Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.55.32
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
ātmajaḥ
—
her own son, born of self
Compound: ātma (self) + jaḥ (born from). The child born from one's own body — not adopted, not by surrogate. Rukmiṇī claims a specific biological tie, and the next clause grants the hypothesis.
-
sūtikā-gṛhāt
—
from the maternity room
Compound: sūtikā (new mother) + gṛhāt (from the house, abl.). The sūtikā-gṛha is the postnatal chamber — Vedic dharma's most protected interior, and the very place Śambara breached. The detail reactivates the original outrage.
-
tulya-vayaḥ-rūpaḥ
—
equal in age and appearance
Compound: tulya (equal) + vayaḥ (age) + rūpaḥ (form). Rukmiṇī's hypothesis is precise on two axes simultaneously — age and look. Both must match for the hypothesis to hold; both do.
-
jīvati-kutracit
—
is living somewhere
Verb + indefinite locative: jīvati (lives) + kutracit (somewhere, anywhere). She cannot yet say 'here'; the indefiniteness preserves the hypothesis. Bhakti often advances by what it cannot quite say.
My son, who was taken by some a bala graham demon (seizer of children), would be the same age.
My son had disappeared (nāstaḥ). If he is possibly alive somewhere, he would be the same age at this time.
By remembrance of her son by the similarity, her heart becomes attracted with affection to her son who cannot be seen (nāṣṭaḥ). Nothing is known about who took him. She then wonders. If he were alive, he would be this age with this form.
- Where do you do quiet calculations about people you hope are still alive?
- How does math of memory steady or disturb you?
'If my lost son still lives, He would be of just this age, just this look.' Rukmiṇī ventures the hypothesis — the bhakta sometimes can only approach the Lord through 'if.' The conditional clause is the door bhakti uses when the body is still ahead of the mind.
My note
Source: vedabase.io