FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.3.12

इति शुश्रुम निर्बन्धं तप: परममास्थित: । विधत्स्वानन्तरं युक्तं स्वयं त्रिभुवनेश्वर ॥ १२ ॥
iti śuśruma nirbandhaṁ
[iti shushruma nirbandham]
tapaḥ paramam āsthitaḥ
[tapah paramam aasthitah]
vidhatsvānantaraṁ yuktaṁ
[vidhatsvaanantaram yuktam]
svayaṁ tri-bhuvaneśvara
[svayam tri-bhuvaneshvara]
iti — in this way śuśruma — we have heard nirbandham — strong determination tapaḥ — austerity paramam — very severe āsthitaḥ — is situated in vidhatsva — please take steps anantaram — as soon as possible yuktam — befitting svayam — yourself tri-bhuvana-īśvara — O master of the three worlds.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti śuśruma nirbandhaṁ
iti
in this way
śuśruma
we have heard
nirbandham
strong determination
tapaḥ paramam āsthitaḥ
tapaḥ
austerity
paramam
very severe
āsthitaḥ
is situated in
vidhatsvānantaraṁ yuktaṁ
vidhatsva
please take steps
anantaram
as soon as possible
yuktam
befitting
svayaṁ tri-bhuvaneśvara
svayam
yourself
tri-bhuvana-īśvara
O master of the three worlds.
O lord, we have heard from reliable sources that in order to obtain your post, Hiraṇyakaśipu is now engaged in severe austerity. You are the master of the three worlds. Please, without delay, take whatever steps you deem appropriate.

In the material world, a servant is provided for by the master but is always planning how to capture the master’s post. There have been many instances of this in history. Especially in India during the Mohammedan rule, many servants, by plans and devices, took over the posts of their masters. It is learned from Caitanya literature that one big Zamindar, Subuddhi Rāya, kept a Mohammedan boy as a servant. Of course, he treated the boy as his own child, and sometimes, when the boy would steal something, the master would chastise him by striking him with a cane. There was a mark on the boy’s back from this chastisement. Later, after that boy had by crooked means become Hussain Shah, Nawab of Bengal, one day his wife saw the mark on his back and inquired about it. The Nawab replied that in his childhood he had been a servant of Subuddhi Rāya, who had punished him because of some mischievous activities. Upon hearing this, the Nawab’s wife immediately became agitated and requested her husband to kill Subuddhi Rāya. Nawab Hussain Shah, of course, was very grateful to Subuddhi Rāya and therefore refused to kill him, but when his wife requested him to turn Subuddhi Rāya into a Mohammedan, the Nawab agreed. Taking some water from his waterpot, he sprinkled it upon Subuddhi Rāya and declared that Subuddhi Rāya had now become a Mohammedan. The point is that this Nawab had been an ordinary menial servant of Subuddhi Rāya but was somehow or other able to occupy the supreme post of Nawab of Bengal. This is the material world. Everyone is trying to become master through various devices, although everyone is servant of his senses. Following this system, a living entity, although servant of his senses, tries to become master of the whole universe. Hiraṇyakaśipu was a typical example of this, and Brahmā was informed by the demigods of his intentions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O lord of the three worlds! We have heard that Hiraṇyakaśipu is now engaged in severe austerity with insistence on taking your post. Please, without delay, take suitable action. We have heard that he is insistent (nirbandham) on taking your post. Therefore he is fixed in extreme austerity.
The demigods plead with Brahmā to act before Hiraṇyakaśipu captures his post. History shows servants overthrowing masters through deception. Watch the rising student or apprentice, not with paranoia, but with attentiveness to character.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you taken loyalty for granted that may need re-examination?
  • How do you cultivate genuine succession rather than merely hoping for it?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 3