Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.54.38
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
sādhvi
—
O saintly lady
Feminine vocative of sādhu. Balarāma honors Rukmiṇī by the strongest dharma-title even as He corrects her grief. The Bhāgavatam shows that loving rebuke must begin with honorific address.
-
sva-kṛta-bhuk
—
the sufferer of his own deeds
Sva (own) + kṛta (done) + bhuj (experience). 'One who eats his own cooking.' The compound is karma-doctrine in three syllables. Cf. BG 5.15: 'na ādatte kasyacit pāpaṁ na caiva sukṛtaṁ vibhuḥ.' The Lord does not assign sin or virtue; the soul harvests its own.
-
asūyethāḥ
—
(please do not) feel inimical / envious
Aorist optative of √sūy with a- prefix. Asūyā is one of the six enemies of the soul in Gauḍīya catalogues. Balarāma asks Rukmiṇī not to fall into even momentary asūyā — the verse's tenderness disguises a rigorous spiritual point.
-
sukha-duḥkha-daḥ
—
bestower of happiness and unhappiness
Sukha (joy) + duḥkha (misery) + da (giver). Compound. Balarāma denies any 'other' as the bestower — but the Bhāgavatam reading is that the Lord, working through karma, is the bestower-through-justice. There is no third party.
-
pumān
—
a man / person
Puruṣa-singular. The same word as the cosmic Puruṣa. The jīva is a tiny puruṣa within the big Puruṣa, accountable for his own actions in the field He shares with the Lord.
In order to remove the sorrow of Rukmini, he reasons with her in this verse. "Every jiva must enjoy of suffering the results of his acts. So what is this useless affection for a person who is evil and who acts against your husband?" He gives a hint of scolding to Rukmini.
Though Balarāma spoke to Kṛṣṇa in this way, Rukmiṇī did not give up her grief. He then consoled her directly in this verse. Do not ascribe fault to Kṛṣṇa and others. Do not ascribe fault at all (eva), even if there is cause. On the other hand (ca), happiness and distress are not caused by others, but by oneself since the jīva (pumān) enjoys the result of his karma.
- Where do you blame circumstances when your karma is the actual author?
- How do you console someone with karma-truth without sounding dismissive?
Each man is the sole bestower of his own joy and sorrow — a sentence as Vedic as the Upaniṣads and as Buddhist-sounding as the Dhammapada. The Gauḍīya wrinkle: the doer-of-actions remains the soul, but the supplier-of-results is the Lord. Karma is real; impersonal karma is not.
My note
Source: vedabase.io