Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.59.1
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
bhaumaḥ
—
Narakāsura, son of the earth-goddess
Bhauma = 'of Bhūmi'. The demon's name itself encodes the chapter's tension: a son of the earth, yet plundering heaven and abducting princesses — a reminder that material birth alone does not sanctify.
-
niruddhāḥ
—
captured, confined
Past passive participle of ni + √rudh. The 16,100 women are described first as 'confined' — Gauḍīyas read their later turning to Kṛṣṇa as the deeper niruddhi (binding) of bhāva, the only captivity that liberates.
-
vikramam
—
heroic feat, adventure
From vi + √kram (to step boldly). Parīkṣit asks not for theology but for vikrama — Bhāgavata-śravaṇa includes the relish of Kṛṣṇa's prowess; līlā-kathā is itself bhakti.
-
śārṅga - dhanvanaḥ
—
of the wielder of the Śārṅga bow
Śārṅga is Viṣṇu's bow, made of horn. Naming Kṛṣṇa by His weapon prefigures the chapter: this is Bhagavān in His kṣatriya aiśvarya, not the flute-player of Vraja, yet the same Person.
-
hataḥ
—
killed
Past participle of √han. When Bhagavān 'kills' an asura, Gauḍīyas read it as the highest mercy — instant liberation by direct contact with the Lord (sāyujya at minimum, often more).
In the fifty ninth chapter Krsna, at the request of Indra, kills Narakasura, the son of Bhumi, and marries sixteen thousand one hundred dauthers of kings, held captive by him. He also brings the parijata tree from svarga loka.
Please describe the glorious acts of the holder of Sarnga; how Krsna killed Bhaumasura, who held many women captive.
Bhauma imprisoned sixteen thousand women. How did he do it? (ca) By what means (yathā) was he killed by the Lord? Please describe all of these (etat) deeds with details (vi—kramam) of cause and effect. I desire to hear about the Śārṅga bow now.
How was Bhauma who kept the women in his house (niruddhā) killed directly by the Lord who appeared to destroy demons (bhagavatā)? Narrate the astonishing story or the valor of the Lord. That was suitable since he held the Śārṅga bow. Etad instead etam is poetic license. Or it indicates the general followed by the particular.
- What rescue stories do you most want to hear from scripture?
- Where do you wait for someone else to ask the question that would unlock teaching?
Parīkṣit's question is a torch held to a dark corner of līlā — he asks not 'did it happen' but 'how was it done', because every blow of Kṛṣṇa's hand is meditation-fuel for a devotee. The wielder of Śārṅga does nothing trivial; even His war-craft is mādhurya for those who listen.
My note
Source: vedabase.io