FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.64.43

ब्राह्मणार्थो ह्यपहृतो हर्तारं पातयत्यध: । अजानन्तमपि ह्येनं नृगं ब्राह्मणगौरिव ॥ ४३ ॥
brāhmaṇārtho hy apahṛto
[braahmanaartho hy apahrito]
hartāraṁ pātayaty adhaḥ
[hartaaram paatayaty adhah]
ajānantam api hy enaṁ
[ajaanantam api hy enam]
nṛgaṁ brāhmaṇa-gaur iva
[nrigam braahmana-gaur iva]
brāhmaṇa — of a brāhmaṇa arthaḥ — the property hi — indeed apahṛtaḥ — taken away hartāram — the taker pātayati — causes to fall adhaḥ — down ajānantam — unaware api — even hi — indeed enam — this person nṛgam — King Nṛga brāhmaṇa — of the brāhmaṇa gauḥ — the cow iva — as .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
brāhmaṇārtho hy apahṛto
brāhmaṇa
of a brāhmaṇa
arthaḥ
the property
hi
indeed
apahṛtaḥ
taken away
hartāraṁ pātayaty adhaḥ
hartāram
the taker
pātayati
causes to fall
adhaḥ
down
ajānantam api hy enaṁ
ajānantam
unaware
api
even
hi
indeed
enam
this person
nṛgaṁ brāhmaṇa-gaur iva
nṛgam
King Nṛga
brāhmaṇa
of the brāhmaṇa
gauḥ
the cow
iva
as .
  • brāhmaṇa - arthaḥ — the property of a brāhmaṇa
    Brāhmaṇa + artha (property, wealth). The verse pairs this with apahṛtaḥ (taken away, from apa-√hṛ). Apahṛta is the technical term — even an unintended apahāra functions as apahāra.
  • pātayati adhaḥ — causes to fall down
    Causative of √pat (to fall) + adhaḥ (downward). The very verb whose imperative form (pata, v. 24) Yamarāja used. The chapter binds its grammar tight: the same root that condemned Nṛga is now the universal law.
  • ajānantam api — even one unaware
    A-jānant (not knowing) + api (even). The closing of the ignorance-loophole. Modern moral intuition often softens unintended wrong; the Bhāgavata, in this verse, refuses to.
  • nṛgam brāhmaṇa - gauḥ iva — as the brāhmaṇa's cow did to Nṛga
    Nṛga + brāhmaṇa + go (cow) + iva (as). The chapter's narrative-bookend: the example is named in the doctrinal verse. Gauḍīya pedagogy: doctrine is always anchored to a story; the law without its illustration is not the Bhāgavata's style.
When a brāhmaṇa’s property is stolen, even unknowingly, it certainly causes the person who takes it to fall down, just as the brāhmaṇa’s cow did to Nṛga.

The Lord here demonstrates that His instructions are not theoretical but practical, as seen concretely in the case of Nṛga Mahārāja.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When a brāhmaṇa's property is stolen, even unknowingly, it certainly causes the person who takes it to fall down, just as the brāhmaṇa's cow did to Nṛga.
Commentary

This is not an exaggeration to instill fear. There is direct proof as stated in this verse.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

That the cow was taken from the brāhmaṇa was not known to Nṛga, but was understood by the people listening to the story.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

In all cases one should have devotion to brāhmaṇas. One should not steal from them at any time, anything by any means. This is the summary. Stolen wealth (arthaḥ) causes the stealer to fall, even he does so unknowingly, what to speak of doing it in knowledge. That is certain (hi). The example is this person (enam) Nṛga. You have directly seen it.

Related values
Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Bhakti (Devotion)
Related verses
Even unknowingly stealing a brāhmaṇa's property certainly causes the taker to fall down, just as the cow did to Nṛga. The Lord shows that His warnings are not abstract — they are illustrated in living memory.
Reflection Questions
  • What living example in my own community demonstrates the teaching I keep ignoring?
  • How does grounding a principle in a real story make it harder to dismiss?

The chapter's whole arc compressed into a single śloka: brāhmaṇa-property taken, even unknowingly, drops the taker — as Nṛga the lizard, who stands as the verse's living footnote. The story is the proof; the proof is now turned into law.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 64