Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.23.47
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
śrīḥ
—
the goddess of fortune
Lakṣmī — Bhagavān's nitya-śakti. She is named in the same verse as His begging — the rhetorical jolt is intended. He whose wife is Wealth-itself is begging food.
-
pāda-sparśa-āśayā
—
with the desire for the touch of His lotus feet
Compound: pāda (foot) + sparśa (touch) + āśayā (with hope, instrumental). Even Lakṣmī's highest desire is pāda-sparśa — the gopīs' easy treasure. Gauḍīyas: vraja-bhāva surpasses Lakṣmī-bhāva.
-
sva-ātma-doṣa-apavargeṇa
—
by putting aside the faults of fickleness and pride
Compound: sva-ātma (her own self) + doṣa (faults) + apavargeṇa (with the putting-aside). Even Lakṣmī, to attain pāda-sparśa, sets aside her cancalā (fickleness) and her aiśvarya-māna. The bhakta's path.
-
yācñā
—
begging
From √yāc — the act of begging. Same noun as verse 9 (yācñām). The chapter's structural keyword: Bhagavān asks, and the question is who recognises what the ask actually is. Verse 9: rejected. Verse 47: marvelled at.
-
jana-mohinī
—
bewildering to ordinary humans
Compound: jana (people) + mohinī (bewildering). His begging is itself a form of His māyā — it bewilders even the wise. Gauḍīyas: aiśvarya covered by mādhurya is the most opaque of all His coverings.
The supreme master of the goddess of fortune herself obviously does not have to beg for food, as pointed out here by the brāhmaṇas, who are finally manifesting real spiritual intelligence.
“Though he makes you remember him, why do you not remember him?” When she appeared during the churning of the Milk Ocean, she enacted the pastime of choosing a husband. At that time she ignored others and serves him constantly without being touched by the faults of the material Lakṣmī who is her expansion (svātma). Thus he should not beg for food. That act bewildered everyone including us so that we did not think he was the Lord.
“By his will he can deliver anyone from saṁsāra. Why did he beg food, unbecoming of the Lord?” That question is raised in this verse. With a desire to touch his lotus feet once, or to touch even one foot once (sakṛt), Lakṣmī serves him. Or with a desire to touch his feet she serves continually (asakrt). In that condition (always with Lakṣmī or wealtlh) how could he beg? Thus begging is bewildering for all jīvas. Who can understand his actions? Or he does this to bewilder the non-devotees (jana-mohinī or ajana-mohinī) and nourish the bhakti of the devotees. The non-devotees are bewildered but the devotees are not. On the contrary their bhakti increases. By his human pastimes the supreme Lord stimulates intense bhakti. Or such actions enchant the devotees’ hearts. Uddhava says to Vidura:
māṁ khedayaty etad ajasya janma- viḍambanaṁ yad vasudeva-gehe vraje ca vāso ’ri-bhayād iva svayaṁ purād vyavātsīd yad-ananta-vīryaḥ Kṛṣṇa’s appearance in the prison house of Kaṁsa in miserable circumstances, his stay in Vraja out of fear of enemies, and his leaving Mathurā though he has infinite power used to give me great suffering. SB 3.2.16 His birth in the prison room of Vasudeva, his stay in Vraja out of fear of Kaṁsa, fleeing from Mathurā though he is full of unlimited power, causes me pain. By such human pastimes, increasing bhakti, I feel pain in my heart. By showing his powers as Narasiṁha he does not produce suffering in me since special bhakti does not appear. dunoti cetaḥ smarato mamaitad yad āha pādāv abhivandya pitroḥ tātāmba kaṁsād uru-śaṅkitānāṁ prasīdataṁ no ’kṛta-niṣkṛtīnām Remembering his conduct, my heart fills with pain. Bowing at the feet of his parents, he said, “O father! O mother! Forgive us because, being greatly fearful of Kaṁsa, we could not serve you.” SB 3.2.17
tat tasya kaiṅkaryam alaṁ bhṛtān no viglāpayaty aṅga yad ugrasenam tiṣṭhan niṣaṇṇaṁ parameṣṭhi-dhiṣṇye nyabodhayad deva nidhārayeti O Vidura! Kṛṣṇa’s acting as a servant of Ugrasena gives us servants great pain. Standing in from of Ugrasena sitting on the king’s throne he informed him, “O king of kings! Please establish me in your service.” SB 3.2.22
- Where am I missing Him because I expect the Lord to come from a higher posture than 'beggar'?
- What current 'beg' from Him to me am I refusing because His form looks too small?
The goddess of fortune, whose worshipers measure their offerings in oceans, has been begging Him for the touch of His feet for ages — and He stands at a yajña-gate begging a meal. The asymmetry is the chapter's deepest astonishment.
Bilvamaṅgala Ṭhākura, blinded by his own hand for his attachments, walked through the country chanting Kṛṣṇa's name. Tradition records that even Lakṣmī served him bhikṣā at his door, recognising the wealth he carried that her own husband had granted only to His most exclusive bhaktas.
The brāhmaṇas of this verse see the same principle from the other side: Śrī herself worships His feet — and the worshiped-by-Śrī begs at a brāhmaṇa-gate. The verse is the chapter's deepest gesture of mādhurya-aiśvarya inversion.
My note
Source: vedabase.io