FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.5.37

परोऽप्यपत्यं हितकृद्यथौषधं स्वदेहजोऽप्यामयवत्सुतोऽहित: । छिन्द्यात्तदङ्गं यदुतात्मनोऽहितं शेषं सुखं जीवति यद्विवर्जनात् ॥ ३७ ॥
paro ’py apatyaṁ hita-kṛd yathauṣadhaṁ
[paro ’py apatyam hita-krid yathaushadham]
sva-dehajo ’py āmayavat suto ’hitaḥ
[sva-dehajo ’py aamayavat suto ’hitah]
chindyāt tad aṅgaṁ yad utātmano ’hitaṁ
[chindyaat tad angam yad utaatmano ’hitam]
śeṣaṁ sukhaṁ jīvati yad-vivarjanāt
[shesham sukham jeevati yad-vivarjanaat]
paraḥ — not belonging to the same group or family api — although apatyam — a child hita-kṛt — who is beneficial yathā — just as auṣadham — remedial herb sva-deha-jaḥ — born of one’s own body api — although āmaya-vat — like a disease sutaḥ — a son ahitaḥ — who is not a well-wisher chindyāt — one should cut off tat — that aṅgam — part of the body yat — which uta — indeed ātmanaḥ — for the body ahitam — not beneficial śeṣam — the balance sukham — happily jīvati — lives yat — of which vivarjanāt — by cutting off.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
paro ’py apatyaṁ hita-kṛd yathauṣadhaṁ
paraḥ
not belonging to the same group or family
api
although
apatyam
a child
hita-kṛt
who is beneficial
yathā
just as
auṣadham
remedial herb
sva-dehajo ’py āmayavat suto ’hitaḥ
sva-deha-jaḥ
born of one’s own body
api
although
āmaya-vat
like a disease
sutaḥ
a son
ahitaḥ
who is not a well-wisher
chindyāt tad aṅgaṁ yad utātmano ’hitaṁ
chindyāt
one should cut off
tat
that
aṅgam
part of the body
yat
which
uta
indeed
ātmanaḥ
for the body
ahitam
not beneficial
śeṣaṁ sukhaṁ jīvati yad-vivarjanāt
śeṣam
the balance
sukham
happily
jīvati
lives
yat
of which
vivarjanāt
by cutting off.
Although a medicinal herb, being born in the forest, does not belong to the same category as a man, if beneficial it is kept very carefully. Similarly, if someone outside one’s family is favorable, he should be given protection like a son. On the other hand, if a limb of one’s body is poisoned by disease, it must be amputated so that the rest of the body may live happily. Similarly, even one’s own son, if unfavorable, must be rejected, although born of one’s own body.

Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu has instructed all devotees of the Lord to be humbler than the grass and more tolerant than trees; otherwise there will always be disturbances to their execution of devotional service. Here is a vivid example of how a devotee is disturbed by a nondevotee, even though the nondevotee is an affectionate father. The material world is such that a nondevotee father becomes an enemy of a devotee son. Having determined to kill even his son, Hiraṇyakaśipu gave the example of amputating a part of one’s body that has become septic and therefore injurious to the rest of the body. The same example, of course, may also be applied to nondevotees. Cāṇakya Paṇḍita advises, tyaja durjana-saṁsargaṁ bhaja sādhu-samāgamam. Devotees actually serious about advancing in spiritual life should give up the company of nondevotees and always keep company with devotees. To be too attached to material existence is ignorance because material existence is temporary and miserable. Therefore devotees who are determined to perform tapasya (penances and austerities) to realize the self, and who are determined to become advanced in spiritual consciousness, must give up the company of atheistic nondevotees. Prahlāda Mahārāja maintained an attitude of noncooperation with the philosophy of his father, Hiraṇyakaśipu, yet he was tolerant and humble. Hiraṇyakaśipu, however, being a nondevotee, was so polluted that he was even prepared to kill his own son. He justified this by putting forward the logic of amputation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Someone else’s child, if beneficial like a medicinal herb, is treated like a son. A son who is unbeneficial, though coming from one’s body, is like disease. A limb which is unbeneficial should be cut off. By cutting it off, one can finally live happily. “How can we kill your son?” A person not of one’s family, if beneficial like a medicinal herb, is treated like son. A limb, if unbeneficial for oneself, should be cut off.
Hiraṇyakaśipu reasons: a beneficial outsider should be kept like a son, and a poisoned limb of one's own body must be amputated. Therefore Prahlāda, even one's own son, can be rejected. Demonic logic dresses cruelty in surgical metaphors.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you reach for 'surgical' metaphors to justify cutting off someone you love?
  • How would treating Prahlāda's gentleness as medicine — not poison — change your decisions?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 5