Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.18.23
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
śrīdāma-vṛṣabha-ādayaḥ
—
Śrīdāmā, Vṛṣabha and others
The named sakhās of Vraja. Śrīdāmā is among Kṛṣṇa's dearest priya-sakhās in Gauḍīya rasa-classification. Vṛṣabha is another close associate. The naming is doctrinal — these are nitya-siddha cowherds, not mere narrative extras.
-
rāma-saṅghaṭṭinaḥ
—
members of Lord Balarāma's party
Saṅghaṭṭin — affiliate. The same ending used in verse 20 for Kṛṣṇa's group. Gauḍīyas treat the team-affiliations as transposable surface affiliations on top of permanent yūtha-loyalties.
-
jayinaḥ
—
victorious
Plural of jayin — one having victory. Cognate to Jayadeva, Vijaya, and the eternal pair of doorkeepers Jaya-Vijaya. The vocabulary of victory is highly charged — and here it labels boys carrying their friends.
-
ūhuḥ
—
(they) carried
Perfect of √vah. The Lord, on whose back the universe rests, is now being borne on the backs of His friends. The grammar holds the inversion plainly.
-
kṛṣṇa-ādayaḥ
—
Kṛṣṇa and others (His team)
Even in defeat Kṛṣṇa is named first. Gauḍīyas note that in śāstric naming-order, Bhagavān is always ādya — first — regardless of whether the moment makes Him look small.
When Śrīdāmā and his group won, Kṛṣṇa and his group had to carry them.
Before it was described that the winners would be carried and the losers would carry their opponents. Now at Bhāṇḍira by the will of Kṛṣṇa his side lost in order that Pralamba would carry Balarāma, and Balarāma’s side would ride on the losers’ shoulders. That is described in two verses. Ādayaḥ indicates Subala and others. This was the very nature of the childhood pastimes (krīḍāyām). O king! Śukadeva cries out in astonishment at how the Lord is controlled by his devotees.
- Which recent defeat of mine, looked at again, might have been His company's grace?
- Where am I treating losing in His side as personal failure rather than shared play?
Even Kṛṣṇa's team has to lose sometimes — Vraja runs on the rule that no one always wins, not because Bhagavān could not win, but because winning would dissolve the game. He withholds His invincibility so the play can continue.
My note
Source: vedabase.io