Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.67.16
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
avinayam
—
rudeness, lack of humility
From a- (not) + vinaya (proper conduct, discipline). Vinaya is the foundational quality a śiṣya brings before a guru; avinaya is its absence. The Lord punishes precisely the lack of vinaya — the original asuric flaw.
-
muṣalam
—
His club
Muṣala — Balarāma's signature weapon, the pestle/club. Gauḍīyas note the muṣala is also a yajña-implement (used to husk rice for offerings); Balarāma's weaponry is agricultural-yājñika, never merely martial.
-
halam
—
His plow
Hala — the plow, source of His name Halāyudha. Plough first, weapon second: the Lord's tools cultivate the earth before they discipline its disturbers. Sandhinī-śakti shapes even His arsenal.
-
ari-jighāṁsayā
—
with the intention to kill the enemy
Compound: ari (enemy) + jighāṁsā (desire to kill, desiderative of √han). Bhagavān's hiṁsā is doctrinally not hiṁsā — it is precisely the form His mercy takes for an asura too far gone for any other intervention.
-
kruddhaḥ
—
angry
Past participle of √krudh. Bhagavān's krodha is not a vikāra of guṇa but a līlā-mood, taken up at need (cf. Nṛsiṁha). Gauḍīyas distinguish material krodha (a defect) from līlā-krodha (a perfection).
The word avinayam means “without humility.” Dvivida, completely lacking in modesty and humility, shamelessly performed the most wicked activities. Lord Balarāma knew of the great disturbances Dvivida had caused to people in general, apart from the vulgar behavior the ape was exhibiting in the Lord’s own presence. The offensive ape would now have to die.
Balarāma considered his rudeness and his disturbance to the country. This verse again mentioned that he was anger. He was even angrier.
“Balarāma should have tolerated his bad behavior, since previously he was a devotee.” The ape had disrupted the kingdoms. Thus Balarāma became angry. He took up his club with a desire to kill the ape who was inimical to him.
- Where might true compassion ask me to set a firm limit rather than indulge?
- Whom am I tolerating whose harm to others I am ignoring?
A king tolerates much, but when the mischief of one man becomes the suffering of many, he rises with the rod. Balarāma reaches not for a personal-wound response but for muṣala and hala — the implements that govern, plough, and pacify the land.
My note
Source: vedabase.io