FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 5.18.3

अहो विचित्रं भगवद्विचेष्टितंघ्नन्तं जनोऽयं हि मिषन्न पश्यति ध्यायन्नसद्यर्हि विकर्म सेवितुंनिर्हृत्य पुत्रं पितरं जिजीविषति ॥ ३ ॥
aho vicitraṁ bhagavad-viceṣṭitaṁ
[aho vichitram bhagavad-vicheshtitam]
ghnantaṁ jano ’yaṁ hi miṣan na paśyati
[ghnantam jano ’yam hi mishan na pashyati]
dhyāyann asad yarhi vikarma sevituṁ
[dhyaayann asad yarhi vikarma sevitum]
nirhṛtya putraṁ pitaraṁ jijīviṣati
[nirhritya putram pitaram jijeevishati]
aho — alas vicitram — wonderful bhagavat-viceṣṭitam — the pastimes of the Lord ghnantam — death janaḥ — a person ayam — this hi — certainly miṣan — although seeing na paśyati — does not see dhyāyan — thinking about asat — material happiness yarhi — because vikarma — forbidden activities sevitum — to enjoy nirhṛtya — burning putram — sons pitaram — the father jijīviṣati — desires a long life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho vicitraṁ bhagavad-viceṣṭitaṁ
aho
alas
vicitram
wonderful
bhagavat-viceṣṭitam
the pastimes of the Lord
ghnantaṁ jano ’yaṁ hi miṣan na paśyati
ghnantam
death
janaḥ
a person
dhyāyann asad yarhi vikarma sevituṁ
ayam
this
hi
certainly
miṣan
although seeing
na paśyati
does not see
dhyāyan
thinking about
asat
material happiness
nirhṛtya putraṁ pitaraṁ jijīviṣati
yarhi
because
vikarma
forbidden activities
sevitum
to enjoy
nirhṛtya
burning
putram
sons
pitaram
the father
jijīviṣati
desires a long life.
Alas! How wonderful it is that the foolish materialist does not heed the great danger of impending death! He knows that death will surely come, yet he is nevertheless callous and neglectful. If his father dies, he wants to enjoy his father’s property, and if his son dies, he wants to enjoy his son’s possessions as well. In either case, he heedlessly tries to enjoy material happiness with the acquired money.

Material happiness means to have good facilities for eating, sleeping, sexual intercourse and defense. Within this world, the materialistic person lives only for these four principles of sense gratification, not caring for the impending danger of death. After his father’s death, a son tries to inherit his money and use it for sense gratification. Similarly, one whose son dies tries to enjoy the possessions of his son. Sometimes the father of a dead son even enjoys his son’s widow. Materialistic persons behave in this way. Thus Śukadeva Gosvāmī says, “How wonderful are these pastimes of material happiness transacted by the will of the Supreme Personality of Godhead!” In other words, materialistic persons want to commit all kinds of sinful activities, but without the sanction of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, no one can do anything. Why does the Supreme Personality of Godhead permit sinful activities? The Supreme Lord does not want any living being to act sinfully, and He begs him through his good conscience to refrain from sin. But when someone insists upon acting sinfully, the Supreme Lord gives him the sanction to act at his own risk ( mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca ). No one can do anything without the sanction of the Lord, but He is so kind that when the conditioned soul persists in doing something, the Lord permits the individual soul to act at his own risk.

According to Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura, sons always outlive their fathers in other planetary systems and other lands in this universe, especially on Svargaloka. However, on this planet earth a son often dies before his father, and the materialistic father is pleased to enjoy the possessions of his son. Neither the father nor the son can see the reality — that both of them are awaiting death. When death comes, however, all their plans for material enjoyment are finished.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How astonishing it is that a person, though seeing death, does not see really death, the action of the Lord, since, meditating on sinful acts, he desires to live to enjoy material life even though burning his father and his sons after their deaths. Though he sees death, he does not see it. Burning his dead father who produced him and son whom he produced, who have died, he, positioned between them, even though produced by one and producing the other, desires to live off of their wealth. He does not bother to ask, “Can death take me away?” Someone may say, “But to live fifty years for the service of the Lord is not to be criticized.” But this person meditates on how to get himself married, to get some material happiness (vikarma sevitum). Not only is he not aware of death, but he enjoys after burning his son. This is most astonishing. Another version has jijīviṣan. Since that version keeps the meter, it is acceptable. “In Bhadrāśva and other heavenly planets on earth, a person would not see the death of his father and son at the same time.” That is true. In their descriptions, they are speaking of the inhabitants of Bhārata. “We are unfortunate. We are enjoying the results of our good karmas. In Bhadrāśva we live like animals. Those who are most fortunate have taken birth in Bhārata for attaining practices to get out of this world. There, even the low-born easily attain Vaikuṇṭha. How can they become bewildered?” This is how they thinking.
Inheriting from a dead father or son, we hurry to enjoy the same money that could not save them. The death of those close to us is the loudest warning we ignore. Let bereavement teach you what no philosophy can — wealth does not protect anyone.
Reflection Questions
  • What lesson have the deaths of people I knew tried to teach me that I have so far refused to learn?
  • If today's money cannot prevent tomorrow's death, what is its proper use?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 18