FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 8.24.61

प्रलयपयसि धातु: सुप्तशक्तेर्मुखेभ्य: श्रुतिगणमपनीतं प्रत्युपादत्त हत्वा । दितिजमकथयद् यो ब्रह्म सत्यव्रतानां तमहमखिलहेतुं जिह्ममीनं नतोऽस्मि ॥ ६१ ॥ स वै मन: कृष्णपदारविन्दयो- र्वचांसि वैकुण्ठगुणानुवर्णने । करौ हरेर्मन्दिरमार्जनादिषु श्रुतिं चकाराच्युतसत्कथोदये ॥
pralaya-payasi dhātuḥ supta-śakter mukhebhyaḥ
[pralaya-payasi dhaatuh supta-shakter mukhebhyah]
śruti-gaṇam apanītaṁ pratyupādatta hatvā
[shruti-ganam apaneetam pratyupaadatta hatvaa]
ditijam akathayad yo brahma satyavratānāṁ
[ditijam akathayad yo brahma satyavrataanaam]
tam aham akhila-hetuṁ jihma-mīnaṁ nato ’smi
[tam aham akhila-hetum jihma-meenam nato ’smi]
pralaya-payasi — in the water of inundation dhātuḥ — from Lord Brahmā supta-śakteḥ — who was inert because of sleeping mukhebhyaḥ — from the mouths śruti-gaṇam — Vedic records apanītam — stolen pratyupādatta — gave back to him hatvā — by killing ditijam — the great demon akathayat — explained yaḥ — one who brahma — Vedic knowledge satyavratānām — for the enlightenment of Satyavrata and the great saintly persons tam — unto Him aham — I akhila-hetum — unto the cause of all causes jihma-mīnam — appearing as and pretending to be a great fish nataḥ asmi — I offer my respectful obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pralaya-payasi dhātuḥ supta-śakter mukhebhyaḥ
pralaya-payasi
in the water of inundation
dhātuḥ
from Lord Brahmā
supta-śakteḥ
who was inert because of sleeping
mukhebhyaḥ
from the mouths
śruti-gaṇam apanītaṁ pratyupādatta hatvā
śruti-gaṇam
Vedic records
apanītam
stolen
pratyupādatta
gave back to him
hatvā
by killing
ditijam akathayad yo brahma satyavratānāṁ
ditijam
the great demon
akathayat
explained
yaḥ
one who
brahma
Vedic knowledge
satyavratānām
for the enlightenment of Satyavrata and the great saintly persons
tam
unto Him
tam aham akhila-hetuṁ jihma-mīnaṁ nato ’smi
aham
I
akhila-hetum
unto the cause of all causes
jihma-mīnam
appearing as and pretending to be a great fish
nataḥ asmi
I offer my respectful obeisances.
I offer my respectful obeisances unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who pretended to be a gigantic fish, who restored the Vedic literature to Lord Brahmā when Lord Brahmā awakened from sleep, and who explained the essence of Vedic literature to King Satyavrata and the great saintly persons.

Here is a summary of Satyavrata’s meeting with the fish incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu. Lord Viṣṇu’s purpose was to take back all the Vedic literatures from the demon Hayagrīva and restore them to Lord Brahmā. Incidentally, by His causeless mercy, the Lord spoke with Satyavrata. The word satyavratānām is significant because it indicates that those on the level of Satyavrata can take knowledge from the Vedas delivered by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Whatever is spoken by the Supreme Lord is accepted as Veda. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, vedānta-kṛd veda-vit: the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the compiler of all Vedic knowledge, and He knows the purport of the Vedas. Therefore, anyone who takes knowledge from the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, or from Bhagavad-gītā as it is, knows the purpose of the Vedas ( vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ ). One cannot understand Vedic knowledge from the veda-vāda-ratās, who read the Vedas and misconstrue their subject matter. One has to know the Vedas from the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Eighth Canto, Twenty-fourth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Matsya, the Lord’s Fish Incarnation.”

— This commentation has been finished in our New Delhi center today, the first of September, 1976, the day of Rādhāṣṭamī, by the grace of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the ācāryas. Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura says, tāṅdera caraṇa sevi bhakta-sane vāsa janame janame haya, ei abhilāṣa. I am attempting to present Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam in the English language by the order of my spiritual master, Śrīmad Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, and by his grace the work of translation is gradually progressing, and the European and American devotees who have joined the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement are helping me considerably. Thus we have expectations of finishing the great task before my passing away. All glories to Śrī Guru and Gaurāṅga.

END OF THE EIGHTH CANTO

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer my respectful obeisances unto Matsya, the cause of all causes, who, after killing the demon, restored to Lord Brahmā the Vedic literature stolen from his mouths while Brahmā had no powers, during sleep at the time of the devastation, and who explained the essence of Vedic literature to King Satyavrata. The purposes of the two avatāras are summarized for clarity. Diti-jam (born from Diti) means a demon. Here the conventional meaning is take over the literal meaning (he was not really Diti’s son.) Satyavratānām is in the plural out of respect. Jihma-mīnam means “having a corrupted fish form.” It was a distorted form because the fish had a horn which was tied to the boat. Another form of distorted fish is known commonly as āḍi. The commentary Śārātha-darśinī on twenty-fourth chapter of the Eighth Canto has been completed to give pleasure to the hearts of the devotees in accordance with the views of the ācāryas. I do not have detachment or a trace of bhakti. I do not have a trace of knowledge nor good conduct. I do not write a commentary but make a net to catch my intelligence which is quivering in the waves of saṁsāra. The commentary of the Eighth Canto has been completed on the sixth lunar day in the waxing phase of Phalguna month on the banks of Rādhā-kuṇḍa. I offer respects to Rādhā-kuṇḍa, Śyāma-kunḍa, Govardhana and my guru. Chapter One The Story of Sudyumna
Obeisances to the Lord who pretended to be a gigantic fish, restored Vedic literature to Brahmā, and explained essence to Satyavrata and the sages. Those on Satyavrata's level can take knowledge from the Lord directly.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'level' would I need to reach to take knowledge from the Lord directly rather than only through intermediaries?
  • Where in this entire canto's arc do I see myself most clearly — and what is my next step?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 24