FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.28.50

चितिं दारुमयीं चित्वा तस्यां पत्यु: कलेवरम् । आदीप्य चानुमरणे विलपन्ती मनो दधे ॥ ५० ॥
citiṁ dārumayīṁ citvā
[chitim daarumayeem chitvaa]
tasyāṁ patyuḥ kalevaram
[tasyaam patyuh kalevaram]
ādīpya cānumaraṇe
[aadeepya chaanumarane]
vilapantī mano dadhe
[vilapantee mano dadhe]
citim — funeral pyre dāru-mayīm — made with wood citvā — having piled up tasyām — on that patyuḥ — of the husband kalevaram — body ādīpya — after igniting ca — also anumaraṇe — to die along with him vilapantī — lamenting manaḥ — her mind dadhe — fixed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
citiṁ dārumayīṁ citvā
citim
funeral pyre
dāru-mayīm
made with wood
citvā
having piled up
tasyāṁ patyuḥ kalevaram
tasyām
on that
patyuḥ
of the husband
kalevaram
body
ādīpya cānumaraṇe
ādīpya
after igniting
ca
also
anumaraṇe
to die along with him
vilapantī mano dadhe
vilapantī
lamenting
manaḥ
her mind
dadhe
fixed.
She then prepared a blazing fire with firewood and placed the dead body of her husband upon it. When this was finished, she lamented severely and prepared herself to perish in the fire with her husband.

It is the long-standing tradition of the Vedic system that a faithful wife dies along with her husband. This is called saha-maraṇa. In India this system was prevalent even to the date of British occupation. At that time, however, a wife who did not wish to die with her husband was sometimes forced to do so by her relatives. Formerly that was not the case — the wife used to enter the fire voluntarily. The British government stopped this practice, considering it inhuman. However, from the early history of India we find that when Mahārāja Pāṇḍu died, he was survived by two wives — Mādrī and Kuntī. The question was whether both should die or one should die. After the death of Mahārāja Pāṇḍu, his wives settled that one should remain and the other should go. Mādrī would perish with her husband in the fire, and Kuntī would remain to take charge of the five Pāṇḍava children. Even as late as 1936 we saw a devoted wife voluntarily enter the fire of her husband.

This indicates that a devotee’s wife must be prepared to act in such a way. Similarly, a devoted disciple of the spiritual master would rather die with the spiritual master than fail to execute the spiritual master’s mission. As the Supreme Personality of Godhead comes down upon this earth to reestablish the principles of religion, so His representative, the spiritual master, also comes to reestablish religious principles. It is the duty of the disciples to take charge of the mission of the spiritual master and execute it properly. Otherwise the disciple should decide to die along with the spiritual master. In other words, to execute the will of the spiritual master, the disciple should be prepared to lay down his life and abandon all personal considerations.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After piling up wood and lighting fire on the body of her husband on the pyre, in a state of lamentation, she decided to die with her husband. She placed the body on the pyre and lit ablaze with fire. Having performed the last rites for his guru, the disciple then decides in his mind, “Separated from the feet of my guru, I cannot maintain my life. My body is burning in the fire of lamentation on remembering his qualities. I cannot put my energy in the bhakti of hearing and chanting that he taught. Therefore I will die today.” That is shown here.
She built a blazing pyre, placed the body, and prepared to perish with him. Saha-maraṇa was a real spiritual practice; the disciple's willingness to enter the same fire is the highest fidelity.
Reflection Questions
  • Where would I refuse to enter the same fire as my teacher even metaphorically?
  • What does 'same fire' mean in modern spiritual terms?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 28