmed, cannot yet hear it.
"I took you just to destroy the pride (smayanuttaye) of those conceited kings who were intoxicated with valor."
It is not my fault. They hate me because of their evil natures. They have lost all discrimination because intoxication with their power or strength (vīrya). Thus they have become proud (dṛptānām). To curb their pride (smaya-nuttaye) I took you away. The real purpose was to curb the strength of the wicked. My goal was to take you away, not to marry you.
- Where do you forget that the Lord's actions in your life serve a dharmic purpose beyond romance?
- How does naming the larger purpose stabilize the smaller drama?
A judge tells the convict's mother, 'I took your son not out of love but to break a syndicate of bullies.' The mother knows the judge well — she knows the love is real. So Kṛṣṇa says, 'I carried you off only to humble proud kings,' and Rukmiṇī, hearing only the surface, begins to tremble.
In SB 10.53, Kṛṣṇa enters the city of Kuṇḍina, lifts Rukmiṇī into His chariot from the temple of Ambikā, and routs the kings who pursue. Tradition reads this as the rākṣasa-vivāha permitted to kṣatriyas — and as the Lord's reclaiming of His own consort from a wrong betrothal.
The present verse retells that act as if its sole purpose were to humble the assembled kings. The truth-content is partial; the deeper truth — that she is His eternal consort — He withholds, in order to draw it from her own mouth in v. 39.
My note
Source: vedabase.io