FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.41.1

श्रीशुक उवाच स्तुवतस्तस्य भगवान् दर्शयित्वा जले वपु: । भूय: समाहरत् कृष्णो नटो नाट्यमिवात्मन: ॥ १ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
stuvatas tasya bhagavān
[stuvatas tasya bhagavaan]
darśayitvā jale vapuḥ
[darshayitvaa jale vapuh]
bhūyaḥ samāharat kṛṣṇo
[bhooyah samaaharat krishno]
naṭo nāṭyam ivātmanaḥ
[nato naatyam ivaatmanah]
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca — Śukadeva Gosvāmī said stuvataḥ — while praying tasya — he, Akrūra bhagavān — the Supreme Lord darśayitvā — having shown jale — in the water vapuḥ — His personal form bhūyaḥ — again samāharat — withdrew kṛṣṇaḥ — Śrī Kṛṣṇa naṭaḥ — an actor nāṭyam — the performance iva — as ātmanaḥ — his own .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
stuvatas tasya bhagavān
stuvataḥ
while praying
tasya
he, Akrūra
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
darśayitvā jale vapuḥ
darśayitvā
having shown
jale
in the water
vapuḥ
His personal form
bhūyaḥ samāharat kṛṣṇo
bhūyaḥ
again
samāharat
withdrew
kṛṣṇaḥ
Śrī Kṛṣṇa
naṭo nāṭyam ivātmanaḥ
naṭaḥ
an actor
nāṭyam
the performance
iva
as
ātmanaḥ
his own .
  • bhagavān — the Supreme Lord
    Parāśara's six aiśvaryas (Viṣṇu Purāṇa 6.5.47) — wealth, strength, fame, beauty, knowledge, renunciation — fully present. Gauḍīyas read bhagavān here as Kṛṣṇa svayaṁ, not a partial expansion (kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam, SB 1.3.28).
  • darśayitvā — having shown
    Causative absolutive of √dṛś. The vision was actively granted, not stumbled upon — a deliberate gift to Akrūra's bhāva. Darśana in Gauḍīya use is always relational: Bhagavān shows Himself to the eye He chooses.
  • samāharat — He withdrew
    Imperfect of saṁ + √hṛ — to gather back, fold up. The same verb-field used for an actor packing his costume. The Lord's līlā-rūpas are not metaphysical illusions but real forms He controls absolutely.
  • naṭaḥ — an actor
    Vyāsa's chosen image: Bhagavān as nartaka. Caitanya-line ācāryas (Viśvanātha) read this carefully — the analogy concerns sovereign control over the play, not unreality of the role. Every līlā is fully real and fully chosen.
  • ātmanaḥ — his own
    Genitive of ātman. The actor winds up his own performance — the Lord owns His forms. No outside script binds Him; aiśvarya-darśana and Vraja-līlā alike are svecchā-mayī.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: While Akrūra was still offering prayers, the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa withdrew His form that He had revealed in the water, just as an actor winds up his performance.

Lord Kṛṣṇa withdrew from Akrūra’s sight the Viṣṇu form along with the vision of the spiritual sky and its eternal inhabitants.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: While Akrūra was still offering prayers, the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa withdrew His form that He had revealed in the water, just as an actor winds up his performance.
Commentary

In the forty first chapter, Krsna goes to see Mathura, and attracts all the women there. He kills Kamsa’s washerman and bestows boons to the weaver and the garland maker named Sudama. Having shown Akrura his remarkable form in the water, he made that form disappear without asking Akrura. The disregard for Akrura is expressed by the use of the sixth case (tasya) instead of the second case (tam). Just as the players give up their costumes at the conclusion of a play, Krsna, after showing the eternal objects of Vaikuntha within the water, made that scene disappear. Krsna, seeing the astonishment on Akrura’s face and in his eyes, asked him, "It appears that you must have seen something very astonishing, for your eyes are wide with wonder and full of tears."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Stuvatas tasya in the genitive case indicates that Kṛṣṇa was not much attracted to the prayers. Thus, without asking Akrūra he withdrew that form, as quickly as an actor sheds his costume after a play. But this form he was Kṛṣṇa’s own (ātmanaḥ) body, an eternal form.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

As Akrūra offered prayers, Kṛṣṇa then (bhuyaḥ) made the form disappear. Genitive case indicates disinterest on the part of Kṛṣṇa. Or having showed the form in the water explicitly (bhuyaḥ) he showed the form since he was bhagavān, full of all powers. This was one of his powers. He withdrew the form since he was fond of fun (kṛṣṇaḥ) or attracted to his devotee by his affection. Otherwise he could not accomplish bliss in realizing his sweetness. He showed and withdrew the form by himself, easily (ātmanaḥ). The form was non-different from himself. He was like an actor who shows many forms. This indicates that the form shown was not his only form. It arose from Kṛṣṇa.

Related values
Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Dana (Charity / Generosity)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
While Akrūra still prays, Kṛṣṇa withdraws the Viṣṇu vision from the water, the way an actor concludes a performance. Visions are granted and then withdrawn at the Lord's discretion — they are not possessions to clutch.
Reflection Questions
  • When have you clung to a peak experience after Kṛṣṇa was already 'closing the curtain'?
  • How does seeing experiences as His performance change your grip on them?

Like an actor who lowers the curtain the moment his role is done, Kṛṣṇa folds away the four-armed Nārāyaṇa-darśana in the Yamunā the instant Akrūra's stuti is complete. The form was not illusion — it was a precise gift, opened only for the eye that prayed.

Brahmā's bewilderment and Kṛṣṇa's withdrawal

When Brahmā stole the calves and boys in SB 10.13, Kṛṣṇa expanded into millions of cowherds and calves identical to the originals. After a full year, He withdrew the entire display in a single moment and showed Brahmā the four-armed Viṣṇu-forms of each.

The same poet-grammar is at work here: the Lord opens aiśvarya-darśana to a specific devotee at a specific moment, then closes it without trace. Bhagavān is the actor; the līlā is the play; the curtain is His will.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 41