Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.68.47
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
akhila-śikṣā-artham
—
meant for the instruction of all
The pivotal doctrinal phrase of the chapter. Śikṣā-artha — for instruction. Bhagavān's anger is pedagogical, not pathological. Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism holds firmly: krodha in the Lord is līlā, never doṣa.
-
dveṣāt
—
out of hatred
Explicitly denied of the Lord. Dveṣa = aversion. Such anger as the world knows — born of dveṣa — does not belong to Bhagavān.
-
matsarāt
—
out of envy
Also explicitly denied. Matsara = envy. The Bhāgavatam opens (1.1.2) by setting itself apart from any work meant for the matsara-hearted; here it shows the Lord Himself untouched by it.
-
sthiti - pālana - tat - paraḥ
—
intent on maintenance and protection
His anger's purpose: to maintain (sthiti) and protect (pālana). Even at the moment of dragging a city, He is protecting it from a worse fate — its own pride uncorrected.
The Kurus admit that Lord Balarāma’s anger was entirely appropriate and in fact was meant for their benefit. As Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī puts it, the Kurus meant to say, “Because You exhibited this anger, we have now become civilized, whereas previously we were wicked and could not see You, blinded as we were by pride.”
"The display of anger from you, who maintain sattva guna for maintenance, was only to teach us. What type the anger? That which has as its purpose (tatparah) to maintain respect for rules of conduct. Because you exhibited anger, we are now obedient. Previously we were polluted, and did not see you, being blinded by pride." Tat parah without the visarga would make the phrase a vocative: "O lord whose object is maintenance of correct behavior!"
Even your anger is for protecting the universe. Instead of khalu (certainly) sometimes akhila is seen. Your anger is for the purpose of teaching everyone. It is for everyone’s benefit since you are inclined to protect everyone during the time the universe remains (shtiti-pālana-tatparaḥ). Your anger is not because of hatred or envy since you nourish sattva-guna in the form of Viṣṇu. It is not just a favor you do. O Lord revealing natural power, pastimes and wealth (bhagavān)! You maintain the worlds because of your natural compassion for its people.
- Where have I read divine correction as rejection rather than care?
- What recent 'reproof' might I want to revisit as mercy?
A father's harsh word to his children is meant to teach, not to wound. Balarāma's anger has been a teacher's anger from the first verse — not a quarrel, but a lesson.
In SB 7.8 the Lord's most terrible form roared and tore Hiraṇyakaśipu, yet it was that very form which Prahlāda saw as the most loving. The wrath was for Hiraṇyakaśipu; the mercy was for Prahlāda; in fact the same form gave both.
Balarāma's plough-anger in this chapter is structurally identical. Sāmba (Prahlāda's position here) was protected by the very wrath that bent the Kurus' pride. The Lord's anger is always śikṣārtham — a tutor wearing a tutor's frown.
My note
Source: vedabase.io