Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.23.1
श्रीशुक उवाच
अनो: सभानरश्चक्षु: परेष्णुश्च त्रय: सुता: ।
सभानरात् कालनर: सृञ्जयस्तत्सुतस्तत: ॥ १ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
anoḥ sabhānaraś cakṣuḥ
[anoh sabhaanarash chakshuh]
pareṣṇuś ca trayaḥ sutāḥ
[pareshnush cha trayah sutaah]
sabhānarāt kālanaraḥ
[sabhaanaraat kaalanarah]
sṛñjayas tat-sutas tataḥ
[srinjayas tat-sutas tatah]
Word-for-word
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
—
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
anoḥ
—
of Anu, the fourth of the four sons of Yayāti
sabhānaraḥ
—
Sabhānara
cakṣuḥ
—
Cakṣu
pareṣṇuḥ
—
Pareṣṇu
ca
—
also
trayaḥ
—
three
sutāḥ
—
sons
sabhānarāt
—
from Sabhānara
kālanaraḥ
—
Kālanara
sṛñjayaḥ
—
Sṛñjaya
tat-sutaḥ
—
son of Kālanara
tataḥ
—
thereafter.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
anoḥ sabhānaraś cakṣuḥ
anoḥ
of Anu, the fourth of the four sons of Yayāti
sabhānaraḥ
Sabhānara
cakṣuḥ
Cakṣu
pareṣṇuś ca trayaḥ sutāḥ
pareṣṇuḥ
Pareṣṇu
ca
also
trayaḥ
three
sutāḥ
sons
sabhānarāt kālanaraḥ
sabhānarāt
from Sabhānara
kālanaraḥ
Kālanara
sṛñjayas tat-sutas tataḥ
sṛñjayaḥ
Sṛñjaya
tat-sutaḥ
son of Kālanara
tataḥ
thereafter.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Anu, the fourth son of Yayāti, had three sons, named Sabhānara, Cakṣu and Pareṣṇu. O King, from Sabhānara came a son named Kālanara, and from Kālanara came a son named Sṛñjaya.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Anu, the fourth son of Yayāti, had three sons, named Sabhānara, Cakṣu and Pareṣṇu. O King, from Sabhānara came a son named Kālanara, and from Kālanara came a son named Sṛñjaya.
The Twenty-third Chapter describes the dynasties of Anu, Druhya, Turasu and Yadu, ending with Jyāmagha, and describes the glory of Kārtavīryārjuna. Having described the dynasty of Pūru, the fifth son of Yayāti (through Śarmiṣṭhā), the dynasties from the other four sons are now described.
Related lectures
Personal Guidance
Anu has Sabhānara, Cakṣu, Pareṣṇu; from Sabhānara come Kālanara and Sṛṣjaya. The Bhāgavatam now turns to Yayāti's fourth son's line — each son's branch deserves its own paragraph.
Reflection Questions
- Whose 'fourth son's branch' in my family have I been ignoring as less important?
- Where could equal attention to all branches enrich my understanding of my lineage?
My note
Source: vedabase.io