Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.68.8
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
acintya
—
of the inconceivable Lord
Sāmba is named here as the son of acintya Kṛṣṇa — the Supreme Lord whose nature is beyond reason. Gauḍīya doctrine names Bhagavān's nature acintya-bhedābheda; the word is no accident here.
-
arbhaḥ
—
the child
The Kurus called him arbhaka (verse 2) as an insult; Śukadeva now calls him arbha as Kṛṣṇa's child — the same youth, two utterly different framings.
-
yadu - nandanaḥ
—
the darling of the Yadus
Nandana — 'one who delights.' The whole Yadu clan loves Sāmba. To strike him is to wound them all, which is exactly the Kuru error.
-
kṣudra - mṛgaiḥ
—
by insignificant animals
Śukadeva's verdict on the six Kuru champions. The Kurus see lions in themselves; the Bhāgavata sees kṣudra-mṛgas — small game.
-
na amṛṣyat
—
did not tolerate
Sāmba's pride is kṣatriya pride, not vanity. The śiṣya of dharma tolerates injustice to himself but not the dishonor of his clan and his father.
Commenting on the word acintyārbha, Śrīla Prabhupāda writes in Kṛṣṇa: “Sāmba, the glorious son of the Yadu dynasty, [was] endowed with inconceivable potencies as the son of Lord Kṛṣṇa.”
The child of the supreme lord ( acintaysa arbhah) did not tolerate being struck so unjustly (apaviddha).
Attacked violently (atividdhaḥ) or attacked out of infamy (apa—viddhaḥ) Sāmba did not tolerate it. O best of the Kurus! Śukadeva pacified Parīkṣit who was ashamed of the Kurus bad behavior. Sāmba was the joy of the Yadus (yadu-nandanaḥ) Hari-vaṁśa says: bālyāt prabhṛti rāmeṇa so ‘streṣu viniyojitaḥ rāmād anantaraṁ caiva mānitaḥ sarva-vṛṣṇabhiḥ From childhood Sāmba had been trained by Balarāma. He was respected by Balarāma and all the Vṛṣṇis. By his nature he was an astounding boy.
Śukadeva calls to Parīkṣit in lamentation at Sāmba’s being attacked or he is joyful at Samba’s anger. Or he pacifies Parīkṣit who was ashamed of Sāmba’s bad behavior. As the best of the Yadus, Sāmba was superior to the Kurus, or he was the very best. Hari-vaṁśa indicates his power: bālyāt prabhṛti rāmeṇa so ‘streṣu viniyojitaḥ rāmād anantaraṁ caiva mānitaḥ sarva-vṛṣṇabhiḥ From childhood Sāmba had been trained by Balarāma. He was respected by Balarāma and all the Vṛṣṇis. Or he was the joy of the Yadus (yadu-nandanaḥ). Though he was a boy, he was not inferior to the Kuru warriors. He was an astonishing boy (acintyaḥ). He was like a lion who does not tolerate the attack of small animals but kills them.
- Where am I tolerating mistreatment because I think bhakti requires it?
- What is the difference between humility and accepting injustice?
A lion-cub of inconceivable parentage, mobbed by jackals: his patience is not weakness but composure, because the Father whose son he is watches from beyond the trees.
My note
Source: vedabase.io