Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.2.15
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
garbhe
—
the embryo
Locative — 'when the embryo was [being transferred].' The same word that names the soul's residence in the body across the Bhāgavatam. The Lord's transfer between wombs is a small mirror of every jīva's transmigration, redeemed because He is the transferor.
-
yoga - nidrayā
—
by the spiritual energy called Yoga-māyā / Yoga-nidrā
Yoga-nidrā — the Lord's mystic sleep on the ocean of milk, personified as Yoga-māyā. The synonym list itself names her function: she puts the world to sleep regarding the truth, then arranges the truth behind the curtain.
-
aho
—
alas
Interjection of grief. The Bhāgavatam dignifies the inhabitants' lamentation — it does not laugh at them. Devotees today similarly grieve apparent losses that are, from the Lord's vantage, only rearrangements.
-
visraṁsitaḥ
—
is lost / fallen
From vi-√sraṁs, 'to slip down, to miscarry.' The very word for spiritual fall in classical Vaiṣṇava grammar. The world reads providence as miscarriage; the verse trains the reader to suspect every visraṁsa of being a sannikrṣya.
-
vicukruśuḥ
—
they lamented loudly
Reduplicated intensive of √kruś — 'they wailed.' Material lamentation is described as loud and reduplicated; devotional grief is sober. The contrast is structural in Bhāgavatam prose.
“All the inhabitants of the palace” includes Kaṁsa. When everyone lamented, Kaṁsa joined in compassion, thinking that perhaps because of drugs or some other external means, Devakī had undergone this abortion. The real story of what happened after Yoga-māyā attracted the child of Devakī into the womb of Rohiṇī in the seventh month of Rohiṇī’s pregnancy is described as follows in the Hari-vaṁśa. At midnight, while Rohiṇī was deeply sleeping, she experienced, as if in a dream, that she had undergone a miscarriage. After some time, when she awoke, she saw that this had indeed happened, and she was in great anxiety. But Yoga-māyā then informed her, “O auspicious lady, your child is now being replaced. I am attracting a child from the womb of Devakī, and therefore your child will be known as Saṅkarṣaṇa.” The word yoga-nidrā is significant. When one is spiritually reconnected through self-realization, one regards his material life as having been like a dream. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (2.69) : yā niśā sarva-bhūtānāṁ tasyāṁ jāgarti saṁyamī yasyāṁ jāgrati bhūtāni sā niśā paśyato muneḥ “What is night for all beings is the time of awakening for the self-controlled; and the time of awakening for all beings is night for the introspective sage.” The stage of self-realization is called yoga-nidrā. All material activities appear to be a dream when one is spiritually awakened. Thus yoga-nidrā may be explained to be Yoga-māyā.
Concerning the apparent miscarriage, the citizens suspected that Kamsa must have done so black magic to cause the miscarriage. The citizens of Mathura began to lament out of affection for Devaki.
Yoganidrā means Yogamāyā since sleep takes away the intelligence of all people. Yogamāyā did this with great skill (praṇīte) so that Devakī would not suffer, Rohiṇī would not be astonished, and the people could not see it happen. One should understand the sequence of events according to Hari-vaṁśa. Vasudeva first placed the child in Devakī’s womb and Rohiṇī then went Gokula. In the seventh month of pregnancy the embryo was transferred from Devakī to Rohiṇī. The Lord speaks to Yogamāyā in Hari-vaṁśa: saptamo devakī-garho yo ‘ṁśaḥ saumyo mamāgrajaḥ sa saṁktrāmiyitavyas te saptame māsi rohinīm The seventh child of Devakī who is expansion and my elder brother was transferred to the womb of Rohiṇī in the seventh month of pregnancy. Then method of transfer is described in detail: sārdharātre sthitaṁ garbham pātayantī rajasvalā nidrayā sahasāvisṭā papāta dharaṇī-tale sā svapnam iva taṁ dṛsṭvā svagarbhe garbham āhitaṁ apaśyantī ca taṁ garbhaṁ muhūrtam vyatitā ‘bhavat tām āha nidrā-saṁvignāṁ naiśe tamasi rohiṇīm kaṛṣaṇenāsya garbhasya svagarbhe cāhitasya vai saṇkarṣaṇo nāma śubhe tave putro bhaviṣyati In the middle of the night Devakī aborted her child and fell on the ground unconscious. As if in a dream she saw the child come out of her womb and felt pain for some moments on seeing her child. Yogamāyā spoke to Rohiṇī in the darkness of night, as she slept. “The child taken from another womb and placed in your womb will be your son named Saṅkarṣaṇa.” Aho indicates amazement or lamentation. They understood that the child had been aborted out of fear of Kaṁsa. Viṣṇu Purāṇa says: saptamo bhoja-rājasya bhayād rodhoparodhataḥ devakhyāḥ patito garbh iti loko vadisyati The people said that the seventh child of Devakī had been aborted out of fear of Kaṁsa, which had caused great damage. Or, Kaṁsa somehow caused the child to be aborted. They did not speak this directly, out of fear of Kaṁsa, but gossiped among themselves in loud voices.
- Chaitanya Charan Pr SB 10-02-15-24 - The Mysterious Appearances of Balarama and Krishna
- Devakinandan Pr SB 10-02-15 Hindi - 2019-12-21 ISKCON Juhu
- Padaseva Pr SB 10-02-15 Oriya
- SDAP SB 10-02-15 - 2007-05-02 Riga Latvia
- BPSPSw SB 10-02-15 Hindi - 2013-05-03 ISKCON Mira Road
- BVijnanaGS SB 10-02-15 - 2020-11-01 ISKCON Vrindavan
- PrahladAnS SB 10-02-15 - Eternal Sleep or the revolution of thinking - 2023-04-16 ISKCON Slovenia
- PrahladAnS SB 10-02-15 Slovenian Translation - Vecno spanje ali revolucija razmi%C5%A1ljanja - 2023-04-16 ISKCON Slovenia
- Romapada Sw SB 10-02-15 - Dealing with Reversals - 2011-01-29
- Notice one event today you've been mourning as 'loss' and ask honestly where Kṛṣṇa's hand may be arranging something unseen.
- Refuse to join the crowd's lamentation reflex — pause before reacting to bad news and remember yoga-nidrā: material life is dream-like to the awakened.
- Spend ten minutes in japa or scriptural reading tonight to practice the muni's reversal — waking to Kṛṣṇa while the world sleeps in viṣaya.
- Where in my own life have I mistaken Yoga-māyā's protective rearrangement for loss — what 'miscarriage' did I once mourn that was actually Kṛṣṇa's hand quietly relocating something for safekeeping?
- Like Kaṁsa joining the lament out of material compassion while missing the real spiritual reality, where am I outwardly sympathizing with surface events while remaining blind to the deeper movement of Kṛṣṇa's plan?
- Notice the next time your friend group collectively 'laments' over something — a breakup, a bad grade, someone not getting into the college they wanted. Join the comfort, but privately ask: am I grieving for their soul's situation or just for the social-media-shaped version of their disappointment? Offer one sentence that points beyond the surface, even if it costs you a little coolness.
- Yoga-nidrā means being awake while others sleep. Pick one thing your peers are obsessively awake to right now (a streaming series everyone is bingeing, a discourse cycle, a comparison spiral on Instagram) and consciously 'sleep' through it for one week — no consumption, no commentary. Use the reclaimed attention for japa, reading, or a real conversation with a parent.
- Before your next exam or interview, do the work fully — but the night before, formally hand the result over to Kṛṣṇa the way Yoga-māyā handled the transfer: not your project to micromanage. If you fail, you are still being moved by His arrangement; if you succeed, the credit was never yours to claim.
- When a family member is suffering — a child failing at school, a spouse stressed at work, an aging parent declining — pause before reacting like 'all the inhabitants of the palace.' Ask: is my distress karuṇā for their soul, or panic about my own identity as good-parent, good-spouse, good-child? Then act from the first, not the second.
- Money, promotions, and home decisions often feel like they require frantic management. Practice one major family decision this month where you do your sva-dharma fully — research, discuss, decide — and then explicitly entrust the outcome to Kṛṣṇa, the way Vasudeva and Devakī had to trust Yoga-māyā's arrangement when the child seemed lost. Watch how this changes the temperature of the household.
- Your children are watching which 'losses' devastate you. If you collapse over a missed bonus or a dented car, you are teaching them that the body and its extensions are the self. Choose one such 'loss' this quarter and respond visibly as a dhīra — name it as Kṛṣṇa's arrangement at the dinner table, without preaching.
- The body's 'transfer' is no longer abstract for you. Each morning, sit for five minutes and rehearse the truth that Yoga-māyā is already arranging your next ashram — your job is to remain a willing instrument, not a frightened palace-dweller. Let this steady the day's smaller fears.
- Loosen one attachment publicly this season — give away a possession, hand a responsibility to a younger person, release a grudge by name. Do not narrate it as renunciation; simply let it go, the way the womb released the child. Mentor someone by showing them what unclenched hands look like.
- When juniors lament around you — over careers, marriages, illnesses — resist the pull to join the chorus. Offer the dhīra-bhāva: a calm word that points to Kṛṣṇa's arrangement, a verse you have lived with, a story from your own life where what looked like loss was Yoga-māyā's transfer. Your composure at this stage is itself the teaching.
- Reading yoga-nidrā as a poetic metaphor for mindfulness or 'being present,' rather than as the awakened state in which all material life is recognized as a dream and Kṛṣṇa as the only reality.
- Sentimentalizing Devakī's apparent loss into a generic lesson about grief, while ignoring the verse's actual point that Yoga-māyā was actively protecting Kṛṣṇa — and missing that what looks like calamity is often the Lord's arrangement.
- Imitating Kaṁsa's external compassion — performing concern for others' bodily setbacks while inwardly indifferent to their spiritual welfare — and calling it karuṇā.
- Kaṁsa wept along with the palace when he heard of the 'miscarriage' — his compassion was real in the moment, yet rooted in misunderstanding. Share a time you offered sincere sympathy that, in hindsight, was actually karuṇā for the body rather than for the soul. What would real compassion have looked like instead, and where do you disagree with each other about that line?
- The verse turns on yoga-nidrā — the seer is awake to what others sleep through, and asleep to what they chase. Name one area of your life where the people around you are 'awake' (career anxiety, relationship drama, political news) and you sense Kṛṣṇa is asking you to 'sleep.' Push back on each other: is this genuine vairāgya, or is it spiritual bypassing of a duty you owe?
- Yoga-māyā moved the child without anyone's consent — Devakī, Rohiṇī, and the palace were all 'deceived' for a higher purpose. Discuss: when, if ever, is it acceptable for a devotee to allow others to misperceive a situation for the sake of a deeper good? Where does each of you draw the line between Yoga-māyā's protective concealment and ordinary dishonesty (violating satya)?
Two students. Student A is a devotee whose elderly father has just been diagnosed with a terminal illness. The doctors recommend an aggressive, painful treatment that will extend bodily life by perhaps six months. Student A senses the father is ready to turn inward toward Kṛṣṇa and would prefer to use that time in remembrance, kīrtana, and family. Student B is Student A's sibling — not a devotee — who is openly weeping like 'all the inhabitants of the palace,' insisting that anything less than the full treatment is abandonment and cruelty. Role-play the conversation. Student A must articulate the difference between karuṇā for the body and karuṇā for the soul without being cold, condescending, or hiding behind Sanskrit. Student B must press hard on what looks, from outside, like a failure of duty (kartavya) and even of love. The teacher pauses the scene at the moment of greatest tension and asks the class: where is each person right? Where is each person being moved by Yoga-māyā's covering, and where by her revealing?
- This story is mythological window-dressing for what was simply a miscarriage. Reading divine fetal-transfer into it is exactly the kind of magical thinking that keeps religion from being taken seriously by intelligent modern people.
We are not asked to swap one ideology for another; we are asked to look at what the text actually claims and what it predicts. The Bhāgavata is consistent: Kṛṣṇa is the supreme Personality of Godhead, and His potencies — Yoga-māyā among them — act in history when His descent requires it. If you grant the premise that Kṛṣṇa is who the text says He is, the protective concealment of Balarāma's transfer is no more 'magical' than a parent moving a sleeping child to a safer room. The deeper question for you is not whether the event is plausible to a materialist, but whether the materialist frame itself accounts for the lived experience of devotees across centuries who have found this Kṛṣṇa to be personally responsive. Test the personalist hypothesis on its own terms — chant, hear, serve — before ruling it out by a frame imported from elsewhere. - Yoga-māyā deceives Kaṁsa, deceives the palace, even leaves Rohiṇī to wake up confused. Isn't this divinely sanctioned dishonesty? How can a tradition that prizes satya celebrate a cover-up?
Satya in our line is not the flat reporting of sense-data; it is speaking and acting in accordance with the highest reality, which is Kṛṣṇa and His pleasure. Yoga-māyā's concealment of Balarāma is not a lie told to harm — it is a mother's hand placed over a child's mouth so that the assassin in the next room does not hear him cry. Kaṁsa's 'compassion' was already operating inside a deeper deception: the illusion that he was the controller, that he could kill the unkillable. Yoga-māyā did not introduce falsehood into a true situation; she protected truth (the descent of Saṅkarṣaṇa) from being destroyed by a man committed to a much larger lie. For us as practitioners, the takeaway is not 'deceive when convenient' but 'arrange your speech and silence in service of Kṛṣṇa, not in service of appearances.' That is the demanding form of satya the verse teaches.
When a precious jewel is moved from one casket to another in the dark, the courtiers who hear the lid close cry 'the jewel is lost!' — but the jewel is only re-housed. Devakī's seeming miscarriage is exactly such a courtyard cry; the people in the palace mourn because they cannot see Yoga-māyā's hands.
My note
Source: vedabase.io