FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.1.40

यमदूता ऊचु: वेदप्रणिहितो धर्मो ह्यधर्मस्तद्विपर्यय: । वेदो नारायण: साक्षात्स्वयम्भूरिति शुश्रुम ॥ ४० ॥
yamadūtā ūcuḥ
[yamadootaa oochuh]
veda-praṇihito dharmo
[veda-pranihito dharmo]
hy adharmas tad-viparyayaḥ
[hy adharmas tad-viparyayah]
vedo nārāyaṇaḥ sākṣāt
[vedo naaraayanah saakshaat]
svayambhūr iti śuśruma
[svayambhoor iti shushruma]
yamadūtāḥ ūcuḥ — the order carriers of Yamarāja said veda — by the four Vedas (Sāma, Yajur, Ṛg and Atharva) praṇihitaḥ — prescribed dharmaḥ — religious principles hi — indeed adharmaḥ — irreligious principles tat-viparyayaḥ — the opposite of that (that which is not supported by Vedic injunctions) vedaḥ — the Vedas, books of knowledge nārāyaṇaḥ sākṣāt — directly the Supreme Personality of Godhead (being the words of Nārāyaṇa) svayam-bhūḥ — self-born, self-sufficient (appearing only from the breath of Nārāyaṇa and not being learned from anyone else) iti — thus śuśruma — we have heard.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yamadūtā ūcuḥ
yamadūtāḥ ūcuḥ
the order carriers of Yamarāja said
veda-praṇihito dharmo
veda
by the four Vedas (Sāma, Yajur, Ṛg and Atharva)
praṇihitaḥ
prescribed
dharmaḥ
religious principles
hi
indeed
hy adharmas tad-viparyayaḥ
adharmaḥ
irreligious principles
tat-viparyayaḥ
the opposite of that (that which is not supported by Vedic injunctions)
vedo nārāyaṇaḥ sākṣāt
vedaḥ
the Vedas, books of knowledge
nārāyaṇaḥ sākṣāt
directly the Supreme Personality of Godhead (being the words of Nārāyaṇa)
svayambhūr iti śuśruma
svayam-bhūḥ
self-born, self-sufficient (appearing only from the breath of Nārāyaṇa and not being learned from anyone else)
iti
thus
śuśruma
we have heard.
The Yamadūtas replied: That which is prescribed in the Vedas constitutes dharma, the religious principles, and the opposite of that is irreligion. The Vedas are directly the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Nārāyaṇa, and are self-born. This we have heard from Yamarāja.

The servants of Yamarāja replied quite properly. They did not manufacture principles of religion or irreligion. Instead, they explained what they had heard from the authority Yamarāja. Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ: one should follow the mahājana, the authorized person. Yamarāja is one of twelve authorities. Therefore the servants of Yamarāja, the Yamadūtas, replied with perfect clarity when they said śuśruma (“we have heard”). The members of modern civilization manufacture defective religious principles through speculative concoction. This is not dharma. They do not know what is dharma and what is adharma. Therefore, as stated in the beginning of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, dharmaḥ projjhita-kaitavo ’tra: dharma not supported by the Vedas is rejected from śrīmad-bhāgavata-dharma. Bhāgavata-dharma comprises only that which is given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Bhāgavata-dharma is sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja: one must accept the authority of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and surrender to Him and whatever He says. That is dharma. Arjuna, for example, thinking that violence was adharma, was declining to fight, but Kṛṣṇa urged him to fight. Arjuna abided by the orders of Kṛṣṇa, and therefore he is actually a dharmī because the order of Kṛṣṇa is dharma. Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) , vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ: “The real purpose of veda, knowledge, is to know Me.” One who knows Kṛṣṇa perfectly is liberated. As Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad-gītā (4.9) :

janma karma ca me divyam evaṁ yo vetti tattvataḥ tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti mām eti so ’rjuna

“One who knows the transcendental nature of My appearance and activities does not, upon leaving the body, take his birth again in this material world, but attains My eternal abode, O Arjuna.” One who understands Kṛṣṇa and abides by His order is a candidate for returning home, back to Godhead. It may be concluded that dharma, religion, refers to that which is ordered in the Vedas, and adharma, irreligion, refers to that which is not supported in the Vedas.

Dharma is not actually manufactured by Nārāyaṇa. As stated in the Vedas, asya mahato bhūtasya niśvasitam etad yad ṛg-vedaḥ iti: the injunctions of dharma emanate from the breathing of Nārāyaṇa, the supreme living entity. Nārāyaṇa exists eternally and breathes eternally, and therefore dharma, the injunctions of Nārāyaṇa, also exist eternally. Śrīla Madhvācārya, the original ācārya for those who belong to the Mādhva-Gauḍīya sampradāya, says:

vedānāṁ prathamo vaktā harir eva yato vibhuḥ ato viṣṇv-ātmakā vedā ity āhur veda-vādinaḥ

The transcendental words of the Vedas emanated from the mouth of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore the Vedic principles should be understood to be Vaiṣṇava principles because Viṣṇu is the origin of the Vedas. The Vedas contain nothing besides the instructions of Viṣṇu, and one who follows the Vedic principles is a Vaiṣṇava. The Vaiṣṇava is not a member of a manufactured community of this material world. A Vaiṣṇava is a real knower of the Vedas, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā ( vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ ).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Yamadūtas replied: Acts which are prescribed in the Vedas constitute dharma, and acts which are not prescribed by the Vedas are adharma. The Vedas are directly Nārāyaṇa and are born from him. This we have heard from Yamarāja. Dharma is what is prescribed in the Vedas. What is in the Vedas is the nature of dharma (tattva) and the rules of the Vedas are the measurement of dharma. Because the servants of Viṣṇu asked about adharma, the servants of Yama describe the nature and measurement of adharma. This also covers the question about the reasons for punishment. What is forbidden in the Vedas is adharma. Doing what is forbidden in the Vedas is the measure of adharma. The Vedas are manifested from the Lord (svayambhūḥ): they arise from the breathing of Viṣṇu on their own. Śruti says asya mahato bhūtasya niśvasitam etad yad ṛgvedaḥ: the breathing of the Lord is the Ṛg-veda. (Bṛhad-ārāṇyaka Upaniṣad)
The Yamadūtas answer that dharma is what the Vedas prescribe, adharma the opposite — and the Vedas are non-different from Nārāyaṇa Himself. They do not invent principles; they cite their authority, just as we must.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I manufacturing my own private definition of right and wrong rather than referring to śāstra?
  • Whom do I cite as authority when I make moral decisions — and is that authority actually trustworthy?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 1