Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.46.4
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
mat - manaskāḥ
—
their minds (absorbed) in Me
Compound: mat (Me) + manaskāḥ (whose minds are). The gopīs' citta is no longer their own property; it has been resettled at Kṛṣṇa's address. This is the defining condition of mahābhāva.
-
mat - prāṇāḥ
—
their lives are Mine
Compound: mat + prāṇāḥ. Not merely 'they live for Me' but 'their prāṇa itself is identified with Me.' Gauḍīyas read this phrase as the textual basis for kṛṣṇa-prāṇa, the gopī-bhāva where Kṛṣṇa is the very breath, not the object of breath.
-
tyakta - daihikāḥ
—
having abandoned everything bodily
Compound: tyakta (abandoned) + daihika (bodily). The gopīs have not become disembodied; they have detached from the body's interests. Gauḍīya commentators insist this is not Māyāvāda dehātma-tyāga but bhakti's reorientation of the body as Kṛṣṇa's instrument.
-
ātmānam
—
Self
Accusative of ātman. Kṛṣṇa identifies Himself as the very ātmā of the gopīs — not merely their beloved. The chapter's tattva-summit (verse 42-43) will expand this same word into universal Paramātmā doctrine; here it sits hidden inside love-language.
-
loka - dharmāḥ
—
religious duties for this world (and next)
Compound: loka (world) + dharma (duty). The gopīs gave up not only laukika-sukha but also the dharma that would secure svarga. Gauḍīyas cite this as the textual proof that pure bhakti transcends varṇāśrama-dharma — a doctrine Caitanya Mahāprabhu would later make explicit.
-
bibharmi
—
I sustain
First-person singular present of √bhṛ (to bear, support). Same root as bhartṛ (husband/lord). Kṛṣṇa speaks of Himself in the husband-register toward devotees who have surrendered all other supports — a deliberate echo of the marriage-vocabulary of verse 2.
Here the Lord explains why He wants to send a special message to the gopīs. According to the Vaiṣṇava ācāryas, the word daihikāḥ, “related to the body,” refers to husbands, children, homes and so on. The gopīs loved Kṛṣṇa so intensely that they could think of nothing else. Since Śrī Kṛṣṇa maintains ordinary devotees engaged in sādhana-bhakti, devotional service in practice, He will certainly maintain the gopīs, His most exalted devotees.
"These gopis have their minds fixed on me (mat manaska). I am their very life (mat prana). They have given up all bodily connections such as husbands, sons, mothers, fathers, sleeping, eating, drinking etc. (tyakta daihikah). They think of me, not as their husband, but as their beloved (dayitam). Not only as their beloved, but as the dearmost. Not only I am the dearmost, but they think of me as their very selves, and as the Paramatma. As I, their soul, am living here in Mathura, they believe that their souls have left their bodies and only by the power of my yogamaya energy are they still living. I protect those devotees practicing sadhana bhakti who give up all considerations of etiquette for my sake. What to speak then of these gopis?"
In regards to delivering the message to the gopīs, first he describes the gopīs’ general condition in order to then speak of the cause, by describing their particular condition in two verses. Through three descriptive phrases he says that except for him they are indifferent to the unlimited goals of dharma, to their bodies and to other people. Concerning their bodies they have given up husbands, children, eating and drinking. They have dedicated their minds to me. Thus they have no interest in external sense enjoyment. They take me as their very life. Thus they have no interest in internal objects of enjoyment. It is said: bhoktṛtve sukha-duḥkhānāṁ puruṣaṁ prakṛteḥ param They say that ātmā, superior to prakṛti, is the cause of enjoyment and suffering of the jīva. SB.26.8 Thus mad-arthe (for me) indicates that since all material enjoyment is ultimately caused by ātmā, they have become indifferent to ātmā, their selves. The cause of their sacrifice is then stated. They take me as their beloved in their minds. They do not take external objects as dear. More than that, they take me alone as most dear (preṣṭham). They do not take internal objects such as prāṇa as dearest, since in my absence they have no interest in these things. They take me alone, and not their own ātmās, as their dearest self since in my absence they consider their ātmās completely vacant. They experience no pleasure within their ātmās for any other being in my absence. By these three phrases he indicates to Uddhava that they take Kṛṣṇa alone as their husband. They do not consider those who are said to be their husbands to be their real husband. The gopīs will say api bata madhu-puryām ārya-putro ’dhunāste: it is indeed regrettable that Kṛṣṇa, our husband, resides in Mathurā. (SB 10.47.21) This line is included in many versions, but Śrīdhara Svāmī does not seem to accept it since he does not explain the difficult phrase ārya-putraḥ. I will support those persons who give up regard for dharma and people for surrender to me. This is a general statement (including not only the gopīs), to express his obligation to support anyone without regard for their qualification, if they renounce for his sake. The word ca indicates the gopīs who have given up even their lives for him. Or man-manaskā can mean “those who are in my mind at all times.” Mat-prāṇā means “those who are my life” since they have given up everything related to their bodies. The cause of giving up everything is stated. They take me as most dear, as their very selves. If I am obligated to anyone (ye) who renounces for me, what to speak of the gopīs? Though I am the object of meditation for Brahmā, I support them within (bibharmi), or meditate on them. Ādi Purāṇa says: bhaktā mamānuraktāś ca kati santi na bhūtale kintu gopījanaḥ prāṇādhika piryatamo mama There are many devotees and persons attracted to me on earth, but the gopīs are dearer to me than my life. Because their suffering enters my mind I always feel pain. Or I protect even those whom the gopīs reject such as their husbands, those nourishing their bodies by eating and those women who are chaste and shy. Thus I should protect the gopīs.
- Where do you keep 'next-life insurance' instead of trusting Kṛṣṇa with both this life and the next?
- What 'religious duty' might Kṛṣṇa actually invite you to release if it impedes total absorption?
A lamp tilted entirely toward the wind cannot keep its own flame; only the cupped hand of the lamp-bearer keeps it alive. The gopīs have tilted everything — body, life, this-world dharma, next-world dharma — toward Kṛṣṇa, and so He says, 'I personally sustain them.' Where the devotee has surrendered the maintenance, Bhagavān must take it up.
In Bhagavad-gītā 9.22 Kṛṣṇa promises: 'For those who worship Me with exclusive devotion, meditating on Me alone — I personally carry what they lack and preserve what they have.'
SB 10.46.4 is the Vraja-side proof of that Gītā vow. The gopīs have demonstrably given up daihika, loka-dharma, and ordinary happiness; Kṛṣṇa demonstrably bibharmi — sustains them. The Gītā promise is not theoretical; the gopīs are its supreme evidence.
When Hiraṇyakaśipu cast Prahlāda among serpents, off cliffs, into fire — every bodily relation severed — the boy went on chanting (SB 7.5-7). Nṛsiṁha emerged precisely because there was nothing left to hold him; the devotee's total tyāga compelled the Lord's total bharaṇa.
The gopīs' tyakta-daihika in this verse is the same logic in a sweeter key — and the bibharmi at the end of the verse is its Vraja-flavored Nṛsiṁha-tearing-open-the-pillar.
My note
Source: vedabase.io